international conference on fifty years of nuclear power lead-bismuth reactor technology conversion:...
TRANSCRIPT
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
LEAD-BISMUTH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY CONVERSION: LEAD-BISMUTH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY CONVERSION: FROM NS REACTORS TO POWER REACTORS ANDFROM NS REACTORS TO POWER REACTORS AND
WAYS OF INCREASING THE INVESTMENT WAYS OF INCREASING THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF NUCLEAR POWER BASED ON ATTRACTIVENESS OF NUCLEAR POWER BASED ON
FAST REACTORSFAST REACTORS
A.V. Zrodnikov, G.I. Toshinsky (IPPE), A.V. Zrodnikov, G.I. Toshinsky (IPPE),
U.G. Dragunov, V.S. Stepanov, N.N. Klimov (EDO “Gidropress”),U.G. Dragunov, V.S. Stepanov, N.N. Klimov (EDO “Gidropress”),
I.I. Kopytov, V.N. Krushelnitsky, (“Atomenergoproekt”), I.I. Kopytov, V.N. Krushelnitsky, (“Atomenergoproekt”),
N.I. Yermakov (Minatom), A.G. Kornienko (“Rosenergoatom”)N.I. Yermakov (Minatom), A.G. Kornienko (“Rosenergoatom”)
All Russian Federation All Russian Federation
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
INTRODUCTION (1)INTRODUCTION (1)
Sustainable development is impossible without usage of Sustainable development is impossible without usage of fast reactors operating in the closed fuel cycle fast reactors operating in the closed fuel cycle
Despite the successful industrial demonstration of fast Despite the successful industrial demonstration of fast reactors technology, they have not been extensively reactors technology, they have not been extensively developed developed
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation 2
INTRODUCTION (2)INTRODUCTION (2)
The major cause is that the fast reactors are more expensive then the thermal ones
This is caused by application of sodium as coolant that makes it possible to provide intensive heat removal and ensure a short doubling time of plutonium
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
3
INTRODUCTION (3)INTRODUCTION (3)
Even today at low costs of natural uranium it is an Even today at low costs of natural uranium it is an opportunity to increase considerably the investment opportunity to increase considerably the investment attractiveness of nuclear power based on fast reactors if attractiveness of nuclear power based on fast reactors if the task of breeding the plutonium with a short doubling the task of breeding the plutonium with a short doubling time, that is not actual, is cancelled time, that is not actual, is cancelled
This opportunity is coupled with use of an innovative This opportunity is coupled with use of an innovative nuclear power technology in which there is no conflict nuclear power technology in which there is no conflict between the safety requirements and economic between the safety requirements and economic requirements that is peculiar to the traditional nuclear requirements that is peculiar to the traditional nuclear power technologies power technologies
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
4
INTRODUCTION (4)INTRODUCTION (4)
This nuclear power technology is a technology based
on usage of small power modular fast reactors
SVBR-75/100 with heavy liquid metal coolant – lead-
bismuth eutectic alloy that has been mastered in
Russia for nuclear submarines’ reactors
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
5
ASSURING AVAILABLE BISMUTH RESOURCES
~ 70 GWe on the basis of mining the bismuth sources in the Chita region,
~ 270 GWe on the basis of mining the bismuth sources in the Kazakhstan.
IN RUSSIA:
IN THE WORLD: Not less than ~ 350 GWe on the basis of the known ore mines (in compliance with the USA Mining Bureau data),
Not less than ~ 4000 GWe on the basis of mining the nonmetalliferous bismuth sources (in compliance with the JNC data, Japan)
In compliance with the available bismuth resources, the scales of nuclear power for Pb-Bi alloy of the eutectic content (56% of bismuth, melting point is ~125C) can be as follows (need for bismuth is ~1100 t/GWe):
Changing over to the Pb‑Bi alloy of the non-eutectic content (10% of bismuth, melting point is ~250C) makes it possible to increase the nuclear power scales by 5.5 correspondingly
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
6
7
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIENCE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIENCE IN USING LEAD-BISMUTH COOLANT (1)IN USING LEAD-BISMUTH COOLANT (1)
♦ At the beginning of 50-ties the USSR started development of At the beginning of 50-ties the USSR started development of reactor installation (RI) with lead-bismuth coolant (LBC) for reactor installation (RI) with lead-bismuth coolant (LBC) for nuclear submarines (NSs)nuclear submarines (NSs)
♦ Eight nuclear submarines were constructed in the USSR in total Eight nuclear submarines were constructed in the USSR in total with RI using LBCwith RI using LBC
♦ Two full-scale ground-based reactor test prototypes with LBC Two full-scale ground-based reactor test prototypes with LBC were constructed and operatedwere constructed and operated
♦ Total operating lifetime of RI with LBC was about 80 reactor-yearsTotal operating lifetime of RI with LBC was about 80 reactor-years
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
8
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIENCE IN USING LEAD-BISMUTH COOLANT (2)
In the course of designing and operating the LBC cooled reactor
installations at the NSs, a set of principal science and engineering
problems on mastering the LBC technologies has been solved:
– Assuring corrosion resistance of structural materials, controlling the LBC
quality, and controlling the mass-transfer processes in the reactor circuit,
– Assuring personnel’s radiation safety when carrying out works with the
equipment contaminated with polonium-210 radionuclide in the course of
operating, maintenance and refueling,
– Multiple coolant “freezing-unfreezing” in the reactor installation
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
9
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIENCE IN USING LEAD-BISMUTH COOLANT (3)
♦ The new nuclear power technology has demonstrated on
the industrial scale that there are no analogs in the world-
wide practice
♦ Nowadays, there are favorable conditions for
implementation of this technology in civil nuclear power
engineering
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
Idea of fast reactor cooled with liquid lead-bismuth eutectics.
A.I. Leypunsky, 1950
Reactor prototype(Stand 27/VT),
1958
Experimental NS,1963
NS “ALPHA”, 1977-81
Multipurpose reactor module SVBR-75/100(conceptual design)
Nuclear desalination and power complex
(conceptual design)
Regional co-generation plant (conceptual design)
Genesis of lead-bismuth cooled reactors
Modular NPP(conceptual design)
Decommissioned VVER-440 renovation
(conceptual design)
1027 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
,
11
♦ State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – Institute for
Physics and Power Engineering named after A.I.Leypunsky — leading
organization in development of fast neutron reactors and liquid metal
coolants
♦ Federal Enterprise - Experimental Design Organization “GIDROPESS”
— Chief Designer of all VVER-type reactors and lead-bismuth cooled
reactors for nuclear submarines
♦ Federal Enterprise “Atomenergoproekt” — Chief Designer of NPPs
with VVER-type reactors and SVBR-75/100
BASIC ORGANIZATIONS IN THE PROJECT
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
12
BASIC STATEMENTS OF SVBR-75/100 CONCEPT (1)
♦ Reactor integral design is used with the core, primary circuit
equipment and steam generators (SGs) arranged in a common
vessel of the reactor monoblock without any valves and pipelines
containing LBC
♦ Two-circuit system of heat removal and steam generator with
multiple natural circulation over the secondary side are used
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
13
BASIC STATEMENTS OF SVBR-75/100 CONCEPT (2)
♦ An ability of fuel self-providing when operating in the
closed NFC with using mixed uranium-plutonium fuel (both
the oxide and the nitride ones), as core breeding ratio
exceeds 1 (CBR 1)
♦ The structural materials, primary and secondary circuits’
mode parameters mastered in the ship nuclear installations
and NPP reactors are used
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
14
BASIC STATEMENTS OF SVBR-75/100 CONCEPT (3)
♦ Providing the levels of coolants' natural circulation (NC) in the heat-
removal circuits to be sufficient enough to ensure reactor's heat decay
removal without dangerous over-heating of the core
♦ A reactor monoblock is installed in the water tank. The tank is a
seismic- resistant support structure, performs the radiation protection
function and provides an entirely passive RI cooling. At this, heat
decay is transferred to the water tank via the reactor vessel.
In the event of blacking out the NPP, heat is removed due to water
evaporating at boiling
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
15
BASIC STATEMENTS OF SVBR-75/100 CONCEPT (4)BASIC STATEMENTS OF SVBR-75/100 CONCEPT (4)
♦ On ending the lifetime, refueling can be performed at once, FSA-by-
FSA with the help of the refueling equipment kit
♦ The RI equipment can be repaired or replaced
♦ Factory manufacturing of the reactor monoblock that ensures high
quality of works, and production in large quantities ensures violent
reduction of manufacturing costs
♦ A small power fast reactor (~ 100 MWe). Transportability of the RI
monoblock, including by railway. This provides an opportunity of RI
multi-purpose usage
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
16
SAFETY CONCEPTSAFETY CONCEPT (1) (1)
♦ INHERENT REACTOR SELF-PROTECTION:
- negative reactivity feedbacks,
- low primary circuit pressure,
- chemically inert coolant,
- sufficiently high natural circulation over the primary and secondary
circuits,
- integral design of the primary circuit,
- availability of guard reactor vessel
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
17
SAFETY CONCEPT (2)
♦ PASSIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS:
- fusible locks of safety rods to provide passive core shutdown
at coolant overheating over 700 C in case of servodrives fault
- bursting disk (membrane) to prevent reactor vessel from overpressure
over 1.0 MPa in case of large SG leak
- passive residual heat removal in case of NPP blackout due to heat
transfer through reactor and guard vessels walls to water tank:
water evaporation makes possible 5 days let-along period (grace
period)
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
18
FEATURES OF INNOVATION NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY BASED ON RI SVBR-75/100
♦ FAST NEUTRON MODULAR REACTOR COOLED WITH LEAD-BISMUTH COOLANT: – inherent safety:
- some severe accidents are deterministically impossible;- no need in many safety systems that necessary for traditional reactors;- an ability of direct demonstration of reactor tolerance to the personnel’s errors, equipment failure and their multiple combinations, I.e. robustness; - simplification and cost reducing of the reactor installation.
♦ MODULAR NPP UNIT STRUCTURE: – serial production of “standard” factory-made reactor modules:
- increase in manufacturing quality and module cost reducing
– construction of NPP of different capacity using “standard” reactor module: - NPP construction cost reducing
– standard designing, construction and mounting of NPP units with “standard” reactor modules:
- reducing the NPP unit construction term down to 3…3.5 years, increased competitive ability.
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
19
REACTOR MONOBLOCK (RMB)
MCP
SG modules
CPS drives
RMB vessel
Reactor core
RMB vessel contains the core, the whole equipment of the primary circuit and SG modules
Absence of pipelines and primary circuit’s valves outside the RMB vessel prevents coolant loss
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
20
SVBR-75/100 RI EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
Concrete vault
PHRS tank
Reactor monoblock
SVBR-75/100 RI main equipment is arranged in the sealed reactor compartment
The number and configuration of the reactor boxes can be different, depending on the NPP unit capacity
Reactorcompartment
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
21
STAGES OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF FUEL AND FUEL CYCLES (1)
.
♦ At the currently existing low costs of natural uranium and services
necessary for its enrichment use of oxide uranium fuel with postponed
reprocessing and storing the SNF in “dry” repositories on the NPP site
will be economically justified for the first RIs SVBR‑75/100 made in
production quantities
♦ Changing over to the closed fuel cycle for the SVBR‑75/100 reactors will
have the lower cost if for fabrication of the first fuel load from MOX-fuel
we use plutonium that has not been extracted from thermal reactors’
spent nuclear fuel (SNF) but has been extracted from the own SNF of
uranium loads
`27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
22
♦ When reactors SVBR‑75/100 operate in the closed nuclear fuel cycle
(NFC), direct utilization of thermal reactors’ SNF (without separating
uranium, plutonium, minor actinides, and fission products) as make up
fuel instead of waste pile uranium is possible (like the
DUPIC‑technology)
♦ Therefore, the following opportunity appears: to develop a principally
new strategy of the closed NFC that does not require preliminary
expensive reprocessing of the thermal reactors’ SNF for the purpose to
extract plutonium for supplying the fast reactors with fuel
STAGES OF USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF FUEL AND FUEL CYCLES (2)
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
23
♦ At the stage of fabricating the initial fuel load by using oxide uranium
fuel, nuclear fissile materials non-proliferation is ensured due to use of
uranium with U‑235 enrichment being less than 20 %
♦ At the stage of SNF storing, non-proliferation is ensured by the fact
that built-up plutonium is not purified from high-radioactive fission
products (“the spent fuel standard”)
♦ At the stage of SNF reprocessing, proliferation resistance is ensured
by the fact that built-up plutonium is separated from uranium together
with built-up MA
NON-PROLIFERATION OF FISSILE MATERIALS
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
24
COMPARABLE PARAMETERS OF DIFFERENT NPP
# Name and Dimensions
of the Parameter NPP with
SVBR-75/100 NPP with
VVER-1500 NPP with
VVER-1000 HPP with PGU-325
1 Installed power of the unit, MWe 1625 1479 1068 325
2 The number units at the plant 2 2 2 10
3 Electric power necessary for plant's own needs, %
4.5 5.7 6.43 4.5
4 Power unit net efficiency, % 34.6 33.3 33.3 44.4
5 NPP specific capital cost, $/kW 661.5* 563**
680 819.3 600
6 Design prime cost of produced electricity, cent/kW-h
1.46 1.85 2.02 1.75
* The additional margin cost being ~17 % (as compared with normative one) is taken into account that is 60 % of the RI equipment cost
** Taking into account the opportunities of overheated steam generation and fuel claddings temperature rising.
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
ACCELERATION OF THE PACE OF NUCLEAR POWER
DEVELOPMENT WITH APPLICATION OF REACTORS
SVBR-75/100 FOR RENOVATION OF THE NPP UNITS (1)
The pace of nuclear power development in market conditions at the
expense of electricity sales is determined mainly by the specific capital
costs of constructing power units
The strictest requirements to economic parameters of the introduced
power units will arise at the approaching stage of nuclear power
development, at which it will be necessary to simultaneously invest
money in withdrawing the “old” units from operating, construction of
replacing power capacities and construction of units developing the
nuclear power
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
25
ACCELERATION OF THE PACE OF NUCLEAR POWER
DEVELOPMENT WITH APPLICATION OF REACTORS
SVBR-75/100 FOR RENOVATION OF THE NPP UNITS (2)
By analogy with fast breeder reactors, the dynamics of nuclear power development at the expense of power company investment possibility can be characterized by:
- the investment breeding ratio coefficient (IBR) of the NPP capacities
- the time of doubling the total set up power of the NPP
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
26
DYNAMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER DEVELOPMENT WHEN DYNAMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER DEVELOPMENT WHEN
DIFFERENT NUCLEAR POWER TECHNOLOGIES ARE USED DIFFERENT NUCLEAR POWER TECHNOLOGIES ARE USED
ONON EXPIRING THE POTENTIALS OF “CHEAP” INCREASE EXPIRING THE POTENTIALS OF “CHEAP” INCREASE
Parameter
Nuclear power technology
IBR T2 (Tph)
years
P(Pr)
GWe/y
Only VVER-1000 0,88 (183) (0,877)
Only VVER-1500 1,057 398 0,057
SVBR-75/100 + VVER-1000
1,391 57,5 0,391
SVBR-75/100 + VVER-1500
1,471 47,8 0,471
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power
27
–
28
♦ Nuclear power based on the NPPs with the considered type reactors
can be competitive with heat electric power based on the modern steam-
gas HPPs not only at the liberalized electricity market, but at the
investment market as well
♦ A high level of technological readiness makes it possible to construct the
first reactor installation SVBR‑75/100 (first-of-a-kind) by the years 2010…
2012
♦ The least construction cost - $100M - will be in Russian conditions: the
proposed reactor module could be placed in the reactor building of the
shut down second unit of the Novo-Voronezh NPP
CONCLUSION
27 June-2 July 2004, Obninsk, Russian Federation
International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power