intravenous glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding reporter:...
TRANSCRIPT
Intravenous Glutamine Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Enteral
Feeding
Reporter: 黃孜立Instructor: 賴聖如 營養師
1
Abstract
• Glutamine and Dipeptiven• Metabolism under stress• Paper
– Metabolic Effects Of Enteral Versus Parenteral Alanyl-glutamine Dipeptide Administration In Critically Ill Patients Receiving Enteral Feeding: A Pilot Study
– The Effect Of Intravenous Alanyl-glutamine Supplementation On Plasma Glutathione Levels In Intensive Care Unit Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: The Results Of A Randomized Controlled Trial
– Effect Of Intravenous Glutamine Supplementation IN Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition Study Protocol (GLINT Study): A Prospective, Blinded, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
• Conclusion
2
What is Glutamine (GLN) ?3
Endogenous
Glutamine
Plasma Glutamine concentrations↑, improve:1.Antioxidant capacity2.Nitrogen balance ↑3.Immune function ↑4.Intestinal permeability ↑5.The incidence of hospital-acquired infection ↓
4
Hypermetabolic response5
Metabolism under stress6
Stress hypermetabolismREE ↑↑Respiratory quotient 0.8-0.9Proteolysis ↑↑Hepatic protein synthesis
↑↑
Ureagenesis ↑↑Gluconeogenesis ↑↑Urinary nitrogen loss ↑↑
7
Glutamine Therapy
Glutamine Therapy
Dipeptiven 雙胜胺8
Concentrated GLN solution containing the dipeptide alanyl-glutamine (Ala-Gln)
100 ml contains: 20 g N(2)-L-alanyl-L-glutamine
=>13.46 g L-glutamine, 8.20 g L-alanine(= 3.87 g N)-Water for injection-Theoretical osmolarity: 921 mosmol/ lIndication
In patients in catabolic and/ or hypermetabolic states
Prescribing information Dosage per day:0.4 g Ala-Gln / kg BW
(= 2.0 ml Dipeptiven®/ kg BW)Administration: For central venous infusion, as part of a PN regime
Aim of the three papers9
Metabolic Effects Of Enteral Versus Parenteral Alanyl-glutamine Dipeptide Administration In Critically Ill Patients Receiving Enteral Feeding: A Pilot Study
Menghua Luo, Niloofar Bazargan, Daniel P. Griffith, Concepción Fernández-Estívariz, Lorraine M. Leader, Kirk A. Easley, Nicole M. Daignault, Li Hao, Jon B. Meddings, John R. Galloway, Jeffrey B. Blumberg, Dean P. Jones, and Thomas R. ZieglerClinical Nutrition 27(2009),297–306
10
Metabolic effects of enteral versus parenteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide administration in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding: a pilot study
Objective To find the metabolic effects of intravenous (IV) alanyl-Gln dipeptide (AG) supplementation and enteral (EN) AG supplementation in adult critically ill patients requiring tube feeding
Design double-blind, pilot clinical trial
Setting surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU)
Patients Critically ill patients (N=44) in the ICU with indication for PNExcluded:active uncontrolled infection, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, active GI bleeding or gastric outletobstruction, history of small intestinal or gastric resection
11
12
Double-blindrandonmization
Control:IV Gln-free amino acid (0.5g/kg/d) (n=15)
IV AG: IV Gln (0.5g/kg/d) (n=14)
EN AG: IV placebo + EN Gln (0.5g/kg/d) (n=15)
11 33 66 99Study day
3-day N blance
Iso-N, iso-caloric tube feedsLab dataLab data Lab dataLab data
MethodMethod
Metabolic effects of enteral versus parenteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide administration in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding: a pilot study
13
MethodMethod
Metabolic effects of enteral versus parenteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide administration in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding: a pilot study
Lab data:•Day1, 9:1.plasma Gln2.antioxidant indices3.lymphocyte subsets4.serum IGF-1 and IGF binding protein-35.intestinal permeability
•Days 6 to 8: Nitrogen balance study
Metabolic effects of enteral versus parenteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide administration in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding: a pilot study
14
ConclusionConclusion
criteria Result (compared to control group)
antioxidant capacity X No significant differences
oxidative stress markers X No significant differences
α-tocopherol EN AG group↑
T-lymphocyte subset number X No significant differences
gut barrier function X No significant differences
whole-body protein metabolism
X No significant differences
Plasama glutamine ↑ IV AG group: Significant increase
15
Plasama glutamine→ IV AG group: Significant increasePlasama glutamine→ IV AG group: Significant increase
16
EN AG group : ↑
17
IV AG group : ↑
The Effect Of Intravenous Alanyl-glutamine Supplementation On Plasma Glutathione Levels InIntensive Care Unit Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: The Results Of A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ahmet Eroglu, MDInternational Anesthesia Research Society 109(2009),502-505
18
The Effect of Intravenous Alanyl-Glutamine Supplementation on Plasma Glutathione Levels in Intensive Care Unit Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Design randomized, controlled study (double blind manner)
Setting Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Patients 40 adult patients with severe trauma according to the Injury Severity Score(ISS) >20
Interventions 1. Group G received 0.5 g /kg/d of IV alanyl-glutamine dipeptide supplementation
2. Group C received a control solution without alanyl-glutamine
for 7 days
Parameter Blood samples: total glutathione, C reactive protein (CRP), prealbumin, and glucose before the initiation of supplementation and on the 3rd, 7th, and 10th days of feeding.
19
Objective IV alanyl-glutamine dipeptide supplementation↔plasma glutathione
20
ConclusionConclusion
IV alanyl-glutamine supplementation for 7 days → total plasma glutathione levels ↑IV alanyl-glutamine supplementation for 7 days → total plasma glutathione levels ↑
•No differences in : CRP, prealbumin, glucose
Effect Of Intravenous Glutamine Supplementation IN Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition Study Protocol (GLINT Study): A Prospective, Blinded, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
Ruqaiya M Al Balushi,1 Jennifer D Paratz,1,2 Jeremy Cohen,1,2 Merrilyn Banks,3 Joel Dulhunty,1,2 Jason A Roberts,1,2 Jeffrey LipmanAl Balushi RM, Paratz JD, Cohen J, et al. BMJ Open 1(2011),1-7
21
Effect Of Intravenous Glutamine Supplementation IN Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition Study Protocol (GLINT Study): A Prospective, Blinded, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
• Objective
22
IV alanyl-glutamine supplementation in multiple
trauma patients receiving enteral nutrition
preservation of lean body mass
infectious complications
infectious complications
organ failure
23Design Prospective, Blinded, Randomised, Placebo
Controlled Clinical Trial
Setting Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Patients 88 critically ill patients with a diagnosis of multiple trauma requiring mechanical ventilation, patients requiring enteral feeding for >48 h, expected length of stay in the ICU >48 h
Interventions 1. 0.5 g/kg/day IV alanyl-glutamine2. IV placebo continuous infusion (24 h/day) & the same
standard enteral nutrition protocol until discharge from the intensive care unit, death
or a maximum duration of 3 weeks.
parameter 1. Total sequential organ failure assessment score on the last day of treatment
2. infectious complications during the ICU stay3. 60-day mortality4. length of stay in the intensive care unit 5. fat-free mass and fat percentage
24
Strengths limitations
Longer study period
1. Mortality2. The long-term
outcomes 3. Trauma patients
with severe renal failure or hepatic impairment
Comparison251 2 3
Objective IV EN ↔ 1. 血糖2. 抗氧化力3. 免疫能力4. 腸道保護5. 住院天數、死亡率、併發症
IV ↔1. 抗氧化力 (plasma
glutathione)2. 血糖3. 住院天數、死亡率、併發症
IV ↔1.保留 LBM 能力2.住院天數、死亡率、併發症3.ICU 常規檢測數值
Design double-blind,RCT
Setting ICU
Patients 44 40 88
Nutrition Regime
1. EN AG 2. IV AG 0.5 g /kg/d3. control
1. IV :0.5 g /kg/d2. control
1. IV :0.5 g/kg/day2. Control
管灌多元配方for 9 days for 7 days 最多 3 weeks
Conclusion IV:Plasama glutamine↑EN:α-tocopherol ↑
IV:7.10day total plasma glutathione levels ↑
Conclusion26
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
27