isolation and characterization of a novel thermostable α-amylase from korean pine seeds
TRANSCRIPT
ResearchPap
er
New Biotechnology �Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009 RESEARCH PAPER
Isolation and characterization of a novelthermostable a-amylase from Koreanpine seedsMd. Abul Kalam Azad1, Jae-Han Bae1, Jong-Sang Kim1, Jin-Kyu Lim1,Kyung-Sik Song2, Beom-Soo Shin3 and Hak-Ryul Kim1
1Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Republic of Korea2 School of Applied Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Republic of Korea3Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Republic of Korea
Amylases have significant importance in broad industrial application including bio-ethanol production.
Although amylases are widely distributed in microbes, plants and animals, it has been sought for new
amylases from various sources with special industrial potential. In this study we firstly isolated and
characterized a novel thermostable a-amylase from Korean pine seed. Enzyme was purified to
homogeneity level with purification fold of 1286.1 using several techniques such as self-precipitation,
(NH4)2SO4 fractionation, DEAE anion exchange and starch affinity chromatography. The purified a-
amylase showed two bands in SDS-PAGE with molecular weight of 44 and 45 kDa. The apparent
molecular weight of native enzyme was calculated to be 46.7 kDa. Internal peptide sequencing
confirmed that the purified a-amylase was a novel enzyme. The optimum pH and temperature for
enzyme activity were pH 4.5 and 65 8C, respectively. This enzyme was fully stable for 48 h at 50 8C and
retained 80% activity up to 96 h. The Km and Vmax were 0.84 mg/ml and 3.71 mmol/min, respectively. On
the basis of high thermal stability and a broad range of pH stability, the pine seed a-amylase showed a
good prospect of industrial application.
IntroductionAmylases (EC 3.2.1.0) widely distributed in microbes, plants and
animals [1,2] are classified into four major groups such as a-amylase
(endoamylase), b-amylase, glucoamylase (exoamylase) and pullu-
lanase. Among these enzymes, a-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) plays an
important role in the digestion of starch in animals. It plays also
an important role in seed germination of plant. The germinating
embryo obtains the necessary energy from the enzymatic hydrolysis
of storage carbohydrate of plant seed. Alpha-amylase in the endo-
sperm is responsible for mobilization of the stored carbohydrate
reserves by initiating the degradation process [3,4]. Although other
amylolytic enzymes participate in the process of starch breakdown,
however, the breaking of a-1,4 linkage of polyglucan by a-amylase is
a prerequisite for the initiation of this process [5,6].
Corresponding author: Kim, H.-R. ([email protected])
1871-6784/$ - see front matter � 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2009.09.006
Amylases have a significant commercial importance and they
occupied about 25–33% of the world enzyme market [7]. In many
industries, the hydrolysis of starch by a-amylase is used as the basic
step to produce glucose, maltose or a mixture of malto-oligosac-
charides from starch [8]. These products have significant industrial
uses in nutritional, cosmetic and pharmaceutical application [9].
However, the most common uses of a-amylase are in the prepara-
tion of glucose syrup, bread making and brewing [10]. Recently,
the hydrolysis of starch by a-amylase has been increasingly used as
a key step to produce carbohydrate substrate for bio-ethanol
production. At now about 60% of the ethanol is produced by
fermentation process [11]. The major advantages of the enzymatic
route are the selectivity with its associated high yield and exclu-
sivity toward the desired product. However, a least expensive,
economical and environmentally favored process is always desired
for large-scale production of bio-ethanol [12,13].
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 143
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology � Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009
Research
Pap
er
Accordingly, it has been sought for new amylases from various
sources with special industrial potential. So far, amylases for
industrial purposes are mainly produced from microbial system.
Plant sources had not been considered with enough significance as
the source of these enzymes yet. As an attempt to seek novel
industrially valuable a-amylase, we have chosen the pine seeds
as the source of a-amylase since there is no study done yet on the
isolation of a-amylase from pine seeds. In this study, we firstly
isolated and characterized a novel highly thermostable a-amylase
from Korean pine seed.
Materials and methodsMaterialsFresh seeds of Korean pine tree (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc., KPS)
were purchased from a local market. Protein markers for size
exclusion chromatography and DEAE–Sepharose anion exchange
resins were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Purifica-
tion column was purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Uppsala,
Sweden). Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma, unless
mentioned otherwise.
Preparation of crude protein extractCrude protein extract was prepared from Korean pine seeds as
followed. The outer seed coat of healthy pine seeds were removed
carefully and nude pine seeds were stored in airtight poly-bag at
4 8C. About 350 g of pine seeds was homogenized in a blender with
1400 ml of buffer A (sodium acetate buffer 20 mM, pH 5.5, 10 mM
CaCl2) for 3 min at 4 8C. After homogenization, the homogenate
was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm (19,650 � g) for 30 min at 4 8C.
Finally, the supernatant was filtered through the filter paper
(150 mm, 5B, Advantec Toyo, Japan) to get the clear crude extract
of pine seeds.
Enzyme purificationA portion of crude extract was taken in Falcon tube with tight
sealing and kept at 25 8C for 36 h in BOD incubator. Suspended
dissolved substances and unstable proteins of crude extract were
precipitated during this heat treatment step. The precipitate was
removed from the solution by centrifugation (7,155 � g for 30 min
at 4 8C) and the supernatant was concentrated under 65% satura-
tion of (NH4)2SO4 overnight at 4 8C. The precipitated protein was
collected by centrifugation (19,650 � g, 30 min at 4 8C) and dis-
solved in buffer A. After dialysis overnight in the same buffer with
five buffer changes, the collected enzyme was loaded on DEAE–
Sepharose CL-6B column and the elution was carried out by
50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.6) with a stepwise gradient of NaCl
(0–500 mM). The highest active fractions were pooled and dia-
lyzed for 5 h in buffer A and loaded on starch affinity column
(1.4 cm I.D. � 12.0 cm). The starch affinity column was prepared
with 40.0 g of insoluble corn starch following a method described
by Mendu et al. [14] with some modifications. In brief, the starch
was washed several times with distilled water and finally with
buffer A before packing. The packed column was kept overnight at
4 8C to settle down the starch and the column was equilibrated
with 200 ml of buffer A. The starch column was then transferred to
room temperature and kept for 3 h before use. After loading
protein sample, the unbound proteins were removed by extensive
washing of the column with the equilibrium buffer till no protein
144 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt
was detected in the effluent. The bound proteins were then eluted
with the same sodium acetate buffer using a gradient concentra-
tion of NaCl (100–400 mM) at a flow rate of 5.6 ml/h. The purified
amylase from this step was used for the characterization study. The
purity of protein from each step was confirmed by SDS-PAGE
under the denaturing condition. Protein concentration was mea-
sured by Bradford method [15] using the Bio-Rad protein assay
reagent (Richmond, VA). Bovine serum albumin was used as the
standard protein.
SDS-PAGE and native-PAGEThe purity and molecular mass of amylase was determined by SDS-
PAGE with 12% gel in mini gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad, Rich-
mond, CA, USA). The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
R-250 and destained with a solution composed of methanol, acetic
acid and water (50:10:40, v/v/v). Discontinuous native-PAGE was
done in 8% acrylamide gel with Bio-Rad mini gel electrophoresis.
All the buffer system used for native-PAGE was prepared without
SDS.
Enzyme assayThe amylase activity was determined using dinitrosalicylic acid
(DNSA) method by measuring the reducing sugars released from
the soluble potato starch [16]. The reaction mixture contained
50 ml of enzyme solution, 450 ml of buffer B (sodium acetate buffer
20 mM, pH 5.5) and 500 ml of 1% (w/v) soluble potato starch
dissolved in buffer B. Enzymatic reaction started by addition of
enzyme solution to the assay mixture at 60 8C and continued for
5 min. After the reaction was stopped by the addition of a few
drops of 0.5 M HCl, 1.0 ml of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent was
added and the reaction mixture was incubated at 90 8C in water
bath for 5 min. The released reducing sugar changed the original
color of dinitrosalicylic acid and the intensity of color change was
spectrophotometrically measured at 540 nm. The amount of sugar
released from starch was calculated from the standard curve of
glucose. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of
enzyme required to release 1 mmol of glucose per min at 60 8C.
Data presented in this study were average of duplicate and error
range was within 10%, unless mentioned otherwise.
Analysis of hydrolytic end productsThe end product of starch degradation by amylase was identified
by following the method of Kimura and Horikoshi [17] with slight
modification. About 1.0 ml enzyme solution and 1.0 ml soluble
potato starch solution (5%, w/v) were taken in a test tube and the
reaction mixture was incubated at 60 8C for 36 h in a water-bath.
An aliquot of reaction mixture (10 ml) was spotted on silica gel 60
F254 TLC plate (Merck, Germany) and TLC was run with a solvent
system of 1-butanol:ethanol:water (5:3:2, v/v/v). The plate was
first air-dried and the spots were visualized by spraying 50%
sulfuric acid followed by heating at 110 8C for 45 min. Finally,
the end products were identified by comparing the spots with
standard carbohydrates.
Characterization of the enzymeThe optimum pH for enzyme activity was determined by changing
the pH of assay mixture using the following buffers: glycine–HCl
(20 mM, pH 2.0–3.0), sodium acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 4.0–5.5),
New Biotechnology �Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009 RESEARCH PAPER
TABLE 1
Purification of a-amylase from Korean pine seeds
Purification stepa Total protein (mg) Total activity (unit) Specific activity (unit/mg) Purification (n-fold) Recovery (%)
Crude extract 3230.3 2200.9 0.7 1.0 100.0
Self-precipitation 2067.0 1906.4 0.9 1.4 86.6
Ammonium sulfateprecipitation
228.0 1082.7 4.8 6.9 49.2
DEAE–Sepharose 21.3 311.0 14.6 21.4 14.1
Starch affinity 0.2 128.6 874.6 1286.1 5.8
a See ‘Materials and Methods’ for detailed description of purification steps.
ResearchPap
er
sodium phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 6.0–7.0), Tris–HCl (20 mM,
pH 8.0–9.0), and glycine–NaOH (20 mM, pH 10.0–11.0). For pH
stability of the purified enzyme, enzyme sample was diluted 4
times with proper buffers and incubated at 4 8C. An aliquot
amount of enzyme was withdrawn at a given time and the activity
was measured using standard way. Optimum temperature for
enzyme activity was measured by determination of enzyme activ-
ity at different temperatures ranged from 50 to 80 8C in buffer B.
The thermal stability of the purified enzyme was determined by
incubating the purified enzyme in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer
(pH 5.5) at different temperatures (4–80 8C) in a water-bath. After a
given incubation period, a small portion of enzyme was with-
drawn and the enzyme activity was measured by the standard way.
This procedure measured the irreversible inactivation of enzyme
by heat treatment [18]. The effect of metal ions and enzyme
effectors on enzyme activity was determined using the enzyme
purified with metal ion-free buffer system. Metal ions and other
compounds (1 mM) were added to assay mixture independently
before enzyme assay started.
A variety of carbohydrate substrates were tested to find out the
substrate specificity of the purified enzyme. A 1% solution of each
carbohydrate was prepared in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH
5.5) and used as substrate and the enzyme activity was measured
by the standard way. For kinetic analysis of the purified enzyme,
the initial rates of pure enzyme on soluble potato starch were
determined at various substrate concentrations (1–10 mg/ml) by
the standard way. The rate constant Km and the maximum reac-
tion rate Vmax were calculated from Lineweaver–Burk plot.
Determination of internal peptide sequenceFor partial internal amino acid sequencing of the purified enzyme,
the protein band run on a 12% SDS-PAGE was cut off from the gel
and digested with trypsin. The peptides obtained from digestion
were analyzed using ESI-QUAD-TOF-MS/MS (QTOF II, Micromass,
UK) at Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI, Daejon, Korea). The
spectra obtained were used to determine amino acid sequence
using MassLynx software (ver 3.5). The amino acid sequences
determined were quarried to NCBI databases to find out homo-
logous protein.
ResultsEnzyme purificationThe target protein was purified to homogeneity level by four steps;
self-precipitation, ammonium sulfate fractionation, DEAE–Sephar-
ose anion exchange chromatography and starch affinity chromato-
graphy. The results from each purification step are summarized in
Table 1. In DEAE–Sepharose anion exchange chromatography, the
most active fractions were eluted with 100 mM NaCl in 50 mM Tris–
HCl buffer, pH 7.6 (data not shown). The starch affinity chromato-
graphy among four different purification techniques used in this
study was most effective to increasepurification fold. From this step,
a single active peak was obtained and the purification fold increased
60 times over the previous step (data not shown). Consequently, the
purified protein yielded a specific activity of 874.6 U/mg, represent-
ing purification fold of 1286.1 and 5.8% recovery. This protein
presented two bands closely located at 44 and 45 kDa in SDS-PAGE
(Figure 1A). When this protein sample was run on native PAGE, two
bands were appeared with different enzyme activities (Figure 1B).
The gels corresponding to each band were cut off followed by
protein extraction for activity determination. The lower band repre-
sented 82.3% activity whereas upper band contained 17.7% activity
of the total enzyme activity. The protein isolated from lower band
was co-chromatographed in SDS-PAGE with the purified protein
from the last step (Figure 1A, lane 7). The apparent molecular mass
of the native protein from the last step was calculated to be 46.7 kDa
using size exclusion chromatography (data not shown). From these
results, it was concluded that the purified protein was amylase and
existed in two isozymes in the active form. As the purified enzyme
was identified to be amylase, enzymatic action of the purified
enzyme was examined. After incubation of the protein sample from
each purification step with soluble starch as a carbohydrate sub-
strate, reaction products were analyzed by TLC. As shown in
Figure 2, three major products such as glucose, maltose and mal-
totriose were identified as end products from the samples of all
purification steps. On the basis of this result, the purified amylase
was confirmed to be a-amylase.
Effect of pHThe optimum pH for enzyme activity was determined with pH
range from pH 2.0 to pH 9.0. Although maximum activity was
detected with pH 4.5 (Figure 3), relative activities with between pH
4.0 and pH 7.0 were retained over 60% compared to maximum
value. However, when the purified enzyme was incubated in the
buffer with different pHs for six days, activities at between pH 4.1
and pH 8.8 were retained over 95% compared to the starting point
suggesting that the purified enzyme was highly stable at these pH
ranges (Figure 4). At acidic pH 2.2 and 3.2, enzyme lost its total
activity within 12 and 48 h, respectively. Similarly at alkaline pH
9.7 and 10.7, the enzyme activity was lost completely within 24
and 3 h, respectively.
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 145
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology � Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009
FIGURE 1
Analysis of the protein samples in SDS-PAGE (A) and in native PAGE (B). Lane
1, standard proteins; lane 2, crude enzyme extract; lane 3, self-precipitation;
lane 4, 65% (NH4)2SO4 precipitation; lane 5, DEAE–Sepharose CL-6Bchromatography; lane 6, starch affinity chromatography; lane 7, protein
collected from the native PAGE.
FIGURE 3
OptimumpH for activity of the purifieda-amylase. Activity was determined at60 8C using different pH buffers such as 20 mM glycine–HCl (pH 2.0–3.0),
20 mM Na–acetate (pH 4.0–5.5), 20 mM Na–phosphate (pH 6.0–7.0), and
20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0–9.0).
Research
Pap
er
Effect of temperatureTo determine the effect of temperature on enzyme activity,
enzyme assay was performed under varied temperatures ranging
from 50 to 80 8C. In general, temperature effect on the purified a-
amylase was mild in that enzyme activity was recorded over 60%
compared to the maximum value for all the temperatures tested in
this study although optimum temperature was 65 8C (Figure 5).
Even at 80 8C, relative activity was about 80% of the maximum
value. On the basis of these results, heat stability was determined
with broad temperature range (Figure 6). When incubated at 40 8Cand 50 8C, activity increased by 50% and 32% during the first 24 h,
respectively, and decreased thereafter. However, after 72 h incuba-
tion, activity was retained to be 103% and 92%, respectively. At
60 8C, 61% of the original activity was remained after five-day
FIGURE 2
TLC analysis of the hydrolysis products of soluble potato starch by the protein
samples. Protein samples from each purification step in Table 1 were used for
hydrolysis of soluble potato starch. Lane 1, standard sugars; lane 2, crudeextract; lane 3, self-precipitation; lane 4, (NH4)2SO4 precipitation; lane 5,
DEAE–Sepharose chromatography; lane 6, starch affinity chromatography.
Reaction conditions are described in ‘Materials and Methods’ section.
146 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt
incubation. Half-life of the enzyme activity at 70 8C and 80 8C was
36 and 10 h, respectively. From these results, the purified a-amy-
lase was confirmed to be thermally stable.
Effect of metal ionsOut of nine metal ions tested, none of them was specifically
required for catalytic activity of a-amylase (Table 2). The calcium
ion, generally known to be required for amylase activity, had no
positive effect on a-amylase activity (99.81%). The enzyme activity
was partially inhibited by Na+ (85.31%), K+ (80.28%), Mg2+
(72.14%), Mn2+ (64.24%), Zn2+ (58.73%) and Co2+ (50.82%).
Fe3+ and Cu2+ inhibited completely the enzyme activity.
FIGURE 4
pH stability of the purified a-amylase. All the enzyme samples prepared in
adjusted pH were stored at 4 8C. At each given time period, protein sample
was withdrawn and enzyme activity was measured by standard way
described in ‘Materials and Methods’ section.
New Biotechnology �Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009 RESEARCH PAPER
FIGURE 5
Optimum temperature for activity of the purified a-amylase at pH 5.5 (20 mM
sodium acetate buffer).
FIGURE 6
Thermal stability of the purified a-amylase. After a fixed time of interval, a
small portion of enzyme was withdrawn and left at room temperature for 1 hfollowed by activity determination. The enzyme activity was measured at
60 8C.
TABLE 2
Effects of metal ions on a-amylase activity
Metal ions (1 mM) Relative activity (%)
Controla 100.0
Na+ 85.3
K+ 80.3
Ca2+ 99.8
Mg2+ 72.1
Fe3+ n/db
Mn2+ 64.2
Cu2+ n/d
Zn2+ 58.7
Co2+ 50.8
a Control represents enzyme activity without metal ion.b Not detected.
TABLE 3
Effects of enzyme effectors on a-amylase activity
Effector (1 mM) Relative activity (%)
Controla 100.0
EDTA 74.9
DTT 111.7
b-Mercaptoethanol 124.8
Urea 93.9
SDS n/db
PMSF 90.2
a Control represents enzyme activity without effectors.b Not detected.
TABLE 4
Substrate specificity of a-amylase
Substrate (1%) Relative activity (%)
Controla 100.0
Corn starch 41.3
Amylose n/db
Amylopectin 48.3
Glycogen (Oyster) n/d
Pullulan n/d
Dextran n/d
Cellulose n/d
a Soluble potato starch was used as control.b Not detected.
ResearchPap
er
Effect of enzyme effectorsAmong the different enzyme effectors tested, DTT and b-mercap-
toethanol increased the enzyme activity by 11.7% and 24.8%,
respectively (Table 3). However, EDTA (74.9%), urea (93.9%) and
PMSF (90.2%) slightly reduced the activity and SDS caused total
loss of the enzyme activity.
Substrate specificitySpecificity of the purified a-amylase was examined for several
carbohydrate substrates such as potato starch (soluble), corn
starch, glycogen (oyster), amylose, amylopectin, pullulan, dextran
and cellulose (Table 4). This enzyme was highly specific to soluble
potato starch for its enzymatic hydrolysis. Corn starch and amy-
lopectin showed relative activities of 41.26% and 48.33% com-
pared with soluble potato starch, respectively, while other
carbohydrates did not show any activities. These results might
come from the different solubilities of substrates tested.
Enzyme kineticsThe purified a-amylase showed a typical Michaelis–Menten reac-
tion rate curve when soluble potato starch was hydrolyzed at pH
5.5 and 60 8C (data not shown). Kinetic values of Km and Vmax were
calculated from Lineweaver–Burk plot as to be 0.84 mg/ml and
3.71 mmol/min, respectively (Figure 7).
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 147
RESEARCH PAPER New Biotechnology � Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009
FIGURE 7
Lineweaver–Burk plot of enzyme activity of the purified a-amylase over
varied concentration of soluble potato starch.
Research
Pap
er
Partial internal sequencingFor internal amino acid sequencing, sequences of two peptides
were obtained (Table 5). Sequences of peptide-I and II determined
from Mascot search were Arg-Leu-Lys-Asp-Ser-Asn-Gly-Lys-Pro-
Ser-Gly-Leu-Ile-Gly-Val-Leu-Pro-Gln-Lys-Ala and Arg-Ile-Ile-Thr-
Ala-Glu-Gly-Asp-Leu-Tyr-Met-Ala-Ala-Ile-Asp-Glu-Lys-Ile, respec-
tively. NCBI Blast searches (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blas-
t.cgi) for those sequences were performed over 60% homology
identity to find out any homologous protein from plant sources.
The sequence of peptide-I showed varied homology identities with
six a-amylases of plant sources such as Citrus reticulata (80%),
Phaseolus vulgaris (70%), Ipomoea nil (70%), Arabidopsis thaliana
(70%), Zea mays (65%) and Oryza sativa (65%) while the sequence
of peptide-II showed homology identities over 60% with four plant
a-amylases such as Phaseolus vulgaris (70%), Vigna angularis (64%),
TABLE 5
Sequence alignment of internal peptides of a-amylase from Korean
aIdentical residues at each position are highlighted.
148 www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt
Vigna mungo (64%) and Malus domestica (61%). The sequences of
both peptide-I and II peptides showed 70% homology identity
with a-amylase of Phaseolus vulgaris. These results confirmed that
the purified a-amylase of Korean pine seed was a novel enzyme.
DiscussionThermostable a-amylase is very important for food, paper, textile,
distillery and brewing industries [19–21]. Microbial sources are
solely used for the commercial production of this enzyme for
simple preparation process. However, new trials need to be focused
on finding new sources of this enzyme with distinct properties for
diverse industrial application. In this view point, we isolated and
characterized a novel thermostable a-amylase from Korean pine
seeds. Initially, we faced severe problems to get clear crude enzyme
solution from the pine seeds owing to high content of fat and
dissolved carbohydrate materials in the seed. This problem was
solved by the addition of 10 mM CaCl2 in extracting buffer and
heat-treated precipitation of crude extract by incubation at 25 8Cfor 36 h. After this step, clear enzyme solution was obtained. Most
of the amylases are known to be metal ion dependent, especially
calcium ion [21]. However, pine seed a-amylase activity was not
influenced by the presence of calcium ion although EDTA, the
chelating agent, reduced the activity by 25% explaining partially
the importance of basal or intrinsic metal ions for the activity.
The purified a-amylase of Korean pine seed represented appar-
ent molecular weight of 46.7 kDa and exhibited two close bands at
44 and 45 kDa in SDS-PAGE. These molecular sizes were similar to
other a-amylases from plant sources such as pea seedlings and
shoots 43.5 kDa [22], barley 43 and 44 kDa [23], rice seeds 44 kDa
[24], poplar leaves 44 kDa [25] and maize 44.5 kDa [3]. Two close
bands from SDS-PAGE and two bands from native PAGE with
relative distinct enzyme activities suggested that the a-amylase
from Korean pine seed existed in nature as two possible isozymes.
This was supported by the fact that treatment of the enzyme with
the reducing agents such as DTT and b-mercaptoethanol did not
give any negative effects on enzyme activity but even increased
enzyme activity. In plants and cereal seeds, most of the a-amylases
pine seed with plant a-amylases
New Biotechnology �Volume 26, Numbers 3/4 �October 2009 RESEARCH PAPER
ResearchPap
er
are found to consist of several isozymes [26]. Four isozymes from
maize seeds (44.5–47.5 kDa), two isozymes from barley (43–
44 kDa) [3,23,24], and three isozymes from finger millet
(45 � 2 kDa) have been reported [27].
The optimum temperature for enzyme activity and thermal
stability of a-amylase of Korean pine seed were higher than any
other plant a-amylases reported so far. The optimum temperature
of a-amylases from finger millet and wheat were reported to be 45–
50 8C and 40–50 8C, respectively [27,28]. As like as thermal stabi-
lity, the pine seed a-amylase had a good stability in wide range of
pH (4.0–7.0). On the basis of wide range of pH stability and high
thermal stability, a-amylase of Korean pine seed showed a good
prospect in industrial application. Enzymatic hydrolysis of starch
generally involves liquefaction and saccharification of starch
molecules at high temperature to precook and dissolve the parti-
cles [29,30]. In the case of barley a-amylase, the most suitable
condition for enzyme reaction to liquefy the starch is pH 4.5 at
45 8C [28]. Comparing to this enzyme, a-amylase of Korean pine
seed showed similar optimal pH but higher thermal stability
suggesting that it contained better useful properties for starch
liquefaction for industrial scale.
In conclusion, this study identified a novel thermostable a-
amylase from Korean pine seeds. The a-amylase was purified to
homogeneity level through the two cost-effective simple steps,
DEAE anion exchange and starch affinity chromatography. The
purified a-amylase of Korean pine seed showed a higher thermal
stability than any other a-amylases isolated from plants. Consid-
ering a wide distribution of pine trees in the temperate region of
the world, the pine seeds would have a good prospect to be used as
a source of a-amylase in future.
AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the Research Foundation Grant
funded by the Korean Government (KRF-2005-211-C00091).
References
1 Kadziola, A., Abe, J., Svensson, B. and Haser, R. (1993) Crystal and molecular
structure of barley a-amylase. J. Mol. Biol. 250, 195–202
2 Yamamoto, T. (1988) Application of amylases and related enzymes to industry. In
Handbook of Amylases and Related Enzymes: Their Source, Isolation Methods, Properties
and Applications. The Amylase Research Society of Japan (Pergamon Press) pp. 195–
243
3 Subbarao, K.V., Datta, R. and Sharma, R. (1998) Amylases synthesis in scutellum
and aleurone layer of maize seeds. Phytochemistry 49, 657–666
4 Tangphatsornruang, S., Naconsie, M., Thammarongtham, C. and Narangajavana,
J. (2005) Isolation and characterization of an alpha-amylase gene in cassava
(Manihot esculenta). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43, 821–827
5 Jones, R.L. and Jacobsen, J.V. (1991) Regulation of synthesis and transport of
secreted proteins in cereal aleurone. Int. Rev. Cytol. 126, 49–88
6 Perata, P., Pozueta-Romero, J., Yamaguchi, J. and Akazawa, J. (1992) Artifactual
detection of ADP-dependent sucrose synthase in crude plant extracts. FEBS Lett.
309, 283–287
7 Nguyen, Q.D., Rezessy-Szabo, J.M., Claeyssens, M., Stals, I. and Hoschke, A. (2002)
Purification and characterization of amylolytic enzymes from thermophilic
fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus strain ATCC 34626. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31,
345–352
8 Yang, C.H. and Liu, W.H. (2004) Purification and properties of a maltotriose-
producing alpha-amylase from Thermobifida fusca. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 35,
254–260
9 Nigam, P. and Singh, D. (1995) Enzyme and microbial systems involved in starch
processing. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 28, 770–778
10 Marchal, L.M., Beeftink, H.H. and Tramper, J. (1999) Toward a rational design of
commercial maltodextrins. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 10, 345–355
11 Baras, J., Gacesa, S. and Pejin, D. (2002) Ethanol is a strategic raw material. Chem.
Ind. 56, 89–105
12 Kim, S. and Dale, B.E. (2004) Global potential bioethanol production from wasted
crops and crops residues. Biomass Bioeng. 26, 361–375
13 Krishnan, M.S., Taylor, F., Davison, B.H. and Nghiem, N.P. (2000) Economic
analysis of fuel ethanol production from corn starch using fluidized-bed
bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 18, 149–153
14 Mendu, R.D., Ratnam, B.V.V., Purnima, A. and Ayyanna, C. (2005) Affinity
chromatography of a-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis. Enzyme Microb. Technol.
37, 712–717
15 Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of
microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254
16 Miller, G.N. (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for the determination of
reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 81, 426–428
17 Kimura, T. and Horikoshi, K. (1989) Production of amylase and pullulanases by an
alkalopsychrotrophic Micrococcus sp. Agric. Biol. Chem. 53, 2963–2968
18 Bryjak, J. (2003) Glucoamylase, a-amylase and b-amylase immobilization on
acrylic carriers. Biochem. Eng. J. 16, 347–355
19 Schenck, F.W. and Hebeda, R.E. (1992) Starch Hydrolysis Products: Worldwide
Technology. Production and Applications, VCH
20 Crabb, W.D. and Mitchinson, C. (1997) Enzymes involved in the processing of
starch to sugars. TIBTECH 15, 349–352
21 Pandey, A. and Nigam, P. (2000) Advances in microbial amylases. Biotechnol. Appl.
Biochem. 31, 135–152
22 Beers, E.P. and Duke, S.H. (1990) Characterization of alpha-amylase from
shoots and cotyledons of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. 92,
1154–1163
23 Sticher, L. and Jones, R. (1991) Isolation and partial characterization of a factor
from barley aleurone that modifies a-amylase in vitro. Plant Physiol. 97, 936–942
24 Miyata, S. and Akazawa, T. (1982) Enzymic mechanisms of starch breakdown in
germinating rice seeds. Plant Physiol. 70, 147–153
25 Witt, W. and Satur, J.J. (1996) Purification and characterization of alpha-amylase
from poplar leaves. Phytochemistry 41, 365–372
26 Scandalios, J.G. (1974) Isozymes in development and differentiation, annual
review. Plant Physiol. 25, 225–258
27 Nirmala, M. and Muralikrishna, G. (2003) Three alpha-amylases from malted
finger millet (Ragi, Eleusine coracana, Indaf-15)—purification and partial
characterization. Phytochemistry 62, 21–30
28 Tkachuk, R. and Kruger, J.E. (1974) Wheat alpha-amylases II. physical
characterization. Cereal Chem. 51, 508–529
29 Mikuni, K., Monma, M. and Kainuma, K. (1987) Alcohol fermentation of corn
starch digested by Chalara paradoxa amylase without cooking. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
29, 729–732
30 Montesinos, T. and Navarro, J.M. (2000) Production of alcohol from raw wheat
flour by amyloglucosidase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 27,
362–370
www.elsevier.com/locate/nbt 149