1. TheApostolicSuccessionoftheMatthewitesDerives FromAFreemasonandEcumenistPatriarch InhisbookElenchosKaiAnatropeMr.Gkoutzidiswritesaboutthe variousecclesiologicalbooksthatwereprintedbytheZealotAthonitefathers: At the very same time important documents of an ecclesiological nature are circulated by the Zealot Hieromonks who had departed Mt. Athos, the foremost of which was the then Hieromonk and later Bishop and Archbishop of the G.O.C., MatthewKarpathakis.Fromamongthesedocumentswementionthemostimportant, namely, Apostasias Elenchos, Distomos Romphaia published in 1934 and Phos tois en Skotei published in 1936, which widely shocked the innovative process of ChrysostomPapadopoulos FromthelastoftheseAthonitebooks,PhostoisenSkoteiof1936,we provide the following quote: Therefore, the Official Church of Chrysostom Papadopoulos,recognizedbytheState,isnakedanddeprivedofthegraceandgiftof God,becauseitbetrayedtheFaithofourChristbyitstoleranceandcollaborationwith atheisticJudeoMasonry!!!... Belowisaphotocopyoftheactualpagefromwhichthequoteistaken:

2. We agree wholeheartedly with the above quote, that if a bishop enslaveshimselftoantichristianandsatanicJudeoMasonry,hismysteriesare invalidandhishierarchicalstatusisnakedanddeprivedofthegraceand giftofGod.Butunfortunately,ArchbishopChrysostomofAthenswasnot thefirst,norwashethelast,oftheseMasonhierarchs. AmongthemasonsofhighrankalsohappenedtobetheEcumenical Patriarch Joachim III, the first Masonic Patriarch of Constantinople. This informationisderivedfirstlyfromtheofficialwebsiteoftheGrandLodgeof Greece, as well as from several books published by the Zealot Fathers themselves,manyofwhichrefertoJoachimIIIasthefirstMasonEcumenical Patriarch. On the Greek version of Wikipedia, in the article regarding Joachim III, we read: According to the official website of the Grand Lodge of Greece,hewasamemberoftheMasonicLodgecalledProgress.(). AndhewasntonlyaMason,butalsoanEcumenist.InthePatriarchal Encyclicalof1904heaskedofthePrimatesoftheAutocephalousOrthodox Churches to discuss the following: a) the meeting and strengthening by concordance andlove,oftheHolyOrthodoxChurchesofGod, b)thepossibilityof relationandChristianloveandrapprochementofourChurcheswiththetwogreat branchesofChristianity,namely,CatholicismandProtestantism,c)howitispossible fortheOrthodoxChurchtoapproachthesocalledOldCatholics,whodesireaunion withus,andd)whetheritispossibleornotforustoformulateandbetteradjustour currentCalendar. He also wrote: It is beloved of God and Evangelicalforme to ask of the leadership of the Holy Autocephalous Churches regarding our present and future relationswiththetwogreatbranchesofChristianity,theWesternChurchandthe ProtestantChurches.AnditisknownthateverygenuineChristianmustprayand petition,asisfoundinthetextsofourChurch,fortheEvangelicalUnity,ateaching constitutingapiousandheartfeltdesireintheOrthodoxFaith,fortheunityofthem andallwhobelieveinChrist Furtherdownhewrites:Notwithoutworthisourattentiontowardsthe issue of a common calendar, so that we can adequate document things said and written,usingthesameproposedsystemsofreformofourJulianCalendar,whichhas beenkeptbytheOrthodoxChurchforalongtime.[Thisreformshalltakeplace]either by adopting the Gregorian Calendar, since [the Julian Calendar] is scientifically lacking,whereasthisoneismoreaccurate.Wemustconsequentlyalsoconsiderthe transformationofourecclesiasticalPaschalion.Regardingthistopic,theopinionsare divided,aswecanseefromtheresultedspecificopinionsofourOrthodoxpeople 3. Thus, Ecumenical Patriarch Joachim III was not only a Mason (member of the Lodge called Progress), but he was also a branch theory Ecumenist(hecalledCatholicismandProtestantismbranchesofChristianity andheexpressedadesireforunitywiththem).Additionallyhewasalsoin favourofthereformoftheecclesiasticalcalendar,eitherbytheadoptionof the Gregorian Calendar or the creation of a new calendar. In any case his purposeisspelledoutquiteclearlyascommoncalendar,meaningasingle calendarforWesternsandOrthodox,tobetterpromotetheirunity.Inother words,PatrarchJoachimIIIwastheforerunnerofArchbishopChrysostom Papadopoulos!HewastheMetaxakisbeforeMeletiusMetaxakis!!! ButthisveryMason,EcumenistandverywellwouldhavebeenNew Calendarist Patriarch is the very bishop who consecrated Metropolitan Chrysostom Kavouridis of Florina in 1909, who in turn consecrated Bishop MatthewofBresthenain1935!Inotherwords,theApostolicSuccessionofthe MatthewitesderivesfromaMason,EcumenistandModernistPatriarch!!! SobywhatmeansdoesBp.KirykosKontogiannisandMr.Eleutherius Gkoutzidis preach to us that supposedly Bishop Matthew offered a pure lineofApostolicSuccession,whereasallotherlines(RussianChurchAbroad, etc) are looked upon as unclean? What could be more unclean than a consecration derived from a Mason, Ecumenist and Modernist Patriarch such as Joachim III??? Such a line of Apostolic Succession is by far as uncleanasonecanpossiblyget!YetBp.Kirykospresentsitassomekindof spotless bastion of Apostolic Succession! The fact that Joachim III was a Mason is enough to disqualify the validity of this line, without even mentioningthefacthewasalsoabranchtheorybelievingEcumenistheretic, andwasalsoinfavourofthereformationoftheecclesiasticalcalendar! But the hypocrisy doesnt stop there. This Mason, Ecumenist and Modernist Patriarch Joachim III did not only pass on the Apostolic SuccessiontotheMatthewites.HewasalsotheveryPatriarchwhoblessed theHoly Chrism in1903andagainin1912,theveryHolyChrismthatthe Matthewites were using until as late as 1958! Thus the Matthewites were rechrismating converts from New Calendarism by anointing them with the HolyChrismblessedbyaFreemason,EcumenistandModernistPatriarch!!! Behold a photograph of Patriarch Joachim III and the Synod of the EcumenicalPatriarchateshortlyaftertheblessingoftheHolyChrismonHoly Thursday,1912: 4. TheconsecrationofHolyChrismbyPatriarchJoachimIIIin1912 NowletusagainreadthequotefromPhostoisenSkoteipublished in1936:Therefore,theOfficialChurchofChrysostomPapadopoulos,recognized bytheState,isnakedanddeprivedofthegraceandgiftofGod,becauseitbetrayedthe Faith of our Christ by its tolerance and collaboration with atheistic Judeo Masonry!!!... What does this mean? This means that according to their own ecclesiology, the Matthewites THEMSELVES are naked and deprived of the graceandgiftofGodbecausetheyderivenotonlytheirApostolicSuccession buteventheirHolyChrismfromaPatriarchwhobetrayedtheFaithofour ChristbyhistoleranceandcollaborationwithatheisticJudeoMasonry!!!... Alas!ButlettheMatthewitesrethinkastowhethertheytrulydohave pureApostolicSuccessionandvalidmysteriesbeforetheydaretojudge ordoubttheApostolicSuccessionandValidMysteriesofthehistoricRussian OrthodoxChurchAbroad,andtheAcacianhierarchyitfoundedinGreece.