kaist 2011 fall semester_revst_designer baby presentation

65
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱, 배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균 Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park Final Presentation Designer Babies Yes or No?

Upload: engel1412

Post on 05-Jul-2015

935 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

DESCRIPTION

KAIST 2011 가을학기 Revolution of Science and Technology - Designer Baby Debate 관련 발표자료입니다.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,

배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

Designer Babies

Yes or No?

Page 2: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

We‟re smart and intelligent… But we still have problems

Introduction(1)

Page 3: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

You might want to choose..

Non-Smoking???

World Star???Blue Eyes???

Introduction(2)

Page 4: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Are we to play God??

Introduction(3)

Page 5: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,

배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

Designer Babies

Yes or No?

Page 6: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

정수황

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

찬성의견1 ;

질병을 고칠 수 있는 이득이 있다

Arguments #1 For

There are benefits of being able to

cure disease

Page 7: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Many parents want to

choose for their child‟s

traits

Poll

Page 8: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

To search for genetic mutations

that could develop into a

chronic disease.

PGD?(Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis)

It takes place before implantation

Page 9: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

List of disorders that could be treated using PGD

Page 10: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Phone call with Lisa Nash

Lisa Nash

Page 12: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

반대의견1

현재 맞춤아기 기술은 질병치료에 사용하기는 부족하다

Against 1

It is too early to apply current „designer

baby‟ technology for medical purposes

강성민

Page 13: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

No technique that guarantees 100%

Distributed

properties

or

Genetic diseases are

not Y/N problems

Usually determined by

not static properties

(ex. Hormones)

Hard to distinguish

diseased embryo

Page 14: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Probability

CalculationWould be dead

No technique that guarantees 100%

As a result of probability calculation, many

healthy babies would be dead

Page 15: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Not caused by one gene

No technique that guarantees 100%

Some tests are dangerous

Genetic disease is not caused by only

one gene

gene1

gene2

gene3

Genetic

Disease

Dangerous!

Page 16: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

구태균

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

찬성의견2 ;

기술적인 문제는 해결될 수 있다.

Arguments #1 For

Technical problems can be resolved

Page 17: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Who could imagine we could

throw an object to thousands

kilometers away?

Example of Amazing Technical Improvement

Page 18: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #1

Page 19: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation
Page 20: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #2

Page 21: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Human Genome Project

Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #3

Page 22: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Cost required to sequence individual human genome

Page 23: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

We will provide

Genome Analysis for

5000 dollars.

Page 24: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,

배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

Designer Babies

Yes or No?

Page 25: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

What if the technology

develops?

If it becomes available?

Page 26: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

이남일

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

반대의견2

맞춤아기는 계급의 발생을 초래한다 – 사회적 측면

Designer babies lead to a discriminative “class-

oriented” society

Page 27: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Movie GATTACA (1997)

Page 28: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Movie GATTACA (1997)

Page 29: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Hierarchy Generation

Negative Cycle

Page 30: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Gap Between Classes

The gap in society as it exists today will get wider

Page 31: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Cost required to sequence individual human genome

Page 32: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

발표자 ; 배재완

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

Arguments #3 For

From the economic perspective, designer

babies should be developed

찬성의견3

경제적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 발전해야 한다

Page 33: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Cost of PGD vs Cost of medical

treatment

PGD is more economical than medical treatment

Page 34: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

PGD Medical treatment

• IVF ($ 10,000)

• ICSI ($ 1,500 ~ 2,500)

• Embryo biopsy($ 1,500 ~ 2,500)

• Antibiotic treatment

• Gene therapy

• Chest therapy

• Drug•

Cost of PGD vs Cost of medical

treatment

Page 35: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

권동욱

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

반대의견3

윤리학적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 실행될 수 없다.

Against #3.

From an ethical perspective, „designer babies‟

should not be permitted..

Page 36: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Money vs. Life(1)

Do you really think that the economic

advantages overwhelm the value of lives?

Page 37: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Money vs. Life(2)

Life is much valuable

than Money

We must not try to

compare life w/

money

Page 38: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Designer Baby as an Accessory

Parents expect their child as a product

or accessory for their tastes.

Page 39: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Disposal of Designer Babies

Page 40: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Implantation is even not occurred.

We do not consider it as a baby.

It‟s just a material for

research.

Numerous 8 stage cells died

naturally (not intended)

8 Stage cell is not a Life

Page 41: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

41

Page 42: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

유태선

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

반대의견4

장애인들이 현재보다 더 소외될 것이다.

Against #4.

The disabled will become even more

isolated and discriminated upon.

Page 43: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Process

Be more

minor class

The disabled will become even more isolated and discriminated upon.

National

Support will

decrease

Overall condition

for the disabled

gets worse

Page 44: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Disorder

(90% is acquired)

The disorder problem would not be changed.

Consumer Reports

: N. 소비자고발

Page 45: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

전승제

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

찬성의견5

자식에게 좋은 조건을 제공해주는 것은 부모의 당연한 책임이다.

As parents, it is a dutiful responsibility to provide their

children with the best possible conditions.

Page 46: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Parents do For their kid..

Mencius

: N. 맹자

Like that!

Parents do their best for their Offspring

Page 47: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Mencius Mother

: N. 맹모

Mencius Mother 3-

times Moving

: 맹모삼천지교

Like that!

Parents‟ Mind ; Mencius mother 3-times moving

Parents do their best for their Offspring

Page 48: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Design their baby is parent‟s authority

Designing is Reasonable

Page 49: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

성영제

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

반대의견5

아이들도 자신의 인생을 선택할 권리가 있다.

Against #5.

The children, too, have the rights to

make their own decisions.

Page 50: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Video Clip – My Sister‟s Keeper (2009)

Page 51: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Story of Lesbian couple

with hearing disorder

Deaf not obstacle

Deaf Choose Deaf?

Page 52: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Designer baby ignore the most fundamental right for human

Fundamental right

Page 53: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,

배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

Designer Babies

Yes or No?

Page 54: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

김승민

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

반대의견6

진화론적으로 생물의 다양성을 감소시킨다.

Against #6.

The diversity of living organisms will

decrease from an evolutionary perspective

Page 55: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Evolution Aspects(1)

Now

Designer Baby would be design to have contemporary good

genetic character

Why am I

looks so fat?

SLIM

SLIM

Genetically

Recombine

SLIMFAT

Page 56: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Evolution Aspects(2)

This Unstable gene pool would cause extinction or

bottleneck effect

SLIMFAT

Glacial Epoch

Only Fat People would

survive in glacial epoch

SLIMFAT

Page 57: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

배재완

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

찬성의견6

보기 좋은 떡이...

Designer baby is real evolution

Page 58: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

VS

Which world do you want?

Page 59: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

VS

Which world do you want?

Page 60: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation
Page 61: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,

배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park

Final Presentation

CONCLUSION

Yes or No?

Page 62: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Arguments FOR PGD

Technological prospect

Economic benefits

Parents‟ rights to choose

World full of perfect

people! :)

Page 63: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Arguments AGAINST Unreliable technology

“Class” society

Babies = product

Handicap discrimination

Child‟s freedom restrained

EYES

FACE

BODY

IQ

EQ

Page 64: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

Yes? No? => Need for boundaries

YES NO

Page 65: KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

65

What‟s Your Verdict?