kaist 2011 fall semester_revst_designer baby presentation
DESCRIPTION
KAIST 2011 가을학기 Revolution of Science and Technology - Designer Baby Debate 관련 발표자료입니다.TRANSCRIPT
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
We‟re smart and intelligent… But we still have problems
Introduction(1)
You might want to choose..
Non-Smoking???
World Star???Blue Eyes???
Introduction(2)
Are we to play God??
Introduction(3)
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
정수황
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견1 ;
질병을 고칠 수 있는 이득이 있다
Arguments #1 For
There are benefits of being able to
cure disease
Many parents want to
choose for their child‟s
traits
Poll
To search for genetic mutations
that could develop into a
chronic disease.
PGD?(Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis)
It takes place before implantation
List of disorders that could be treated using PGD
Phone call with Lisa Nash
Lisa Nash
Which lifestyle would you wish
your children to have?
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견1
현재 맞춤아기 기술은 질병치료에 사용하기는 부족하다
Against 1
It is too early to apply current „designer
baby‟ technology for medical purposes
강성민
No technique that guarantees 100%
Distributed
properties
or
Genetic diseases are
not Y/N problems
Usually determined by
not static properties
(ex. Hormones)
Hard to distinguish
diseased embryo
Probability
CalculationWould be dead
No technique that guarantees 100%
As a result of probability calculation, many
healthy babies would be dead
Not caused by one gene
No technique that guarantees 100%
Some tests are dangerous
Genetic disease is not caused by only
one gene
gene1
gene2
gene3
Genetic
Disease
Dangerous!
구태균
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견2 ;
기술적인 문제는 해결될 수 있다.
Arguments #1 For
Technical problems can be resolved
Who could imagine we could
throw an object to thousands
kilometers away?
Example of Amazing Technical Improvement
Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #1
Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #2
Human Genome Project
Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #3
Cost required to sequence individual human genome
We will provide
Genome Analysis for
5000 dollars.
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
What if the technology
develops?
If it becomes available?
이남일
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견2
맞춤아기는 계급의 발생을 초래한다 – 사회적 측면
Designer babies lead to a discriminative “class-
oriented” society
Movie GATTACA (1997)
Movie GATTACA (1997)
Hierarchy Generation
Negative Cycle
Gap Between Classes
The gap in society as it exists today will get wider
Cost required to sequence individual human genome
발표자 ; 배재완
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Arguments #3 For
From the economic perspective, designer
babies should be developed
찬성의견3
경제적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 발전해야 한다
Cost of PGD vs Cost of medical
treatment
PGD is more economical than medical treatment
PGD Medical treatment
• IVF ($ 10,000)
• ICSI ($ 1,500 ~ 2,500)
• Embryo biopsy($ 1,500 ~ 2,500)
•
•
•
• Antibiotic treatment
• Gene therapy
• Chest therapy
• Drug•
•
•
Cost of PGD vs Cost of medical
treatment
권동욱
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견3
윤리학적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 실행될 수 없다.
Against #3.
From an ethical perspective, „designer babies‟
should not be permitted..
Money vs. Life(1)
Do you really think that the economic
advantages overwhelm the value of lives?
Money vs. Life(2)
Life is much valuable
than Money
We must not try to
compare life w/
money
Designer Baby as an Accessory
Parents expect their child as a product
or accessory for their tastes.
Disposal of Designer Babies
Implantation is even not occurred.
We do not consider it as a baby.
It‟s just a material for
research.
Numerous 8 stage cells died
naturally (not intended)
8 Stage cell is not a Life
41
유태선
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견4
장애인들이 현재보다 더 소외될 것이다.
Against #4.
The disabled will become even more
isolated and discriminated upon.
Process
Be more
minor class
The disabled will become even more isolated and discriminated upon.
National
Support will
decrease
Overall condition
for the disabled
gets worse
Disorder
(90% is acquired)
The disorder problem would not be changed.
Consumer Reports
: N. 소비자고발
전승제
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견5
자식에게 좋은 조건을 제공해주는 것은 부모의 당연한 책임이다.
As parents, it is a dutiful responsibility to provide their
children with the best possible conditions.
Parents do For their kid..
Mencius
: N. 맹자
Like that!
Parents do their best for their Offspring
Mencius Mother
: N. 맹모
Mencius Mother 3-
times Moving
: 맹모삼천지교
Like that!
Parents‟ Mind ; Mencius mother 3-times moving
Parents do their best for their Offspring
Design their baby is parent‟s authority
Designing is Reasonable
성영제
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견5
아이들도 자신의 인생을 선택할 권리가 있다.
Against #5.
The children, too, have the rights to
make their own decisions.
Video Clip – My Sister‟s Keeper (2009)
Story of Lesbian couple
with hearing disorder
Deaf not obstacle
Deaf Choose Deaf?
Designer baby ignore the most fundamental right for human
Fundamental right
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
김승민
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견6
진화론적으로 생물의 다양성을 감소시킨다.
Against #6.
The diversity of living organisms will
decrease from an evolutionary perspective
Evolution Aspects(1)
Now
Designer Baby would be design to have contemporary good
genetic character
Why am I
looks so fat?
SLIM
SLIM
Genetically
Recombine
SLIMFAT
Evolution Aspects(2)
This Unstable gene pool would cause extinction or
bottleneck effect
SLIMFAT
Glacial Epoch
Only Fat People would
survive in glacial epoch
SLIMFAT
배재완
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견6
보기 좋은 떡이...
Designer baby is real evolution
VS
Which world do you want?
VS
Which world do you want?
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
CONCLUSION
Yes or No?
Arguments FOR PGD
Technological prospect
Economic benefits
Parents‟ rights to choose
World full of perfect
people! :)
Arguments AGAINST Unreliable technology
“Class” society
Babies = product
Handicap discrimination
Child‟s freedom restrained
EYES
FACE
BODY
IQ
EQ
Yes? No? => Need for boundaries
YES NO
65
What‟s Your Verdict?