list new2.asp

6
                                                                                       CA No. :  03/2015                                                                                Sanjeet Sahni Vs. State                                                               15.05.2015  Present :  None for the Appellant.         Sh. S.K. Berwal, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Neither appellant nor his counsel has appeared despite repeated calls since morning.  It is already 3 PM. The appellant has been given sufficient opportunities  for making  submissions on his appeal but the appellant  has not preferred to turn up and to address arguments on his appeal.  Arguments of Ld. Addl. PP  heard. The appeal is dismissed vide separate judgment of today. Vide order dated 30.03.2015, the appellant was admitted to bail during the pendency of appeal and sentence awarded by Ld. MM  was suspended during the pendency of appeal. Vide judgment of today, the appeal  filed by the appellant has been dismissed and conviction and sentence awarded by Ld. MM vide impugned order dated 04.03.2015 has been upheld.  As per impugned order of Ld. MM dated 04.03.2015 , fine imposed on the appellant has already been deposited.  In the circumstances,  the bail bond  furnished by  the appellant is forfeited and Non bailable warrant be issued against  the appellant  and he be committed to imprisonment   for serving  the sentence awarded to him  in terms of  impugned order dated 04.03.2015 and notice be also issued under Section 446  Cr.P.C. to his surety. Put up for report on 22.05.2015.    (Harish Dudani)                 Special Judge (PC Act) CBI                                                             Dwarka Courts, New Delhi.                                                          15.05.2015

Upload: vinaykumarjain

Post on 09-Sep-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

COURT FILES.

TRANSCRIPT

  • CANo.:03/2015SanjeetSahniVs.State

    15.05.2015Present:NonefortheAppellant.

    Sh.S.K.Berwal,Ld.Addl.PPfortheState.

    Neitherappellantnorhiscounselhasappeareddespite

    repeatedcallssincemorning. Itisalready3PM.Theappellanthas

    beengivensufficientopportunities formaking submissionsonhis

    appealbuttheappellanthasnotpreferredtoturnupandtoaddress

    arguments onhis appeal. Arguments of Ld. Addl. PP heard. The

    appealisdismissedvideseparatejudgmentoftoday.

    Videorderdated30.03.2015,theappellantwasadmitted

    tobailduringthependencyofappealandsentenceawardedbyLd.

    MMwassuspendedduringthependencyofappeal.Videjudgmentof

    today, the appeal filed by the appellant has been dismissed and

    convictionandsentenceawardedbyLd.MMvideimpugnedorder

    dated04.03.2015hasbeenupheld.AsperimpugnedorderofLd.MM

    dated04.03.2015 , fine imposedontheappellant hasalreadybeen

    deposited. Inthecircumstances, thebailbond furnishedby the

    appellantisforfeitedandNonbailablewarrantbeissuedagainstthe

    appellant andhebecommittedtoimprisonment forserving the

    sentence awarded to him in terms of impugned order dated

    04.03.2015andnoticebealsoissuedunderSection446Cr.P.C.tohis

    surety.

    Putupforreporton22.05.2015.

    (HarishDudani)SpecialJudge(PCAct)CBI

    DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi. 15.05.2015

  • CANo.:01/2015VerendraSinghYadav

    Vs.Smt.NeenaGupta

    15.05.2015

    Present:Appellantinperson.Sh.MukulGupta,Ld.CounselfortheRespondent.

    Part arguments heard. At the stage appellant seeks

    adjournmentashiscounselisnotavailabletoday.

    Asrequested,putupon22.5.2015forfurtherarguments.

    (HarishDudani)SpecialJudge(PCAct)CBI

    DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi. 15.05.2015

  • CRNo.:05/2015MaheshYadavVs.SureshJain

    15.05.2015

    Present:RevisionistinpersonwithSh.SunilSingh,Advocate.

    AnapplicationunderSection399Cr.P.C.forstayofthe

    proceedingsofTrialCourthasbeenfiledbytherevisionist.

    Heard. Perused the record. It is contended that the

    presentrevision isagainsttheorderdated 26.02.2015 wherebythe

    applicationofrevisionist/complainantseekingpermission toplace

    onrecordsomedocumentsandtoleadfurtherCEweredismissed.It

    iscontendedthatafterclosingCE,theLd.TrialCourt hasrecorded

    statementofaccusedunderSection313Cr.P.C.andthecaseisatthe

    stageofDEandthenextdatebeforetheTrialCourtis28.05.2015and

    in case proceedings of Trial Court are not stayed, the

    revisionist/Complainantshallsufferirreparableloss.

    Inthetotalityofcircumstances,proceedingsbeforethe

    Trial Court are stayed till next dateof hearing. Notice of revision

    petition/application beissued tothe respondent videsteps and

    TCRbesummonedfornextdateofhearing.

    Putupon29.05.2015forconsideration/arguments.

    Acopyofthisorderbesenttocourtconcerned.

    (HarishDudani)SpecialJudge(PCAct)CBI

    DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi. 15.05.2015

  • CRNo.:06/2015MaheshYadavVs.SureshJain

    15.05.2015

    Present:RevisionistinpersonwithSh.SunilSingh,Advocate.

    AnapplicationunderSection399Cr.P.C.forstayofthe

    proceedingsofTrialCourthasbeenfiledbytherevisionist.

    Heard. Perused the record. It is contended that the

    presentrevision isagainsttheorderdated 26.02.2015 wherebythe

    applicationofrevisionist/complainantseekingpermission toplace

    onrecordsomedocumentsandtoleadfurtherCEweredismissed.It

    iscontendedthatafterclosingCE,theLd.TrialCourt hasrecorded

    statementofaccusedunderSection313Cr.P.C.andthecaseisatthe

    stageofDEandthenextdatebeforetheTrialCourtis28.05.2015and

    in case proceedings of Trial Court are not stayed, the

    revisionist/Complainantshallsufferirreparableloss.

    Inthetotalityofcircumstances,proceedingsbeforethe

    Trial Court are stayed till next dateof hearing. Notice of revision

    petition/application beissued tothe respondent videsteps and

    TCRbesummonedfornextdateofhearing.

    Putupon29.05.2015forconsideration/arguments.

    Acopyofthisorderbesenttocourtconcerned.

    (HarishDudani)SpecialJudge(PCAct)CBI

    DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi. 15.05.2015

  • CRNo.:07/2015MaheshYadavVs.SureshJain

    15.05.2015

    Present:RevisionistinpersonwithSh.SunilSingh,Advocate.

    AnapplicationunderSection399Cr.P.C.forstayofthe

    proceedingsofTrialCourthasbeenfiledbytherevisionist.

    Heard. Perused the record. It is contended that the

    presentrevision isagainsttheorderdated 26.02.2015 wherebythe

    applicationofrevisionist/complainantseekingpermission toplace

    onrecordsomedocumentsandtoleadfurtherCEweredismissed.It

    iscontendedthatafterclosingCE,theLd.TrialCourt hasrecorded

    statementofaccusedunderSection313Cr.P.C.andthecaseisatthe

    stageofDEandthenextdatebeforetheTrialCourtis28.05.2015and

    in case proceedings of Trial Court are not stayed, the

    revisionist/Complainantshallsufferirreparableloss.

    Inthetotalityofcircumstances,proceedingsbeforethe

    Trial Court are stayed till next dateof hearing. Notice of revision

    petition/application beissued tothe respondent videsteps and

    TCRbesummonedfornextdateofhearing.

    Putupon29.05.2015forconsideration/arguments.

    Acopyofthisorderbesenttocourtconcerned.

    (HarishDudani)SpecialJudge(PCAct)CBI

    DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi. 15.05.2015

  • CANo.:22/14AnwarHussainV.Smt.Rukshar

    15.05.2015

    Present: Appellant,AnwarHussain,inperson.

    Respondent,Smt.Rukshar,inperson.

    Boththepartiesseekadjournmentastheircounselsarenot

    availabletoday.

    At joint request of the parties, put up for consideration/

    argumentson30.5.2015.

    (HarishDudani)SpecialJudge(PCAct)CBI

    DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi. 15.05.2015