list new2.asp
DESCRIPTION
DELHI COURT.TRANSCRIPT
-
C.S.No. 53A/15
11.05.2015
Present: ProxyCounselforplaintiffswithplaintiffsProxyCounselforMCDwithJLOandwithSh.RajeevKumar,AdministrativeOfficerinpersonSh.AjitKumar,LicensingInspectorinperson.
It is submitted on behalf of MCD that written
statement could not be filed for want of attestation, due to
Lawyersbeingonstrike. Ihaveperusedthecopyandreturned
thesame.Perusedtherecordalso.
The stand taken by the MCD appears that no
permissionwasgrantedbytheMCDeverforrunningtheweekly
Bazaar.ItisfurthersubmittedthatNOCwasdeclinedbyTraffic
Policein2011itself.
Oninquiry,itissubmittedthattherearesixweekly
BazaarsbeingorganizedinDwarkaandinnoneofthose,MCD
hasevergrantedpermission.
It is furthersubmittedthatMCDissimply issuing
TehbazariReceipt/R4tothehawkersinthoseweeklyBazaars.It
isfurthersubmitted,oninquirythatonlyoncearoundin2011
for one dayTehbazari receipt/R4wasissuedtotheHawkers.
Even,intheweeklyBazaarinSector7.Subsequentlyorearlier,
ithasneverbeenissuedandnobazaarisbeingorganizedover
thereforlong.
Myattentionwasdrawnonbehalfofplaintiffstoa
letteratpageno.21ofthelistofdocumentswhichappearstobe
aletterwrittenbyDDAinrespectofinspectionbyDwarka
-
2
Planning Office on 23.11.2007 wherein reference to weekly
BazaarbeingorganizedatSector7isalsothere.Thisletterwas
tobeplacedbeforetheCommissioner,MCDalso. Thisfurther
refersthatMPD2021recognizesweeklymarketandtalksabout
theplanningforoperationoftheseweeklymarketssothatthese
markets be not locatedonmaster planroad/zonal planroad
whichcouldinterferewiththeTrafficbutcouldbelocatedinthe
parkingandotheropenspace.
MCDis directedto file detailedwrittenstatement
takingintoconsiderationall theaforesaidacpects. It appears
that the aforesaid weekly bazaar was infact operating on the
serviceroadalongthewallofSikhshaBhartiSchoolasperthe
survey conducted by DDA, Dwarka, as reflected in the office
letterofMCDitself.
Defendantno.1&2arealsodirectedtofilewritten
statementinthismatter.Noticebeissuedtodefendantno.1&
2inthisregardalongwithcopyoftheorder.
Putupon22.05.2015at02:00p.m.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 189/13
11.05.2015
Present: PlaintiffinpersonDefendantno.1inperson.ProxyCounselforDefendantno.6MCD.
Lawyers are abstaining from work on account of
strike.Caseisatthestageofcrossexaminationoftheplaintiff.
Perusedtherecord.
Plaintiff is seeking permanent and mandatory
injunction restraining defendant from transferring the suit
propertyorraisinganyillegalconstructionandfurtherpraying
fordirectionfordemolitionofillegalconstruction.
Plaintiff is claiming her right on the basis that
propertywaspurchasedbyhergrandfatherwhodiedintestate
and subsequently thereto father of plaintiff died intestate.
Defendantno.1to4whoarebrother,sisterandwifeofJawahar
SinghandGrandMotheroftheplaintiff,whoaretryingtosell
thepropertytodefendantno.5.
In the written statement contention of
maintainability of thesuit withoutseekingpartitionhasbeen
raised.ItisfurtherstatedthatJawaharSinghwhoisfatherofthe
plaintiffhadpurchasedthesuitpropertyintheyear1981and
-
2
expired in 2009 bequeathing his all assets including the suit
propertytohiswifeSmtRamwatiDefendantno.2throughWill
dated09.07.2009.
To come up on 05.08.2015 for tendering
clarificationsandargumentsonthemaintainabilityofthesuitin
itspresentformbeforeproceedingfurtherwiththismatter.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 59/14
11.05.2015
Present: Noneforplaintiff.
Defendantno.1inperson.
Affidavit of evidence not filed. Advance copynot
given. Lawyersareabstainingfromworkonaccountofstrike.
Onefurtheropportunityisgrantedtotheplaintifftocomplythe
directions for supplying the advance copy of affidavit of
evidence.
Tocomeupon 11.08.2015 fortenderingandcross
examination.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 93/14
11.05.2015
Present: Sh.VijaySonofplaintiffinperson
Nonefordefendant.
Lawyers are abstaining from work on account of
strike,tocomeupon04.08.2015 forfilingreplyandarguments
onapplicationunderOrder7rule11CPCandalsohearingon
theaspectofpossession.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 140/12
11.05.2015
Present: ProxyCounselforplaintiff.
Defendantinperson.
CaseisatthestageofPE.Plaintiffhasalreadybeen
crossexamined in this case. No affidavit of evidence filed.
Advancecopyhasalsonotbeengiven. Itappearsthatthereis
nolistofwitnessesfiledinthiscase,aslawyersareabstaining
fromworkonaccountofstrike. Intheinterestofjustice,one
opportunity is granted for RPE. Advance copyof affidavit of
evidencebegiventotheoppositecounsel.Officialwitnesses,if
any,besummonedwellinadvance.
Putupon24.08.2015.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 82/15Freshsuit received by wayof assignment. It be checkedandregistered.
11.05.2015
Present: ProxyCounselforplaintiffwithplaintiff
Heard.Fileperused.
Issue summons of the suit and notice to the
applicationtothedefendantonfilingofPF&RCreturnablefor
21.05.2015. Plaintiff is at liberty to accompany the Process
Serveratthetimeofservice.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 83/15Freshsuit received by wayof assignment. It be checkedandregistered.
11.05.2015
Present: None
Fileperused.
Issue summons of the suit and notice to the
applicationtothedefendantsonfilingofPF&RCreturnablefor
06.07.2015.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015
-
C.S.No. 63/15
11.05.2015
Present: ProxyCounselforplaintiff.
Heard.
Amended plaint was already filed on 06.04.2014
givendetailsinpara3oftheamendedplaint.
Itisfurthersubmittedthataslawyersarepresently
abstainingfromworkonaccountofstrike,anapplicationunder
Order 6 Rule 17 CPC giving specific details as to the
incorporationsandamendmentsmadewouldbefiledshortly.
SubjecttofilingoftheapplicationunderOrder6Rule17 CPC,
noticeoftheamendedplaintbeissuedonfilingofPF&RCfor
27.05.2015,asprayed.
(VipinKumarRai)JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015