low-impact development from the developer perspective
DESCRIPTION
Michael Pozzebon LID goals and barriers to implementation – finding the “water balance” between them as we move forwardTRANSCRIPT
• Introduction
• Goals of LID
• What We Have Done
• Barriers to Implementing LID
• “Water Balance”
• Moving Forward
• Conclusion
• Part of the Con Drain Group of Companies
• Over 30 years of land development experience in the Greater Golden Horseshoe
• Metrus Properties & Condor Properties
• Aspen Ridge Homes & CountryWide Homes
• Managing stormwater runoff using the treatment train approach
• Increase opportunities for evapotranspiration
• Infiltration
• Volume Retention
• Additional Topsoil
• Soakaway Pits
• Clean Water Collector
• Bioswales / Engineered Wetlands
• Permeable Pavers
• Cisterns
• Rain Barrels
• Green Roof
• Added Cost
• Added Timing
• Ownership
• Operational Issues / Perceived or Real
• Long Term Maintenance
• Climate
• Soils Composition – Engineering Issues
• Education of Stakeholders & End User
Balancing the Goals and Barriers • Allowing LID Technologies on Municipal Lands
• Engineering Standards • Reduced Road Widths with bioswales & enhanced vegetation do not
balance well with the snow operations or fire department concerns
• Parks Requirements • Parks provide a huge opportunity for LID measures, in bioswales, infiltration
galleries etc.
• Stormwater Management Credits
• Expedited Approvals
• It’s Not Our Fault – The Development Industry is Innovative
• Time may not be on our side – LID Implementation can add an additional approvals track to the timeline
• Pilot Projects – Important to gather data and provide examples of LID Technologies that
are successful
• Rules & Expectations Vary • Potential Conflicts
– Engineering / Planning / Parks / Operations / Political – The Municipality has to buy into LID or it cannot be successful
Questions / Comments