m ethod of r egions and i ts a pplications
DESCRIPTION
M ethod of R egions and I ts A pplications. Graduate University of the CAS Deshan Yang. Outline. Introduction Examples of Method of Regions Connections to Effective Field Theory Applications Summary. Victor Frankenstein’s Idea of Science. Modern Physics - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Method of Regionsand Its Applications
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 1
Graduate University of the CAS
Deshan Yang
Outline
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 2
1. Introduction
2. Examples of Method of Regions
3. Connections to Effective Field Theory
4. Applications
5. Summary
Victor Frankenstein’s Idea of Science
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 3
Modern Physics Understand the nature of the Universe
qualitatively and quantitatively.
What can we do? Anatomy--approaching to the truth gradually
Cut the body into pieces and study each part
Stitch them together and hope for the best
Scientist: FrankensteinTo create the Frankenstein’s monster or an angel?
Beauty charmless decay
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 4
Many scales
Many couplings
Many hadrons
Difficulties: Strong interactions
Way-out: Factorization
Factorization
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 5
Questions to be answered
How to separate the contributions from the different scales?
How to establish the RGEs to resum the large logarithms?
How to estimate or compensate the loss due to the power corrections?
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 6
Method of regions can help!
Integration by regions For a Feynman integral containing small parameters (multiple-
scale problem) in dimensional regularization Divide the space of the loop momenta into various regions and , in
each region, expand the integrand into a Taylor series with respect to the parameters that are considered small there;
Integrate the integrand, expanded in the appropriate way in every region, over the whole integration domain of the loop momenta;
Add up all the expanded integrals in all regions, we reproduce the Taylor series of the original Feynman integral with respect to the small parameters exactly.
Finally, a multiple-scale problem is divided into single (less) scale problems.
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 7
Example 1: Two-masses dependent integral
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 8
Cut-off regularization
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 9
UV div. IR div.
Dimensional regularization
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC10
The expansion is valid up to any order of a; The integral in each region is the function of only one scale and simpler
than the original integral; The factious divergence in each region is cancelled after adding up the
contributions from large scale region and small scale region.
UV div. IR div.
Example 2: Threshold Expansion Beneke & Smirnov, NPB1998
Small parameter:
Hard region:
Potential region:
Soft/Ultra-soft region: or Tadpole diagrams: 0 in DR
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC 11
2221 ))()((
][pkykqkykqk
dkI
222
2
4qpqmy
2,, 21
2122
22
1pppppqmpp
qkqk ~,~0
1
1 2 2 2 2
[ ] 4 1 ( )( )( ) 2 1 2
Eh dkI ek k q k k q k q
ykqyk ~,/~0
2)2/1(
))((1)1(
22212/
1
1
yq
yepkyk
kdeq
I EEd
dp
ykyk ~,~0
qykqyk /~,/~0
Adding up
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC12
11 2 1
1
2
1 ˆ( ) (1/ 2,1 ,3 / 2; 1/ (4 ))2
ˆ4 (4 ) ( 1/ 2)8 2(1 2 )ˆ
E
E
I e y F y
yeq y
/1 1 1 1
h p s usI I I I
Remarks on method of regions
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC13
Effective Field Theory
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC14
Application 1: Effective weak Hamiltonian
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC15
Effective operators
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC16
First step factorization in B decays
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC17
Example of matching : Tree-level
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC18
One-loop level matching equation
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC19
(1)fulliM
...
1Q
1Q
...
One-loop matching equation
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC20
1tr loopfulliM iM iM 1 1tr loop loop
hard IRiM iM iM
Hard part
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC21
Putting together
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC22
Renormalization
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC23
Application 2: Heavy-to-light Form-factors
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC24
Factorization formula
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC25
There’s another factorization formula in which the transverse momenta of the patrons are invoked to avoid the endpoint singularity. Kurimoto, Li, Sanda 2002
Factorization formula in SCET
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC26
Matching procedure
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC27
More on matching
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC28
“Hard” contribution
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC29
Wilson coefficients
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC30
Wilson coefficients
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC31
RGEs
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC32
Jet functions
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC33
Application 3: B two-body charmless decay
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC34
Matching onto SCETII
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC35
Factorization formula
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC36
Hard-spectator interaction
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC37
NNLO vertex corrections
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC38
Complete NNLO: G.Bell, 2009; Beneke,Li,Huber 2009
Application 4: Exclusive single quarkonium production
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC39
NRQCD factorizationFor single quarkonium production
: NRQCD operator with definite velocity power counting
multi-scale problem: Q>>m stability of the perturbation: large log(Q/m) may need the resummation.
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC40
Refactorization
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC41
At the leading power of velocity,
The hard kernel is the same as the similar process in which the quarkonium is replaced by a flavor singlet light meson.
Since , the LCDA of bounded heavy quark and anti-quark can be calculated perturbatively.
Ma and Si, PRD 2006; Bell and Feldmann, JHEP 2007;
Example:
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC42
Qe e
NRQCD factorization up to leading power of velocity:
The short-distance contribution is parameterized as
The equivalent computation is to calculate the on-shell heavyquark anti-quark pair with equal momentum and the samequantum number as the quarkonium. At the tree level,
One-loop level
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC43
Sang, Chen, arXiv:0910.4071; Li, He, Chao arXiv:0910.4155
Leading regions
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC44
Hard Region:
Collinear region:
Anti-collinear region:
Potential region:
Soft region:
Ultra-soft region:
2( , ) ~ (1, , ),n k k n k s ~ / ,Qm s 2 2~ Qk m
2( , ) ~ ( , ,1),n k k n k s
~ ,k s 2 ~k s
2 2~ Qk m
NRQCD regionsNon-perturbative
Form factor
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC45
NRQCD:
Collinear factorization:
Hard-kernel:
at tree level
Light-cone distribution amplitude
Ma and Si, PRD 2006; Bell and Feldmann, JHEP 2007;
RGE for LCDA
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC46
Brodsky-Lepage kernel:
Resum the leading logarithms
where
NLO results (preliminary)
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC47
Braaten, PRD 1981;
Ma and Si, PRD 2006; Bell and Feldmann, JHEP 2007;
Hard Part
Collinear Part
Total Results
2(1) 2 ln( ) (3 2ln ) ln ln 9 ( 1 )
4 1S FC x xT x x x x xx s i x
Sang, Chen, arXiv:0910.4071; Li, He, Chao arXiv:0910.4155
2(1) (0) (1) 2 2(1/ 2) ((9 6ln 2) ln 9ln 2 3ln 2 27 )mT T
s
Summary
Method of regions: Not mathematically proved, but no counter-examples so far.
Intimately connected to the calculation of the matching coefficients in EFT.
Advantages: Multiple scale problems simplified to single scale problems;
Disadvantages: How to find the relevant regions? (No general procedure!)
2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC48
谢谢!2011.4.21 The Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC49