macroeconomics ch 11

Upload: karim-kobeissi

Post on 02-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    1/33

    Macroeconomics

    Dr. Karim Kobeissi

    Arts, Sciences and Technology University in

    Lebanon

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    2/33

    Chapter 11: Fiscal Policy

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    3/33

    Introduction

    The governments tax and spending activitiesinfluence economic outcome (GDP).

    Keynesian theory emphasizes the markets

    lack of self adjustment, particularly in

    recessions. If the market doesnt self adjust,

    then the government may have to intervene.

    Specifically, the government may have to use

    its tax and spending power (fiscal policy) tostabilize the macro economy.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    4/33

    Fiscal Policy Refers to changes in government

    expenditures and/or taxes to achieve

    particular economic goals, such as low

    unemployment rate, price stability, and

    economic growth.

    Government expenditures is the sum of

    government purchases and transferpayments.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    5/33

    Fiscal Policy Definitions

    Expansionary fiscal policyrefers to increases ingovernment expenditures

    and/or decreases in taxesto achieve macroeconomicgoals.

    Contractionary fiscalpolicy attempts to

    decrease governmentexpenditures and/orincreases in taxes toachieve macroeconomicgoals.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    6/33

    A Key Assumption

    In our discussion of fiscal policy, we assume that

    any change in government spending is due to a

    change in government purchases and not to a

    change in transfer payments.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    7/33

    Demand-Side Fiscal Policy

    A change in consumers consumption, businessinvestments, government purchases, or net

    exports can change aggregate demand and

    therefore shift the AD curve.

    A change in taxes can affect consumers

    consumption or business investment or both andtherefore can affect aggregate demand.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    8/33

    Fiscal Policy: A Keynesian

    Perspective

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    9/33

    Crowding Out An economic concept where increased public sector

    spending replaces, or drives down, private sectorspending. Crowding out refers to when government mustfinance its spending with taxes and/or with deficitspending, leaving businesses with less money andeffectively "crowding them out" .

    One explanation of why crowding out occurs isgovernment financing of projects with deficit spendingthrough the use of borrowed money. Because thegovernment borrows such large amounts of capital, itsactivities can increase interest rates. Higher interest ratesdiscourage individuals and businesses from borrowingmoney, which reduces their spending and investmentactivities.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    10/33

    Crowding Out Complete Crowding Out occurs when the decrease in one or

    more components of private spending completely offsets the

    increase in government spending.

    Incomplete Crowding Out occurs when the decrease in one

    or more components of private spending only partially

    offsets the increase in government spending.

    Crowding out question the effectiveness of expansionary

    demand-side fiscal policy:

    In fact, if complete or incomplete crowding out occurs, it

    follows that expansionary fiscal policy will have less impact

    on aggregate demand and Real GDP than Keynesian theory

    predicts.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    11/33

    Keynesian Theory

    & Crowding Out

    In Keynesian theory, expansionaryfiscal policy shifts the aggregatedemand curve to AD2 and movesthe economy to point 2.

    If there is no crowding out,expansionary fiscal policyincreases Real GDP and lowers theunemployment rate.

    If there is incomplete crowdingout, expansionary fiscal policyincreases Real GDP and lowers theunemployment rate (point 2), butnot as much as in the case of zero

    crowding out (point 2

    ).

    If there is complete crowding out,expansionary fiscal policy has noeffect on the economy (point 1).

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    12/33

    The New Classical View of Fiscal Policy:Crowding Out with No Increase in Interest Rates

    Individuals respond to expansionary fiscal policy, a largerdeficit, and greater deficit-financing requirements bythinking the following Alarger deficit implies more debtthis year and higher future taxes. Illsimply save more in

    the present so I can pay the higher future taxes required topay interest and to repay principal on the new debt. But,of course, if Imgoing to save more, Illhave to consumeless.

    1. Current consumption will fall as a result of expansionaryfiscal policy.

    2. Budget deficits do not bring higher interest rates.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    13/33

    The New Classical View of

    Expansionary Fiscal Policy

    As long as

    expansionary

    fiscal policy is

    translated intohigher future

    taxes, there will

    be no change in

    Real GDP,unemployment

    rate, the price

    level, or interest

    rates.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    14/33

    Lags & Fiscal PolicyEconomists argue that an economic policy that is based on the

    ad hoc judgment of policymakers is not likely to have theexpected impact on the economy. By the time the fullimpact of the policy is felt, the economic problem it wasdesigned to solve may no longer exist, may not exist to thedegree it once did, or it may have changed altogether.

    There are lags in the execution of macroeconomic policybecause of:

    1. The Data Lag

    2. The Recognition lag

    3. The Legislative Lag

    4. The Implementation Lag

    5. The Effectiveness Lag

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    15/33

    Lags & Fiscal Policy (con)1. The Data Lag

    Many macroeconomic data series such as GDP are onlyavailable with a considerable lag, and they are subject tobig revisions. Because of this, information policy makersuse is retrospective, not contemporaneous. Gettinginformation about the current state of the economy isdifficult, we don't have good information until monthsafter the economy has already changed course.

    2. The Recognition lag

    Once the data are finally available it takes time to figure outwhat they are saying. Is the downturn in employment inthis month's data temporary, or the beginning of a longerterm trend? If it's temporary, no need to act, but if it's

    permanent, then action may be needed.

    L & F i l P l i ( )

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    16/33

    L a g s & F i s c a l P o l i c y ( c o n )

    3. The Legislative Lag

    Once we've obtained the necessary data and concluded

    something must be done, there can be considerable lags in

    the legislative process as legislators debate the exact form

    of the package, or oppose it altogether.

    4. The Implementation lag

    Once a policy is passed, it takes time to put it into place, e.g.

    to set up the administration of the money, to deliver it to

    the right agencies, to make the plans needed to spend it.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    17/33

    Lags & Fiscal Policy (con)5. The Effectiveness Lag

    After all of that, and the policy is finally put into place, it takes

    time for policy to hit the economy and take effect. For

    monetary policy it can be a year to a year and a half

    before the peak effect of the policy is felt (though the

    legislative lags are much shorter since the Federal Reserve

    can act faster than congress). The effectiveness lag for

    fiscal policy is a bit shorter, but still considerable, six

    months at least.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    18/33

    Lags & Fiscal Policy (con)

    The government

    has moved the

    economy from

    point 1 to point 2,

    and not, as theyhad hoped, from

    point 1 to point 1.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    19/33

    Demand-Side Fiscal Policy: Return to the

    Keynesian Model

    It would seem that under

    the conditions of no lags

    and zero crowding out,

    expansionary fiscalpolicy either

    increasing government

    spending or cutting

    taxes will work at

    removing the economy

    from a recessionary gap.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    20/33

    The Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)

    The proportion of an aggregate raise in pay that a consumer spends on

    the consumption of goods and services, as opposed to saving it.

    Marginal propensity to consume is a component of Keynesian

    macroeconomic theory and is calculated as the change in

    consumption divided by the change in income [C / Y]. If

    consumption increases by 80 cents for each additional dollar of

    income, then MPC is equal to 0.8 / 1 = 0.8.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    21/33

    Demand-Side Fiscal Policy: Return to the Keynesian Model

    If government knows the difference

    between Q1 and QN (so that it knows

    how much to change Real GDP;

    Real GDP) and it knows the MPC

    multiplier (m) = [1 (1- MPC)], then it

    can use fiscal policy (Taxes) to get the

    economy out of a recessionary gap and

    producing Natural Real GDP.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    22/33

    Hypothetical Example # 1 (Case of Recession)

    Suppose Q1= $1600 billions; QN= $2400 billions; MPC = 0.75m=4.

    Real GDP = - [(m) x T]T = - [Real GDP / m ]

    = - [(2400 -1600) /4 ]

    = - $ 200 billions .

    Starting from an initial situation where Q1 = $1600 billions, and in

    order to reach a final situation where QN (the natural employment or

    full employment GDP) = $2400 billions, the government has to

    reduce the taxes by: $ 200 billions.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    23/33

    Hypothetical Example # 2 (Case of Expansion)

    Suppose Q1= $3000 billions; QN= $1800 billions; MPC = 0.75m=4.

    Real GDP = - [(m) x T]T = - [Real GDP / m ]

    = - [(1800 -3000) /4 ]

    = + $ 300 billions .

    Starting from an initial situation where Q1 = $3000 billions, and in

    order to reach a final situation where QN (the natural employment or

    full employment GDP) = $1800 billions, the government has to

    increase the taxes by: $ 300 billions.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    24/33

    Hypothetical Example # 3 (Case of Recession)

    Suppose AD1= $600 billions; AD2= $1000 billions; MPC =

    0.75m = 4.

    AD = (m) x Fiscal StimulusFiscal Stimulus = [AD /m]

    = [(1000 -600) /4 ]

    = $ 100 billions .

    Starting from an initial situation where AD1= $600 billions, and in

    order to reach a final situation where AD2= $1000 billions, the

    government has to spend an additional amount of $ 100 billions.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    25/33

    Demand-Side Fiscal Policy: Return to the

    Keynesian Model If the government

    doesnt know the

    actual MPC and itdoesnt know theactual differencebetween Q1and QN,

    then fiscal policyisnt likely to workas intended.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    26/33

    Tax Cuts Instead: Are Things Any Different?

    A dollar spend by the government is a dollar

    spent whereas a dollar tax cut is a dollar

    partly saved and partly spent In order to

    get the same change in Real GDP,

    government has to cut taxes more than it

    has to increase spending.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    27/33

    Marginal Tax Rate - Definition

    The amount of tax paid on an additional dollar of

    income. The marginal tax rate for an individual will

    increase as income rises. This method of taxation

    aims to fairly tax individuals based upon their

    earnings, with low income earners being taxed at a

    lower rate than higher income earners.Marginal Tax Rate = ( Tax payment)/( Taxable Income)

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    28/33

    Supply-Side Fiscal Policy

    All other things held constant, lower marginal tax rates

    increase the incentive to engage in productive activities

    relative to leisure and tax avoidance activities.

    If the government cut the marginal tax rate The amount

    of money individuals can earn by working will increases.

    Therefore, we can implicitly assume that a cut in marginal

    tax rate will increases work activity The aggregate

    outcome (Supply Side) will increase Real GDP will

    increase.

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    29/33

    The Predicted Effect of a Permanent Marginal

    Tax Rate Cut on Aggregate Supply

    Th L ff C Th R l ti hi B t

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    30/33

    The Laffer Curve: The Relationship Between

    Tax Rates and Tax Returns

    If income tax rates were lowered, would it increaseor decrease tax revenue? ? ?

    There are two tax rates at which zero tax revenues will becollected 0 and 100% (people would choose not to work

    because everything they earned would go to thegovernment).

    An INCREASE in tax rates could cause tax revenues toincrease.

    A DECREASE in tax rates could cause tax revenues to

    increase.

    The Laffer Curve: The Relationship Between Tax

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    31/33

    The Laffer Curve: The Relationship Between Tax

    Rates and Tax Returns

    The Laffer curve shows the relationship between tax rates and

    tax revenue collected by governments. The curve suggests

    that, as taxes increase from low levels, tax revenue collected

    by the government also increases. It also shows that tax rates

    increasing after a certain point (B) would cause people not to

    work as hard or not at all, thereby reducing tax revenue.

    Tax revenues = (Tax base) x (the average Tax rate)

    Th L ff C Th R l ti hi B t

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    32/33

    The Laffer Curve: The Relationship Between

    Tax Rates and Tax Returns

  • 8/10/2019 Macroeconomics Ch 11

    33/33

    The Laffer Curve: Implications

    1) Tax revenues increase if a tax reduction is made in thedownward-sloping portion of the curve (between points Band C); tax revenues decrease following a tax ratereduction in the upward sloping portion of the curve(between points A and B).

    2) We assume that as the tax rate is reduced, the taxbase expands. The rationale is that individuals workmore, invest more, and enter into more exchanges,

    and shelter less income from taxes and lower taxrates.

    How much does the tax base expand following thetax rate reduction? ? ? ?