mel712-29

Upload: sharath-chandra

Post on 14-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    1/28

    Gas Turbine Technology : Flying Machine to

    Ground Utilities

    P M V Subbarao

    Professor

    Mechanical Engineering Department

    A White Collar Power Generation Method

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    2/28

    Progress in Rankine Cycle

    Year 1907 1919 1938 1950 1958 1959 1966 1973 1975

    MW 5 20 30 60 120 200 500 660 1300

    p,MPa 1.3 1.4 4.1 6.2 10.3 16.2 15.9 15.9 24.1

    ThoC 260 316 454 482 538 566 566 565 538

    TroC -- -- -- -- 538 538 566 565 538

    FHW -- 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 8

    Pc,kPa 13.5 5.1 4.5 3.4 3.7 3.7 4.4 5.4 5.1

    h,% -- ~17 27.6 30.5 35.6 37.5 39.8 39.5 40

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    3/28

    The most Unwanted Characteristic of RankineGroup of Power Generation Systems

    The amount of cooling required by any steam-cycle power plantis determined by its thermal efficiency.

    It has nothing essentially to do with whether it is fuelled by

    coal, gas or uranium. Where availability of cooling water is limited, cooling does not

    need to be a constraint on new generating capacity.

    Alternative cooling options are available at slightly higher cost.

    Nuclear power plants have greater flexibility in location thancoal-fired plants due to fuel logistics, giving them more

    potential for their siting to be determined by coolingconsiderations.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    4/28

    Cooling Problems !!!!

    The bigger the temperature difference between the internalheat source and the external environment where the surplusheat is dumped, the more efficient is the process inachieving mechanical work.

    The desirability of having a high temperature internallyand a low temperature environmentally.

    In a coal-fired or conventionally gas-fired plant it ispossible to run the internal boilers at higher temperaturesthan those with finely-engineered nuclear fuel assemblies

    which must avoid damage. The external consideration gives rise to desirably siting

    power plants alongside very cold water.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    5/28

    Steam Cycle Heat Transfer

    For the heat transfer function the water is circulated

    continuously in a closed loop steam cycle and hardly any islost.

    The water needs to be clean and fairly pure.

    This function is much the same whether the power plant is

    nuclear, coal-fired, or conventionally gas-fired. Cooling to condense the steam and surplus heat discharge.

    The second function for water in such a power plant is to coolthe system so as to condense the low-pressure steam and

    recycle it. This is a major consideration in siting power plants, and in the

    UK siting study in 2009 all recommendations were for siteswithin 2 km of abundant water - sea or estuary.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    6/28

    Water, Water & Water .!!!!!

    A nuclear or coal plant running at 33% thermal efficiencywill need to dump about 14% more heat than one at 36%efficiency.

    Nuclear plants currently being built have about 34-36%thermal efficiency, depending on site (especially watertemperature).

    Older ones are often only 32-33% efficient.

    The relatively new Stanwell coal-fired plant in Queenslandruns at 36%, but some new coal-fired plants approach 40%and one of the new nuclear reactors claims 39%.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    7/28

    History & Repetition 1791: A patent was given to John Barber, an Englishman,

    for the first true gas turbine. His invention had most of the elements present in the

    modern day gas turbines. The turbine was designed to power a horseless carriage. 1872: The first true gas turbine engine was designed by Dr

    Franz Stikze, but the engine never ran under its ownpower.

    1903: A Norwegian, gidius Elling, was able to build thefirst gas turbine that was able to produce more power thanneeded to run its own components, which was consideredan achievement in a time when knowledge aboutaerodynamics was limited.

    Using rotary compressors and turbines it produced 11 hp(massive for those days).

    He further developed the concept, and by 1912 he haddeveloped a gas turbine system with separate turbine unitand compressor in series, a combination that is nowcommon.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    8/28

    1914: Application for a gas turbine engine filed by

    Charles Curtis. 1918: One of the leading gas turbine manufacturers oftoday, General Electric, started their gas turbinedivision.

    1920: The practical theory of gas flow throughpassages was developed into the more formal (andapplicable to turbines) theory of gas flow past airfoils

    by Dr A. A. Griffith. 1930: Sir Frank Whittle patented the design for a gas

    turbine for jet propulsion.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    9/28

    THE WORLDS FIRST INDUSTRIAL GAS TURBINE

    SETGT NEUCHTEL

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    10/28

    4 MW GT for Power Generation

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    11/28

    First turbojet-powered aircraftOhains engine on He 178

    The worlds first aircraft to fly purely on turbojet power, the

    Heinkel He 178.

    Its first true flight was on 27 August, 1939.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    12/28

    Steam Turbine Vs Gas Turbine : Power Generation Experience gained from a large number of exhaust-gas turbines for

    diesel engines, a temp. of 538C was considered absolutely safe for

    uncooled heat resisting steel turbine blades. This would result in obtainable outputs of 2000-8000 KW withcompressor turbine efficiencies of 73-75%, and an overall cycleefficiency of 17-18%.

    First Gas turbine electro locomotive 2500 HP ordered from BBC by

    Swiss Federal Railways The advent of high pressure and temperature steam turbine withregenerative heating of the condensate and air pre-heating, resulted incoupling efficiencies of approx. 25%.

    The gas turbine having been considered competitive with steam

    turbine plant of 18% which was considered not quite satisfactory. The Gas turbine was unable to compete with modern base loadsteam turbines of 25% efficiency.

    There was a continuous development in steam power plant which ledto increase of Power Generation Efficiencies of 35%+

    This hard reality required consideration of a different application forthe as turbine.

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    13/28

    Anatomy of A Jet Engine

    1 2 34 5 6

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    14/28

    Variation of Jet Technologies

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    15/28

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    16/28

    Ideal Jet Cycles

    T0

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Direction

    1

    6jTurboJet

    6f 7f

    6p 7p

    Turbofan

    Turboprop

    ~1970sAero Rejected Engines & Aero Derivative Engines

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    17/28

    Brayton Cycle

    1-2 Isentropic compression (in a compressor)

    2-3 Constant pressure heat addition

    3-4 Isentropic expansion (in a turbine)

    4-1 Constant pressure heat rejection

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    18/28

    pv & Ts diagrams

    SSSF Analysis of Control Volumes Making a Brayton Cycle:

    CV

    outin

    CV WgzV

    hmgzV

    hmQ

    22

    22

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    19/28

    CV

    outin

    wgzV

    hgzV

    hqCV

    22

    22

    Specific Energy equation of SSSF :

    No Change in potential energy across any CV

    CVoutin whhqCV ,0,0

    Calorically perfect and Ideal Gas as working fluid.

    CVoutpinp wTCTCqCV ,0,0

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    20/28

    )( 010212 TTchhw pcomp 12 : Specific work input :

    23 : Specific heat input :

    34 : Specific work output :

    41 : Specific heat rejection :

    )( 020323 TTchhq pin

    )( 040343 TTchhw ptur

    )( 010414 TTchhq pout

    Isentropic Processes:

    1

    01

    02

    01

    02

    T

    T

    p

    p 1

    04

    03

    04

    03

    T

    T

    p

    p

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    21/28

    01040203

    & pppp

    Constant Stagnation Pressure Processes:

    1

    04

    031

    01

    02

    04

    03

    01

    020

    T

    T

    T

    T

    p

    p

    p

    prp

    011

    00102

    TrTT p

    0

    03

    1

    0

    0304

    T

    r

    TT

    p

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    22/28

    )()(01020403

    01020403

    TTTTc

    hhhhwww

    p

    compturnet

    )1(1

    )()(

    001

    0

    003

    010103

    03

    TTc

    TTT

    Tcw

    p

    pnet

    )( 0103

    0103

    T

    TTTcw pnet

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    23/28

    )( 010030203 TTchhq pin

    )(

    0103

    01

    0

    0301003

    TTc

    TT

    TTc

    q

    w

    p

    p

    in

    net

    th

    h

    11111

    0

    0

    h

    p

    in

    netth

    rqw

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    24/28

    11

    10

    0

    h

    p

    th

    r

    010030

    001

    0

    030

    001

    0

    003

    1)1(

    )1(1

    TTcTT

    c

    TTcw

    pp

    pnet

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    25/28

    00.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0 10 20 30

    thh

    pr0

    Pressure Ratio Vs Efficiency

    P R ti V S ifi W k t t

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    26/28

    ne t

    pr0

    Pressure Ratio Vs Specific Workoutput

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    27/28

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    0 10 20 30Pressure ratio

    hth

    wneth%

  • 7/27/2019 mel712-29

    28/28

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    0 10 20 30Pressure ratio

    1872, Dr Franz Stikzes Paradox