meljun cortes automata theory (automata15)
DESCRIPTION
MELJUN CORTES Automata Theory (Automata15)TRANSCRIPT
(MSCS) Theory of Automata & Formal Languages
Turing Machines
Fall 2008
MELJUN P. CORTES, MBA,MPA,BSCS,ACSMELJUN P. CORTES, MBA,MPA,BSCS,ACS
MELJUN CORTESMELJUN CORTES
What is a computer?What is a computer?
A computer is a machine that manipulates data according to a list of instructions.
computerinput data
instructions(program)
output data
Are DFAs and PDAs Are DFAs and PDAs computers?computers?
0, / a
#, / , Z0 /
1, a / 0
1
0, 1
A computer is a machine that manipulates data according to a list of instructions.
yes no!
A short history of computing A short history of computing devicesdevices
Leibniz calculator (1670s)
slide rule (1600s)
abacus (Babylon 500BC, China 1300)
Babbage’s mechanical
engine(1820s)
A brief history of computing A brief history of computing devicesdevices
Z3 (Germany, 1941) ENIAC (Pennsylvania, 1945)
PC (1980) MacBook Air (2008)
Which of these are “real” Which of these are “real” computers?computers?
not programmable
programmable
Computation is universalComputation is universal
In principle, all these computers have the same problem-solving ability
C++ java python LISP
The Turing MachineThe Turing Machine
C++ java python LISP
Turing Machine
The Turing MachineThe Turing Machine
The Turing Machine is an The Turing Machine is an abstract automatonabstract automaton that is that ismeant to model meant to model any physically realizable computerany physically realizable computer Using any technology (mechanical, electrical, nano, bio)Using any technology (mechanical, electrical, nano, bio) Under any physical laws (gravity, quantum, E&M)Under any physical laws (gravity, quantum, E&M) At any scale (human, quantum, cosmological)At any scale (human, quantum, cosmological)
How come there is How come there is one model one model that can capture allthat can capture allthese vastly different settings?these vastly different settings?
Why do we need an abstract model of a computer?Why do we need an abstract model of a computer?
Computation and mathematical Computation and mathematical proofsproofs
Prove that...Prove that...√2 is irrational.
The equation xn + yn = zn, n ≥ 2has no integer solutions.
G = (L, R) has a perfect matching iff |(S)| ≥ |S| for every L ⊆ S.
L ⊆ {1}* is regular iff L = L0 ∪ Lq1,r ∪ ... ∪ Lqk,r
The language 0n1n is not regular.
Math is hard, let’s go shopping!
(Archimedes’ Theorem)
(Fermat-Wiles Theorem)
(Hall’s Theorem)
Hilbert’s list of 23 problemsHilbert’s list of 23 problems
Leading mathematician in the 1900sLeading mathematician in the 1900s
At the 1900 International CongressAt the 1900 International Congressof Mathematicians, proposed a list ofof Mathematicians, proposed a list of23 problems for the 2023 problems for the 20thth century century
Hilbert’s 10Hilbert’s 10thth problem: problem:
David Hilbert(1862-1943)
Find a method for telling if an equation like xyz – 3xy + 6xz + 2 = 0 has integer solutions
Automated theorem-provingAutomated theorem-proving
computerinput data
instructions
output
√2 is irration
al.
The equation xn + yn = zn, n ≥ 2has no integer solutions.
G = (L, R) has a perfect matching
iff |(S)| ≥ |S| for every L ⊆ S.The language 0 n1 n
is not regular.
check ifthey are
true!
xyz – 3xy + 6xz +
2 = 0 has integer solutions.
true / false
Automated theorem provingAutomated theorem proving
How could automated theorem proving work?How could automated theorem proving work?
Let’s look at a typical proof:Let’s look at a typical proof:
√2 is irrational.
Assume not.Then √2 = m/n.Then m2 = 2n2
But m2 has an even number of prime factors and 2n2 has an odd number of prime factors.Contradiction.
Theorem:
Proof:
First idea of automated theorem First idea of automated theorem provingproving
Checking that a proof is correct is much easier than Checking that a proof is correct is much easier than coming up with the proofcoming up with the proof
➀
Proof:
... if we write out the proof in sufficient detail
√2 = m/n both sides ×n(√2)n = m square
(√2)2n2 = m2def of sqrt
2n2 = m2
First idea of automated theorem First idea of automated theorem provingproving
Checking that a proof is correct is much Checking that a proof is correct is much easier than easier than coming up with the proofcoming up with the proof
In principle this is uncontroversialIn principle this is uncontroversial In practice, it is hard to do because writing In practice, it is hard to do because writing
proofs inproofs indetail sometimes requires a lot of workdetail sometimes requires a lot of work
➀
A proof, if written out in sufficient detail, canbe checked mechanically
Second idea of automated Second idea of automated theorem provingtheorem proving
To find if statement is true, why don’t we try To find if statement is true, why don’t we try allallpossible proofspossible proofs
After all, a proof is just After all, a proof is just a sequence of symbols a sequence of symbols (over (over alphabet alphabet {0, 1, 2, {0, 1, 2, mm, , nn, , √, √, 22, etc.}, etc.}))
If statement is true, it has a proof of If statement is true, it has a proof of finite length, say finite length, say kk
To find it, let’s just try To find it, let’s just try all possible all possible proofsproofs of length of length 11, , 22, up to , up to kk
➁
√2 = m/n(√2)n = m
(√2)2n2 = m2
2n2 = m2
...
Königsberg, 1930Königsberg, 1930
David Hilbert(1862-1943)
Kurt Gödel(1906-1978)
September 8: Hilbert gives a famous lecture“Logic and the understanding of nature”
Königsberg, 1930Königsberg, 1930
David Hilbert(1862-1943)
Kurt Gödel(1906-1978)
John von Neumann(1903-1957)
I reached the conclusion that in any reasonable formal system in which provability in it can be expressed as a property of certain sentences, there must be propositions which are undecidable in it.
It is all over!
What did Gödel say?What did Gödel say?
To find if statement is true, why don’t we try To find if statement is true, why don’t we try allallpossible proofspossible proofs
After all, a proof is just After all, a proof is just a sequence of symbols a sequence of symbols (over (over alphabet alphabet {0, 1, 2, {0, 1, 2, mm, , nn, , √, √, 22, etc.}, etc.}))
If statement is true, it has a proof of If statement is true, it has a proof of finite length, say finite length, say kk
To find it, let’s just try To find it, let’s just try all possible all possible proofsproofs of length of length 11, , 22, up to , up to kk
➁
NO!
Gödel’s incompleteness Gödel’s incompleteness theoremtheorem
Some mathematical statementsare true but not provable.
What are they?
Example of incompletenessExample of incompleteness
Recall Hilbert’s 10Recall Hilbert’s 10thth problem: problem:
Matyashievich showed in 1970 that there Matyashievich showed in 1970 that there exists aexists apolynomial polynomial pp such that such that
Find a method for telling if an equation like xyz – 3xy + 6xz + 2 = 0 has integer solutions
p(x1, ..., xk) = 0 has no integer solutions, butthis cannot be proved
Another example of Another example of incompletenessincompleteness
Recall Recall ambiguousambiguous context free grammars context free grammars
We did exercises of the typeWe did exercises of the type
“Show that “Show that GG is ambiguous” is ambiguous”
However there exists a CFG However there exists a CFG GG such that such thatG is unambiguous, but this cannot be proved
Gödel’s incompleteness Gödel’s incompleteness theoremtheorem
Some mathematical statementsare true but not provable.
What does this have to do with computer science?
The father of modern computer The father of modern computer sciencescienceInvented the Invented the Turing TestTuring Test to tell to tellhumans and computers aparthumans and computers apart
Broke German encryption codesBroke German encryption codesduring World War IIduring World War II
The The Turing AwardTuring Award is the “Nobel is the “Nobelprize of Computer Science”prize of Computer Science”Alan Turing
(1912-1954)
“On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem”
1936:
Turing’s angle on Turing’s angle on incompletenessincompleteness
computer
input data
instructionsoutput
check if true!
true / false
mathematical statement
Gödel’s theorem says that a computer cannot determine the truth of mathematical statements
But there are many other things!
Computer program analysisComputer program analysispublic static void main(String args[]) { System.out.println("Hello World!"); }
What does this program do?
How about this one?
public static void main(String args[]) { int i = 0; for (j = 1; j < 10; j++) { i += j; if (i == 28) { System.out.println("Hello World!"); } } }
Computers cannot analyze Computers cannot analyze programs!programs!
computer
input data
instructionsoutput
does it printHello, world!
java program
The essence of Gödel’s theorem is thatcomputers cannot analyze computer programs
How do you argue things like How do you argue things like that?that?
To argue what computers cannot do,we need to have a precise definitionof what a computer is.
“On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem”
1936:
Section 1. Computing Machines
Turing MachinesTuring Machines
state control
…
A Turing Machine is a finite automaton with a A Turing Machine is a finite automaton with a two-way accesstwo-way access to an to an infinite tapeinfinite tape
Initially, the first few cells contain the input, and the Initially, the first few cells contain the input, and the other cells are blankother cells are blank
infinite tape
0 1 0
input
Turing MachinesTuring Machines
state control
…
At each point in the computation, the machine seesAt each point in the computation, the machine seesits current state and the symbol at the headits current state and the symbol at the head
It can It can replace the symbol replace the symbol on the tape, on the tape, change change statestate,,and and move the headmove the head left or right left or right
0 1 a 0
head
ExampleExample
…0 1 a 0q1 q2
a/bL
Replace a with b, and move head left
current state
…0 1 b 0q1 q2
a/bL
current state
Formal DefinitionFormal Definition
A Turing Machine is A Turing Machine is (Q, (Q, ,, , , , q, q00, q, qaccacc, q, qrejrej)):: QQ is a finite set of is a finite set of statesstates;; is the is the input alphabetinput alphabet;; is the is the tape alphabettape alphabet ( ( ) including the ) including the blank symbol blank symbol ☐☐ qq00 in in QQ is the is the initial stateinitial state;;
qqaccacc, q, qrejrej inin Q Q are the are the acceptingaccepting and and rejecting staterejecting state;; is the transition functionis the transition function
: (Q – {qacc, qrej}) → Q {L, R}
Turing Machines are deterministic
Language of a Turing MachineLanguage of a Turing Machine
The The language recognized by a TM language recognized by a TM is the set of all is the set of all inputs that make it reach inputs that make it reach qqaccacc
Something strange can happen in a Turing Machine:Something strange can happen in a Turing Machine:
q0
qacc
qrej
= {0, 1}
input: ☐/☐R
0/0R
1/1RThis machinenever halts
Looping behaviorLooping behavior
Inputs can be divided into three types:Inputs can be divided into three types: 1. Reach the state 1. Reach the state qqaccacc and halt and halt
2. Reach the state 2. Reach the state qqrejrej and halt and halt 3. Loop forever3. Loop forever
The language recognized by a TM = type The language recognized by a TM = type 1 inputs1 inputs
The Church-Turing ThesisThe Church-Turing Thesis
Turing Machinequantum computing
DNA computing
cosmic computing
The Church-Turing ThesisThe Church-Turing Thesis
“On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem”
1936:
Section 9. The extent of the computable numbers
All arguments [for the CT Thesis] which can be given are bound to be, fundamentally, appeals to intuition, and for this reason rather unsatisfactory mathematically. The arguments which I shall use are of three kinds: 1. A direct appeal to intuition 2. A proof of the equivalence of two definitions (In case the new definition has greater intuitive appeal) 3. Giving examples of large classes of numbers which are computable.