FOOT – PREVENTIVI 2019Maria Giuseppina Bisogni

Universita’ e INFN Pisa

INFN Pisa 3/7/2018

2

FOOT IN PILLSBologna, LNF, Milano, Napoli, Perugia, Pisa, Roma1, Roma2, Torino, Trento (TIFPA)

CNAO, Strasbourg, GSI, Aachen, Nagoya

People (2018): 72 research/techn., 33.7 FTE

Data taking 2018-2021@ GSI, Heidelberg, CNAO

Resp. Nazionale Vincenzo Patera, UNI Sapienza and INFN Roma 1

3

FOOT DETECTOR

ü Start Counter = thin plastic scintillator

ü Beam Monitor = drift chamberü Vertex detector & Intermediate Tracker = monolithic

silicon pixel detector

ü Large tracker = silicon strip detectorü DE/TOF Detector = plastic scintillator

ü Calorimeter = BGO crystal calorimeter

Expected target fragmentation performances:σp/p ~4-5%σTOF ~ 100 psσEkin/Ekin ~ 1-2%σDE ~ 2%

measurements of TOF, P, Ekin, DE

Dipole magnets

Length < 2.5 metersBM

SC

Pixel

DE/TOF

BGOCalo

MSD

target

Summary of the 2018 activities

December January February March April May June

CNAO Test Beam

New Bars and SiPMs arrived

Results with 20 cm barsshown at BormioMeeting

First TOF/dEdxpaper submitted at NIM-A

Results and simulationsshown at PisaMeeting

End of preliminary analysis:50 ps CTR, 6% En. Res.

Validation of opt. trans. simulations

Readapted form Matteo Morrocchi FOOT meeting - Isola d’Elba 04-05/06/2018

CNAO Test Beam

DE/TOF TEST @ CNAO PROTON & 12C BEAM• Tested 2 EJ-200 Scintillator

bars 20 x 3 x 400 mm3

• readout by 2 parallel of 2 SiPMpowered in series (Hamamatsu SiPM 25 um cell size)

• readout by 4 SiPMs powered in series (AvanSiD 40 um cell size)

• WaveDAQ from MEG experiment

Matteo Morrocchi, Luca Galli, Patrizia De Maria

11

¢ Motivation: study energy resolution and fragmentation

¢ as function of Z:

¢ as function of bar thickness:

¢ as function of energy:

à To compare with measurements and to decide on optimal thickness

¢ Methods/materials:

¢ FOOT software

¢ FLUKA code

¢ Made automatized framework to simulate different Z, A, E, z, scintthickness, etc …

¢ Performed many simulations:

¢ 6 (thicknesses: 2,3,4,5,6, 7 mm)

¢ 8 energy values: 100, 120, 140,

160, 180, 200, 350, 500, 750 MeV

¢ 8 Z-values

à TOTAL: 6x8x8=384 simulations,

each only 1000 ev à 300 Gb

¢ ROOT for analysis

Simulations Aafke Kraan

Fragmentation studies

12

Fragmentation vs Z

Z=2, A=4

0 2 4 6 8d [mm]

0123456789

10

Frag

men

tatio

n pr

obab

ility

[%] Z=2, A=4 Z=8, A=16

0 2 4 6 8d [mm]

0123456789

10

Frag

men

tatio

n pr

obab

ility

[%] Z=8, A=16

Fragmentation vs thickness

Z=6, A=12, 3 mm bar

0 200 400 600 800 [MeV]kinE

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Fr

agm

enta

tion

prob

abilit

yZ=6, A=12, 3 mm bar

Fragmentationvs energy

Example plots: energy resolution

Landau shape!

Gaussian shape!

Z=1, A=1, 200 MeV/u

0 2 4 6d [mm]

00.020.040.060.08

0.10.120.140.160.18

0.20.22

[MeV

]de

pos

of E

s

Z=1, A=1, 200 MeV/u

Z=6, A=12, 200 MeV/u

0 2 4 6d [mm]

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

[MeV

]de

pos

of E

s

Z=6, A=12, 200 MeV/u Z=6, A=12, 200 MeV/u

0 2 4 6d [mm]

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

depo

s/m

u of

Es

Z=6, A=12, 200 MeV/u

Z=1, A=1, 200 MeV/u

0 2 4 6d [mm]

00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.09

depo

s/m

u of

Es

Z=1, A=1, 200 MeV/u

• Z=1, A=1: σ/μ varies between 9% (2 mm) and 7% (6 mm), weak dependence on d• Z=6, A=12: σ/μ varies from 2.5% (d=2 mm) to 1.5% (d=6 mm): resolution decreases

with thickness d

Plane 1Plane 2

Plane 1Plane 2

Plane 1Plane 2

Plane 1Plane 2

13

Simulation Esther Ciarrocchi

SiPMSiPM

Black absorber

Reflector

Primary beam

Scintillation photon

SiPMSiPM

Optical photons Black absorberReflector

Nph,det = Nph, gen. PDE . εgeom,transport

Nph, gen = ΔE . Y ~10% per side @ detector center

(Geant4)

~23% for Hamamatsu

3x3mm2 SiPM104 ph/MeV FLUKA

Matlabl Given nr. of emitted photonsl EJ212 emission spectruml HAM/ASD spectral PDEl Probability of a photon of given energy to be detected

Optical attenuation - Hamamatsu

R = bar reflection coefficient

Absolute number of photons

l Only Hamamatsul Simulation does not account for noise factorsl High uncertainty on gain used to determine exp nr of photons

TELAIO

Andrea Moggi

Analisi sollecitazione

F1 25,27 Hz

F2 70,26 Hz

F3 88,22 Hz

ACTIVITIES 2019

¢ Second half 2018

¢ Data analysis test beam 16/6/2018

¢ Simulations (physics and transport)

¢ Mechanical structure construction

¢ Bars, SiPMs, PCBs procurement¢ Assembly (?)

¢ Activity 2019¢ Assembly and test first layer

¢ Calibration

¢ Bars, SiPMs, PCBs procurement 2° layer

¢ Assembly and test 2° layer

¢ Calibration18

19

RICHIESTE missioni

viaggio diaria persone giorni turni/meetings

cnao 100 100 4 2 2 2400gsi 400 100 4 15 1 7600Meeting tecnici 100 100 2 1 10 4000conferenze 1000 100 1 5 3 4500

coll meeting 150 100 5 3 2 4500totale 23000

trasporti

gsi 2000

consumocosto unit quantita

sipm 35 200 7000scintillatore 200 24 5000wavedaq 4 6000materiali (pcb, cavi, connettori, profilati, termometri) 13000totale 28000

inventariomovimentazione det 12000pc da apparato 2000totale 14000

gran total 70000

20

PERSONE E RICHIESTE AI SERVIZISi richiede inoltre ilsupporto del

¢ servizio elettronico:

0.1 FTE per sviluppoibridi FE del DE/TOF¢ Servizio AT:

0.1 FTE epr incollaggioSiPMs

¢ Servizioprogettazionemeccanica:

0.4 FTE per meccanicaesperimento

¢ Officina meccanica: 0.2 FTE realizzazionetelaio e supporti

Posizione FOOT (%)

N. Belcari PA 40

M.G. Bisogni PA 60

P. Carra Dott 50

N. Camarlinghi RTDa 50

E. Ciarrocchi Ass 100

L. Galli Ric- INFN 20

A. Kraan Ric-INFN 50

M. Morrocchi Ass. 50

A. Moggi Tecn INFN 20

F. Raffaelli Tecn INFN 20

V. Rosso PA 20

G. Sportelli RTDb 50

TOTALE FTE 4.6

FOOT MILESTONES IN 2018

Milestone Date

test of the MSD with DAMPE electronics 30-09-2018 Test of the time resolution on 12C beam of TOF/DE prototype with WaveDream board 30-10-2018

Test of the INNER tracker ladder with MIMOSA 28 (50 µm) thick at BTF 15-11-2018

Complete the production of the ECC for FOOT 15-06-2018

Test of the version 0 for the reconstruction code on MC, included the tracking in realistic magnetic field

20-06-2018

Final choice of the BGO procurement 30-09-2018 21

22

Name Conference W here W hen W hat SezMorrocchi Bormio 2018 Bormio (Ita) 1/18 Talk Pi

Valle S.M. Int. work Multi facets of Eos-Clust

LNS Catania(Ita) 5/18 Talk Mi

Cerello PTCOG57 Cincinnati, US 5/18 Poster To

Biondi 14th Nordic Meet Nuclear Phys Longyearbyen,Norway 5/18 Talk Bo

Patera biophysics-seminar GSI, Darmstaadt 5/18 Seminar Roma1Silvestre G. Pisa meeting Elba 6/18 Poster Pg

Ciarrocchi E. Pisa meeting Elba 6/18 Poster Pi

Montesi Rad 2018 Ohrid (Macedonia) 6/18 Talk Na

Marafini M. Nuclear React Mechanism NRM Varenna (Ita) 6/18 Talk Roma1Traini G. Nuclear Photonics 2018 Brasov (Romania) 6/18 Poster Roma1

Yun NSP2018 Trabzon (Turkey) 9/18

Spighi EUNPC 2018 Europ Nucl Phys Conf

Bologna 9/18 Talk Bo

Cerello CNR18 Berkeley, United States 9/18 ToSIRR 2018 Rome, Italy 9/18

VERTEX 2018 Chennai, India 10/18

Morone C. Incontri di Fisica Nucleare Catania 11/18 talk Roma2

Franchini Nuclear and Plasma Physics London 11/18 Talk BoQNP2018 Tzukuba, Japan 11/18NN2018 Nucleus–NucleuCollision

Saitama, Japan 12/18

Before end of 2018,other 4-5 Talks q Talks (done + abstract accepted): 8q Poster: 4q Seminar: 1

23

Paper submitted NIMA

Pisa Group:

“Development and characterization of a ΔE-TOF

detector prototype for the FOOT experiment”

NIMA-D-18-00219

Signed by the whole collaboration

Submitted June 25 2018

E. Ciarrocchi et al., proceedings Pisa Meeting 2018

24

FOOT PHYSICS PROGRAM

Phys Beam Target Energy(MeV/u)

Inv/direct

Target Frag. PT 12C C, C2H4 200 inv

Target Frag. PT 16O C, C2H4 200 inv

Beam Frag. PT 12C C, C2H4, PMMA 350 dir

Beam Frag. PT 16O C, C2H4, PMMA 400 dir

Beam Frag. PT 4He C, C2H4, PMMA 250 dir

Rad. Prot.space 4He C, C2H4, PMMA 700 dir

Rad. Prot.space 12C C, C2H4, PMMA 700 dir

Rad. Prot.space 16O C, C2H4, PMMA 700 dir

Method of cross section difference is crucial to obtain X section on pure elements: • Using C, C2H4 è cross sections on C and H • Using C, C2H4, PMMA è cross sections on C, O and H

These are specific measurements related with PT & RPS. But we are open to suggestions!!!

PMMA is a combination

of C,O,H.