cvdenergy.jpcvdenergy.jp/firefly/01fireflyusa.pdf · firefly “microcell carbon foam technology...
TRANSCRIPT
• Genesis of Firefly Technology
• About Firefly Technology
• Value for the customers
• US battery Market Potential
• Competitive Landscape
• About Firefly International Energy Inc
• Our Plan
Presentation Roadmap
• Firefly’s revolutionary battery technology was born in the Research and Development laboratory of Caterpillar, Inc., a world-renowned manufacturer of heavy equipment
• Caterpillar has long been a consumer of batteries for its many heavy equipment products. These, by their very nature, put a severe strain on batteries. Hot and cold extreme temperatures, severe vibration, and prolonged periods of disuse are standard operating conditions for heavy equipment batteries.
• With a new corporate focus on improving batteries, CAT electronics turned the issue over to their R&D arm.
Future : Lead-Carbon = Firefly (Advanced Lead- Acid Battery)
• Firefly has patented ‘Microcell Carbon Foam Technology’, which allowed exploitation of existing lead-acid chemistry to compete head-on with other advanced battery technologies
• Through material innovation, Firefly succeeded to offer Higher Efficiency & Cycle life which brings down the total cost of ownership
• Firefly's goal is to manufacture the lowest-cost-of-ownership, energy-storage systems in the world
• This revolutionary technology was invented by Mr Kurt Kelly. He was able to configure the material in such a way that it thrived in the harsh lead acid chemistry environment
Mr. Kurt Kelley
Firefly “Microcell Carbon Foam Technology ” (Advanced Lead Acid Batteries)
Lead Acid – Battery Problems
Corrosion Sulfation Shedding
Use of Carbon
as envisaged by Experts
Cost Effective Solution
Kurt is a geologist, by training. He wanted to use carbon for solving the problems of lead acid
batteries in 1998. He found that the Pb acid battery literature is discussing the same in detail.
Microcell Carbon Foam Technology:
• Disruptive processes and performance
• Battery design capable of using multiple chemistries
• Utilizing lead-acid chemistry presents greatest gains
• Advanced battery performance for lead-acid costs
• Insensitive to state-of-charge
Firefly Technology
From decades-long use of Lead Plates with limited Surface Area…. 30% - 40% Utilization
…To Micro Cellular-based Batteries with 2000x Surface Area…90% Utilization
Firefly’s “Revolutionary” Product
Firefly battery get’s better life
From decades-long use of lead plates with limited surface areas…. Low Utilization
To micro-cellular-based Foam plates with much greater surface areas… Exceptional Utilization
• Infrared images snapped at the end of a 5C (12 minute) discharge of both a Firefly 3D cell and a traditional cell.
• More uniform temperature distribution of the 3D cell o = uniform current density distribution
o = higher overall active material utilization
• More uniform temperature distribution will minimize o localized positive grid corrosion (PCL1)
o localized positive active material wearout (PCL2)
Positiv
e P
late
s
Negativ
e P
late
s
Traditional Cell Firefly 3D Cell
12
Internal testing
FF battery has better heat transfer
Firefly “Microcell Carbon Foam Technology ” (Advanced Lead Acid Batteries)
Quantum Leap in Performance
• The Solution – Firefly: Microcell Carbon Foam Battery • Increased power density and specific energy over traditional Pb Acid battery
• 2-3x recharge rate
• 2-3x the calendar life expectancy of Pb Acid Battery
• 2-3 times cycle life expectancy of Pb Acid Battery
• Manufactured cost equivalent to premium lead acid
• New Combination of Off the Shelf Materials o Up to 12-15% reduction of lead
o Environmentally safe
• Fits into existing lead acid battery infrastructure o Manufacturing Production
o Customer use
o End of life recycling
Intellectual Property and Awards
• Eight (8) U.S. & Other Patents 23 Patent Applications filed
• Patented in US, India, China, Korea, Russia, Brazil, Japan and UK
– Enhanced lead acid battery using commercially viable modifications to the existing materials. Could use existing manufacturing base (evolutionary)
– New battery concept using novel materials to improve performance. Novel materials revolutionize battery performance, minor change in manufacturing capability (revolutionary)
Evolution of LA Battery Technology – In brief
• Flooded Lead Acid Battery – 1859 (Gaston Plante)
• Sealed Battery – Low maintenance – early 1900's
• VRLA (Valve Regulated Lead Acid) Battery , AGM –
1972 (Gates Corporation)
• VRLA Battery , Gel – 1983 (Sonneschien)
• VRLA Battery, Carbon Foam Technology – 2000
(Firefly International Energy LLc)
Firefly “Microcell Carbon Foam Technology ”
(Advanced Lead Acid Batteries)
Comparison Li ion Carbon Foam Pb acid batteries (SMF)
Performance 3C 8C 5C
Life (80% DOD) 1000 cycles* 1000 cycles* 300 cycles
Discharging Temp Range -10°C to 60°C -40°C to 60°C -20°C to 60°C
Charging Temp Range 0°C to 45°C -40°C to 60°C -15°C to 50°C
Self-Discharge very low 0.15% per day 0.3% per day
PSOC No effect on Life No effect on Life Affects the battery life
Serviceability Maintenance free Maintenance free Maintenance free
Standards NA SAE J2185 & BCI : 05 NA
Cost per kW H in USD 600-650 275 150
* with BMS
Firefly’s Microcell Carbon Foam technology offers
“Higher Efficiency, High shelf life at Lowest-cost-of-ownership”
Item 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Secondary Battery Demand 5190 6495 8570 11300 14550
Lead-Acid 3920 4650 5400 7000 8950
Rechargeable Lithium 420 875 1880 2845 4020
Nickel-Metal Hydride 220 480 740 810 840
Nickel-Cadmium 465 250 220 195 160
− net imports 1107 1999 3020 3820 4920
Secondary Battery Shipments 4083 4496 5550 7480 9630
SECONDARY BATTERY SUPPLY & DEMAND 2000 – 2020 - USA
Source: The Freedonia Group, Inc.
Values in USD million
LEAD-ACID BATTERY SUPPLY & DEMAND 2000 – 2020 - USA
Item 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Lead-Acid Battery Demand 3920 4650 5400 7000 8950
Starting/Lighting/Ignition 3200 3700 4350 5670 7250
Non-SLI 720 950 1050 1330 1700
+ net exports -14 -347 -140 -210 -330
Lead-Acid Battery Shipments 3906 4303 5260 6790 8620
Source: The Freedonia Group, Inc.
Values in USD million
NON-SLI LEAD-ACID BATTERY DEMAND (million dollars) 2000 – 2020 - USA
Source: The Freedonia Group, Inc.
Item 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Non-SLI Lead-Acid Battery Demand 720 950 1050 1330 1700
Motive Power 392 583 670 935 1245
Stationary & Other Types 328 367 380 395 455
Values in USD million
Competitive Landscape – Lead Acid
EnerSys –a well established company with a good R&D staff provides primarily backup – power for emergency use and power applications. Deep-cycling is not strength of their technology
C&D Technologies – A well established company that excels in good - quality, large, storage batteries. C&D uses a more traditional battery design than EnerSys, which has better deep – cycle capability. The technology is still limited by the traditional design and failure modes. Lately, they are offering PSOC operating battery using carbon additives mainly for ISS
Exide – Exide is a well established company, which is recently trying to rebuild its R&D capability. The battery designs are traditional PbA and, while offering a wide range of products, are average performers at best. For PSOC operation, Carbon Additives Batteries are being offered.
East Penn – A well established company with probably the best R&D and manufacturing quality in the group. EP batteries consistently outperform the competition in our testing. They have a wide selection of batteries, but do not intensely compete well in the large deep-cycle arena. Expect new products from this company that are well designed for applications. “Ultra Battery” is offered for mainly HEV/Frequency Stabilization application.
Trojan Battery – Trojan is best known for their deep –cycle batteries for golf carts and small utility EVs. An excellent product and quality construction. Trojan does not compete in batteries over about 1 kWh, in general.
Peoria Police – Utilizes a standalone battery system designed and built by FIE to power a
DVR system and up to 10 cameras. The truck is left unattended for up to 10 days
recording video surveillance in all elements.
Tata Motors – Currently is testing the FIE Oasis battery in a 72 volt configuration for their
hybrid electric car. Tata is the largest auto manufacturer in India.
Herzog – A railway maintenance company, their current batteries do not survive the abuse
and neglect of a rail car. Partial state of charges and poor charging has decimated
competitor’s batteries.
HPEV – Currently are converting utility trucks into hybrid electric vehicles for the mining
industry. There need for a robust, safe and quality battery has brought them to FIE.
Currently they are installing 30 Oasis batteries in series per truck.
Two defense contractors are using Firefly batteries for tough application conditions and the
likely future numbers are high. FF Batteries are approved by Dept of Defense
Existing Customers
The Company currently is focusing on the following end
market segments:
• Telecommunications
• Renewable Energy
• Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)
• Electric/Hybrid Vehicles
• Grid Scale Energy Storage for distributed generation
• Mass Transit and Commercial Trucking
• Military and Municipal Applications
• RV/Boat Recreational needs
Target Market Segments
• With coming in of new regulations, steep rise in energy demand and advent of advanced lead acid batteries multiple new applications are coming up for secondary batteries like:
• Intermittent Start and Stop (ISS)
• Energy storage for peak shaving/ frequency stabilization/ voltage regulation BESS
• Energy storage from non-conventional sources BESS
• EV/PHEV – For low cost vehicles
• Underground Mining/ High Power Motive Equipment like Electric Locomotives
• Renewed Emphasis on Island Operation of Strategic Installations
• OFF GRID Island Operation of Renewable Energy Sources
• Recent study by IHS Research projects, World Solar storage market set to explode to US$19 billion in 2017
(http://solarquarter.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=303:solar-storage-market-set-to-explode-to-us-19-billion-in-2017-says-ihs)
Potential Market Segments
• Mr. Mukesh Bhandari – Director, CEO
• Mr. Rajendra Patel- Director, Vice- President
• Mr. Kurtis C. Kelley – Chief Technology Officer
• Mr. Mat Stone – Manufacturing Manager
• Mr. Rob MacDuff - Testing Manager
Management Team
The company has an Advisory board comprising of leading industry professionals and opinion makers, the names are as under:
• Mr. Mike Kepros
• Dr. Arvind Parthasarathy
• Mr. Garth Corey
• Dr. Nasser Kutkut
• Mr. Kurtis Kelley
• Mr. Mukesh Bhandari
Advisory Board
2003 - 2009 2010 - Present
Corporate
2003
Firefly Energy, Inc. (FFE) is established as a spin-off from
CATERPILLAR’S R&D
2007
FFE’s technology is recognized for major industry awards
from Wall Street Journal Technology Innovation and R&D
100
2008
FFE receives $15 million total funding (including earning a
$2 million grant from the US military)
2009
FFE’s Oasis battery undergoes benchmark testing within
Peoria (IL) public buses (CityLink)
2010
Firefly International Energy Co. (FIE) acquires assets
of Firefly Energy from Bankruptcy Estate
Re-launches new corporate website
(www.fireflyenergy.com)
2011
FIE brings production of carbon foam in-house.
Undertakes development to increase manufacturing
quality substantially and reduce cost by 70%.
2012
Begins inhouse manufacturing of Group 31 batteries
on small scale and reduce cost by 33%
2013
Finished development of Computer aided temperature
controlled formation process, leading to better
Ampere hour delivery
Employees 0 - 50 10
Locations
Peoria, IL
Peoria, IL
Additional operational center in India
Revenue $(MM)
Pre-Revenue
2011 = N/A
2012 = $1.67
2013 = $1.33
Markets USA USA, Canada, India, Australia
Firefly: Then and now