mobile tv mike short vice president, research & development - group technology, o2 plc...
TRANSCRIPT
Mobile TV
Mike Short
Vice President, Research & Development - Group Technology , O2 plc
Transmission network
End-to-end system
Content
Research data
Identify/recruit 375 customers who reside and ‘roam’ in trial area
Supply handsets
Provide customer care
Research data
ARQIVA O2
Roles of Arqiva and O2
Commercial Confidential
Korea – Commercial Service– 300K subscribers forecast to grow to 6.6M by 2010 –
TU Media
USA– Spectrum allocated for two networks - commercial services in 2006
Italy– Commercial service 2007, TIM and Mediaset
Finland– License tender issued by Finnish Government to be awarded in early 2006
Worldwide Developments
Commercial Confidential
Pre-Trial research showed strong consumer interest - 56% said good/really good idea
23% said they would take up service within 12 months
Mobile phones are no longer just “phones”
– Creating content - cameras– Being entertained – games, music, tv– Multimedia devices
UK market for mobile content was £600m (2005)
Global Interest – evidenced by many trials worldwide and commercial service announcements (20+)
By 2010 there will be 3 billion users of ‘mobile devices’ and a good proportion with TV viewers [125millions (Informa); 250millions (ABI)]
Why trial Mobile Broadcast TV?
Recruitment
Network Build Testing
Trial
Triallist rollout29/30th Sept
Launch event 22nd Sept
Testing & recruitmentbegan 5th Sept
Mid-term update early 2006
Trial endSpring2006
Results Spring 2006
Analysis
Began May
Timeline – Mid-term update
One or Two-way radio
Media Rich Interactive Services– Web-links– Interactive content– Mobile Commerce
Regional Services or Targetted Advertising
More than 16 channels or “made for mobile” content
Advanced features such as ‘Catch-up TV’ and ‘See Me TV’
But … we also knew what the cellular demand was
This could all add up to a ‘Personal TV’ experience
What we couldn’t trial
Participating channels
Usage of service– Where, when, how often, how long
TV service’s appeal & acceptance– Number & type of channels
Adequacy of the trial services– Quality (picture and sound), reliability, coverage, enhancements
Take-up intentions– Likelihood and any barriers
Value and payment preferences– Explore subscription/pay as you go/pay per view etc
Market research
CableTV
15%
Current TV Service Received of Triallists
Commercial Confidential
5%
27%
18%
14%
4%
28%
4%
1 hour or less 2 hours 3 hours 4 hours5 hours 6 hours 7 hours+
Standard Analogue
32%
FreeviewReceiver
22%
SatelliteTV
32%
Average TV Viewing: 3.4 hours a day
Usage Levels – How Much (%)
Weekly Viewing
Over 3 hours per week
Viewing Durations
Average 23 minutes per session
Wide range of viewing durations
Includes short and long-form programmes
9
15
26 26
3
13
2
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1-5 mins 6-10 mins 11-20mins
21-30mins
31-40mins
41-60mins
61-90mins
90+ mins
*How long on average do you watch the mobile tv service at any one time?
Usage Levels – Where (%)
36
2321
71 2 1 3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Home At work/uni
Bus Car Wait forothers
Pub On street Bus stop
Month 2
*Q Where do you use the service most often (%)?
Usage Levels – Time of Day
18%
10%
15%
7%9%
12%3% 2%
24%
Before 9am 9am - 12pm 12pm - 2pm2pm - 4pm 4pm - 6pm 6pm - 8pm8pm - 10pm 10pm - midnight Midnight - 6am
9am
6 pm
*Q When do you use the service most often?
Usage Levels – Time of Day
Viewing Peaks
Breakfast/Morning Commute
Lunchtime
Early Evening
*At what time of day do you watch the mobile tv service most often?
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
24:00:0
0
FinPilot Oxford T ria l
Category Champions (%)
16 channel line-up
Proving very popular
Evidenced by 83% satisfaction level
Channel Branding Important
‘Made for Mobile’ content needs more development
Most Popular Genres
News, Soaps, Music, Docs, Sports
Lunchbreak - favourite daytime soaps
44
36
32
25 25 24 22
16 15
11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
News Soaps Music Docs OtherSports
Movies Comedy Football Childrens Drama
Programmes suitable to watch
Other Feedback
High Satisfaction Levels
83% satisfied or better with the service
Satisfaction Drivers
Choice of channels
High Picture and Sound Quality
Electronic Services Guide (ESG)
High Take-up Intentions
76% of triallists would take up service within 12 months at an acceptable price
This demonstrates that the majority of triallists are prepared to pay for a service
Other Feedback
Consumers also interested in:
Digital radio channels
PVR type functionality
Interactive services
Web links to broadcaster/other content
Number of Channels
16 channels is felt to be adequate choice
Next Steps
Trial Results
Release more results as the trial progresses
Government
Keep Government informed of our findings
Make spectrum issues clear to Government
Delivery partnership
Explore collaborative UK cross-industry co-operation
Conclusions
High satisfaction and clear consumer demand
Home usage has exceeded our expectations
Channel choice is a clear driver of usage
Today channel brands offer the strongest category champions
‘Mobile TV’ alone does not convey the demand we have seen in Oxford so far
‘Personal TV’ will take us beyond broadcasting as we know it today