monteiro1997.pdf

Upload: mohamedraahim

Post on 06-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    1/7

     

    Pergamon

    PH: 50273-1223(97)00670-7

    Wal

    Sci.

    T.ch. Vol. 36,

    No.

    II ,

    pp. 61-67,

    1997.

    C 1997 IAWQ. Published by Elsevier Science Lid

    Prinled in Great Britain.

    0273-1223/97 S

    l7-llO

    +0'00

    THE

    INFLUENCE OF THE ANAEROBIC

    DIGESTION PROCESS ON

    THE

    SEWAGE

    SLUDGES RHEOLOGICAL

    BEHAVIOUR

    Paulo Santos Monteiro

    IHRH

      lnstituto

    de Hidrliulica

    e Recursos Hidricos

    Faculdade de Engenharia da

    Universidade do

    Porto

    Rua

    des

    Bragas

    4099

    Porto

    Codex

    Portugal

    ABSTRACT

    During the anaerobic digestion process, a significant part of the organic mailer in sewage sludge is

    decomposed to form other organic and inorganic compounds in dissolved form. This biological

    transformation of a substantial part of the organic solids has, cenainly, a strong influence on the rheological

    characteristics of the sludge. In this paper a test racility was set up to simulale sewage sludge digestion and

    periodic observalions on the evolution of the sludge characteristics were carried oul. Results of this study

    show that imponant changes on the sludge rheological behaviour occur during anaerobic digestion and that

    the evolution

    of

    those changes is related to the degree

    of

    digestion. Moreover. it is shown that the verified

    high degree of physical changes can not be explained only by the total solids concentration variation and two

    hypotheses are proposed to explain those changes.

    @

    1997

    IA

    WQ. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd

    KEYWORDS

    Sludge; anaerobic digestion; rheology

    of

    sludges.

    INTRODUCTION

    About 3

    of

    the wastewater that reaches any urban treatment plant is transformed into a final residue called

    raw sludge. Raw sludge is an unstable solids suspension that must be subjected to a specific and complex

    treatment before an environmentally acceptable product is obtained for final disposal.

    In a conventional activated sludge wastewater treatment plant. raw sludge is normally a mixture of the

    primary sludge and the excess biological sludge. In general. raw sludge has about 3-5 (by weight) total

    solids, among which about 70-80 is organic matter.

    Due to its high organic solids content, raw sludge must be stabilized by digestion processes. in order to

    obtain a stable product which is easier to handle and to dispose of. During the anaerobic digestion.

    heterotrophic bacteria reduce about 40-50 of the organic compounds, especially those less complex and

    readily biodegradable. These compounds are normally in soluble and colloidal form and may

    be

    classified as

    a complex mixture

    of

    nutrients, proteins, carbonhydrates and organic acids - small organic particles linked

    to other solids

    of

    greater dimension or suspended in the liquid phase.

    The biological assimilation of these solids reduces slightly the total solids concentration of the sludge but

    certainly plays a major role in the well known great rheological differences between raw and digested

    .NSl1,.\I.C

    61

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    2/7

    62

    P. S. MONTEIRO

    sludges, as concluded in studies carried out in the Water Research Centre (Frost, 1982, 1983; Johnson,

    1981),

    by

    Mulbarger et al. (1981) and by Hendo and Kanari (1980).

    In the above-mentioned studies important results are obtained on the sludge rheological characteristics

    relating to the influence of two specific parameters - solids concentration, and sludge nature. However, the

    application of the proposed methods to raw and digested sludges with an average solids concentration of,

    respectively, 3-4 and 2-3 , gives very different results. According to the Water Research Centre studies

    these sludges are Herschell-Bulkley fluids, in Mulbarger et al. studies they are Bingham fluids and, finally,

    for Hendo and Kanari they are pseudo-plastic fluids.

    The aim of this study is to provide more information about the rheological characteristics of sewage sludges

    with a particular focus on the influence

    of

    the anaerobic digestion process in order to minimize the

    uncertainty faced by the designers of sludge transport systems.

    METHODS

    Figure I shows the experimental set-up used to simulate the sewage sludge digestion. The installation

    includes a heated anaerobic reactor with a volume

    of

    0.7 m

    3

    , equipped with a mechanical mixer in order to

    simulate the anaerobic digestion process of sludges at a constant temperature of 32-34OC.

     

    Figure

    I.

    Experimental sct-up.

    The biological activity was permanently followed

    by

    the measurement

    of

    the volume of biogas produced and

    by periodic measurements of the total and volatile solids concentration. When necessary small amounts

    of

    lime were added in order to maintain the pH

    of

    the digesting sludge

    in

    the range of 6.0 to 8.0.

    Weekly a rheological test was performed in a Physica Rheolab MClOO rheometer using a rotational

    viscometer (MS Z2 DIN model

    of

    the concentric cylinders geometry).The bob and the cup radius

    of

    this

    geometry are, respectively, 0.0225 m and 0.0244 m.

    The rheological measurements were performed in the controlled shear rate mode. The range of the

    measurements was carefully studied to avoid any interference at high values

    of

    shear rate, caused by the

    secondary cellular motions that develop in the flow, the so-called Taylor instabilities. On the other hand the

    low shear rate limit was also made an object of special study in order to minimize the influence

    of

    wall

    depletion on the viscometric results since this effect is most likely to occur in this kind

    of

    suspension.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Two experiments were performed using raw sewage sludge from a domestic wastewater treatment plant.

    Figure 2 shows the evolution

    of

    solids concentration during the anaerobic digestion process.

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    3/7

    Anaerobic digestion process

    63

     

    . .

    . -.,

    I

    ; u .......... . . : ~ : : - - - - - - - -

    •.

    :=-:;;::

    '.t------..--••  ••----..

     

    Figure 2. Tolal solids concentration

    durin,

    the anaerobic digestion process.

    It

    was also

    observed that the

    biogas

    product ion during both experiments, measured at the gasmeter, was

    about 0.7 m

    3

    /kg

    of

    the

    volatile solids destroyed.

    Rheological

    data

    was in the first place analysed in a shear rate versus viscosity coordinate system in order

    to

    remove

    any

    interference ofwall depletion or

    Taylor

    instabilities in the results.

    Recent studies by Escudier

    et al.

    (1995), revealed that the development ofTaylor vortices

    on

    non-Newtonian

    shear-thinning fluids is

    marked

    by a progressive

    and

    gradual increase in the instabilit ies, in contrast

    to the

    abrupt way it takes place

    in

    Newtonian fluids. Moreover, experimental studies by Coelho

    et al.

    (1996) with

    polymers confirmed the results of Escudier and showed that the flow instabili ty was reached only when Ta •

    3100.

    I·,..,

    .........

     

    IIi.. 1

    · -

    _

    -:s=::

    FiglR 3. Viscometric results with raw sludge (2nd clIperirnellt).

    J.,... .....__  

    Z

      '-IIIIII

    .::

    * \ ; ; ..

     

    Fiaure 4. Viscornetric results willi diacslina siudac (2nd

    uperimcnt).

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    4/7

    64

    P. S. MONTEIRO

      - -.-,--- -,  ;;

    ..

    ,. .....,•

    D U ....

    TI ·I.

    Figure

    S

    Viscometric ~ u t with digested sludge (2nd experimenll.

    Figures 3. 4 and 5 show, using a shear rale versus viscosily coordinate system. three examples

    of

    lhe

    viscometric results obtained in the rheological tests perfonned during the second experiment.

    Due

    to the

    great reduction

    in

    the viscosity of the sludges during digestion and in order to avoid any interference of the

    Taylor instabilities. the shear rate upper limit of the experiments was fixed at 700 s-I for raw sludges and

    300

    s·1

    for digested sludges. With a shear rate lower limit of 10,2

    s,1 it

    was not possible to

    find

    any

    interference due

    to

    wall depletion.

    Figure 6. Rheological results with raw sludge (2nd experiment).

    , ruT

     -\,/Il l ~ I U J Q G

    i .

    ..•,M J .....

    I

    y

    i

    1.,

    •• .........,.,

     

    .. I  .

    PCMa

    .1

    1

    Figure 7. Rheological results with digested sludae (2nd experiment).

    The

    rheological measurements showed that the best statistical approximations to the measured values are

    obtained with

    the

    rheological models that include the yield stress parameter, namely the Herschell-Bulkley

    model and

    the

    Bingham model. The correlation coefficient obtained for raw sludge is 0.99 for the

    Henchell-Bulkley model and 0.95 for the Bingham model. On the other hand. for digested sludge these

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    5/7

    Anaerobic digestion process

    coefficient is 0.99 for both models. Figures 6 and 7 show two examples of the results obtained in the

    rheological tests performed in the first and last runs

    of

    the second experiment with the best fit lines for

    the

    Herschell-Bulkley and Binghammodels.

      . . .

    .

     

    .  . _ . ~ _ . . . ~ .

     

    Figure 8. Evolution of the yield stress (Herschell-Bulkley model).

    ..   1lOD. .T

      ~  

    · ·

    utI;--

     

    .. 

    ~

    Figure 9. Evolution of the consistency index (Herschell-Bulkley model).

    ·.1·...-....

     

    ...

     

    .   _ ~ --- . --- . -- .

    --

    Fi,lun: 10. Evolution of the power

    index

    (Herschell-Bulkley

    model).

    Finally. Figures 8, 9 and 10 show the evolution

    of the

    parameters

     t

    c

    K and n, applying the Herschcl l•

    Bulkley model to the experimental data, and Figures II and 12 show the evolution of the  t

    c

    (yield stress)

    and  1B (plastic viscosity)

    of

    the Bingham model during the anaerobic digestion

    of

    the sludges. The time

    evolution

    of

    the rheological parameters clearly shows that the digestion process has a very strong influence

    on the rheological behaviour

    of

    the sludges.

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    6/7

    66

    P. S. MONTEIRO

    · · ~

    ....

    -

    ....

    -   - - -

  • 8/18/2019 monteiro1997.pdf

    7/7

    REFERENCES

    Anaerobic digestion process

    67

    Coelho, P. M., Pereira,

    A.

    S. and Pinho. F. T. (1996).

    Rheology of Tylose. CMC

    and

    Xantham Gum Aqueous Solutions.

    Internal

    Report. Departamento de Engenharia Meclinica e Gestao Industrial. Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade

    do

    Porto.

    Portugal.

    Escudier, M. P

    .•

    Gouldson,

    I.

    W. and Jones, D. M. (1995). Taylor vortices in Newtonian and shear-thinning liquids.

    Proc.

    R

    Soc.

    Lond

     

    449, 155-176.

    Frost, R. C. (1982). Prediction

    of

    Friction Losses for the Flow

    of

    Sewage Sludges in Straight Pipes. Technical Report TR 175,

    Water Research Centre.

    Frost, R. C. (1983).

    How to Design Sewage Sludge Pumping Systems.

    Technical Report TR 185. Water Research Centre.

    Johnson, M. (1981).

    First Reporton the WRC Sewage Sludge Pumping Project.

    Technical Report

    TR

    162, Water Research Centre.

    Levine, A. D., Tchobanoglous, G. and Asano, T. (1985). Charactenzation of the size distribution of contaminants in wastewater:

    treatment and reuse implications.

     

    WPCF 57(7), 805-816.

    Monteiro, P. and Valente,

    J.

    T. (1996).

    Flow Characteristics

    of   nauobic

    Digesting Siudgu

    Slurry Handling and Pipeline

    Transport - HYDROTRANSPORT 13. BHR Group Conference Series, Publication n° 20, 3-19.

    Mulbarger, M. C., Copas. S. R., Kordic, 1.

    R.

    and Cash. F. M. (1981). Pipeline friction losses for wastewater sludges.

      WPCF

    51(8).