muokkaa otsikon perustyyliä napsauttamalla
DESCRIPTION
Muokkaa otsikon perustyyliä napsauttamalla. 1. Muokkaa tekstin perustyylejä napsauttamalla toinen taso. COMMON SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS FOR SIX LARGEST CITIES IN FINLAND 22 March 2007,Sevilla, Spain Marketta Karhu, Oulu, Finland. 6.3.2007. Oulu. Tampere. Vantaa. Turku. Helsinki. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
6.3.2007
Muokkaa otsikon perustyyliä napsauttamalla
• Muokkaa tekstin perustyylejä napsauttamalla– toinen taso
1
COMMON SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS FOR SIX LARGEST CITIES IN FINLAND
22 March 2007,Sevilla, Spain
Marketta Karhu, Oulu, Finland
The six major cities in Finland
Oulu
Tampere
Helsinki
Espoo
Vantaa
Turku
2003 CITY MANAGERS SET UP A WORKING GROUP
The task of the working group was
• to develop and harmonize environmental reporting
• to agree on and define common sustainability indicators including economical issues
• to share experiences and knowledge between the six cities and inside of each city
3
RESULTS
Final report includes
•Decided content of a sustainability report•Ecological sustainability indicators•Environmental economic key figures
Instruction manual for calculating the chosen indicators
4
CRITERIA FOR INDICATORS
•Availability•Repeatability•Representative•Describes development trends in operations of a city organization•Are close to every day work of the employees of a city organization
5
ECOLOGIAL SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS
Indicators (27) are divided as follows:
A.Indicators describing general development B.Sustainability of land use and urban structureC.Environmental load and eco-efficiency of
activitiesD.Mobility efficiencyE.Environmentally responsible consumption and
environmental education
6
FURTHER ACTIONS
• To continue development of ecological and economical sustainability indicators and check calculation
• To make a joint report of the results in the six participating cities
• To choose common social sustainability indicators
7
A. INDICATORS DESCRIBING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
• Ecological Footprint • Green House Gas emissions • Energy consumption of the community • Citizens’ satisfaction • Environmental attitude and awareness of the
city’s personnel
8
B. SUSTAINABILITY OF LAND USE AND URBAN STRUCTURE
• Amount of buildings and apartments included the town plan
• Amount of recreational and protected areas included the town plan
• Share of nature reserves from the total surface area of the city
• Accessibility of services
9
C. ENVIRONMENTAL LOAD AND ECO-EFFIENCY OF ACTIVITIES
• Electricity consumption • Water consumption• Number of inhabitants and real-estates which
have joined into the district heating• Specific electricity, heat and water consumption • Air quality• Waste water load from the community• Amount of waste • Amount of recycled waste
10
WATER CONSUMPTION
11
0
100
200
300
Com
mu
nit
ys w
ater
co
nsu
mp
tion
l/in
h/y
Helsinki Espoo Vantaa Turku Oulu
2004 2005
C. MOBILITY EFFICIENCY
• Diversity of mobility• Number of cars• Number of passengers using public transport• Total km of pedestrian/cycle paths
12
NUMBER OF PERSONAL CARS
13
0
100
200
300
400
500
nu
mb
er o
f ca
rs/1
000
inh
.
Helsinki Espoo Tampere Vantaa Turku Oulu
Lähde: www.ake.fi, www.tilastokeskus.fi2004 2005
PASSENGERS USING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
14
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
pas
san
gers
/inh
./day
Helsinki Turku Oulu
2004 2005
LENGTH OF THE PEDESTRIAN PATH NETWORK
15
0
1
2
3
4
Ped
estr
ian
pat
h n
etw
ork
m
/inh
Helsinki Turku Oulu
2004 2005
E. ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
• Paper consumption in city organization• City procurements that consider
environmental aspects• Schools and day-care centres with
environmental management plans• Participation in city-organized environmental
education
16
PAPER COSUMPTION IN CITY ORGANIZATION IN OULU
17
32002942
2735
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2003 2004 2005
sheets
/ em
plo
yer
CORE CONTENTS OF A SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
•Survey of the city manager •The city in a ”nutshell”•Description of environmental management system in the city•Common sustainability indicators•Special indicators for the city•Sustainable development in the departments of the city organization
18