n@4 a( - 佐久間研究室:ホームページ of the influence of directivity of the piano on...

4
J;/"-J7BG,KE2 Elucidation of the influence of directivity of the piano on music listening impression in a hall ¨đĀ 47136737 ï Ĝ¢Ļ ŐUeda, Shutaroő Î°Ô h]Ł vÔÏ 1N 1.1 >?C3 J9G'ʼnòÎÄ(ŒMeyer 0 Giron 'ĈČ%13Œ[Ŏʼn×"Îľ #Ù2%5!4 [1][2] œÝĈČ"(J 9G'ʼnòÎÄMUQt%.4ʼnå ĚĮ%+ÀŊ8ĥÙ4_8ăā #ŒJ9G8ʼnò#MUQ"'ʼnŊ ñ©# 6ch uû?ADO8üĚǪō %13Ù2%4œÝĈČ%13Á25 ćĤ(ŒʼnòÎÄ8ĘÉMUQʼn ŊĪj'V{#$3Á4."$Œªņ 'MUQĨĦ%!/İù4/'#Ę !4œ 2N JK:& 2.1 :&8D 1 %Ċ¹ŁMUQ(14 m22 m12 m (H))%ĝ}ô¤J9G(Yamaha CF)ėʼnxµñ©) 6ch ʼn?AD O [3] 8ü!Ģ 2 ' 2 Û'ô¤ľʼn8ġ œJ9G(ŒĿĂ[£'HSNUͼf ė8ʼnòõ#!Œ:SEADU@#B SCUADU@8Å©Ŕ<Ë%ļė Œ×(ê®,(ÚĦ3 30 ºij) 1)²â'Üö( Ü3(ŀøÈ) 8 œʼnxµñ©%.4ʼnõ( 3 m Ł Ņ'ã§õW'Ŏ 1.5, 4.0 m 48 õ8 Fig.1 : Arrangement of the piano and receivers in the floor plan. Se and Sc for end-/center-stage style. Ĩėœô¤ľʼn%.4ʼnõ(5 5ʼnò2 8 m 'ďIJŇ%ļė,J9G ěň (Rc1), J9Gêň (Rc3,Re3) (Rc2,Re2), (Rc4,Re4)#œñ©(ĝ }ô¤%13 632k Hz ';=CUKt 'ºʼn 6 8V©Ĺº"Ė3ĶÍ ĿŒʼnõ%.4ľʼnð¿';=C UKISExß8ġœ 3N @4A( 3.1 J$+:& 2 %ÎÄ'ÀŊŌĠ%ú5[ʼn × 500 Hz #Ŏʼn× 2 kHz 'ʼn'ʼnRL Qxµñ©ēà8ĊœeŒʼnRLQ 'ó#!Œ¯ÄT:SEADU@T êňT²âÜ3Þc'J9Gĵpõ((b)[ ŏ\'fė)500 Hz 'm8 0 dB #œ, 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3.5 m 3.5 m 3 m 22 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 14 m 2.5 m 2.5 m 5 m 6 m Catwalk S S Measurement point e c rec for Se rec for Sc src rec +30° 8 m 30° Meas 2 Meas 1 Rc2 Re2 Re3 Re4 Rc3 Rc4 Rc1

Upload: hoangbao

Post on 18-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

���J;/"-�����J7B �G����,KE2

Elucidation of the influence of directivity of the piano on music listening impression in a hall

47 136737

Ueda, Shutaro

1N ����

1.1 >?C3�Meyer Giron

×

[1][2]

.

6ch

.

2N JK:&�2.1:&8D� 1 (14 m 22 m 12

m (H)) (Yamaha CF )

6ch[3] 2 2

( 30 )

( )

. 3 m

1.5, 4.0 m 48

Fig.1 : Arrangement of the piano and receivers in the

floor plan. Se and Sc for end-/center-stage style.

.

8 m ,

(Rc1), (Rc3,Re3)

(Rc2,Re2), (Rc4,Re4)

63 2k Hz

6

.

3N @4�A(�3.1�J$����+:&� 2

× 500 Hz × 2 kHz

((b)

)500 Hz 0 dB

3 m

3 m

3 m 3 m3.5 m 3.5 m

3 m

22 m

3 m 3 m 3 m

14 m

2.5

m2.

5 m

5 m 6 m

Catwalk

S S

Measurement point

e c

rec for Serec for Sc

srcrec

+30°

8 m

−30°

Meas 2Meas 1

Rc2Re2

Re3

Re4

Rc3

Rc4

Rc1

1 .

Table1 : Relative SPL at the nearest receiver on

the reference condition.

2(a)

. , ×

×

.

2(b)

× 30 °

,

.

4 4.1

6ch [3]

(10 60 20 ) 3

4

(13 )

4.2t

5

.

3

No.8,11

Chopin

4kHz

. Chopin

×

,

,

No.2

,

,

No.2

Table 2: Two pieces of music for the listening experiment.

Table 3: Pairs of listening conditions for comparison.

Table 4: Evaluation terms and rating scales.

Table 5: Results of t-test for mean values.

(No.8)

,

(No.9)

(No.10)

(No.11) No.8

4.2

4

3

2

×

5

×

,

,

,

×

4kHz

×

,

[1] J. Meyer, Acoustics and the Performance of Music (Springer, 1978). [2] F. Giron, Ph.D. dissertation, Ruhr- Universität Bochum (1996). [3] , AA2006-3.

Beethoven Op.27-2 3rd Mov., Bar. 1-14 (20sec)Chopin Op.22 Grande Polonaise Brillante, Bar. 1-16 (30sec)

Variable factor No. Reference Target1 Rc3 Rc2(High)2 Rc3 Rc43 Rc3 Rc3(High)4 Rc4 Rc4(High)5 Re2 Re2(Rot)6 Re3 Re3(Rot)7 Re4 Re4(Rot)8 Rc3 Rc19 Rc3(w/oLid) Rc1(w/oLid)10 Rc1 Rc1(w/oLid)11 Rc3 Rc3(w/oLid)

Orientation(Rec.)

Height(Rec.)

Rotation(Pf.)

Lid(Pf.)

3 2 1 0 1 2 3

No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 No.8 No.9 No.10 No.11-0.15 -0.38 -0.30 -0.15 -0.58 -0.03 0.38 -0.55 0.60 0.28 -1.00-0.30 -0.88 -0.60 0.05 0.08 -0.58 0.40 -0.88 -0.43 0.40 -0.850.43 -0.78 -0.53 0.40 -0.30 -0.20 0.83 -1.78 0.15 0.38 -1.830.38 0.55 0.63 -0.05 0.35 0.08 -0.48 1.55 0.00 0.15 1.43-0.28 -0.20 -0.15 -0.05 -0.03 -0.08 0.25 -0.48 0.10 0.18 -0.380.33 0.23 0.35 0.05 0.25 -0.20 -1.15 1.78 -0.50 -0.45 1.70-0.13 0.18 -0.05 -0.08 -0.05 0.03 -0.35 1.38 0.05 -0.55 0.98-0.08 -0.28 0.03 -0.05 0.25 -0.13 -0.05 0.83 0.20 -0.45 0.480.23 -0.85 -0.15 0.30 0.23 0.43 1.00 -0.85 0.35 0.20 -1.10-0.45 -0.40 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.28 0.15 -0.65 0.25 0.73 0.200.70 -0.73 -0.45 0.83 0.48 0.90 1.53 -1.58 0.53 0.65 -1.230.23 1.08 0.70 -0.23 0.05 -0.40 -0.60 1.43 -0.25 -0.48 0.800.45 -0.1 -0.10 0.05 0.43 0.08 0.63 -0.03 0.20 0.08 -0.48-0.75 1.03 0.45 -0.45 -0.25 -0.58 -1.35 1.95 -0.15 -0.48 1.230.30 1.20 0.88 -0.28 0.55 -0.63 -0.85 1.58 -0.05 -0.50 1.530.18 0.60 0.90 0.23 0.55 -0.45 -0.58 0.93 0.15 -0.25 0.85

Beethoven

p<0.05, p<0.01

Chopin

fig.2

Fig. 2: Relative SPL distributions on the two planes (h = 1.5, 4.0 m) from the real piano: (a) with/without the piano lid, (b) straight and 30 degrees rotation in piano direction.

Fig.3: Leq differences of target-to-reference in octave bands.

Fig.4: Averages and distributions of preference score for the variation of listening conditions.

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

(b) Chopin

Diff

eren

ce o

f Leq

[dB]

No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 No.8 No.9 No.10 No.11Orientation Height Rotation Lid

Listening conditions

-6 -4

-2

0

2

4

6 (a) Beethoven

Diff

eren

ce o

f Leq

[dB] M(250-500 Hz)

4k Hz

L (63-125 Hz)

H(1k-2k Hz)

No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 No.8 No.9 No.10 No.11Orientation Height Rotation Lid

Listening conditions

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

0

20

40

60

80

100

Aver

age s

core

Perc

entil

e[%]

(a) Beethoven

Rc3 Re2 Re3

Re4(Rot)

Re4

Re3(Rot)

Re3(High

)

Re4(High

)

Rc1(w/oL

id)

Re2(Rot) Rc1

Rc3(w/oL

id)

Listening positions

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

(b) Chopin

Listening positions

Re2

Re3(High

) Rc3

Re4(Rot)

Re3(Rot)

Re3

Re2(Rot)

Re4(High

) Re4

Rc1(w/oL

id)

Rc1

Rc3(w/oL

id)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Aver

age s

core

Perc

entil

e[%]

-2 -3 -1 0 1 2 3