near-horizon expansion of second-order bh perturbations · • the vacuum field equations to the...
TRANSCRIPT
Near-horizon Expansion of Second-order BH Perturbations
Kei Yamada (山田 慧生) Kyoto U. with A. Pound & T. Tanaka
20th Capra meeting @UNC, Chapel Hill
• The vacuum field equations to the second order are where & are linear & quadratic in .
• Solutions in FD should diverge near the horizon of BH.
• Once we identify the secularly growing piece , solutions to the following equations do NOT diverge:
Summary of today’s talk
�Gµ⌫ [h] �2Gµ⌫ [h, h] h
�Gµ⌫ ["h
(1) + "2h(2)] = ��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1), "h(1)],
�Gµ⌫ ["h
(1) + "2h(2)] = ��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1)]� �Gµ⌫ ["h
(1)sec].
h(1)sec
Outlines
• Introduction
• Near-horizon expansion
• Static/secularly growing pieces
• Summary
Outlines
• Introduction
• Near-horizon expansion
• Static/secularly growing pieces
• Summary
Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals
• Expand equations in the mass ratio:
• Consider the two time-scale expansion.
• Orbital “fast time”:
• Inspiral “slow time”:
" ⌘ µ/M ⌧ 1,
v
v
• We expand equations in the mass ratio:
• The field equations to the second-order are where & are linear & quadratic in .
IR divergence around boundaries
gµ⌫ = gBGµ⌫ + "h(1)
µ⌫ + "2h(2)µ⌫ + · · · .
h
�Gµ⌫ ["h
(1) + "2h(2)] = ��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1), "h(1)]
• The field equations to the second-order are
�Gµ⌫ ["h
(1) + "2h(2)] = ��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1), "h(1)],
�Gµ⌫ [h] �2Gµ
⌫ [h, h]
•
• Schematically, the following integral diverges around boundaries.
✓ @infinity use the PN/PM results (cf. [Pound 2015]).
• We discuss the near-horizon expansion.
IR divergence around boundaries
h(2)!`m =
Z 1
rh
G!`m(r, r0)�2G(r0)dr0,
�Gµ⌫ ["h
(1) + "2h(2)] = ��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1), "h(1)]
• The field equations to the second-order are
�Gµ⌫ ["h
(1) + "2h(2)] = ��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1), "h(1)].
• The origins of secular growth are the “stationary” parts of .
• Almost all of the “stationary” parts should be balanced with “stationary” solutions .
• Let us decompose as
• Focus on the “stationary” piece, because does not cause the divergence.
Decomposition of
Oscillatory piece “Stationary” pieceh(i)µ⌫ = h(i)
µ⌫v�dep(v, v, r, ✓,�) + h(i)
µ⌫sta(v, r, ✓).
h(i)sta
h(i)
h(i)
h(i)µ⌫
v�dep
��2Gµ⌫
Outlines
• Introduction
• Near-horizon expansion
• Static/secularly growing pieces
• Summary
The Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates
• The Schwarzschild background metric is in the ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, where .
✓Regularity of metric perturbations on the horizon.
✓On the horizon : does not appear in the Lorenz gauge.
grr = 0d2/dr2
ds2 = �fdv2 + 2dvdr + r2d✓2 + r2 sin2 ✓d�2
f = 1� 2M/r
Near-horizon expansion
• The metric perturbations are
• Expand the perturbations near the horizon where is a slow-time variable.
✓ in is not necessary because of the absence of .
gµ⌫ = gBGµ⌫ + "h(1)
µ⌫ + "2h(2)µ⌫ + · · · .
d2/dr2
v ⌘ "v
h(i)staµ⌫ (v, r, ✓) = h(i)sta
0µ⌫ (v, ✓) + fh(i)sta1µ⌫ (v, ✓) + O(f2),
O(f2) h(i)staµ⌫ (v, r, ✓)
The Lorenz gauge conditions
• The Lorenz gauge conditions are formally in the near-horizon limit , where .
✓Under the Lorenz gauge conditions, we can eliminate for 4 components of .
f ! 0 I = ✓,�
h(i)µ⌫
;⌫ = 0
h(i)1 �Gµ
⌫
h(i)1vv = F (i)
v [h0], h(i)1I
I = F (i)r [h0],
h(i)1v✓ = F (i)
✓ [h0], h(i)1v� = F (i)
� [h0],
First order in
• At the first order in , 4 components of NOT containing are
• Although these do not vanish in general,
• Non-trivial solutions for the zero modes.
�Gµ⌫ h(1)
1
"
"
sin ✓�G(1)sta rv = �@✓
sin ✓
8M2
⇣h(1)sta0v✓ + @✓h
(1)sta0vv
⌘�,
...
Zsin ✓ �G(1)sta r
v d✓ d� =
Zsin ✓ �G(1)sta r
� d✓ d� = 0.
First order in
• The first-order field equations do NOT determine the zero modes of .
• The second order does, because appears in the second order.
• The solutions are secularly growing.
"
Zsin ✓ �G(1)sta r
v d✓ d� =
Zsin ✓ �G(1)sta r
� d✓ d� = 0.
h(1)sta
@vh(1)sta
Energy & angular momentum fluxes
• Ingoing GW’s & across the horizon are where .
• These components of the second-order source terms for zero modes of correspond to & of first-order ingoing GWs.
E L
E L
h(1)sta
E ⌘ 1
8⇡
Z p�g
���2Gr
v
�d✓ d�,
L ⌘ 1
8⇡
Z p�g
���2Gr
�
�d✓ d�,
˙⌘ @/@v
Outlines
• Introduction
• Near-horizon expansion
• Static/secularly growing pieces
• Summary
Second-order Einstein tensor
• At the second order in , 4 components of NOT containing are
�Gµ⌫
"
h(2)1
sin ✓ �G(2)sta rv =
sin ✓
8M@v
⇣4h(1)sta
0vv + h(1)sta0✓✓ + h(1)sta
0��
⌘
� @✓
sin ✓
8M2
⇣h(2)sta0v✓ + @✓h
(2)sta0vv � 4M@vh
(1)sta0v✓
⌘�,
sin ✓ �G(2)sta r� =
sin2 ✓
2@v
⇣4h(1)sta
0v� + h(1)sta0r�
⌘
+ @✓
� sin3 ✓
4M@✓
✓1
sin ✓h(2)sta0v�
◆+ sin2 ✓ @vh
(1)sta0✓�
�,
...
Abbott & Deser’s quantities
• We findwhere
1
8⇡
Z p�g sin ✓ �G(2)sta r
v d✓ d�
����r=rh
= �@v�MAD
���r=rh
,
1
8⇡
Z p�g sin ✓ �G(2)sta r
� d✓ d�
����r=rh
= �@v�LAD
���r=rh
,
MAD =1
2
ZF (v)↵� d⌃↵� , LAD =
1
2
ZF (�)↵� d⌃↵� ,
F (v/�)µ⌫ ⌘ � 1
8⇡
h⇠(v/�)↵h(1)sta
↵[µ;⌫] + ⇠(v/�)↵;[µh(1)sta⌫]↵ + ⇠(v/�)µ h(1)sta
⌫]↵;↵i.
Physical secular growth
• & components of determine the secular growth of zero modes.
• The secular growth => the secular change of the BH’s mass/spin & .
Z p�g �Gµ
⌫ d✓ d� =
Z p�g
���2Gµ
⌫
�d✓ d�,
{r�}{rv}
�M = M v �a = av
Identification of the secular pieces
• Calculating deviations due to , , we obtain which reproduces the zero modes.
• Therefore, the effective source term, can be integrated without any divergences.
�M �a
�Gµ⌫ [h(1)sec] =
0
BBBBBBB@
2
r2@v �M(v) 0 0 � (M + r) sin2 ✓
r2@v �a(v)
0 0 0sin2 ✓
r@v �a(v)
0 0 0 0
� (M + r) sin2 ✓
r2@v �a(v)
sin2 ✓
r@v �a(v) 0 0
1
CCCCCCCA
,
��2Gµ⌫ ["h
(1), "h(1)]� �Gµ⌫ ["h
(1)sec],
Outlines
• Introduction
• Near-horizon expansion
• Static/secularly growing pieces
• Summary
Summary
• Need the second-order metric perturbations for EMRI observations by LISA.
• IR divergences appear around boundaries.
• By the near-horizon expansion, we found
• the 2nd-order eqs. determine the zero modes of .
• the secular growth => & due to & .
• Extension to the Kerr case is straightforward.
• How to tame secular growth of pure gauge modes…?
E L
h(1)sta
@vMAD @vL
AD
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION