new opportunity for the control of newcastle disease in ... · new opportunity for the control of...
TRANSCRIPT
New opportunity for the control of Newcastle Disease in Latin America
Luiz Sesti, DVM, MSc, PhD
International Technical Services – Latin AmericaCeva Animal Health
Campinas, SP, Brazil - 15-16 April 2014
Poultry Industry Evolution
www.poultry.allotment.org.ukwww.engormix.com
± 60 years
Mexico
Guatemala
Belize
El Salvador
Honduras
Dominican Republic
Venezuela
Colombia
Ecuador
Peru
Bolivia
WOAH, 2013
Countries with endemic velogenic Newcastle Disease (ND)in Latin America
Still, the most important poultry disease in the industrial poultry production worldwide !!!
Newcastle Disease
Vectormune ND
Efficacy of several vaccination programs against Newcastle Disease
Protection against challenge by Newcastle(velogenic strain genotype VII ICPI 1.93 from Thailan, 2012 – Ceva Animal Health
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
14 days 21 days 28 days
No vaccineConventional liveVTM NDVTM ND + conventional liveConventional live + inactivated
Age at challenge
% de protection
76
98 100 100 100 100 100 100
18
0 0 0 0 0 0 00
102030405060708090
100
3 4 6 10 15 33 55 73Age at challenge (weeks)(Thai strain – genotype VII – ICPI 1.93)
% protection
Duration of Protection (Palya et al, 2012)
No mortalityNo clinical signs
Differences
Characteristics Vectormune ND Conventional
Interference of MAb NO YESSafety: post vaccination reactions (1 extra day)
NO YESStrong humoral and cell immunity YES NOSignificative reduction on viral excretion = “field cooling effect”
YES NO
100% lifelong protection YES NO
Results from large field trials in different epidemiological situations.(Sesti et al., 2013)
WOAH, 2013
Distinct ND epidemiological realities
MEXICOHigh field challenge from very virulent field strains (ICPI 1.89 – 1.93).
PERU
BRAZIL
Medium to low field challenge from a very virulent field strain (ICPI 1.88).
No field challenge from velogenic strains, medium to low challenge from lentogenic vaccine strains in some regions.
Broiler ND vaccination
MEXICOHigh field challenge by very virulent field strains (ICPI 1.89 – 1.93).
PERU
BRAZIL
Medium to low field challenge by a very virulent field strain (ICPI 1.88).
No field challenge from velogenic strains, medium to low challenge by lentogenic vaccine strains.
• 100%• Very heavy protocols• Protect against high mortality• No concern for post vaccination
reactions
• 100%• Heavy to medium protocols• Protect against high mortality• Some concern for post
vaccination reactions
• Only 25% of all broilers• Very light vaccination protocols• Protect against eventual
challenge from backyard chickens• High concern for post vaccination
reactions
MEXICO
Vaccination ProtocolsMÉXICO
Vector vaccine Control groupsChallenge
in the company
1 • VTM ND + live day 1• Live 15 days
• Killed + live day 1• Live 15 days
High
2 • VTM ND + live day 1• live 12/23- 28 days
• Killed + live day 1• Killed 12 days• Live 12/23 days
Very high
8 broiler field trials% Livability after controlled lab challenge
in broilers taken from the farms
0
20
40
60
80
100
VTM ND Control Non vaccinated SPF birds
average
100 %average
93.75 %
0 %
MEXICO
Vaccination Programs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Trial no. Trial no.
TRIAL VACCINE % REDUCTION
AVTM ND - 97.50%
Conventional
BVTM ND - 95.50%
Conventional
CVTM ND - 58.50%
Conventional
DVTM ND - 100%
Conventional
EVTM ND - 94.90%
Conventional
FVTM ND - 67.40%
Conventional
Reduction of ND challenge virus excretion in broilers vaccinated with VTM ND in comparison with
broilers vaccinated with conventional ND vaccines in Mexico.
ND challenge Chimalhuacán strain
Genotype 5, ICPI = 1.89Dose = 6 log10 EID50
eye drop
Measured by quantitative RT-PCR in
tracheal and cloacalswabs
MEXICO
TRIALS IN MEXICOFINAL COMMENTS
MEXICO
• Programs with VTM ND protected equal or better than the most heavy vaccination program with conventional vaccines.
• The vector vaccine VTM ND eliminated the need for a killed vaccine and so, provided an important opportunity for a better performance (less metabolic cost).
• The vector vaccine proved itself an unique tool to induce a strong decrease in environmental infectious pressure by NDV due to a significantly reduction in virus excretion in birds vaccinated and challenged.
Vaccination protocols
Vectormune ND Control
• VTM ND + Live day 1 (spray)• Live day 1 (spray)• Live day 10 (DW)• Live day 20 (DW)
PERU
• VTM ND = 995,250 broilers
• Control = 950,275 broilers
100% contemporary groups
Broiler performance
41.3 a 41.2 a38
40
42
Control VTM ND
Age (days)
7.1 a
3.7 b1.53
4.56
7.5
Control VTM ND
Mortality (%)
2.28 a2.49 b
1.5
2
2.5
Control VTM ND
Final weight (kg)
291 a
345 b
260
310
Control VTM ND
Production efficiency Index
1.76 a1.68 b
1.5
1.7
Control VTM ND
Feed conversion (g/g)
PERU
US$ 217
VTM ND
Receita extra gerada pelos frangosvacinados com a VTM ND
(US$ / 1000 frangos)
Cost:Benefit analysis between groups
Day old chick cost Feed cost Vaccination cost Medication cost Livability Slaughter age Feed Conversion (FC) Sales price (slaughter broiler) FC adjustment Weight adjustment
PERU
US$ 217 dollarsEXTRA income per 1000 broilers vaccinated with VTM ND
total of US$ 216,000 in this trial
Serology in VTM ND flocks
Newcastle Elisa(idexx)
2802
168 115
474696
1149
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
7 14 21 28 35 42
cutoff
PERU
TRIAL IN PERUFINAL COMMENTS
• VTM ND protected equally as the ND conventional vaccination program used (no ND breaks in both groups).
• VTM ND vaccinated broilers presented a significantly better clinical and growth performance.
• VTM ND vaccinated broilers generated a quite important extra income when compared to the final income generated by the control group.
PERU
BRAZIL
Broiler ND vaccination in Brazil
Only 25% ND vaccinated (mainly north/northeast and some in southeast and south)
Recent comprehensive surveys (serology, virology, molecular detection) found no velogenic NDV in industrial and backyard poultry (Orsi et al. 2010; Thomazelli et al. 2012)
Clinical signs and their consequences in the poultry industry are 100% related to lentogenic vaccine virus circulation (“rolling”reactions)
10 million broilers vaccinated with VTM ND and compared with contemporaneous groups vaccinated with conventional programs
Northeast
Southeast
South
BRAZIL
Newcastle Vaccination program
Company A Hatchery Field
Control apath. Phy.LMV.42 (spray) La Sota (DW) 18 days
rHVT - NDV rHVT – NDV (SQ)
Company B Hatchery Field
Control apath. Phy.LMV.42 (spray)
rHVT – NDV rHVT – NDV (SQ)
Company C Hatchery Field
Control C2 (spray)
rHVT - NDV rHVT – NDV (SQ)
Companies A, B, C(5 million broilers vaccinated with VTM ND)
BRAZIL
BroilerPerformance
BRAZILGroupsSlaughter weight
(g)Mortality (%)
FE(g/g)
Production Index
Company A (mixed sex; slaughter age = 53.3 days)
VTM ND 3010 a 5 a 2.16 a 255 a
Vitapest + La Sota 3050 a 6 a 2.26 b 237 b
Company B (mixed sex; slaughter age = 50.5 days)
VTM ND 3100 a 6.3 a 2.02 a 285 a
Vitapest 3100 a 7.8 a 2.05 a 276 a
Company C (females; slaughter age = 36.7 days)
VTM ND 1830 a 3.5 a 1.80 a 272 a
C2 1840 a 3.9 a 1.83 a 264 a
Company C (males; slaughter age = 50.7 days)
VTM ND 3190 a 6.4 a 2.03 a 294 a
C2 3180 a 7.2 a 2.04 a 286 a
Cost:Benefit Analysis between groups
Day old chick cost Feed cost Vaccination cost Medication cost Livability Slaughter age Feed Conversion (FC) Sales price (slaughter broiler) FC adjustment Weight adjustment
BRAZIL
85
50
32
[VALOR]0
102030405060708090
Company A Company B Company C females
Company C males
US$
VTM ND vaccinated broilers
Extra incomeper 1000 broilers (US$)
BRAZIL
Trachea histopathology lesion scores per age
Treaments
VTMND
ControlVTMND
ControlVTMND
Control
14 days of age 21 days of age 28 days of age
Company 1 0.38 a 0.43 a 0.53 a 0.60 b 0.69 a 0.79 b
Company 3 0.45 a 0.52 b 0.66 a 0.86 b 0.69 a 0.99 b
Company 4 0.20 a 0.33 b 0.35 a 0.45 b 0.56 a 0.60 a
BRAZIL
MOST FREQUENT LESIONS
1. Congestion
2. Deciliation
3. Mononuclear Inflammatory infiltrate
4. Epithelial hyperplasia
Serology Elisa (Idexx) for Newcastle
(Companies A, B and C)BRAZIL
2888
6813
6347
3186
7073
4075
236 332 426158
339198
55 75 137 72 129 105340 350
579
236 160 87
693971
807553 484
176
10371359
11271080 960
112
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000V
1V
1V
1 C1 C1 C1 V14
V14
V14 C1
4C1
4C1
4V
21V
21V
21 C21
C21
C21
V35
V35
V35 C3
5C3
5C3
5V
42V
42V
42 C42
C42
C42
V49
V49
V49 C4
9C4
9C4
9
Dia 1 Dia 14 Dia 21 Dia 35 Dia 42 Dia 49
Elisa Newcastle > 400 = pos
Control A. Vitapest + La SotaB. VitapestC. C2
VTM - ND
• Production performance of VTM ND vaccinated broilers was either statistically better or presented a strong trend of improvement in all trials.
• Better clinical performance for VTM ND vaccinated broilers was consistently reported by caretakers in all companies.
• Financial results were always better to VTM ND vaccinated broiler flocks.
• Elisa seroconversion was evident, of low magnitude and very uniform from 5 weeks of age.
• The safety of VTM ND has been clearly demonstrated in comparison with conventional live ND vaccines by tracheas' histopathology lesion score analysis (no "rolling" post vaccination reactions).
• VTM ND has been proved to be the safest immunological tool for ND prevention in countries with no velogenic NDV.
TRIALS IN BRAZILFINAL COMMENTS
BRAZIL
After being tested in three totally different Newcastle Disease epidemiological situations the vector HVT–NDV vaccine VectormuneND has been clearly shown to be: significantly effective for the clinical protection against Newcastle Disease
and certainly the safest immunological tool to for prevention of Newcastle
Disease Unique tool for an effective decrease in the field infectious pressure
through a significant lower viral excretion in vaccinated birds (unique effect)
With such a tool, many countries around the world will have a quite better opportunity to work on ND eradication programs
(e.g., backyard birds one dose = protection for life)
FINAL COMMENTS
CEVA MEXICOMario LechugaFrancisco MartínezMaurício GonzalezDavid DueñasJesus Reyes
CEVA PERUJorge CorteganaYesenia VegaRocio OroscoRicardo RosembergRoberto ValdiviaJuan Carlos Romero
CEVA BRAZILRicardo PereiraCarlos KneippRodrigo ParanhosAlberto Inoue