next generation mobile network (ngmn) forum june 3-4, 2014, bonn, germany
DESCRIPTION
Next Generation Mobile Network (NGMN) Forum June 3-4, 2014, Bonn, Germany. Team members Chun-Ting Chou, Shih-I Chen, William Chang, Chih-Young Hung, and T. Russell Hsing Background - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Next Generation Mobile Network (NGMN) Forum June 3-4, 2014, Bonn, Germany
• Team members– Chun-Ting Chou, Shih-I Chen, William Chang, Chih-Young Hung, and T. Russell Hsing
• Background– 次代行動網路聯盟 (NGMN Alliance) 為全球最重要之寬頻行動聯盟 之一 , 有別於其他國際通訊標準組織 ( 如 3GPP), 次代行動網路聯盟著重 於制定及整合電信營運商之需求 , 以確保終端消費者對於寬頻行動通訊之需求與期望能被滿足– 目前該聯盟成員由超過六十個會員組成 , 包 含國際間最重要之電信營運商 ( 如 AT&T 、中國移動、日本 DoCoMo 等 ) 、設備製造商 ( 如NSN 、 Ericsson 、華為、聯發科技等 ) 及研究組織– 透過該聯盟之廣大會員基礎與影響力 , 其由會員之貢獻 (Contribution) 所制訂出之最終使用者 (end-to-end) 需求 , 除了將透過國際標準組織制 訂成為新世代的通訊標準 , 也經由擴大之佈建試驗與營運認證 , 加速新世代通訊系統之實現
WorkStreams in Next Generation Mobile Network (NGMN) 5G Initiatives
1. Workstream 1: Visions and Implications (Prof. Chun-Ting Chou)
2. Workstream 2: Requirements (Dr. Shih-I Chen)3. Workstream 3: Technology and Architecture (Prof. T. Russell
Hsing)4. Workstream 4: Spectrum Access (Prof. Chun-Ting Chou)5. Workstream 5: IPRs Management (Prof. Chih-Young Hung)6. Workstream 6: Customers Use Cases (Mr. William Chang)
NGMN WorkStream (WS.1)-Visions and Implications
3
A. Annunziato (Telecom Italia) and K. Holley (Telefonica)
The goals are to provide seamless and consistent user experience across all user cases and to enable various industry verticals (e.g., IoT)
4 different possible business models including connectivity providers, infrastructured service providers, network as a service wholesale providers and virtual service providers
Session Chair
Overall Observations
Work with Taiwan telecomm (via joint work meetings) to re-define their business model for better value propositions and service export
Create focused initiatives (via government projects) to develop new IoT and OTT services companies
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do next
Customer’s Perspective
• End users– Seamless and consistent experience across all user
cases• Mobile communication always available• Proximity connectivity and services • Real-time video, tactile Internet, augmented virtual reality• Sharing experience
• Industry– IoT-based industry verticals
• Automated processes• Remote operations
Innovations & Enablers
• New terminals and devices – Increased computing power with ubiquitous
connectivity– task-specific sensors, flexible displays, wearables, etc
• Software-based network structure– Infrastructure becoming software allows for
centralization of intelligence • Rich ecosystem and fast speed of innovations
– M2M, Big data, “OTT” services
Visions beyond 2020
• Extreme real-time Communication (1)– V2V, V2I, tactile Internet
• Ultra-reliable Communication (100)– Automated industries– Safety lifeline
• Personal/social interaction (510,000,000)– Sharing– Proximity/location based service
• Massive Internet of Things (100,000,000,000)– M2M, M2H, and H2M
Implication and Key Attributes
Coverage
Cost
Volume (scalabil-ity)Latency
Trust
Mobility
Ultra-Reliable Communications
Personal/Social Interaction
Extreme real-time communication
Massive IoT
Conclusions
• NOT a radio interface• 5G is expected to be an end-to-end
ecosystem that supports consistent user experience and new applications/service in a connected society
Connectivity Providers Infrastructured Service Provider
Network as a Service Whole Providers
Evolution of current servicesNew services
Network Sharing
Virtual Platform
9
Workstream 2 – Requirement NGMN Forum June 3~4 2014
Dr. Shihi ChenInstitute for Information Industry
July 29, 2014
10
Summary
Clark Chen China Mobile Senior Researcher
the 5 requirements derived from use cases, operator value proposition and business modelsUser experience requirements: consistent, efficient support of data rates, support of ultra low-latency、 support of high mobility, device power efficiencySystem performance requirements: cost efficiency throughput coverage, connection density, area capacity, spectrum efficiency, resource & signaling efficiencyEnhanced service requirements: seamless connectivity, context awareness, security, high availabilityNew business enabling: evolution of bit pipe model, X-aaS business models, Network sharingManagement & Operation requirements: cost efficiency, energy efficiency, ease of innovation & upgrade, ease of deployment, flexibility & scalability, operational awareness, operation efficiency
Session Chair
Overall Observations
5G system will be defined from both the user and operator perspectives. It is essential that the operators & vertical service providers can actively participate in Taiwan 5G project planning. It will be important to encourage more involvement or leadership of local mobile operators.For the 5G project planning, it is vital to take on the E2E system service view. It will be good to select a few of 5G use cases or scenarios as the system integration master plan, instead of working on a few separate technology items.
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do next
11
Use Cases
Operator ValueProposition
Business ModelWS1:Vision
WS2:Requirement
User Experience Requirement
System Performance Requirement
Enhanced Services Requirement
Business Model Requirement
Mea
sure
men
t &
Ope
ratio
n R
equi
rem
ent
WS3: Technology & Architecture
WS4: Spectrum
WS2: Requirements
12
Shift of Focus
System Centric Performance User Perceived Performance
Technical System Capabilities Business Enabling Capabilities
Stand-Alone Add-ons Toward Efficiencies
Efficiencies in all-dimensions as the foundation
Pre-defined Capability Cost-Adaptive, On-demand Capability
13
User Experience Requirements
Consistent User
ExperienceData Rates Latency
Mobility
Device Power
Efficiency
14
System Performance Requirements
Traffic Volume Density
Connection Density
Spectrum Efficiency
Coverage
Resource and
Signaling Efficiency
15
Enhanced Services Requirements
Context Awareness
Security
Connectivity Transparency
Resilience & High
Availability
16
New Business Enabling Requirements
X-aaS Business Model
Network Sharing
Connectivity Provider
17
Network Deployment, Operation and Management Requirements
Cost Efficiency
Energy Efficiency
Ease of Innovation
and Upgrade
Flexibility &
Scalability
Operational Awareness
OperationEfficiency
18
Essence of My Talk on “Reduction of Latency Delay For End-to-End
Wireless Network”in NGMN Forum Advisor Session
Bonn Germany, June 4, 2014
80%
Major Determining Factors for E2E Delay
• Network Architecture– toward flat
architecture • System Procedures• Smaller TTI
• Processing Delay• Resource
Management• Network load• Channel Status
1. System Specs
2. Implementation Provisioning Deployment
1ms 1ms 1ms 0.5ms1.5ms
TTI + Frame Alignment
RAN Edge
0.2ms 0.2ms 1ms 0.1ms0.3ms
80% 80%
Reference: FP7 ICT LOLA
80%fasterprocessing
? ? ? ?
19
Emerging Network Topologies for Further Reduced End-to-End Latency
20
Software-Define Network (SDN) could reduce core network
transport delay
Cloud-Radio-Access-Network (C-RAN) Centralized BB processing and load balance could facilitate RAN resource allocation and reduce radio access network processing
delay
Device-to-Device (D2D) communications could significantly eliminate
network processing delay
This should be under further research.
• The 5G requirements focused on “user-centric” or “business-centric” will have significant effects on the 5G architecture and technical design.
• The operators are trying to claim more important roles in 5G definitions.
• With the multi-dimensions of requirements, some of them might dictate a major revolution of 5G system.
Conclusions
NGMN WorkStream (WS.3)-Technology and Architecture
22
Dr. Mikio Iwamura, Director of Wireless Research, NTT DOCOMO, Germany
Through four tasks listed as Analysis, Trends, Technologies (need giant step), and Architecture (Design Principles), this work stream will focus on gap analyses, leverage technology trends, and technology components (such as Spectrum Access, Duplex Mode, SDN, Small Cell Network, etc.) to prepare the initial white paper
Need to have a generic view on architecture for wireless 5G
Session Chair
Overall Observations
There will need a disruptive change on requirements , technology advanced, and services creations from current 4G to the future 5G. Many of potential Key technologies which have been mentioned in this Forum (such as SDN, Small Cell Network, Smart Data Pricing and Fog Networking and Computing) are Taiwan’s strength. We need to integrate all R&D resources to start a very focused initiative to develop/secure necessary essential IPRs and deliver a Demonstrable Working End-to-End System (e.g. F-RAN) within 3 Years.
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do next
23Source : Professor Mung Chiang, Princeton University
Conclusions
• Wireless 5G will essentially be “Services & Applications Driven”
• Small Cell Network, Soft-Defined Network (SDN), Smart Data Pricing, Cloud-Based Radio Access Network (C-RAN), and Fog-Based-Radio Access Network (F-RAN) will be key essential technology for both Architecture and Technology in Wireless 5G.
• Let’s concentrate our resources and commitment to: (1)Deliver a demonstrable end-to-end working system within 3 years, and (2) to establish/secure key and essential IPRs for Wireless 5G
NGMN WorkStream (WS.4)-Spectrum
25
S. Apetrei from Orange
Spectrum above 6/10 GHz is needed for very high data rate, below 1GHz for larger coverage, as well as spectrum for shorter-range connectivity
NGMN operators fully support flexible usage of spectrum including licensed share and license exempt, in addition to the original (preferred) licensed access
Session Chair
Overall Observations
Re-farming and open more spectrum for sharing - based on the ITU WRC-15 rules - by Taiwan regulatory bodies (e.g., NCC and MoT) is desperately needed
Expedite and leverage R&D capacity such as cognitive radio and dynamic spectrum access (DSA) for spectrum sharing
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do next
Spectrum Access• Exclusive licensing regimes should remain the preferred solution
– enable guaranteed QoS and support global roaming • Supplementary spectrum made available on a shared basis
– Additional licensed spectrum made available by an incumbent governmental or public user– license-exempt spectrum chapter
Spectrum flexibility
• Spectrum flexibility can bring benefits of spectral efficiency gains– Unlicensed spectrum can serve as a complement,
particularly if it is aggregated with licensed spectrum to increase bandwidths
Spectrum Availability• Unused VHF bands in sub-1 GHz bands
– Available bandwidth: 30 to 200 MHz– Long-distance non-line-of-sight communication (Super WiFi)– Already being tested in rural and urban broadband(US, UK, Singapore,
Kenya, etc)– New generations of long-range sensor networks (IoT)
• 3.5 GHz band– Available bandwidth: 100 MHz in the 3550-3650 MHz). – Small cell and spectrum sharing
Spectrum Availability (cont.)
• 5 GHz band– Available bandwidth: 775 MHz in the US.– 100 more MHz available in 5.15 to 5.25 GHz band in US– Short-range transmission (5.8 GHz for LTE-U)– longer-range, point-to-point gigabit link (wireless backhaul)
• 60 GHz band– Available bandwidth: 7 GHz– Short-range, ultra-fast communication to mobile devices– line-of-sight backhaul from small cells
• Other bands between 6-10GHz, 28GHz, 38GHz, etc
Key Attributes vs. Spectrum
Coverage
Cost
Volume (scalabil-ity)Latency
Trust
Mobility
Ultra-Reliable Communications
Personal/Social Interaction
Sub 1Gbps, 3.5GHz Sub 1Gbps, 3.5, 5 GHz
Extreme real-time communication
Massive IoT
Sub 1Gbps
5GHz, 60 GHz
Conclusions
• Sharing is NOT a synonym of compromised service. Instead, it provides great flexibility for providing QoS services to end users– Via offloading or smart aggregation
• The question is where or not we should implement spectrum sharing. The question is how
• Global harmonization (ITU WRC 15), local regulation and new architecture in place
NGMN WorkStream (WS.5)- IPR Management and Challenge
32
Luke Ibbetson / Head of Group Research & Development – Technology / Vodafone Group Service Limited/ Newbury, Berkshire, United Kingdom
The Basic tenet of this work stream is as follows: The current IP structure for 3G and 4G may not be fit for purpose to support 5G deployment 5G IPR costs must be predictable and manageable The 5G IPR structure must stimulate and reward innovation “Royalty stacking” is perceived to be a significant issue in keeping device costs high
Session Chair
Overall Observations
In terms of IPR, there are at least two lines of opportunities that Taiwan should seize at present in the 5G endeavor: The F-RAN conceptual framework, proposed by our Taiwan team, was well received by the
audience in general and Mr. Chen of China Mobile and the editor-in-chief of the white paper, in particular. The Taiwan team is scheduled to meet with China Mobile this September to further discuss this matter. Thus, firms and research institutes in Taiwan should speed up R&D activities and patent application under the F-RAN structure.
To reflect Taiwan’s voice on IPR structure to NGMN. The experiences of Taiwanese firms in mobile industry regarding their dealing with major IP holders should be collected and compiled. Then, argument should be elaborated and presented to WS5 for their consideration in the writing of the final paper.
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do next
• By interviewing the CTOs of Taiwan's major firms in the telecom industry & Opterator, to learn of their experiences and comments on current IP related matters.
• With the multi-dimensions of requirements, some of them might dictate a major revolution of 5G system.
• “Royalty stacking” solution: Cross licensing and patent positioning to reduce high cost.
• Base on F-RAN conceptual framework, combine Taiwan ICT and Telecom strength, file the cross discipline patents with the synergy.
Conclusions (WS.5)
NGMN WorkStream (WS.6)-Customer Use Case
34
Mr. Armando Annunziato (Telecom Italia)
Submit the Vision of 5G Use Cases beyond 2020, business models Implications & operator value proposition.
The goals are to provide seamless and user experience and application to enable various industry verticals and horizontal cooperation.
4 business models including connectivity providers, infrastructure service providers, network as a service wholesale providers and virtual service providers
Session Chair
Overall Observations
Work with Taiwan TeleCom & DataCom companies (via 5G Taiwan forum) to encourage more networking service providers to join and redefine the value added business model.
Follow F-RAN and Big Data applications, focus on corporate cloud with Fog computing, specify on 3 major E2E scenarios as the system integration master plan, such as E-Healthcare, Telematics & Internet of Things.
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do next
• 4 New Business models: 1.connectivity providers, 2.infrastructure service providers, 3.network as a service wholesale providers and 4.virtual service providers
• User experience requirements: consistent, efficient support of data rates, support of ultra low-latency、 support of high mobility, device power efficiency.
The post-2020 outlook is vastly broad in terms of variety and variability. Sets of selected use cases show both enriched service categories and also prospects for numerous new services.
* Personal/Social Interaction in Connected SocietyVirtual collaborationOut of coverage and proximity
* Extreme Real-Time CommunicationVehicle to Vehicle and to road communication
* Massive Internet of ThingsLow Data/Power
* Critical & Safety - LifelineRemote OperationHealth & Assisted Living
* Ultra-reliable (M2M, M2H, H2M)Automated Industries
• 5G is expected to be an end-to-end ecosystem that supports the new use cases in the connected society, supporting new business models and empowering the Operators’ value proposition.
• End-to-end enabling environment for countless applications
• Matching user-centric requirements of fully mobile and connected society of 2020 and beyond
• Guaranteeing seamless and consistent user experience anytime and across all user spaces
• Providing efficiency and sustainability• Business opportunities and incentives for the
Network Operators• Enabling a rich environment for innovations and
change.
• Big Data Cloud, C-RAN• Corporate Cloud F-RAN• F-RAN Computing Small Cell Networking• LTE Autoload WiFi Coverage & E2E Latency• IoT , Telematics, E-HealthCare, Smart Grid• Data flow, Money flow, Logistic, Body, Car,
Food, Remote control, Smart Data Pricing, Energy Management System…
NGMN WorkStream (WS.6)-Customer Use Case
• The operators & vertical service providers can actively participate in Taiwan 5G project planning, such as the system integration master plan, instead of working on a few separate technology items.
• Use Case: E-Healthcare(SECOM), Telematics(Compal) & Internet of Things(MediaTek)
• 5G new trend: Cloud-Based Radio Access Network (C-RAN), and Fog-Based-Radio Access Network (F-RAN), Small Cell Network, F-RAN Computing center & Data center, Soft-Defined Network (SDN), Smart Data Pricing.
• Overall vision: Use cases and business models are input for defining requirements and architecture.
Conclusions (WS.6)
1
NGMN Forum in Bonn, Germany, June 3-4, 2014Executive Summary
Taiwan Team: Prof. T. Russell Hsing (NCTU), Dr. Shih-I Chen (III), Prof. Chun-Ting Chou (NTU) Prof. Chih-Young Hung (NCTU), Mr. William Chang (NCTU)
NGMN Alliance has officially created a Wireless 5G Initiative in March, 2014 The initial White Paper for Wireless 5G will be available in March,2015. The outlines of
this report will consist of: 1. Visions and Business Models 2. Requirement, 3. Technology and Architecture, 4. Spectrum, 5. IPRs Management and Challenges, 6. Customers Use Case
Dr. Shih-I Chen has presented a contribution on “Reduction of Low Latency for End-to-End Wireless Networks. Taiwan Team has also proposed Fog-based Radio Access Network (F-RAN) in Small Cell Networks. All of them have been well received!
Overall Observations
Many of potential Key technologies (such as SDN, Small Cell Network, Smart Data Pricing and Fog Networking and Computing) which have been discussed in this Forum are all Taiwan’s strength and competence NOW. We need to integrate all of our R&D resources to initiate JUST a few very focused programs to develop/secure necessary essential IPRs and deliver a Demonstrable Working End-to-End System (e.g. F-RAN) within 3 ~4 Years.
Suggestions – for Taiwan to do Next
42Source : Professor Mung Chiang, Princeton University
43Source : Professor Mung Chiang, Princeton University
44Source : Professor Mung Chiang, Princeton University
45Source : Professor Mung Chiang, Princeton University