N卸皿e :

軸即し聞NATIONAL RⅢLE AssocIATION OF AMERICA

PoLITICAL VICTORY FuNDl 1250 WAPLES MILL RoADFARFAX, VA 22030-7400

2020 J加ho Cbn励めQ〃e諭oma加e

MAへこ　巨もくらに、山CampaignName‥　Eleく

Campaign Address: ○○週

83ぎS4

舌.」e重ししe I山

冨●録ope_合ゾ巳

Carapaign Phone : 乙0ぎー 一るe14

ld禽」0_ C〇時¥Website: n¥Aa.c,Campaign Fax: 村O山く」C狐画印B皿拙　爪A八〇a小へA厄C4 1dA」o.亀⊃動

For f血ther infor血Lation on Idaho範rearm laws,

PIease visit肋仇仇n朋枕org and cfrok on the ''Gun Laws一一feature located血the menu.

1・ Do you agree皿at the Second Amendment to the United State§ Constitu債on guarantees a funda皿ental?血dividual right

¥芸P and bear arms that appHes to an law-abiding Americans) regardle§S Ofwhere they live血the U血ted States?

Yes.b.No.

2. Cousidering cu調eut Idaho血eam laws, do you support any additionaI restrictive state legisla脆on reg山a債ng the sale, uSe,

Or POSSe§Sion of粗・earmS Or ammun脆on?

a. Yes, for all血・earmS and ammunition. Please explain:

b. Yes, for certain血eams and/or ammunition. Please explain:

¥寸諸富諸藩袈監禁記譜富。V。d t。 。。n。fi, 1。Wiわiding g。n 。Ⅷ。rS 。nd a。,utSm。n in Idah。.

3. Wo血d you support state legislation bam血g the manufacture) POS§eSSionl OWnerShip) PurCha§e? Sale and/or transfer of

any鯖rearm?

a. Yes, for all fireams. Please specify type ofrestriction(S):b. Yes, for all handguns. Please specify type ofrestriction(s):c. Yes, for some fireanus. Please specify types of範reams万es血ction(s):

『」 d. No, I oppose baming血e ma即席ucture, POSSeSSion, OⅥmerShip, PurChase, Sale and/or transfer of any血eam.

4. Wo山d you support legisla慣on requir血g血dividuals to obta血a s血te膿cense* to own) POSSeSS Or Purchase firearms?

聖iceJrsi喝aS C/Sed her烏J宅倍Jgめsめ初eg醜めn J.equiri喝fream o脇e鳩めob融n a licemef・Om a gOvemment q節cial or

呼enの′わO肋andpo細錆s aj3ream. As a mねfream o脇er /icensing宛閥genem妙7’equire〆nge′print鴫phoわgr呼hi褐and/br a backyo2/nd invesiなa寂on Q/協e雌phcanl N寂e∴7協sおd窮をrent zhan obtaini7略a pemit to cany a co7ZCealed han砂n・

a. Yes, for owners ofall丘reamLS.

b. Yes, for owners ofa11 handg関s.

→丁藷・豊諸芸筈窪慧器誓5. Wo血d you support state legisIation requiring all firearm owners to register their血eam(S) in a centraIized state皿e

or database?

a. Yes, for all firearms.b. Yes, for a11 handguns.

←寸言二諒嵩誤諾蓋詳蒜慧‡慧竺拙

6. WouId you support state legisIation imposing a statewide旬aiting periodブタbetⅥ′een the purchase and the deIivery of

鯖rear皿s?

a. Yes, for a11 fireaⅡus. How Iong?

、、--マ

b. Yes, for all handguns. How Iong?C. Yes for some血eams. Please apecify

±」 d. No, I oppose a statewide `twaiting period” for鰯reams purchase.

7. Wo山d you support state legislation to require a background check on every sale or transfer of a firearm’eVen between

Private血dividual§ Or fa血ily members (SO-CaIled αuniversal,, background checks)?

a. Yes, I would support requiring backgro皿d checks on all private sales, includ血g血ose to family members.

b. Yes, I would support requi血g backgrond checks on private sales, eXClud血g皿ose to immediate fa血叫y members.

へ毒薬嵩聾霊豊憲法諾詰謀議剛血ows o血y・8.血1994’Congress imPOSed a lO-year ban on瓜e mamlfact町e, for sale to private individuals, Ofvarious semi-autOmatic*

fireams it temed短assault weapons,,, and of a-ition magazines capable ofholding more血an l O rounds of ammunition,

Which p血narily a節ected handgms designed for selfdefeuse. Congress’subsequent study ofthe ban, aS Well as state and local

law enforcement agency reports’Showed血at co血ary to the ban’s supporters’claius, these fireams and magazines are nrisused

in less血an one percent ofviolent crim・e. Since this ban expired in 2004,也e則1mbers o弛ese fireams and magazines have risen

to a皿-time highs while violent cri皿e has fallen to an all-time low. Would you support sぬte legislation restricting the

POSSeSSion, OWnerShip’PurChase’Sale’and/or transfer of semi-automatic fireamS and/or limits on皿e capacity ofmagazines designed for se岨de重chse? iSbmi-autOma房c〆rea棚have been common砂ased〆,r hg‘ni鵬細准et shoo毎g, and

Se好雄me Sinceカae加inかOdαCめnめ脇e履花1800g. All semi一勧めma#c可?re onb, One Shot脇en zhe加gger ispg‘嬢d 7均′ are

notf砂-a徹りma訪o machine gz/nS, 14,hich have been脇ic砂7優u寂杉d c/nderJ?deml kw since 1934.

a. Yes, I would support such legislation for semi-automatic fireamS and magazines.b. Yes, I would support such legislation for semi-autOmatic fireams o血y.

へ寸:薫豊謹#欝for am血tion magazines o血y. Please apecify magazine capacity linrfu

9. h血e Uhited States, the number ofprivately ouned fireams is at an a11-t血e址gb and rises by more鳳m lO million am脚lly.

Meanwhle,血e firearm accident dea血rate has decreased more仕はn 90 percent over血e last ce両町y. Accidents have declined in

Part due to NRA丘ream safety training programs used by over lOO,000 NRA Certified血structors as well as hundreds of schooIs,Civic groups, and law enforcement agencies. Nevertheless, legislation has been prQPOSed in many states to single out fireamOWnerS and impose criminal sanctions on the parents or guardiaus of minor children who iIjure也emselves or o血ers in血eam-

related accidents. Wo山d you support state Iegis賞ation to impose crim血al sanc慣on§ On ParentS When their ch組dren are

invo賞ved in such accidents?

一、¥立言菅豊豊謡詰藷誌・ Ple棚担

1 0. Under current federa1 1aw, handgun purchases from a federally liceused dealer are restricted to individuals who have reached血e age of21 ・ Some have argued血is purchase restriction should be extended to all血eams, including r胞es and shotguns,

effectively denying血em血eir Second Amendment rights.血addition, SOme lawmakers want to go even fur血er and prohibit血e

POSSeSSion and ownership offireanus by anyone mder血e age of21. The NRA believes血at 18-20 year old adults have血e saneCOustitutional rig址s as all Americans, and such restrictions would o血y limit也e right of law-al)iding citizeus to protect

血emselves against violent attack w皿e doing nothing to combat crime. Do you believe law abid血g ad血ts 18-20 years of age

Sho山d be prohibited from purchas血g or possessing鯖rearm§?

a. I support extending血e current handgun purchase prohibition by血ose under 21 to include all fireams.

b. I support extending血e cu調ent handgun purchase prohibition by血ose under 2 1 to also prohibit possession and ownersh車

Of handguns o血y.

C. I su則pOrt extending血e cul:rent handgun purchase prohibition by血ose under 2 1 to also prohibit血e purchase, POSSeSSion,

Or OWnerShip of any firearm.d. I su削pOrt extending the current handgr皿PurChase prohibition by血ose mder 2 1 to also prohibit血e purchase, POSSeSSion,

¥。. Or OWnerShip of semi-autOmatic r岨es and shotguns.

I QPPOSe any e餓加to extend the current handgun purchase prohibition in any way. I believe 1 8-20 year olds have the

Sane COnStitutional rights as a11 citizeus.

2

1 1. Idaho is one of49 states wi血some fom offireams preemption. This law guarantees血at the state has sole responsibility in

血e field of丘ream regulations, keaping counties and municipalities from passing a patchwck of confusing and co血旺c血g local

laws t血oughout the state. Wo血d you support streng血e血g Idaho)s firearm preemption Iaw so it would be easier to enforce

and wo血d cIarify to co皿債es and municipa雌es that fiream laws and reg山hations are soIeIy the responsib並ty of血e state?

¥_ 。. Y。S, I w。uld sxpp。r, s,r。ngth。血g Idah。’s fir。。n Pr。。nP,i。n l。W.b. No, I support Idaho’s current血eam preemption law.

C. No, I believe血e fiream preemption law should be rq)ealed.

12. Id血o is one of48 states wi瓜some fom ofrange protection law to protect long-eStablished shooting ranges from being

forced to cIose or curtail activities due to court actions or local noise standards imposed by a growing and/or臆Shifting pQPulation.

Do you support Idaho,s shooting range protectio皿Iaw?

¥a. Yes, I support Idaho’s range protection law.

b. No’I oppose Idcho,s range protection law and think it should be repealed.

13. Do you agree that an血dividual sho血d be enti鵬ed to judicial due process -血cIuding notiee of血e re量evant

accusations’OPPOrtunity to appear at a hearing before a neutral judge and to present evidence in his or her favor, and

access to legal representa債on - before血e血dividual is dec量ared Iegally血eHgible to possess範rear皿S Or forced to

Surrender any範rear皿S the血dividual oⅧS?

¥a. Yes,血e Second Amendment is an in]POrtant liberty interest for all Americaus, and it should not be denied wi血out

S血gent due process.

b. No, it’s always better to err on血e side ofsafety where fireams are concemed’eVen ifthat results in a person being

denied Second Amendmeut rights without due process.C. O血er. Please explain:

14.血2014血e legislature passed, and血e govemor signed into law’Senate Bil1 1254, a law pemitting q脚随ed retired law

enforcemeut o純cers and law-al)iding adults who have obfained an Idaho招e血anced,, concealed cany license to possess a fiream

On Public college or uriversity campuses; Wi心血e excq誼on of student domitories and entertairme血/aporting facilities w地a

Seating capacfty ofover l,000 persons. The NRA s堅POrted S 1254 for two prinary reasons. First, the NRA believes that

a11owing we皿ained, law-abiding adrlts to possess a血℃am On Public college and university campuses is essential for personal

PrOteCtion and will help to deter血e commission ofviolent c血nes on campus. Second,血e NRA believes瓜at血e current fireams

PrOhibition adopted by Ida血O’s public colleges and universities constitutes a broad infriIlgement On individuals’fundane競al right

to self-defeuse and cousti請ional right to ke印and be紺ams. Do you agree with血e overwhe止血g血ajority ofIegislator§

→ヾ二塁:認諾霧;f鵠荒灘器能。ial wh。n i, w。S b。ing 。。nSid。r。d.C. Yes, I am an incumbentpublic o鯖cial who appo$ed to S 1254, but now I believe it is good law.

Please explain:d. No, I am an incumbent public o鯖cial who s堕por花d S 1254, but now I believe it is bad law.

Please explain:e. No. Please explain:

¥葦15・ In 2016, the Idaho Legislature voted overwhelmingly in sxpport ofSenate Bil1 1389’Which a11ows for血e “pem劇ess”

Canying of concealed h狐dguns by law-abiding, ad血t Idahoans. S 1389 received su削pOrt from血e Idaho Fratemal Order of

Police and血e Idaho Sheriffi Association based on their belief血at負Iaw-abiding, nentally sound and responsible gun owners are

[1aw enforcement’s] partners in keeping crime rates Iow in Idaho.” Do you support血e provisions of S 1389?

Yes, I su蛸pOrt血e right of law-abiding’adr肌dahoaus to carry a concealed weapon for selfLdefeuse wi血out govemment-

mmdated pemritting.b. No, I QPPOSe SuCh policy. Please explain:

1 6. Idaho does not cuIrently have an adequate process for persous convicted of certain types of misdemeanors to seek restorationOf血eir gun rights. Cu調ently, it is easier in the state ofId血o for a person to have址s or her rights restored after a felony

COnViction than a misdemeanor conviction. Wo血d you support Iegi§量ation that would create a process to restore rights for

血dividual§ Who have lost血eir right to pos§eS§ a範rear皿due to misdemeanor convictions?

ゝ 。. Y。S, I w。uld supp。it such l。gislati。n.b. No, I would QPPOSe SuCh legislation. Please explain:

17. Which of the following choices best describe your atti血de toward hun債ng?

¥1 a.Hun血g is a valuable tool for wildife management, a POSitive use of natural resources, and an American tradition血at

teaches young people respo髄ibility and re?PeCt for血e outdoors.

b. H関血g should be bamed.

C. O血er. Please explain:

18. Are you a member of組e NationaI Rifle Association9 §tate aSSOCiation or any other鯖rearm/shoo血g

SPOrtS/sportsmen,s organization?

ゝ_a. Y。S. NRAM。n血ship #:b. No.

はら6b「 8 O血er organization(s) :

19. Have you ever run for or held an eIected o飾ce?

生蒜Pl即吟は訪日寸C…印肌品L 〇五与-Zo-毛臆臆臆

If,。。r 。。n#器霊諾誓器謹霊豊三業発禁寵霊諾誌i, as w。n.Thank you for your time and consideration.

丁9よ也o高山。〇両p即位上にふ軍事品争由良七五紅轟㌦糾u和合杭二時s弥刷高的あ。。」トC中信∩虹色も山心細佃昆布之o午的405わ4

一三∽から。→母。鴨に⊂0…色の十多生之もPI7う∽鋤鋤もめて個釧是正○科し丁吃 p多毛〇五〇 C良禽鴫とを三書で暗し臼をしく_し/し/ l▼　し●○ヽ’、‾▼}▼‾

一匪∪∽了九五〇のp什虫偏史記毒血畔毎もc師宣封。7乱のふてZ十〇　〇拘佃-十〇合〇時鴫綱伝

書秘叫I 『高二への↓〇位エビ0色些多の丁ゝ両軍は職名仙仰他種o山oF丁姐S ㊨“守∴ 00両氏D∂U工場∪肌合礼子0頓乙I丁0の出汁丁年も川角何例-申し汀-多　重GO丁やOト)皐二　を0U 」l可レ乏

南峰商え岬中座LうI6古口「 ‥ ・

(ヽ鶴亀心乙にG庫○…○　○しろe　い叱しの乞う車軸・ ≠0し○乙に`　火事で嶋も」戸′∽他面SAし乞う′申何種けい与り団0仕丁曾山Oを…さら小↓†巾の〆

.a蒜票鵠葺二二n aCCurately repre霊端二4