7/28/2019 Oakley v. Koh'ls - Complaint

1/6

1234567

\\ 8910

~ 11...OJ 12:Il lE(I) 130..:.: 14"0(I)..c 15.)t::c.Sc: 16.Q:;: l: Illlo 17. a.....t : 0-..,; ~ 18

19202122232425262728

David R. Gabor, State Bar No. 1. 45729dgabor@weintraub.comAudrey A. Millemann, State Bar No. 124954amillemann@weintraub.com '()

~ : " "f'"""'.-,. --weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodinLaw Corporation9665 Wilshire Blvd., 9th FloorBeverly Hills, CA 90212

c;;l;ic. : . ~.;{31 0) 858-7888- Main(31 0) 550-7191 -FacsimileAttorneys for Pia i ntiffOakley, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

..,

'

,... .,,=C . .>('_c-:---.! l- r J_,::,.-.U1U l

OAKLEY, INC., a Washingtoncorporation, Case NoSACV 13 - 00963 CJC (RZx)Plaintiff,

vKOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.,a Delaware corQ_oratior;;,. andACCUTIME WAlCH CvRP., a NewYork corporation,

Defendants.

COMPLAINT FOR PATENTINFRINGEMENTDEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 0:;o-( j ':z)::>I

OJ-Cll 0 17_a........c 0- ()~ ~ 18

19202122232425262728

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF(Infringement of the 0'359 Patent)

10. Oakley repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations oparagraphs 1 through 9 above as if fully set forth herein.

11. Oakley is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, thaKohl's and Accutime (collectively "Defendants") have manufactured, usedoffered for sale, sold, and imported into the United States, and continue tomanufacture, use, offer to sell, sell, and import, watches covered by the 0'359patent ("the Infringing Products") without permission or license from Oakley. TheInfringing Products include, but are not limited to, the "Viviani Gunmetal Watchsold by Kohl's through its website www.kohls.com and elsewhere. Defendanthave infringed, contributorily infringed, and/or induced infringement of th0'359 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into theUnited States the Infringing Products and/or inducing others to make, use, seloffer to sell, or import the Infringing Products. Defendants continue to infringecontributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of the D'359 patent.

12. As a result of Defendants' acts of infringement, Oakley has sustainedand will continue to sustain economic damages. Oakley is entitled to recover itdamages from Defendants pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 289.

13. As a result of Defendants' conduct, Oakley has suffered damage toits reputation and goodwill, which has caused Oakley irreparable harm and fowhich Oakley cannot be compensated by monetary relief. Defendants wi

..

continue to infringe the D'3'59 patent unless enjoined by this Court. Pursuant to,.-.f'35 U.S.C. 283, Oakley is entitled to a permanent injunction to prevenDefendants' further infringement.

14. Defendants have knowledge of the D1359 patent, and Oakley iinformed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that Defendants' infringemenhas been and is willful. Because this is an exceptional case, pursuant to 35

A rnuPJ A NT FOR P ATP_NT TNFR lNGF.MF.NT

7/28/2019 Oakley v. Koh'ls - Complaint

5/6

123456789

10c 11.a0.....Ol 12I'llE41 13()

~ 14!!

7/28/2019 Oakley v. Koh'ls - Complaint

6/6

.E"00....Olt :t'llE0c.>.!