oakley v. pr trading - complaint

8/17/2019 Oakley v. PR Trading - Complaint

1/80

COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)[email protected] S. Razai (SBN 246922)[email protected], MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street

Fourteenth FloorIrvine, CA 92614Telephone: (949) 760-0404Facsimile: (949) 760-9502

Attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLEY, INC., a Washingtoncorporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

PR TRADING COMPANY, INC. D/B/APR SUNGLASSES, a Texas corporation,

Defendant.

))))))

))))))))

Civil Action No.

COMPLAINT FORPATENT INFRINGEMENT,TRADEMARK

INFRINGEMENT, TRADEDRESS INFRINGEMENT,FALSE DESIGNATION OFORIGIN AND UNFAIRCOMPETITION

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

'16CV1147 NLSAJB

Case 3:16-cv-01147-AJB-NLS Document 1 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 80


2/80

- 1 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”) hereby complains of Defendant PR

Trading Company, Inc. d/b/a PR Sunglasses (“Defendant”) and alleges as

follows:

I. JURISDICTION

1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claims

in this action that relate to patent infringement, trademark infringement, trade

dress infringement, false designation of origin, and federal unfair competition

pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338, and 15

U.S.C. §§ 1116(a), 1121(a), and 1125(a), as these claims arise under the laws of

the United States. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the claims in

this Complaint which arise under state law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a)

because the state law claims are so related to the federal claims that they form

part of the same case or controversy and derive from a common nucleus of

operative facts.

2.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because

Defendant has a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this

judicial district including by selling and offering for sale infringing products in

this judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement in this

judicial district, including but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly

to consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of

commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,

which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to

Oakley’s claim.

3.

Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)

and (d).

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /



3/80

- 2 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

II. THE PARTIES

4.

Oakley is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of

the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at One Icon,

Foothill Ranch, California 92610.

5. Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant PR Trading Company, Inc. d/b/a PR Sunglasses is a corporation

organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, having its principal

place of business at 7596 Harwin Drive, Houston, Texas 77036.

6.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant has committed the acts alleged herein within this judicial district.

III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

7. Oakley is one of the world’s most iconic brands. The company and

its products, particularly in the realm of eyewear, are instantly and universally

recognized for their innovative technology and distinctive style. Since its

founding, Oakley’s engineers and designers have worked continuously to bring

new technology and breakthrough designs to the market.

8.

Oakley has been actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of

high quality eyewear since at least 1985. Oakley is the manufacturer and

retailer of several lines of eyewear that have enjoyed substantial success and are

protected by various intellectual property rights owned by Oakley.

9. On November 25, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark

Office (USPTO) duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No.

D581,443 (“the D443 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASSES COMPONENTS.”

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D443

Patent. A true and correct copy of the D443 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit

1.

/ / /

/ / /



4/80

- 3 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10.

On July 31, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D547,794 (“the D794 Patent”), titled

“EYEGLASSES.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

interest in the D794 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D794 Patent is

attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

11. On November 6, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D554,689 (“the D689 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASS

FRAME.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in

the D689 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D689 Patent is attached hereto

as Exhibit 3.

12. On December 4, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United


COMPONENTS.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

interest in the D818 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D818 Patent is

attached hereto as Exhibit 4.

13.

On February 5, 2013, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D675,664 (“the D664 Patent”), titled “EYEGLASS.”

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D664

Patent. A true and correct copy of the D664 Patent is attached hereto as

Exhibit 5.

14. On January 28, 2003, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United


FRONT.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in

the D458 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D458 Patent is attached hereto

as Exhibit 6.

15. On December 29, 2009, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued

United States Design Patent No. D607,039 (“the D039 Patent”), titled

“EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENT.” Oakley is the owner by



5/80

- 4 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D039 Patent. A true and correct

copy of the D039 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 7.

16.

Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its

patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §287.

17. Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports

into the United States eyewear that infringe the D443 Patent, D794 Patent, D689

Patent, D818 Patent, D664 Patent, D458 Patent and D039 Patent (“Asserted

Patents”), including offering products for sale on the website

www.prsunglasses.com.

18.

In order to protect Oakley’s investment in the development of its

proprietary technology, Oakley has obtained numerous trademark registrations,

including Trademark Registration Nos. 2,146,295 and 1,984,501 (“Oakley

Marks”).

19. Oakley is the owner of Trademark Registration No. 2,146,295.

Trademark Registration No. 2,146,295 was registered with the USPTO on

March 24, 1998 on the Principal Register. Trademark Registration No.

2,146,295 is associated with the following goods: protective and/or anti-glare

eyewear, namely, sunglasses, goggles, spectacles and their parts and

accessories, namely, replacement lenses, earstems, frames, nose pieces and

foam strips; cases specially adapted for protective and/or anti-glare eyewear and

their parts and accessories. A true and correct copy of the certificate of

registration of Trademark Registration No. 2,146,295 is attached hereto as

Exhibit 8.

20.

Oakley is the owner of Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501.

Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501 was registered with the USPTO on July

2, 1996 on the Principal Register. Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501 is

associated with the following goods: protective and/or anti-glare eyewear,

namely sunglasses, goggles, spectacles and their parts and accessories, namely



6/80

- 5 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

replacement lenses, earstems, frames, nose pieces and foam strips; cases

specially adapted for protective and/or anti-glare eyewear and their parts and

accessories. A true and correct copy of the certificate of registration of

Trademark Registration No. 1,984,501 is attached hereto as Exhibit 9.

21. Without permission or consent from Oakley, Defendant is offering

for sale, distributing, marketing, and/or selling eyewear bearing the Oakley

Marks.

Infringing Mark

22.

Oakley is informed, and on that basis alleges, that Defendant did

not begin using its infringing mark in connection with eyewear until long after

Oakley began using the Oakley Marks.

23. Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

Defendant’s unauthorized use of its infringing mark is intended to trade upon

the goodwill and substantial recognition associated with Oakley and the Oakley

Marks.

24.

Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

Defendant is using its infringing mark in an attempt to associate its eyewear

products with Oakley and the Oakley Marks, to cause mistake or deception as to

the source of Defendant’s eyewear products, and/or to otherwise trade upon

Oakley’s valuable reputation and customer goodwill in the Oakley Marks.



7/80


8/80

- 7 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30.

As a result of Oakley’s widespread use and display of the

STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress in association with its eyewear, (a) the

public has come to recognize and identify eyewear bearing the STRAIGHT

JACKET® Trade Dress as emanating from Oakley, (b) the public recognizes

that products bearing the STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress constitute high

quality products that conform to the specifications created by Oakley, and (c)

the STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress has established strong secondary

meaning and extensive goodwill.

31. Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

Defendant’s acts complained of herein are willful and deliberate.

32.

Defendant’s acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to

suffer irreparable injury to its business. Oakley will suffer substantial loss of

goodwill and reputation unless and until Defendant is preliminarily and

permanently enjoined from its wrongful actions complained of herein.

IV. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Patent Infringement)

(35 U.S.C. § 271)

33.

Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1–32 of

this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

34. This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271.

35. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D443

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

similar to the claim of the D443 Patent, including for example, Defendant’s

eyewear model 5173 as shown below.

/ / /

/ / /



9/80

- 8 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accused Product Oakley’s Patent

5173 U.S. Patent No. D581,443

36. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D443 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakley’s rights in the design claimed

in the D443 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry, and Defendant’s eyewear model 5173 is a nearly identical

copy of Oakley’s design. Accordingly, Defendant’s actions constitute willful

and intentional infringement of the D443 Patent. Defendant infringed the D443

Patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant knew, or it

was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted

infringement of the D443 Patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D443

Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.

37.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and


Patent, the D689 Patent, and the D818 Patent by making, using, selling, offering

for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a design that would appear to an

ordinary observer to be substantially similar to the respective claims of the

D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and the D818 Patent, including for example,

Defendant’s eyewear models 6608 and 6053 as shown below.

/ / /

/ / /



10/80

- 9 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


6608

6053

U.S. Patent No. D547,794



38.









11/80

- 10 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


6133 U.S. Patent No. D581,443

39.

Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689

Patent, and the D818 Patent were undertaken without permission or license from

Oakley. Upon information and belief, Defendant had actual knowledge ofOakley’s rights in the designs claimed in the D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and

the D818 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout the

eyewear industry, and Defendant’s eyewear models 6608, 6053 and 6133 are

nearly identical copies of Oakley’s designs. Accordingly, Defendant’s actions

constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689

Patent, and the D818 Patent. Defendant infringed the D794 Patent, the D689

Patent, and the D818 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights.

Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that

its actions constituted infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689 Patent, and the

D818 Patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D794 Patent, the D689

Patent, and the D818 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce

for its industry.

40.









12/80

- 11 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


5121 U.S. Patent No. D675,664

41.

Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D664 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakley’s rights in the design claimed

in the D664 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry, and Defendant’s eyewear model 5121 is a nearly identical

copy of Oakley’s design. Accordingly, Defendant’s actions constitute willful

and intentional infringement of the D664 Patent. Defendant infringed the D664

Patent with reckless disregard of Oakley’s patent rights. Defendant knew, or it

was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted

infringement of the D664 Patent. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the

D664Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.

42.






/ / /



13/80

- 12 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

eyewear models 7223, 7260, 7261, CH228, CH11, CH422, and CH433 as

shown below.


7223

7260

7261

CH228

CH11




14/80


15/80

- 14 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

45.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Oakley is entitled to damages for

Defendant’s infringing acts and treble damages together with interests and costs

as fixed by this Court.

46.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Oakley is entitled to Defendant’s total

profits from the sale of eyewear that infringe Oakley’s design patent rights.

47. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Oakley is entitled to reasonable

attorneys’ fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.

48.

Due to the aforesaid infringing acts, Oakley has suffered great and

irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.

49.

Defendant will continue to directly and/or indirectly infringe

Oakley’s patent rights to the great and irreparable injury of Oakley, unless

enjoined by this Court.

V. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Federal Trademark Infringement)

(15 U.S.C. § 1114)

50.

Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32 of


51.

This is a claim for trademark infringement arising under 15 U.S.C.

§ 1114.

52. Upon information and belief, Defendant is involved in the

manufacture, sale, offer for sale, distribution, import and/or export of sunglasses

that bear one or more of the Oakley Marks without Oakley’s consent.

53.

Upon information and belief, long after Oakley’s adoption and use

of each of the Oakley Marks, after the federal registration of each of the Oakley

Marks, and after each of the Oakley Marks had become famous, Defendant has

affixed and used one or more of the Oakley Marks without Oakley’s consent in

a manner that infringes upon Oakley’s rights in the Oakley Marks in violation of

15 U.S.C. § 1114.



16/80

- 15 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

54.

Without Oakley’s consent, Defendant uses in commerce marks that

are confusingly similar to the Oakley Marks in connection with the sale,

offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods in a manner which is

likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.


Defendant did so with the intent to unfairly compete with Oakley, to trade upon

Oakley’s reputation and goodwill by causing confusion and mistake among

customers and the public, and to deceive the public into believing that

Defendant’s products are associated with, sponsored by, originate from, or are

approved by Oakley, when they are not.

56. Defendant’s activities constitute willful and intentional

infringement of the Oakley Marks in total disregard of Oakley’s proprietary

rights, and were done despite Defendant’s knowledge that the use of the Oakley

Marks was and is in direct contravention of Oakley’s rights.

57.


Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

gains, profits, and advantages from the use of the Oakley Marks in an amount

that is not presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendant’s actions,

constituting unauthorized use of the Oakley Marks, Oakley has been damaged

and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

58. Due to Defendant’s actions, constituting unauthorized use of the

Oakley Marks, Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable

injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.

VI. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Federal Trade Dress Infringement)

(15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))

59. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32 of




17/80

- 16 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

60.

This is a claim for trade dress infringement under 15 U.S.C. §

1125(a).

61.

As a result of the widespread use and display of Oakley’s HALF

JACKET® Trade Dress, the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning to

potential purchasers, in that potential purchasers have come to associate

sunglasses bearing the design of the HALF JACKET® Trade Dress with

Oakley.

62.

Subsequent to Oakley’s use and adoption of the HALF JACKET®

Trade Dress, Defendant has developed, advertised, and sold sunglasses that use

trade dress that is confusingly similar to the HALF JACKET® trade dress. For

example, the frame of Defendant’s eyewear model CAMO11 uses trade dress

that is confusingly similar to Oakley’s HALF JACKET® Trade Dress.

63. As a result of the widespread use and display of Oakley’s

STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress, the trade dress has acquired secondary

meaning to potential purchasers, in that potential purchasers have come to

associate sunglasses bearing the design of the STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade

Dress with Oakley.

64. Subsequent to Oakley’s use and adoption of the STRAIGHT

JACKET® Trade Dress, Defendant has developed, advertised, and sold

sunglasses that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the STRAIGHT

JACKET® trade dress. For example, the stems of Defendant’s eyewear model

CAMO11 uses trade dress that is confusingly similar to Oakley’s STRAIGHT

JACKET® Trade Dress.

65.

Upon information and belief, Defendant’s acts of trade dress

infringement were undertaken willfully with full knowledge and with the

express intent to cause confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing

public.

/ / /



18/80

- 17 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

66.



gains, profits and advantages from Defendant’s trade dress infringement in an

amount that is not presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendant’s

actions, constituting trade dress infringement, Oakley has been damaged and is

entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

67. Due to Defendant’s actions, constituting trade dress infringement,

Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for

which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.

VII. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(False Designation of Origin and Federal Unfair Competition)

(15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))

68. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32

and 51-67 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

69.

This is a claim for false designation of origin and unfair

competition and arising under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

70.

Defendant’s use of Oakley’s trademarks and Oakley’s trade dress

without Oakley’s consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false or

misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact,

which is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the

affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as

to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods or commercial

activities by another person in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

71.

Defendant’s use of Oakley’s trademarks and Oakley’s trade dress

without Oakley’s consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false or

misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact,

which in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature,

/ / /



19/80

- 18 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s

goods or commercial activities in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

72.

Such conduct by Defendant is likely to confuse, mislead, and

deceive Defendant’s customers, purchasers, and members of the public as to the

origin of the Oakley’s trademarks and trade dress or cause said persons to

believe that Defendant and/or its products have been sponsored, approved,

authorized, or licensed by Oakley or are in some way affiliated or connected

with Oakley, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

73.

Upon information and belief, Defendant’s actions were undertaken

willfully with full knowledge of the falsity of such designation of origin and

false descriptions or representations.



gains, profits, and advantages from Defendant’s false designation of origin, false

or misleading statements, descriptions of fact, or false or misleading

representations of fact in an amount that is not presently known to Oakley. By

reason of Defendant’s actions, constituting false designation of origin, false or

misleading statements, false or misleading descriptions of fact, or false or

misleading representations of fact, Oakley has been damaged and is entitled to

monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

75. Due to Defendant’s actions, constituting false designation of origin,

false or misleading statements, false or misleading description of fact, or false or

misleading representations of fact, Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer

great and irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.

VIII. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(California Unfair Competition)

76. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-32

and 51-75 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.



20/80

- 19 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

77.

This is a claim for unfair competition, arising under California

Business & Professions Code § 17200, et seq.

78.

Defendant’s acts of trademark infringement, trade dress

infringement, and false designation of origin complained of herein constitute

unfair competition with Oakley under the laws of the State of California,

particularly California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq.



gains, profits and advantages from Defendant’s unfair competition in an amount

that is not presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendant’s wrongful acts

as alleged in this Complaint, Oakley has been damaged and is entitled to

restitution.

80. By its actions, Defendant has injured and violated the rights of

Oakley and has irreparably injured Oakley, and such irreparable injury will

continue unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court.

WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against

Defendant for the following relief:

A.

An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the

Asserted Patents under 35 U.S.C. § 271.

B. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its

respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and

those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from infringing

the Asserted Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271.

C.

That Defendant accounts for all gains, profits, and advantages

derived by Defendant’s infringement of the Asserted Patents in violation of

35 U.S.C. § 271, and that Defendant pays to Oakley all damages suffered by

Oakley and/or Defendant’s total profit from such infringement pursuant to 35

U.S.C. § 289.



21/80

- 20 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D.

An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages

because of Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284.

E.

An award to Oakley of the attorney fees, expenses, and costs

incurred by Oakley in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285.

F. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case.

G. An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed each of

the Oakley Marks under 15 U.S.C. § 1114.

H.

An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed each of

Oakley’s HALF JACKET® Trade Dress and Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET®

Trade Dress under 15 U.S.C. § 1125.

I. An Order adjudging Defendant to have falsely designated the

origin of its goods under 15 U.S.C. § 1125.

J. An Order adjudging Defendant to have unfairly competed with

Oakley under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 and California Business & Professions Code §

17200, et seq.

K.

That Defendant accounts for all gains, profits, and advantages

derived by Defendant’s infringement of the Oakley Marks, Oakley’s HALF

JACKET® Trade Dress and Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET, false designation

of origin, and federal unfair competition and that Defendant pays to Oakley all

damages suffered by Oakley and/or Defendant’s total profit from such

infringement pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117.

L.

An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages

because of Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117.

M.

A preliminary and permanent injunction against Defendant, its

officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors, and assigns,

and all persons, firms, or corporations in active concert or participation with

Defendant, enjoining them from engaging in the following activities and from



22/80

- 21 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

assisting or inducing, directly or indirectly, others to engage in the following

activities:

1.

using any of the Oakley Marks, or any other mark, symbol, or

logo that is confusingly similar to any of the Oakley Marks on

or in connection with any goods, including but not limited to,

eyewear and replacement parts;

2. using Oakley’s HALF JACKET® Trade Dress, Oakley’s

STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress, or any other trade dress

that is confusingly similar to either Oakley’s HALF JACKET®

Trade Dress or Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET® Trade Dress;

3. manufacturing, using, displaying, distributing, or selling any

goods that infringe any of the Oakley Marks, Oakley’s HALF

JACKET® Trade Dress or Oakley’s STRAIGHT JACKET®

Trade Dress.

4.

falsely designating the origin of Defendant’s goods;

5.

unfairly competing with Oakley in any manner whatsoever;

6.

making false or misleading statements, descriptions of fact, or

false or misleading representations of fact; and

7. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Oakley’s

business reputation.

N. That Defendant be required to account to Oakley for any and all

profits derived by its acts of trademark infringement, trade dress infringement,

false designation of origin and unfair competition complained of in this

Complaint.

O.

That Defendant’s acts of trademark infringement, trade dress

infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition complained of

in this Complaint be deemed willful, that this be deemed an exceptional case,

and that Oakley be entitled to enhanced damages.



23/80

- 22 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P.

That Oakley have and recover the costs of this civil action,

including reasonable attorneys’ fees.

Q.

An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of

this action against Defendant.

R. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and

proper.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated: May 12, 2016 By: /s/ Ali S. Razai Michael K. [email protected] S. [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.



24/80

- 23 - COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so

triable.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated: May 12, 2016 By: /s/ Ali S. Razai Michael K. [email protected] S. [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.23303966



25/80

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Page #

Exhibit 1 ................................................................................................................ 1

Exhibit 2 ................................................................................................................ 5

Exhibit 3 .............................................................................................................. 10

Exhibit 4 .............................................................................................................. 15

Exhibit 5 .............................................................................................................. 21

Exhibit 6 .............................................................................................................. 26

Exhibit 7 .............................................................................................................. 31

Exhibit 8 .............................................................................................................. 41

Exhibit 9 .............................................................................................................. 42

Exhibit 10 ............................................................................................................ 43

Exhibit 11 ............................................................................................................ 44

23322119



26/80

EXHIBIT 1



27/80

1 2 ) United

States

Design Patent 1 0 )

P a t e n t N 0 . :

Jannard e t a ] .

USO0D581443

US D 5 8 1 , 4 4 3 S

4 5 )

Date o f P a t e n t : * 1 ,

Nov.

2 5 , 2008

5 4 )

7 5 )

7 3 )

* * )

2 1 )

2 2 )

6 2 )

5 1 )

5 2 )

5 8 )

5 6 )

EYEGLASSES

COMPONENTS

I n v e n t o r s : James H . J a n n a r d ,

S p i e d e n

I s l a n d , WA

U S ) ;

Lek

h i x t o n , O r c a s ,

WA

U S ) ;

C o l i n B a d e n , I r v i n e ,

CA

U S ) ; P e t e r

Y e e , I r v i n e , CA U S )

A s s i g n e e : O a k l e y ,

I n c . , F o o t h i l l

R a n c h , CA

U S )

Term: 14 Years

A p p l .

N o . :

2 9 / 3 0 1 , 9 0 2

F i l e d :

Mar.

2 1 , 2008

R e l a t e d US.

p p l i c a t i o n

Data

D i v i s i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 2 9 / 2 6 6 , 5 4 7 , ? l e d

on S e p .

2 2 ,

2 0 0 6 , noW

a t .

No. D e s . 5 6 9 , 4 1 2 .

LOC

8)

Cl.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06

US l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .

D16/314

Field

of

Classi?cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/ 01,

D 1 6 / 3 0 0 4 3 4 2 ; D 2 9 / 1 0 9 4 1 1 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;

3 5 1 / 4 1 ,

4 4 , 5 1 4 5 2 , 6 2 , 1 5 8 , 9 2 , 1 0 3 4 1 2 3 ,

3 5 1 / 1 4 0 , 1 5 3 ; 2 / 4 2 6 4 4 3 2 ,

4 4 7 4 4 4 9 ,

4 4 1 ,

2/4344437

S e e

a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e

f o r c o m p l e t e

s e a r c h h i s t o r y .

R e f e r e n c e s

C i t e d

U . S . PATENTDOCUMENTS

D 1 5 0 , 9 2 4 S 9 / 1 9 4 8

B l i g h t

D 1 7 6 , 3 1 6 S

1 2 / 1 9 5 5 F l e m i n g

D 1 7 8 , 1 7 8 S 7 / 1 9 5 6

F l e m i n g

D293,450

S 1 2 / 1 9 8 7

J a n n a r d

D323,333 S

1 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d

e t

a 1 .

D324,394 S 3 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d

D329,442

S 9 / 1 9 9 2

J a n n a r d

D330,035 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d

D331,587 S 1 2 / 1 9 9 2 J a n n a r d

e t

a 1 .

5 , 2 4 9 , 0 0 1

A 9 / 1 9 9 3

J a n n a r d

D344,742 S 3 / 1 9 9 4

J a n n a r d

D346 814 S

* 5 / 1 9 9 4

Iida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D16/314

D354,501 S 1 / 1 9 9 5

J a n n a r d

5 , 6 1 0 , 6 6 8 A 3 / 1 9 9 7 Mage

D384,364 S

9 / 1 9 9 7

Yee

5 , 7 6 0 , 8 6 8 A 6 / 1 9 9 8 J a n n a r d e t

a 1 .

D399,519

S

1 0 / 1 9 9 8

Yee

D399,866 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 8 Yee

D401,607 S

1 1 / 1 9 9 8

M i n i u t t i

D410,484 S 6 / 1 9 9 9 J a n n a r d e t

a 1 .

6 , 2 3 3 , 3 4 2

B1

5 / 2 0 0 1 F e r n a n d e z

D452 522 S * 1 2 / 2 0 0 1 Chiou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D16/330

D 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 S 6 / 2 0 0 2 S o p e r

D473,892 S 4 / 2 0 0 3 T h i x t o n

e t a 1 .

D529 066 S

*

9/2006

Matera

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. D16/315

OTHER

PUBLICATIONS

U . S . A p p l . N o . 2 9 / 2 6 6 , 5 4 7 ,

? l e d

S e p .

2 2 ,

2 0 0 6 .

US. p p l . N o . 2 9 / 2 8 8 , 6 0 4 , ? l e d J u n . 1 5 , 2 0 0 7 .

U . S . A p p l .

N o .

2 9 / 2 8 8 , 6 0 5 , ? l e d J u n . 1 5 , 2 0 0 7 .

U . S . A p p l . N o . 2 9 / 2 8 8 , 6 0 6 , ? l e d J u n . 1 5 , 2 0 0 7 .

*

c i t e d by

examiner

P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i R a p h a e l B a r k a i

7 4 )

A t t o r n e y ,

A g e n t , o r Firm4Gregory K . N e l s o n

5 7 ) CLAIM

The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n

f o r

e y e g l a s s c o m p o n e n t s , a s shoWn

and d e s c r i b e d .

DESCRIPTION

F I G . 1 i s a f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e

v i e W

o f t h e e y e g l a s s

components

o f t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n ;

F I G .

2

i s

a

f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ;

FIG. 3 i s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

4 i s

a

l e f t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

t h e r e o f ,

t h e

r i g h t - s i d e

e l e v a t i o n a l

v i e W

b e i n g

a

m i r r o r

i m a g e

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

5 i s

a t o p e l e v a t i o n a l vieW h e r e o f ; a n d ,

F I G . 6 i s a

bottom

p l a n

vieW

t h e r e o f .

Phantom

l i n i n g ,

W h e r e

u t i l i z e d ,

i s

f o r i l l u s t r a t i v e p u r p o s e s

o n l y and

i s

n o t i n t e n d e d t o l i m i t

t h e

c l a i m e d d e s i g n t o

t h e

f e a t u r e s shoWn n p h a n t o m .

1 C l a i m ,

3 Drawing

S h e e t s

EXHIBIT 1Page 1



28/80

US Patent

N o v 2 5 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 1 o f 3 US 581 443 S

EXHIBIT 1Page 2



29/80

US Patent

N o v 2 5 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 2 o f 3 US 581 443 S

EXHIBIT 1Page 3



30/80

US Patent

N o v 2 5 2 0 0 8

S h e e t

3 o f 3 US 581 443 S

EXHIBIT 1Page 4



31/80

EXHIBIT 2



32/80

1 2 ) United

States

Design Patent 1 0 )

P a t e n t N 0 . :

USO0D547794S

US

D 5 4 7 , 7 9 4

S

Jannard e t a l . 4 5 )

Date o f P a t e n t :

4 * J u l . 3 1 ,

2007

( 5 4 ) EYEGLASSES

D 4 l 4 , 7 9 6 S

1 0 / 1 9 9 9 A r n e t t e

D420 035

S

* 2/2000

Hartman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dl6/325

( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s :

James

H.

Jannard, S p i e d e n

I s l a n d , WA 1 3 4 4 9 5 4 1 5 *

1 0 / 2 0 0 1

A r n e t t eU S ) ; Hans Karsten

M o r i t z , F o o t h i l l

2 i

gage

~ a g e

§:1 Uh’S€A(US)’C°hn Baden’ Imne’ D 5 1 8 , 8 4 7 s * 4 / 2 0 0 6 T e n g . . . .

D532,033 S *

1 1 / 2 0 0 6

Mangum

D534 572 S

* 1/2007

Teng

. . . . ..

( 7 3 )

A s s 1 g n e e : Oakley, I n c . ,

F o o t h 1 l l

Ranch,

CA

US) 1 3 5 3 4 5 7 3 S * V2007 Mage

*

D 5 3 6 , 0 2 8 S * 1 / 2 0 0 7

P a u l s o n

)

Tenn?

14

Years

D537,467 s

*

2/2007

Teng

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326

2 1 )

A P P 1 - N O - 1 2 9 / 2 2 7 J 1 9

OTHE R

PUBLICATIONS

( 2 2 )

F i l e d : A p r .

1 3 , 2 0 0 5

S u n g l a s s

H u t ,

P ~ 5 , 2 0 0 2 *

( 5 1 )

LOC

8 ) C l .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16-06 *

C i t e d by examiner

( 5 2 )

US.

l .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326 Primary

ExamineriRaphael

Barkai

( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o n

Search

. . . . .

Dl6/300i330,

( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n l , 0 1 ’ FirmiGregory K -

Nelson

D l 6 / l 0 l , 3 3 2 i 3 3 8 ; D 2 9 / l 0 9 * l l 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;

3 5 1 / 4 1 ,

4 4 ,

5 1 4 5 2 ,

6 2 ,

1 5 8 ,

9 2 ,

1 0 3 4 1 1 1 ,

5 7 ) CL AI M

3 5 1 / 1 5 6 , 6 1 , 1 1 4 4 1 1 9 ,

1 2 1 4 1 2 3 ; 2 / 4 2 6 4 4 3 2 ,

_

2 / 4 4 7 i 4 4 9 ’ 4 4 1 , 4 3 6 ,

434*437

The o r n a m e n t a l

d e s l g n f o r

a n

e y e g l a s s e s , a s shown a n d

S e e a p p l i c a t i o n

? l e

f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h

h i s t o r y .

d e s c n b e d

( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d

DESCRIPTION

U . S .

PATENT

DOCUMENTS

D192 885 S * 5 / 1 9 6 2 Petitto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/329

D l 9 3 , 0 2 8 S 6 / 1 9 6 2 P e t i t t o

D199,150 S 9 / 1 9 6 4 C a r m i c h a e l

D202,658 S

1 0 / 1 9 6 5

P e t i t t o

D209,862 S l / l 9 6 8 McCracken

D210 418 S * 3/1968 Bloch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326

D218 ,569

S * 9/1970 McCracken

.

D1 6 / 3 2 5

D264 094 S * 4/1982

Morris

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/325

D 2 6 8 , 6 8 3

S 4 / 1 9 8 3

T e n n y

D285,020

S 8 / 1 9 8 6

S c h m i d t h a l e r

D372,726 S

8 / 1 9 9 6

S i m i o n i

D390,589 S 2 / 1 9 9 8 S i m i o n i

D397,351 S 8 / 1 9 9 8

S i m i o n i

D399 238 S * 1 0 / 1 9 9 8

Simioni

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326

D 4 0 7 , 0 9 9

S 3 / 1 9 9 9 Wang

F I G . 1 i s

a f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e

vieW o f

t h e

e y e g l a s s e s o f

t h e

p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n ;

F I G .

2

i s a l e f t - s i d e


vieW o f t h e e y e g l a s s e s , t h e

r i g h t s i d e


v i e W b e i n g a m i r r o r i m a g e t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

3

i s

a

f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ;

FIG.

4

i s a r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

5 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W

t h e r e o f ;

a n d ,

F I G .

6

i s

a

bottom

p l a n

vieW

t h e r e o f .

Phantom l i n i n g ,

W h e r e

u t i l i z e d , i s f o r

i l l u s t r a t i v e

p u r p o s e s

o n l y

and

i s n o t i n t e n d e d

t o

l i m i t

t h e c l a i m e d

d e s i g n

t o t h e


1 C l a i m , 4 Drawing S h e e t s

EXHIBIT 2Page 5



33/80

U.S.

Patent

J u l . 3 1

2 7

S h e e t 1

o f 4

U D547 794 S

EXHIBIT 2Page 6



34/80EXHIBIT 2

Page 7



35/80

U S

atent J u l

3 1

2 7 S h e e t 3 of4

EXHIBIT 2Page 8



36/80

U.S.

Patent

J u l . 3 1

2 7

S h e e t

4 o f 4

U D547 794 S

FIG.

6

EXHIBIT 2Page 9



37/80

EXHIBIT 3



38/80

1 2 ) United

States

Design Patent 1 0 )

P a t e n t N 0 . 2

USO0D554689S

US

D 5 5 4 , 6 8 9

S

Jannard

e t

a ] . 4 5 )

Date o f P a t e n t : 4 *

Nov.

6 , 2007

(54) EYEGLASSFRAME

D399,238

S * 10/1998 Simioni . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D16/326

D 4 0 7 , 0 9 9

S 3 / 1 9 9 9 Wang

( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : James H.

J a n n a r d , S p i e d e n

I s l a n d , WA

1 3 4 1 4 3 9 6

5 1 0 / 1 9 9 9 A f n e t t e

(US);

Hans

Karsten

Moritz,

Foothill

2

i

21mg“

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

ne

e . . . .

. .

221E265‘ms ’ Coll“

Baden’ Imne’

D488,499

s

*

4 / 2 0 0 4

Mage

. . . . . . . . .

. . Dl6/326

D500,781

S

* 1 / 2 005 Mage

.

. . . .

.. D16/326

. _ . D518 847

S

*

4/2006

Teng . . . . . . . . . .. D16/326

( 7 3 )

A s s i g n e e . Oakley,

I n c . , F o o t h i l l

Ranch, CA

US) 1353293

S *

1 1 / 2 0 0 6

Mangum _ _ _ _

_ _

B16626

** D534 572

S

1/2007 Teng . . . . . . . . .

..

D16/326

( )

Tenn?

14 Years D534,573

s

* 1/2007

Mage

. . Dl6/326

D536,028 S *

1/2007

Paulson .. . . . . . . D16/326

( 2 1 )

Appl. No.:

29/272,776 D537,467 s * 2 / 2 0 0 7 Teng

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326

( 2 2 ) F i l e d :

F e b .

15,2007 OTHER UBLICATIONS

_ _

Sunglass Hut,

p. 5 , 2002

R e l a t e d

U - S -

A P P I I C a t I O I I

Data US.

A p p l . N 0 . 2 9 / 2 2 7 , 71 9 , ? l e d A p r . 1 3 , 2 0 0 5 , J a n n a r d , P e n d i n g

( 6 2 )

D i v i s i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n

N o .

2 9 / 2 2 7 , 7 1 9 ,

? l e d o n

A p r .

a p p h c a n o n

1 3 ,

2 0 0 5 . *

c i t e d by

e x a m i n e r

( 5 1 ) LOC

s ) C ] .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06 Primary

ExamineriRaphael

Barkai

( 5 2 ) us. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1)16/326

(74)A”0r @y~4g@”’10rFirm*Greg°1'Y

K- Nelson

(58) Field of

Classi?cation

Searc h

. . . . .

. .

Dl6/300i330,

D 1 6 / 1 0 1 , 3 3 2 * 3 3 8 ;

D 2 9 / l 0 9 i l l 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;

5 7 )

CLAIM

351/41

44

51452 62

158

92 1034111 -

’ ’ ’ ’ ’ _ ’ ’ The rnamental design for a n

eyeglass

frame, as shown nd

3 5 1 / 1 5 6 , 6 1 ,

1 1 4 4 1 1 9 ,

1 2 1 4 1 2 3 ,

2 / 4 2 6 4 4 3 2 , d e s c r i b e d

2 / 4 4 7 4 4 4 9 ,

4 4 1 , 4 3 6 , 4 3 4 4 4 3 7

S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e

f o r

c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y .

DESCRIPTION

( 5 6 )

R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d

F I G .

1

i s a

f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e

v i e W o f t h e e y e g l a s s

f r a m e o f

US. PATENT DOCUMENTS

D192,885 S * 5/ 1 962 Petitto ..................... . D16/329

D193,028 S 6 / 1 9 6 2 P e t i t t o

D199,150

S 9 / 1 9 6 4 C a r m i c h a e l

D202,658

S

1 0 / 1 9 6 5

P e t i t t o

D209,862 S

1 / 1 9 6 8

McCracken

D210,418 S

*

3/1968

Bloch ......................

. D16/326

D218,569 S * 9/1970 McCracken

.

D16/325

D264,094

S *

4/1982

Morri s ....................

.

D16/325

D 2 6 8 , 6 8 3

S 4 / 1 9 8 3

T e n n y

D285,020 S 8 / 1 9 8 6


D372,726 S 8 / 1 9 9 6

S i m i o n i

D390,589 S 2 / 1 9 9 8

S i m i o n i

D397,351 S 8 / 1 9 9 8

S i m i o n i

t h e

p r e s e n t

i n v e n t i o n ;

F I G . 2 i s

a l e f t - s i d e

e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ,

t h e r i g h t - s i d e

e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W b e i n g

a

m i r r o r

i m a g e

t h e r e o f ;

F I G . 3 i s a f r o nt e l e v a t i o n a l

vieW

t h e r e o f ;

FIG. 4

i s

a r e a r e l e v a t i o na l

vieW

t h e r e o f ;

F I G . 5 i s

a t o p e l e v a t i o na l

vieW

t h e r e o f ; a n d ,

F I G . 6 i s a bottom p l a n

vieW

t h e r e o f .

Phantom l i n i n g ,

W h e r e



p u r p o s e s

o n l y

and

i s n o t i n t e n d e d

t o

l i m i t

t h e

c l a i m e d d e s i g n

t o t h e


1 C l a i m , 4 Drawing S h e e t s

EXHIBIT 3Page 10



39/80

U.S.

Patent

N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t 1 o f 4 U

D554 689

S

EXHIBIT 3Page 11



40/80

U.S.

Patent

N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t

2

o f 4 U

D554 689

S

EXHIBIT 3Page 12



41/80

U.S.

Patent

N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t

3

o f 4 U

D554 689

S

FIG. 5

EXHIBIT 3Page 13



42/80

U.S.

Patent

N o v 6 2 0 0 7 S h e e t 4 o f 4 U

D554 689

S

F I G

6

EXHIBIT 3Page 14



43/80

EXHIBIT 4



44/80

1 2 ) United

States

Design Patent 1 0 )

P a t e n t N 0 . :

USO0D556818S

US

D 5 5 6 , 8 1 8

S

Jannard

e t a ] . 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : 4 * D e c . 4 , 2007

54) EYEGL SS

COMPONENTS

D481,063 S *

10/2003

Lane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326

D500,781

S

* 1/ 2 005 Mage .

. . . .

. .

D16/335

7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : James H.

Jannard, Spieden

I s l a n d , W 13534572 5 * 1 / 2 0 0 7 Teng ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 3 1 6 / 3 3 7

US);

Hans

Karsten

Moritz, Foothill

2

i Ting ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

- ~

uang

.. ....

.

221E265‘

ms)’

C o l l “ Baden’ Imne’ D 5 3 6 , 0 2 6 s

* 1 / 2 0 0 7 B r u c k

. . . . . . D 1 6 / 3 2 6

D537,467

S * 2/2007 Teng

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .

D16/326

7 3 )

A s s i g n e e : O a k l e y , I n c . , F o o t h i l l R a n c h ,

CA U S ) OTHER PUBLICATIONS

* * ) T e r m : 1 4 Y e a r s

P e n d i n g U . S . A p p l .

N o .

2 9 / 2 2 7 , 7 1 9 ,

? l e d A p r .

1 3 , 2 0 0 5 , J a n n a r d .

*

c i t e d by

examiner

21) Appl. No.: 29/272,777

P r i m a r y E x a m m e r i R a p h a e l B a r k a i

2 2 )

F i l e d ; Feb

1 5 ,

2 0 0 7

7 4 )

A t t o r n e y ,

A g e n t ,

o r

FirmiGregory K .

N e l s o n

R e l a t e d US. A p p l i c a t i o n

Data 5 7 )

CLAIM

6 2 ) D i v i s i o n O f a P Pl i C a t i O n N O - 2 9 / 2 2 7 , 7 1 9 ,

? l e d On

AP1 The o r n a m e n t a l

d e s i g n

f o r a n

e y e g l a s s

c o m p o n e n t s , a s

1 3 ,

HOW P a t . NO.

D e s . Shown

and d e s c r i b e d _

51) LOC 8 )

Cl.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.

16-06 DESCRIPTION

5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/326;

D16/335

FIG

1

i s a from p e r s p e c t i v e View of h e e y e g l a s s COmpO_

5 8 ) F i e l d of

Classi?cation

Search . . . . . . . Dl6/300i330, Helm of h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n ;

D16/101,332*338; D29/l09ill0; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ; FIG 21S a

e r s

e c t i v e

View t h e r e o f

351/41,

44, 51452, 62,

158,

92, 1034111,

_

p p

_ _ ’

3 5 1 / 1 5 6 , 6 1 ’

1 1 4 E 1 1 9 ’

1 2 1 E 12 3 ; 2 / 4 2 6i 4 3 2 ’

F I G .

3

1 5

a

f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l VleW t h e r e o f ;

2 / 4 4 7 i 4 4 9 , 4 4 1 , 4 3 6 ,

4344437

F I G . 4 i s

a l a t e r a l

l e f t - s i d e

e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f , t h e

S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r C o m p l e t e

S e a r c h

h i s t o r y . l a t e r a l

r i g h t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l

V i e w

b e i n g

a m i r r o r i m a g e

5 6 )

R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d t h e r e o f ;

U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS

D193,028 S 6 / 1 9 6 2

P e t i t t o

D199,150

S 9 / 1 9 6 4 C a r m i c h a e l

D202,658 S

1 0 / 1 9 6 5

P e t i t t o

D209,862

S

1 / 1 9 6 8

McCracken

D 2 6 8 , 6 8 3 S 4 / 1 9 8 3 T e n n y

D285,020 S 8 / 1 9 8 6


D372,726

S 8 / 1 9 9 6

S i m i o n i

D390,589 S 2 / 1 9 9 8 S i m i o n i

D397,351 S 8 / 1 9 9 8

S i m i o n i

D 4 0 7 , 0 9 9

S 3 / 1 9 9 9 Wang

D414,796 S

1 0 / 1 9 9 9

A r n e t t e

F I G . 5 i s a m e d i a l l e f t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l

View

t h e r e o f , t h e

m e d i a l r i g h t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l

V i e w

b e i n g

a

m i r r o r

i m a g e

t h e r e o f ;

FIG.

6 i s a

r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l

View t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

7

i s a

b o t t o m

p l a n

View

t h e r e o f ; a n d ,

F I G .

8

i s a

t o p

e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f .

Phantom

l i n i n g ,

W h e r e



p u r p o s e s

o n l y and

i s

n o t i n t e n d e d

t o

l i m i t

t h e


t o t h e

f e a t u r e s

shoWn n p h a n t o m .

1 C l a i m ,

5

Drawing S h e e t s

EXHIBIT 4Page 15



45/80

U.S. Patent D e c 4

2 0 0 7

S h e e t 1 0 f 5 U

D556 818

S

EXHIBIT 4Page 16



46/80

U.S. Patent D e c

4

2 0 0 7

S h e e t 2 0 f 5 U

D556 818

S

EXHIBIT 4Page 17



47/80

U.S. Patent

D e c

4

2 0 0 7 S h e e t 3 0 f 5 U

D556 818

S

EXHIBIT 4Page 18



48/80

U.S. Patent D e c

4

2 0 0 7

S h e e t 4 0 f 5 U

D556 818

S

FIG.

7

EXHIBIT 4Page 19



49/80

U.S. Patent D e c

4

2 0 0 7

S h e e t 5 0 f 5 U

D556 818

S

FIG.

8

EXHIBIT 4Page 20



50/80

EXHIBIT 5



51/80

1 2 )

United

States

Design Patent

1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . :

USO0D675664S

US

D 6 7 5 , 6 6 4

S

Moritz

4 5 )

Date

o f

P a t e n t :

* 9 : Feb.

5 ,

2013

( 5 4 )

EYEGLASS D 5 4 5 , 8 6 8

S 7 / 2 0 0 7 C h u a n g

D553,173 S 1 0 / 2 0 0 7

Baden

t

a 1 .

D553,177

10/ 2007

Ch

7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : Hans M o r i t z , F o o t h l l l

R a n c h ,

CA U S ) 1 3 5 6 4 5 6 8 S 3 / 2 0 0 8 M o i r i l t z

_ _ D564,571 S 3/2008 Jannard

e t

a 1 .

( 7 3 ) A s s 1 g n e e :

O a k l e y ,

I n c . , F o o t h i l l R a n c h ,

CA

U S ) D 5 6 9 , 4 1 2 S 5 / 2 0 0 8 J a n n a r d e r a 1 ,

D575,324 S * 8/2008 MoritZ . . . . . . . . D16/326

(**)

Term:

1 4 Years

D581,444 s *

ll/2008 Jannard

et

a 1 .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/314

D581,449 S 1 1 / 2 0 0 8 Yee

D583,851 S

1 2 / 2 0 0 8

Lane

( 2 1 )

A p p l . N o . :

2 9 / 3 9 6 , 2 6 7

1 3 5 8 4 3 3 0 S V 2 0 0 9

C h e n

_ 7,497,569 B2 3/2009 Webb

( 2 2 ) F 1 l e d : J u n . 2 8 , 2011 D 5 9 0 , 4 3 2 S 4 / 2 0 0 9 Y e e

D591,787 S

5 / 2 0 0 9

Yee

( 5 1 )

LOC 9 ) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06 13600269 S

90009

Masui

(52) U . S . C 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/315;D16/335 D622’755 S g/2010 Yee

( 5 8 )

F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o n Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D 1 6 / 1 0 1 , g * ? o f i t Z e t a 1 ~

B16614

Dl6/300i342,

900;

D29/109*110;

D24/110.2; OntZ

3 5 1 / 4 1 ’ 4 4 ’ 5 1 * 5 2 ’ 6 2 ’ 1 5 8 ’ 9 2 ’ 1 0 3 * 1 2 3 , 2 0 0 6 / 0 2 3 8 7 0 0 A 1 1 0 / 2 0 0 6

D e l

V e c c h i o

3 5 1 / 1 4 0 ,

1 5 3 , 4 5 * 4 6 ; 2 / 4 2 6 i 4 3 2 , 4 4 7 * 4 4 9 ,

*

c i t e d b y

e x a m i n e r

2 / 4 4 1 , 4 3 4 * 4 3 7 , 1 3 , 1 5 ; D 2 1 / 4 8 3 , 6 5 9 * 6 6 1 ;

D14/372 Primary

Examiner

aphael

Barkai

S e e

a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r

c o m p l e t e

s e a r c h h i s t o r y .

( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t ,

o r

Firm nobbe M a r t e n s Olson

B e a r ,

LLP

( 5 6 )

R e f e r e n c e s

C i t e d


Dl96,000 S

8 / 1 9 6 3

M c N e i l l

4 , 7 8 7 , 7 3 0

A l l / l 9 8 8 B r i s t o l

D398,02l S 9 / 1 9 9 8 B o l l e

D469,459

S

l / 2 0 0 3

M o r i t z

D474,223

S

5 / 2 0 0 3

Chen

D476,354 S

6 / 2 0 0 3 Chen

D483,392 S

1 2 / 2 0 0 3

Chen

D508,5l5 S

8 / 2 0 0 5 Yee t

a 1 .

D5ll,540 S

l l / 2 0 0 5

Hsu

D5 4 , 6 1 3 S 2 / 2 0 0 6 J a n n ar d

e t

a 1 .

D529,066 S 9 / 2 0 0 6 Matera

D539,83l

S 4 / 2 0 0 7

Hsu

D543,572

S 5 / 2 0 0 7 Yee t a 1 .

D543,574 S 5 / 2 0 0 7 J a n n a r d

e t

a 1 .

7 , 2 2 2 , 9 5 8 B1

5 / 2 0 0 7

Chiou

D544,020

S 6 / 2 0 0 7

T h i X t o n

e t

a 1 .

5 7 ) CLAIM

The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a n

e y e g l a s s ,

a s shoWn and

d e s c r i b e d .

DESCRIPTION

F I G .

1

i s

a

f r o n t

p e r s p e c t i v e vieW

o f an

y e g l a s s o f h e p r e s e n t

i n v e n t i o n ;

F I G . 2 i s a

f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

o f t h e

e y e g l a s s

o f

F I G .

1 ;

F I G .

3 i s a

r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW o f

t h e

e y e g l a s s of I G .

1 ;

F I G . 4 i s a l e f t

s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l

vieW o f

h e e y e g l a s s

o f I G . 1 ,

t h e r i g h t s i d e e l ev a t i o n a l

v i e W

b e i n g a m i r r o r

i m a g e

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

5

i s

a t o p

p l a n

v i e W

o f

t h e e y e g l a s s

o f F I G .

1 ;

a n d ,

F I G . 6 i s a

bottom

p l a n

vieW

o f t h e

e y e g l a s s

o f F I G . 1 .

1 C l a i m ,

4

Drawing S h e e t s

EXHIBIT 5Page 21



52/80

US Patent

F e b 5

2 0 1 3

S h e e t 1

o f 4

US

675 664 S

EXHIBIT 5Page 22



53/80

US Patent

F e b

5 2 0 1 3

S h e e t 2 o f 4 US

675 664

S

F I G ;

3

x 3

EXHIBIT 5Page 23



54/80

US Patent

F e b 5

2 0 1 3

S h e e t 3 o f 4 US

675 664 S

EXHIBIT 5Page 24



55/80

US Patent

F e b

5 2 0 1 3

S h e e t 4

o f 4

US

675 664 S

EXHIBIT 5Page 25



56/80

EXHIBIT 6



57/80EXHIBIT 6

Page 26



58/80EXHIBIT 6

Page 27



59/80EXHIBIT 6

Page 28



60/80EXHIBIT 6

Page 29



61/80EXHIBIT 6

Page 30



62/80

EXHIBIT 7



63/80

1 2 ) United

States

Design Patent 1 0 )

P a t e n t N 0 . :

Yee

USO0D607039S

US

D 6 0 7 , 0 3 9

S

4 5 )

Date o f P a t e n t : * 1 , D e c . 2 9 , 2009

5 4 )

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS

COMPONENT

7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : P e t e r Y e e , I r v i n e , CA U S )

7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : O a k l e y , I n c . ,

F o o t h i l l

R a n c h ,

CA U S )

* * )

T e r m :

1 4 Years

2 1 )

A p p l . N o . :

2 9 0 8 8 5 8 5

2 2 ) F i l e d :

J u n . 1 5 ,

2 0 0 7

51) LO 9 ) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16-06

52) US Cl.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. .

D16/315;

D16/314

58) Field of Classi?cation Sea rch . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.

D16/101,

D l 6 / 3 0 0 i 3 4 2 ; D 2 9 / l 0 9 i l l 0 ; D 2 4 / 1 1 0 . 2 ;

3 5 1 / 4 1 , 4 4 , 5 1 4 5 2 , 6 2 , 1 5 8 , 9 2 , 1 0 3 4 1 2 3 ,

3 5 1 / 1 4 0 ,

1 5 3 ,

4 5 4 4 6 ,

1 5 7 ;

2 / 4 2 6 i 4 3 2 ,

4 4 7 4 4 4 9 ,

2 / 4 4 1 , 4 3 4 4 4 3 7 , 1 3 , 1 5 ; D 2 1 / 4 8 3 , 6 5 9 4 6 6 1

S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e

f o r

c o m p l e t e s e a r c h

h i s t o r y .

5 6 )

R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d


9 4 6 , 5 9 6 A 1 / 1 9 1 0 Cook

D 1 3 5 , 1 4 1 S 3 / 1 9 4 3

R e y n o l d s

D 1 3 7 , 7 5 3

S

4 / 1 9 4 4 Rey

D145,288

S 7 / 1 9 4 6

D i C i c c o

D 1 4 6 , 5 3 8

S

4 / 1 9 4 7

Gagnon

D 1 5 0 , 9 2 4 S 9 / 1 9 4 8

B r i g h t

D 1 6 8 , 9 0 3

S 2 / 1 9 5 3

N e a r y

D169,724 S 6 / 1 9 5 3

Bauer

t a l .

2 , 7 0 9 , 2 5 6 A 5 / 1 9 5 5

B a r a t e l l i

2 , 7 5 9 , 3 9 4 A

8 / 1 9 5 6

Evans

D182,459 S 4 / 1 9 5 8 E i s l e r

D200,391 S 2 / 1 9 6 5

B a r a t e l l i

D 2 0 1 , 9 1 9 S 8 / 1 9 6 5 S i m p s o n

D228,026 S 7 / 1 9 7 3 S h i n d l e r

3 , 8 3 8 , 9 1 4 A

1 0 / 1 9 7 4 F e r n a n d e z

4 , 6 9 2 , 0 0 1

A

9 / 1 9 8 7 A n g e r

4 , 7 8 6 , 1 5 8 A 1 1 / 1 9 8 8 B a r f u s - S h a n k s e t

a 1 .

C o n t i n u e d )

OTHER

PUBLICATIONS

B . B . S o l ,

“Mode 7 2 ” ,

1 9 7 2 , p .

4 M o d e l

2 7 3 .

C o n t i n u e d )

P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i R a p h a e l

B a r k a i

7 4 )

A t t o r n e y ,

A g e n t , o r Firm4Gregory K . N e l s o n

5 7 )

CLAIM

The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a n

e y e g l a s s

a n d

e y e g l a s s

compo

n e n t ,

a s

shoWn

and

d e s c r i b e d .

DESCRIPTION

F I G . 1

i s

a

f r o n t p e r s p e c t i v e v i e W o f t h e e y e g l a s s and t h e

e y e g l a s s c o m p o n e n t

o f

h e p r e s e n t

i n v e n t i o n ;

F I G . 2 i s a f r o n t

e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

t h e r e o f ;

FIG.

3

i s

a

r e a r e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

4 i s

a l e f t - s i d e

e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ,

t h e r i g h t - s i d e


v i e W

b e i n g

a

m i r r o r

i m a g e

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

5 i s

a bottom

l a n vieW

t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

6 i s a t o p p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;

F I G .

7 i s a f r o n t

p e r s p e c t i v e

vieW of an a l t e r n a t i v e embodi

m e n t o f t h e e y e g l a s s a n d e y e g l a s s c o m p o n e n t

o f

t h e p r e s e n t

i n v e n t i o n ;

F I G . 8 i s

a f r o n t

e l e v a t i o n a l vieW o f

t h e

e y e g l a s s and

y e g l a s s

c o m p o n e n t

o f F I G .

7 ;

F I G . 9 i s a

r e a r

e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

o f

t h e ey e g l a s s and e y e g l a s s

c o m p o n e n t o f F I G .

7 ;

F I G .

1 0

i s a l e f t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW o f t h e ey e g l a s s and

e y e g l a s s

c o m p o n e n t o f F I G . 7 , t h e i g h t - s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e W

b e i n g a

m i r r o r

i m a g e t h e r e o f ;

F I G . 1 1

i s

a

t o p

p l a n v i e W o f t h e

e y e g l a s s

a n d

e y e g l a s s

c o m p o n e n t

o f F I G . 7 ;

a n d ,

F I G .

1 2

i s

a b o t t o m

p l a n

v i e W o f t h e

e y e g l a s s

a n d

e y e g l a s s

component o f F I G . 7 .

Phantom

l i n i n g , W h e r e u t i l i z e d ,

i s f o r


p u r p o s e s

o n l y and i s n o t i n t e n d e d

t o

l i m i t

t h e


t o t h e

f e a t u r e s

shoWn

n p h a n t o m .

1 C l a i m ,

8 Drawing

S h e e t s

EXHIBIT 7Page 31



64/80

US D 6 0 7 , 0 3 9

S

D 3 2 0 , 4 0 2

D 3 4 2 , 5 3 4

D 3 4 2 , 9 5 9

D 3 4 3 , 1 8 2

5 , 3 8 7 , 9 4 9

D 3 5 6 , 3 2 3

D 3 5 6 , 3 2 4

D 3 5 9 , 3 0 2

D 3 5 9 , 7 4 8

D 3 5 9 , 7 4 9

D 3 6 5 , 5 9 1

D 3 6 9 , 3 7 7

D 3 7 1 , 1 5 2

5 , 5 5 0 , 5 9 9

D 3 7 3 , 7 8 1

D 3 7 4 , 8 8 4

D 3 7 5 , 1 1 2

D 3 7 6 , 1 6 3

D 3 7 6 , 3 8 1

D 3 7 7 , 4 9 8

D 3 8 3 , 1 4 9

5 , 8 0 5 , 2 6 1

D 3 9 9 , 2 4 0

D 3 9 9 , 8 6 5


S

1 0 / 1 9 9 1

J a n n a r d e t a l .

S 1 2 / 1 9 9 3 J a n n a rd

e t

a l .

S

1 / 1 9 9 4 J a n n a r d

e t a l .

S

1 / 1 9 9 4

J a n n a r d

A

2 /

1 9 9 5

T a c k l e s

S

3 / 1 9 9 5

Yee

S

3 / 1 9 9 5

Yee

S 6/1995

Yee

t

a l .

S 6 / 1 9 9 5

Yee

S 6 / 1 9 9 5

Yee

S 1 2 / 1 9 9 5 J a n n a rd

e t

a l .

S 4/1996 Brune

S 6/1996

S i m i o n i

e t a l .

A 8 / 1 9 9 6 J a n n a rd

S 9/1996

S i m i o n i

e t a l .

S 1 0 / 1 9 9 6 J a n n a rd

S 1 0 / 1 9 9 6 J a n n a rd

S 12/1996 J a n n a r d e t a l .

S 12/1996 J a n n a r d

e t a l .

S

1 / 1 9 9 7 J a n n a r d

e t a l .

S

9/ 1997

S i m i o n i

A

9/

1 9 9 8 Houston

t

a l .

S 10/1998 J a n n a r d

e t a l .

S 10/1998 J a n n a r d

e t a l .

P a g e

2

5 , 9 6 3 , 2 9 3

A

1 0 / 1 9 9 9 J a n n a r d

D418 533

S *

1 / 2 0 0 0

Herald t a l. . . . . . . . . . . . .

D16/314

D420,036 S 2 / 2 0 0 0

Yee

t

a l .

D423,035 S 4 / 2 0 0 0

Yee

t a l .

D425,541

S 5 / 2 0 0 0 P o l l a n d

D437 871

S 2 / 2 0 0 1 Tortorella . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/314

D446,804

S 8 / 2 0 0 1 T h i X t o n

e t

a l .

D454 905

S *

3 / 2 0 0 2 Lueking

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D16/314

D462,375 S 9 / 2 0 0 2 Baden t a 1 .

D 4 8 1 , 0 5 9 S * 1 0 / 2 0 0 3 Egbert e t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D 1 6 / 3 1 5

D 5 4 2 , 3 2 9 S * 5 / 2 0 0 7 He ste r D 1 6 / 3 1 5

D567 839 S 4/2008 Fuchs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D16/315

D579 968

S * 1 1 / 2 0 0 8 Yee t a l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D16/320

D 5 9 7 , 1 2 3

S

*

7/2009

S t r e c k e r

D 1 6 / 3 1 5

D601 181

S

9 / 2 0 0 9

Fuchs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D16/315

OTHER

PUBLICATIONS

B . B . S o l . 1 9 7 1 , p . 3 M o d e l s 4 4 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 7 3 ) , p . 4 m o d e l o n b o t t o m

o f p a g e ) , p . 7

m o d e l s

2 5 0 , 2 5 6 ,

2 6 8 ,

a n d . 1 4

m o d e l 3 0 0 .

M a c y ’ s C a t a l o g , J u l .

1 9 9 7 .

A s i a

P a c i ? c T r a d i n g

c o m p a n y , I n c . ,

“ A s i a P a c i ? c 1 9 9 9 - 2 0 0 0 ” ,

unknown month

n 1 9 9 9 , p . 7 , p . 1 1 , p . 1 3 , p . 1 8 , p . 3 5 .

A l p i n a ,

“ S k i

a n d S p o r t s

G l a s s e s

b y A l p i n a 9 6 /

7 ” , unknown

month

n

1 9 9 7 ,

p p .

9 , 1 2 ,

a n d

1 3 .

*

c i t e d by

examiner

EXHIBIT 7Page 32



65/80

US

Patent D e c 2 9

2 0 0 9

S h e e t 1 o f 8 US 607 039 S

FIG.

1

EXHIBIT 7Page 33



66/80

US Patent

D e c 2 9 2 0 0 9 S h e e t 2 o f 8 US 607 039 S

EXHIBIT 7Page 34



67/80

US Patent

D e c 2 9 2 0 0 9

S h e e t

3

o f 8

US 607 039 S

FIG.

5

EXHIBIT 7Page 35



68/80

US Patent

D e c 2 9 2 0 0 9 S h e e t

4

o f 8 US 607 039 S

EXHIBIT 7Page 36



69/80

U

oakley v. pr trading - complaint

Documents