offsite tas 24022016 f
TRANSCRIPT
Drafts under consideration post Acts….
Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order (CARO), 2016 dated 9th February,2016
Draft Rules for Formation of National Company Law Tribunal(NCLT)
Draft rules under chapter XV of Companies Act,2013 ( Compromise, Arrangements and
Amalgamations)
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules,2016 dated 16th February,2016
Companies (Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules,2016
Companies (Amendment) Act,2015 notified on 26th May,2015
Formation of Company Law Tribunal
Issues in and rules for Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Compromises, Arrangements And Amalgamations – Proposed amendments to Sections
by Company Law Committee
Exclusions from the definition of deposits under Companies(Acceptance of Deposits)
Highlights on Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
FDI - Updates
Contents
Supreme Court Judgment
The Present Writ Petition was heard by the SC where it categorized the challenges put forth in three
categories, as under:
1. Challenge to the validity of the constitution of NCLT and NCLAT;
2. Challenge to the prescription of qualifications etc. of President / Chairman and Members of the
NCLT/NCLAT;
3. Challenge to the structure of the Selection Committee for appointment of President/Members of
the NCLT and Chairperson/Members of the NCLAT.
On 14th May 2015 (‘SC Judgment 2015’) , the SC squarely applied the 2010 Judgment to this case
and upheld the Constitutional validity of NCLT and NCLAT mentioned in point 1 above.
As regards to point 2 & 3 , the SC held that that the provisions regarding establishment of NCLT and
NCLAT contained in Companies Act, 2013 are not valid till the point they are not fully realigned as
per the directions given in the 2010 Judgment. Further, SC has held that the technical members in
NCLT / NCLAT should be of a rank equivalent to a Secretary or An Additional Secretary in the
government of India, as opposed to a Joint Secretary as contemplated in the Cos Act, 2013.
Steps taken so far
Apart from the above, in SC Judgment 2015, SC has also considered the following steps taken till date
towards setting up of NCLT and NCLAT:
Approvals taken for creation of various positions in NCLT and NCLAT;
Draft Rules on various matters prepared to place before appropriate authorities, inter alia including:
- rules, remuneration and recruitment of NCLT/NCLAT members;
- schemes of compromises/arrangements, and
- rehabilitation of sick companies
Space for Principal Bench and other Benches of NCLT at Delhi;
Process initiated for set up of infrastructure;
Allocation of budget heads for meeting the expenditure; and
Surrender of allocated funds in 2014-2015 in view of the delay in settling up the Tribunals.
Conclusion
Thus, in order for NCLT to take over the functions currently performed by the High Court, the
following needs to be addressed:
- Settlement of the pending Writ Petition No 276/2012,
- Completion of setup of NCLT and NCLAT; and
- Notification of the relevant provisions which include provisions of Chapter XV - Compromises,
arrangements and amalgamations under sections 230- 240 of Cos Act, 2013 and corresponding rules.
The current procedural aspects pertaining to schemes of arrangement would undergo changes which
include:
i. Threshold limits provided for objections to schemes by any shareholder / creditor;
ii. Threshold limits provided for obtaining dispensation from holding creditors meeting;
iii. Intimation of compromise/ arrangement to be given to various authorities;
iv. Mandatory requirement of auditor’s certificate on accounting;
v. Provision for indicating Appointed Date in schemes;
vi. Exit route to be provided to dissenting shareholders; and
vii. Specific provisions for merger of Specified Companies.
Comments
The SC Judgment 2015 has upheld the constitutional validity for setting up the NCLT and the NCLAT
and has also ensured that the judiciary has a greater role to play than the executive.
Due to the petitions filed with the SC, the notification of a large number of sections including
provisions for schemes of arrangements involving mergers, demergers etc. under the Cos Act, 2013,
haven’t been notified yet due to delay in setting up the NCLT.
Once the NCLT, is set up it will not just replace the Company Law Board (CLB), but will also take
care of cases that are with the High Courts, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction
(BIFR) and the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR).
TAS- Offsite
Feb 2015
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Index
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Sections 391, 393 & 394A vis-à-vis Section 230
Approval of scheme by postal Ballot is allowed by New Act
Introduction of Threshold limit for raising objections in respect of scheme:
• Objection to scheme of compromise or arrangement can be made only by:
- those shareholders who holds not less than 10% of the shareholding or
- those Creditors who holds not less than 5% of the total outstanding debt as per latest audited financial
statement
Circulation of Valuation Report to the shareholders/creditors/debenture-holders along with the
notice convening meeting.
Additional disclosure requirements vide an Affidavit at the time of filing an Application before the
NCLT:
• Reduction of share capital of the company, if any, included in the compromise or arrangement;
• In case of scheme of corporate debt restructuring, report by auditors on the position of liquidity and also as
to whether the corporate debt restructuring is in the line with guidelines provided by RBI among other
disclosures.
Introduction of Concept of dispensation of creditors’ meeting if creditors at least 90% in value agree
and confirm by way of affidavit to the scheme.
Requirement of certificate by auditor to the effect that accounting treatment is in line with
Accounting Standards notified under section 133.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Sections 391, 393 & 394A vis-à-vis Section 230
Requires service of notice to various statutory authorities including :
• Central Govt., Income Tax Authorities, RBI, SEBI, the Registrar, respective stock exchanges, Official Liquidator,
Competition Commission of India and other sectoral regulators and authorities.
The notice and other documents to be placed on the website of the company
Specific provision in relation to matters, all or any of which shall be included in order of tribunal.
Provision for takeover of companies through a scheme of compromise or arrangement.
Buy back if included in scheme shall be in compliance with section 68 of the act.
Section 393 vis-à-vis Section 231
The power of any person to apply for winding up, which existed in sec 392 of the 1956 Act is not
available under the sec 231 of the 2013 Act.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Section 394 vis-à-vis Section 232
Specific provision for compromise or arrangement between Listed transferor company and
Unlisted transferee Company
Proviso requiring filing of report by Registrar and official liquidator is omitted in the light of
serving of notice to them under section 230.
Compliance requirement by way of filing of statement duly certified by CA/Cost
Accountant/CS.
Requirement of certificate by auditor to the effect that accounting treatment is in line
with Accounting Standards notified under section 133.
Prohibition on maintenance of Treasury Stock
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Section 394 vis-à-vis Section 232
The norm and practice of indirectly holding investments through intermediaries like a
private trust is now prohibited and cannot be structured by companies.
The concept of “Appointed Date” has been introduced under this section.
The clubbing of authorised capital which was normally litigated and objected by the
Registrar is now permitted under this section.
Definitions of ‘Transferor Company’ and ‘Transferee Company’ are omitted.
Introduced by way of explanation- new propositions of amalgamation being “merger by
formation of a new company”, “merger by absorption” and scheme involving division
of undertaking, property/liability
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013Section 233[Newly Introduced] – Introduction of Fast Track Merger for certain Companies
Provides for amalgamations between two or more small companies or between a
holding company and its wholly owned subsidiaries or such other class or classes of
companies as may be prescribed.
Small companies which meet the threshold of s. 2(85) of the 2013 Act viz. definition of
‘Small Company’ can avail the merger route under this section.
Attempt to reduce time lines and provide a platform to facilitate amalgamations
without approval of the Tribunal.
Requires Approval of :a) Registrar of Companies;
b) Official Liquidator;
c) Members or class of members holding at least 90% of total no. of shares;
d) Majority of creditors or class of creditors representing 9/10th in value;
e) Each of the companies involved in the merger shall file a declaration of solvency with the ROC
Section 233 of the 2013 Act prohibits the maintenance of the Treasury Stock.
Section 233 of the 2013 Act gives legal sanctity to the concept of Clubbing of
Authorised Capital
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013SECTION 234[Newly Introduced]:- Merger or Amalgamation of company with Foreign Company
Provides legal sanctity to structure cross-border amalgamations
Prior to the introduction of this section, only mergers of Foreign Company being the
Transferor Company and the Indian Company being the Transferee Company were
permitted.
This new section also facilitates the merger of an Indian Transferor Company with a
Foreign Transferee Company.
All the Mergers under this section would require prior approval of the Reserve Bank of
India.
The consideration for merger can be in the form of Cash and / or Depository Receipts
or partly in Cash and partly in Depository Receipts. This would apply to Foreign
Companies in jurisdictions as notified by the Central Government.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013SECTION 235- Major Highlights
Provides the mechanism under which the Transferee Company under a scheme or
contract can acquire shares of the dissenting shareholders.
Scheme or contract to be approved by holders of not less than 9/10th of the value of
the shares whose transfer is involved.
Right to Dissenting Shareholders to make an application to the Tribunal
Transferee Company to send the notice along with the instrument of transfer
Registration of the Transferee Company as the holder of the shares.
the sum received as consideration from the Transferor Company shall be deposited in a
separate bank account and held in trust by the Transferor Company.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Section 395 vis-à-vis Section 236
Facilitates exit mechanism for minority shareholders
Seeks to create a balance between the interests of the promoters and minority
shareholders.
Specific Provision covering Offer to sell by Minority shareholders to Majority
shareholders
Provision for Purchase of Minority Shareholding by Majority shareholder/s
Section can be invoked not only in case of amalgamation but also in case of share
exchange or conversion of securities.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013SECTION 237
Similar to section 396 of Old Act
Provides for the process of amalgamating companies in public interest.
Every member or creditor or a debenture holder of the Transferee Companies shall
have the same right and interest in the Transferee Company.
Member, creditor or debenture holder shall be entitled for compensation if rights and
interest in Transferee Company are less
Any grievance of the shareholder, creditor or debenture holder against the assessment
of compensation can be appealable within 30 days from the date of publication of such
assessment in the official gazette.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013Section 395(4A) vis-à-vis Section 238
Requirement of registration of circular for the offer under s. 235 of the 2013 Act with
Registrar and can be issued only after its registration.
The Registrar may refuse to register the circular for reasons to be recorded in writing.
The section also provides for not only a remedy of Appeal against refusal of
registration but also contains penal provisions of fine.
The above amendment is brought into force in order to provide for a stringent
mechanism with respect to issuing of the scheme or offer to the transferor company
and its shareholders.
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013SECTION 239
Similar to 396A of Old Act
Books and papers of the amalgamating company to be maintained and not to be
disposed off without the prior permission of the Central Government.
Ensures availability of past records of company for any process of investigation which
may be initiated by any Central or State regulatory authority in future.
This section has been inserted to ensure that the past records of the companies are
maintained which can be utilized in the future
Issues in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013SECTION 240 [Newly Introduced]
Liability in respect of any offences committed under this Act by the officers of the
Transferor Company prior to any merger, amalgamation or acquisition shall continue to
exist even after such merger, amalgamation or acquisition.
This section has been inserted to ensure that the officers of the Transferor Company
do not escape any liability which might have arisen on account of violation under the
Act.
Forms prescribed under draft Rules in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Sr.no Form Particulars
1 AMG 1 Affidavit disclosing contents as per section 230(2)
2 AMG 2 Advertisement of notice of meeting of members and creditors
3 AMG 3 Creditors’ Responsibility Statement
4 AMG 4 Notice of meeting
5 AMG 5 Notice to Statutory Authorities
6 AMG 6 Result of meeting
7 AMG 7 Application under section 230(12)
8 AMG 8 Petition confirming Compromise or Arrangement
9 AMG 9 Order on Petition by Tribunal
Forms prescribed under draft Rules in Compromises, Arrangements & Mergers
under the Companies Act, 2013
Sr.no Form Particulars
11 AMG 11 Statement of Compliance
12 AMG 12 Notice of the scheme under section 233 inviting objections or
suggestions
13 AMG 13 Declaration of Solvency
14 AMG 14 Meeting of members or creditors or class of members or
creditors
15 AMG 15 Confirmation order by Central Govt
16 AMG 16 Filing of confirmation order issued by Central Govt in AMG 15
17 AMG 17 Notice to dissenting Shareholders
18 AMG 18 Offer of scheme or contract involving transfer of shares
TAS- Offsite
Feb 2015
Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations – Proposed amendments to
Sections by Company Law Committee
Index
COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS – Proposed amendments
to Sections by Company Law Committee
Purchase of Minority Shareholding [SECTION 236]
Section 236 of the Act deals with the purchase of minority shareholding.
While Sections 236 (4), 236 (5) and 236 (6) make a reference to a “transferor company”,
the term ‘transferor company’ has not been defined in the section itself. The Committee
felt that the use of the term ‘transferor company’ in the said Section 236 without
providing for a context may ostensibly include even transfer of assets by a company,
thereby including amalgamations and mergers within the ambit of this provision, which did
not appear to be the intention.
Accordingly, the Committee recommended that the references to the phrase ‘transferor
company’ in Section 236, may be modified to a ‘company whose shares are being
transferred’ or alternatively, an explanation be provided in the provision clarifying that
Section 236 only applies to the acquisition of shares.
TAS- Offsite
Feb 2015
Exclusions from the definition of deposits under Companies(Acceptance of
Deposits)Rules, 2014
Index
Companies(Acceptance
of Deposits)Rules, 1975
Companies(Acceptance of Deposits)Rules,
2014
Changes in the New Act.
Amount received
• by way of security or
• as an advance from any
purchasing agent, selling
agent, or other agents.
• as an advance received
against orders for the
supply of goods or
properties or for the
rendering of any service
Amount received:
• by issue of Commercial paper
• any other instruments as per the guidelines
of RBI.
• as an advance for the supply of goods or
provision of services,
• as advance as consideration for property
under agreement or arrangement,
• security deposit for performance of a
contract
• Advance received under long term project
for supply of capital goods.
Advance for supply of goods or provision of
services needs to be appropriated against the
same within 365 days. Otherwise the advance
shall fall under the purview of deposits.
Security Deposit received
from an employee
Non-interest bearing Security deposit
received from employee not exceeding his
annual salary
Security Deposit is limited to employee’s
annual salary
Exclusions from the definition of deposits under Companies(Acceptance of
Deposits)Rules, 2014
Exclusions from the definition of deposits under Companies(Acceptance of
Deposits)Rules, 2014
Companies(Acceptance
of Deposits)Rules, 1975
Companies(Acceptance of Deposits)Rules,
2014
Changes in the New Act.
Amount received by way of:
• subscriptions to shares,
bonds, stock or
debentures.
• Bonds or Debentures are
to be secured by a
mortgage on immovable
property
. Amount raised by way of :
• issue of bonds or debentures of type 1 or 2
below
• subscription of securities
Bonds and debentures need to be secured by a
first charge on the assets specified under
Schedule III excluding intangible assets or 2.
Bonds or debentures compulsorily convertible
into equity shares within five years
If the securities are not allotted within 60 days
from the date of receipt of application money
or advance then the Company has to refund the
amount within 15 days from the completion of
60 days.*
Amount received by a
Private Co. from director,
relative of director or
member. Declaration by
director or member that
the funds are not
borrowed or accepted
from others is necessary.
Amount received from director of company or
relative of director of private company (
amended rule wef. 15.09.2015), Declaration
by director or relative that the funds are not
borrowed or accepted from others is necessary
• Apart from private companies , now even
public company can accept the amount
from Directors which will not be
considered as deposit.
• Private companies can accept loans from
relative of directors.
• Also the new provision has excluded
members from the ambit of the rule.
Amount accepted by Nidhi Co.in accordance
with rules made under section 406 of the act.New Rule included
Highlights on Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
• Requirement of Minimum Paid up Share Capital
[Section 2(68) and Section 2(71)]
The requirement of having a minimum paid up sharecapital by a company has been done away with.
Hence, going forward, a private or a public company
can be incorporated without the need for minimum
paid up share capital of one lakh or five lakh rupees,
respectively.
• Common Seal made optional [Sections 9, 12, 22, 46 and223]
The requirement of having a common seal has been
made optional, and as a consequence, changes have
been made with regards to authorization for execution
of documents.
• Commencement of Business [Omission of Section 11]
Hitherto, before commencement of business or
exercising any borrowing powers, the director of a
company having share capital was required to file with
the Registrar of Companies a declaration that every
subscriber to the Memorandum has paid the value of
shares committed by him/her and that the paid-up
share capital of the company is not less than the
amount prescribed.
The relevant Section has now been omitted and the
requirement of filing a declaration before
commencement of business has been done away with.
Highlights on Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
• Punishment for Contravention of Section 73 and Section
76 of Companies Act, 2013 for Acceptance of Deposits
by Companies [New Section 76A inserted]
The amended law has inserted a new Section 76A after
Section 76 which introduces penal provisions for
contravention of provisions of Section 73 and Section 76
(pertaining to acceptance of deposits by a company) or
rules made thereunder, or if a company fails to repay
deposits within the time specified.
As per the amendment:
a) In addition to the payment of the amount of deposit
or part thereof and the interest due, a company
shall be punishable with a fine which shall not be
less than one crore rupees but which may extend to
ten crore rupees.
b) Every officer of the company who is in default shall
be punishable with imprisonment which may extend
to seven years or with a fine which shall not be less
than twenty-five lakh rupees but which may extend
to two crore rupees, or with both.
• Obtaining copies of Board Resolution
As per the amendment, no person shall be entitled
under Section 399 to inspect or obtain copies of the
Board Resolutions passed by a company under Section
179(3), filed with the Registrar under Section 117(3).
• Declaration of Dividend [Section 123(1)]
Additional proviso has been inserted in Section 123 in
accordance with which no company shall declare
dividend unless carried over past losses and
depreciation in previous year or years are set off
against profit of the company for the current year.
Highlights on Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
• Reporting of Fraud by auditor [Section 134(3) and
143(12)]
As per the amendment, the Report by the Board of
Directors, in addition to others, shall also include
details in respect of frauds reported by auditors under
Section 143(12) other than those which are
reportable to the Central Government.
Further, the enabling provisions of Section 143(12)
[replaced vide this amendment] prescribes a
threshold (yet to be defined) beyond which fraud
shall be reported to the Central Government or audit
committee/Board, as may be applicable.
Companies whose auditors have reported fraud to the
audit committee or the Board but not to the Central
Government also need to disclose details of such
fraud in the Board’s Report.
• Empowered Audit Committee to give omnibus approval
for related party transactions [Section 177(4)]
Vide the amendment, an audit committee may give
omnibus approvals for related party transactions
subject to conditions as may be prescribed.
Highlights on Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
• Loan to Directors [Section 185]
Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with
provisions relating to loans, guarantees and securities
provided by a company to its directors or any other
person in whom directors are interested.
The prohibition is not applicable to:
a) loans given to a managing director or whole time
director as part of the conditions of services
extended by the company to all its employees or,
pursuant to any scheme approved by the members
by a special resolution;
b) companies which provide loans or give guarantees or
securities in the ordinary course of its business.
As per the amendment, the following are added to
the above mentioned exceptions:
a) Loan made or guarantee given or security provided
by the holding company to its wholly owned
subsidiary; or
b) Guarantee given or security provided by the holding
company in respect of loan made by the bank or
financial institution to its subsidiary.
Provided the loans made above are utilised by a
subsidiary for its principal business activity.
• Related party Transaction [Section 188]
As per the amendment, the requirement of passing
special resolution for approving certain related
party transactions has been done away with. With
this, certain related party transactions can now be
approved through a ‘resolution’- ordinary instead of
‘special resolution’.
Further, it has also been provided that for related
party transactions between a holding company and
its wholly owned subsidiary, no resolutions are
required to be passed if the accounts of the
holding and subsidiary company are consolidated
and placed before the shareholders in a general
meeting for approval.
Where do we stand ??
Having at least one Woman Director for specified class of companies
Requirement of at least two Independent directors for certain class of
companies
Provision of Vigil Mechanism
Formation of Stakeholder relation committee
Spending on CSR Activities
Appointment of Small Shareholder Director
Floating One person Company
Moving ahead in right direction…
Vesting of powers with Audit Committee
Voting through Electronic mode
Maintenance of registers in electronic form
Voting by postal Ballot
Requirement of Internal Audit
FDI in Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)
100% FDI permitted under the automatic route in LLPs operating in sectors/activities
where 100% FDI is allowed, through the automatic route and there are no FDI-linked
performance conditions.
LLPs having foreign investments are now permitted to undertake downstream
investments in other companies/LLPs where 100% FDI is allowed, through the
automatic route and there are no FDI linked performance conditions
FDI - Reporting
Mandatory reporting on e-Biz platform and discontinuation of physical filing
• Following documents to be mandatorily filed through e-Biz platform:
i. Advance Reporting Form (ARF) to report FDI inflows;
ii. Form FC-GPR to report allotment of shares); &
iii. Form FC-TRS to report transfer of shares
Control & Ownership
Company LLP
Control Right to appoint a majority of the directors
or to control the management or policy
decisions including by virtue of their
shareholding or management rights or
shareholders agreements or voting
agreements
Right to appoint majority of the designated
partners, where such designated partners,
with specific exclusion to others, have
control over all the policies of the LLP
Owned by resident Indian
citizens
More than 50% of the capital is beneficially
owned by resident Indian citizens and / or
Indian companies, which are ultimately
owned and controlled by resident Indian
citizens
More than 50% of the investment in such an
LLP is contributed by resident Indian citizens
and/or entities which are ultimately 'owned
and controlled by resident Indian citizens'
and such resident Indian citizens and entities
have majority of the profit share
Foreign Investment guidelines
Sectors/activities under Government approval route
Government approval required where:
a) Indian company is not owned/controlled by a resident entity
b) Control/ownership of an Indian company is being transferred to a non-resident entity,
including by way of issue of shares through amalgamation/merger, etc
c) Foreign investment includes FDI, investment by FII, FPI, QFI, NRI, ADR, GDR, FCCB,
CCPS & CCD
d) Investment on non-repatriation basis by:
i. NRIs;
ii. A company, Trust & partnership firm incorporated outside India & owned and controlled by
NRIs
Miscellaneous
Foreign investment by way of share swap in companies engaged in automatic route
sector does not require government approval
Valuation of shares to be undertaken by Merchant Banker registered with SEBI or Investment
Banker outside India registered with appropriate regulatory authority
Issue of partly paid shares and warrants recognized as eligible capital instruments
Prior approval of government not mandated
Government approval not required for foreign investment in an Indian company not
having any operations nor having any downstream investments for undertaking
activities under the automatic route without FDI linked performance conditions.
Sector Specific Updates
Sector Foreign
Investment
cap
Route Other Amendments
Construction 100% Automatic - completed
projects for operation
and management of
townships, malls/
shopping complexes
and business centers.
• The conditions of a minimum floor area &
minimum capitalization have been removed
• Permission to exit & repatriate foreign
investment before completion of project (min
lock-in 3 years)
• ‘Real Estate’ business excludes earning of
rent/income income from leased property
Defence 49% Automatic
Approval – upto 49%
Broadcasting
• News channel & FM
Radio
• Non-news channels—
or entertainment
broadcasters
• DTH, digital cable
networks and
Headend in the Sky
services (HITS)Z
49%
(earlier 26%)
100%
100%
(earlier 74%)
Approval
Automatic
Upto 49%-Automatic
Regional Air Transport Services
49% Automatic route
Sector Specific Updates
Sector Foreign
Investment
cap
Route Other Amendments
Plantation 100% Automatic • Plantation sector to include coffee, rubber,
cardamom, palm oil and olive oil
• Earlier only tea was included
Single Brand Retail trading 100% Automatic- upto 49%
Automatic -100% for
Duty free Shops
• Mandatory 30% domestic sourcing condition at the
time of opening of the first store rather than at the
time of receipt of FDI (Relaxations subject to Govt
approval)
• Selling merchandise through e-commerce
permitted
• Indian brands also eligible for SBRT
• A single entity permitted to undertake both the
activities of SBRT and wholesale
Non Scheduled Air
Transport Service, Ground
Handling Services,
Satellites- establishment
and operation and Credit Information Companies
100%
(earlier
74%)
Automatic – Sectors
other than Satellites-
establishment and
operation
Banking – Private Sector • Full fungibility of foreign investment in private
banking sector permitted.
• FIIs/FPIs/QFIs, can now invest up to sectoral limit
of 74%, provided that there is no change in control
and management of the investee company
External Commercial Borrowings
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a revised framework ECB framework, relaxing the regulations, in order to uphold the
needs of the Indian entities.
Track-wise Bifurcations
Parameters Track I Track II Track III
Minimum Average Maturity
(MAM)
Upto USD 50 Mn- 3 Yrs or more
Beyond USD 50 Mn- 5 Yrs or more
10 Yrs or more, irrespective of
amount
Upto USD 50 Mn- 3 Yrs or more
Beyond USD 50 Mn- 5 Yrs or more
Currency Foreign currency Indian Rupees
All-in-cost ceilings If MAM 3-5 Yrs – 300 (earlier 350)
basis points
If MAM more than 5 Yrs – 450
(earlier 500) basis points
500 basis points Commensurate with prevailing
market conditions
Permitted End Uses General Corporate Purposes for
MAM of 5 Yrs or more, if availed
from –
• Direct equity holder (25%)
• Indirect equity holder
(minimum 51%)
• Group company (having
common overseas parent)
● Shipping and Airline companies
can raise ECBs only for import of
vessels and aircraft
● ECBs will now also be permitted
for import of second hand goods
(as per DGFT guidelines) under
the approval route.
● The ECB proceeds can be used for all purposes (including general
corporate purposes and repayment of rupee loans) except for real
estate activities, investing in capital market, domestic equity
investment, on-lending to other entities with any of the above
objectives and purchase of land.
Eligible Borrowers
• Companies engaged in miscellaneous services, Non-
Banking Financial Institutions (NBFCs), Developers of
Special Economic Zones (SEZ) / National
Manufacturing and Investment Zones (NMIZs), Not for
Profit companies, NGOs, etc. can now only avail
Indian Rupee denominated ECBs.
• Shipping companies, Real Estate Investment Trusts
(REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs)
and companies providing logistics services have now
been included as an eligible borrower.
Eligible Lenders
• Indian Banks and their overseas branches /
subsidiaries will not be recognized as lenders to avail
ECBs under Track II and III categories
• Long term lenders like prudentially regulated
financial entities, Sovereign Wealth Funds, Pension
Funds, Insurance companies and financial institutions
located in International Financial Services Centres in
India have are now considered as Recognized
Lenders.
External Commercial Borrowings
External Commercial Borrowings
Miscellaneous Amendments:
ECB borrowers are allowed to park ECB proceeds in term deposits with AD Category I banks in India for a maximum period of 12
months (earlier 6 months)
Change of currency of ECB from one convertible foreign currency to any other convertible foreign currency as well as to INR is
freely permitted (Vice versa not permitted)
ECB by entities under Joint Lender Forum (JLF) or Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) are permitted under approval route
Prepayment of ECBs, irrespective of the sum involved, eliminating the limit of USD 500 million, may be permitted by AD banks in
India subject to compliance with the stipulated MAM as applicable to the contracted loan.
Mumbai
The Ruby, Level 9, North West Wing,
Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (W),
Mumbai – 400028, INDIA
Tel: +91-22-24393600
Pune
Level 3, Riverside Business Bay,
Wellesley Road, Near RTO,
Pune – 411001, INDIA
Tel: +91-20-26225500
Aurangabad
C-6, Balaji Apartments,
Behind Kohinoor Plaza, Nirala Bazar,
Aurangabad – 431001, INDIA
Tel: +91-240-2345597
Hyderabad
Manbhum Jade Towers, II floor,
6-3-1090/A/12 & 13, Somajiguda,
Hyderabad 500082
Tel: +91 40 4040 4003
New Delhi - Gurgaon
Office No. 1032, 1033 & 1034, Level 10,
Tower A, Spaze 1 Tech Park, Sector 49,
Sohna Road,
Gurgaon 122001, INDIA
Tel: +91-124-4518350
Note: This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be seen as broad guidance only. The publication cannot be relied
upon to cover specific situations and you should not act, or refrain from acting, upon the information contained therein without obtaining specific professional advice. Please
contact BDO India LLP to discuss these matters in the context of your particular circumstances. BDO India LLP and each BDO member firm in India, their partners and/or
directors, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any loss arising from any action taken or not taken by anyone in reliance on the
information in this publication or for any decision based on it.
BDO India LLP, a limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network
of independent member firms.
BDO is the brand name for the international BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.
Copyright ©2015 BDO India LLP. All rights reserved.
Visit us at www.bdo.in
Bangalore
Unit # 101, Raheja Chancery,
133, Brigade Road,
Bengaluru 560 025 INDIA
Tel: +91 9900 860 960