okinawa poster-fullres

1
A first look at temporal change among Lau Basin megafauna June 2006—June 2009 Arunima Sen a , Elizabeth L. Podowski a , Erin L. Becker a , George W. Luther III b and Charles R. Fisher a a Biology Department, Pennsylvania State University, 208 Mueller Building, University Park, PA 16802 b College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, DE 19958 Early observations of the three foundation Lau megafauna, Alviniconcha hessleri, Ifrermeria nautliei and Bathymodiolus brevior indicated differentiation on a spatial scale. We combined high resolution imagery with in-situ physico-chemical measurements to tease apart species specific tolerances to temperature, oxygen concentration and sulphide concentrations. Based on these studies, we hypothesized temporal change and succession and both chimney and diffuse flow sites. Alviniconcha hessleri Highest temperature, Highest sulfide Lowest oxygen Ifremeria nautilei Medium temperature Medium sulfide Medium oxygen Bathymodiolus brevior Lowest temperature Lowest sulfide Highest oxygen Spatial Differentiation of Lau megafauna Change in Diffuse Flow Sites Stability of Chimneys We returned to 7 diffuse flow sites in June 2009 for re-imaging and electrochemical measurements. We found both examples of more active and less active sites, giving us a glimpse of successional patterns in different directions. The following examples illustrate our findings. Unlike diffuse flow sites, chimneys displayed much more stability and less change over time. While diffuse flow sites are undergoing a process of replacement linked to changing flow regimes, chimneys communities displayed little difference in the past four years. Kilo Moana Site 1, 2006 Kilo Moana Site 1, 2009 This site is an example of an area becoming less active. Note the larger numbers of dead mussels, fewer anemones and the appearance of non vent endemic brisingids in the 2009 mosaic. The graphs show that the site is dying. 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 M ean H2S (uM ) M ean O2 (uM ) Kilo M oana Site 1 2006 Chem istry 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 250 200 150 100 50 0 M ean H2S (uM ) M ean O2 (uM ) Kilo M oana Site 1 2009 Chem istry ABE Site 2, 2006 25 20 15 10 5 0 150 100 50 0 -50 M ean H2S (uM ) M ean O2 (uM ) ABE Site 2 Chem istry 2006 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 M ean H 2S (in uM ) M ean O 2 (in uM ) ABE Site 2 Chem istry 2009 Kilo Moana 2: Example of less active site ABE 2: Example of more active site Bugs Bunny, 2006 Tu’i Malila 62, 2006 Note the lack of change in fauna between the two years. At the Tu’i chimney, the chemistry has remained the same, whereas at Bugs Bunny, the chemistry has reversed. This indicates that faunal changes at chimneys is slow despite flow regime changes. Future Questions Acknowledgements Bugs Bunny, 2009 ABE Site 2, 2009 This is an example of a site undergoing succession. The graphs show little chemical difference, but note the lack of anemones and the higher dominance of B. brevior in the 2009 mosaic. This is a preliminary look at succession and temporal change among Lau Basin megafauna. Further analyses within a GIS framework will be conducted to quantify both faunal and chemical change at these sites. In addition to diffuse flow and chimney sites, we have collected data for peripheral sites which will further contribute to our understanding of temporal change of Lau megafauna. This project was funded by NSF grants ……………..to CRF? Many thanks to the e-chem team, Andrew Madison, Mustafa Yucel and Amy Gartman, as well as the ROV JASON II and R/V Thompson crews, without whom none of this work would have been possible. Thanks also to Jason Sylvan for use of his photographs and Dominique Cowart for assembling mosaics. 50 40 30 20 10 0 200 150 100 50 M ean H2s conc.(uM ) M ean O2 conc.(uM ) Bugs Bunny Chem istry 2006 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 M ean H2S Conc.(uM ) M ean O2 Conc.(uM ) Bugs Bunny Chem istry 2009 40 30 20 10 0 200 150 100 50 0 M ean H2S conc.(uM ) M ean O2 conc.(uM ) Tu'iM alila 62 Chem istry 2 009 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 150 100 50 0 -50 M ean H2S Conc (uM ) M ean O2 Conc (uM ) Tu'iM alila 62 Chem istry 2009 Tu’i Malila 62, 2009

Upload: borshusen

Post on 13-Feb-2017

143 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Okinawa Poster-fullres

A first look at temporal change among Lau Basin megafaunaJune 2006—June 2009

Arunima Sena, Elizabeth L. Podowskia, Erin L. Beckera, George W. Luther IIIb and Charles R. Fishera

aBiology Department, Pennsylvania State University, 208 Mueller Building, University Park, PA 16802bCollege of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, DE 19958

Early observations of the three foundation Lau megafauna, Alviniconcha hessleri, Ifrermeria nautliei and Bathymodiolus brevior indicated differentiation on a spatial scale. We combined high resolution imagery with in-situ physico-chemical measurements to tease apart species specific tolerances to temperature, oxygen concentration and sulphide concentrations. Based on these studies, we hypothesized temporal change and succession and both chimney and diffuse flow sites.

Alviniconcha hessleriHighest temperature,Highest sulfideLowest oxygen

Ifremeria nautileiMedium temperatureMedium sulfideMedium oxygen

Bathymodiolus breviorLowest temperatureLowest sulfideHighest oxygen

Spatial Differentiation of Lau megafauna

Change in Diffuse Flow Sites Stability of ChimneysWe returned to 7 diffuse flow sites in June 2009 for re-imaging and electrochemical measurements. We found both examples of more active and less active sites, giving us a glimpse of successional patterns in different directions. The following examples illustrate our findings.

Unlike diffuse flow sites, chimneys displayed much more stability and less change over time. While diffuse flow sites are undergoing a process of replacement linked to changing flow regimes, chimneys communities displayed little difference in the past four years.

Kilo Moana Site 1, 2006 Kilo Moana Site 1, 2009

This site is an example of an area becoming less active. Note the larger numbers of dead mussels, fewer anemones and the appearance of non vent endemic brisingids in the 2009 mosaic. The graphs show that the site is dying.

9080706050403020100

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Mean H2S (uM)

Mean

O2 (

uM)

Kilo Moana Site 1 2006 Chemistry

1.81.61.41.21.00.80.60.40.20.0

250

200

150

100

50

0

Mean H2S (uM)

Mea

n O2

(uM

)

Kilo Moana Site 1 2009 Chemistry

ABE Site 2, 2006

2520151050

150

100

50

0

-50

Mean H2S (uM)

Mea

n O2

(uM

)

ABE Site 2 Chemistry 2006

120100806040200

200

150

100

50

0

-50

-100

Mean H2S (in uM)

Mea

n O2

(in

uM)

ABE Site 2 Chemistry 2009

Kilo Moana 2: Example of less active site

ABE 2: Example of more active site

Bugs Bunny, 2006

Tu’i Malila 62, 2006

Note the lack of change in fauna between the two years. At the Tu’i chimney, the chemistry has remained the same, whereas at Bugs Bunny, the chemistry has reversed. This indicates that faunal changes at chimneys is slow despite flow regime changes.

Future Questions

Acknowledgements

Bugs Bunny, 2009

ABE Site 2, 2009

This is an example of a site undergoing succession. The graphs show little chemical difference, but note the lack of anemones and the higher dominance of B. brevior in the 2009 mosaic.

This is a preliminary look at succession and temporal change among Lau Basin megafauna. Further analyses within a GIS framework will be conducted to quantify both faunal and chemical change at these sites. In addition to diffuse flow and chimney sites, we have collected data for peripheral sites which will further contribute to our understanding of temporal change of Lau megafauna.

This project was funded by NSF grants ……………..to CRF? Many thanks to the e-chem team, Andrew Madison, Mustafa Yucel and Amy Gartman, as well as the ROV JASON II and R/V Thompson crews, without whom none of this work would have been possible. Thanks also to Jason Sylvan for use of his photographs and Dominique Cowart for assembling mosaics.

50403020100

200

150

100

50

Mean H2s conc. (uM)

Mea

n O2

con

c. (u

M)

Bugs Bunny Chemistry 2006

181614121086420

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Mean H2S Conc. (uM)

Mea

n O2

Con

c. (u

M)

Bugs Bunny Chemistry 2009

403020100

200

150

100

50

0

Mean H2S conc. (uM)

Mea

n O2

con

c. (u

M)

Tu'i Malila 62 Chemistry 2009

140120100806040200

150

100

50

0

-50

Mean H2S Conc (uM)

Mea

n O2

Con

c (u

M)

Tu'i Malila 62 Chemistry 2009

Tu’i Malila 62, 2009