orozco v. navarro - viento y sol complaint.pdf

8/10/2019 Orozco v. Navarro - Viento y Sol complaint.pdf

1/15

S

i

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2

22

23

4

25

6

7

8

^p

Steven

J. Eyre, CB#

119714

3550 Wilshire Boulevard , Suite 1440

Los Angeles,

Cal i fo rn ia 90010

(213)385-6926

fax (213) 385-3313

[email protected]

Attorney for Plaintiff

^m

OB

o

ro

- i>~

H

^

tnr y

^>

> 2

vJ

C > .

(qheck Yes only ifdemanded in complaint.)

MONEY

DEMANDED

IN

COMPLAINT:

$ UNSPECIFIED

DE F

4

5

6

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION (Citethe U.S. Civil Statute underwhichyouare

filing

andwrite

15 U.S.C. sec. 1051, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

a brief statement ofcause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity.)

VII. NATURE OFSUIT

(Place an Xin

one

box only).

OTHERSTATyTESi

375 False Claims

Act

ii 4 00 S ta te

I' Reapportionment

410

Antitrust

Q 430 Banks andBanking

450

Commerce / ICC

Rates/Etc.

Q 460 Deportation

470

Racketeer

Influ

enced

&Corrupt Org.

f j

480

Consumer Credit

490

Cable/Sat

TV

85 0 Securities/Com-

modities/Exchange

890

Other

Statutory

Actions

891 Agricultural Acts

893 Env ironmen ta l

Matte r s

8 95 F re ed om of Info.

Ac t

896

Arbitration

89 9 Admin . Procedures

| | Act/Review ofAppealof

Agency

Decision

950 Const it ut iona li ty of

State

Statutes

FOROFF ICE USEONLY:

CV-71

(06/14)

CONTRACT

REAL PROPERTYCONT.

IMM GRATION

PRISONER PETITIONS

Q 110

Insurance

120

Marine

130

Miller Act

140 Negotiable

Ins trument

150 Recovery of

| | Overpayments

Enfo rcemen t

of

Judgment

151 Medicare

Act

152 Recovery of

Defaulted Student

Loan

(Excl. Vet.)

153 Recovery of

| | Overpayment of

Vet.

Benefits

160 Stockholders '

Suits

rI 190 Othe r

Con t r a c t

19 5

Con t r a c t

Product

Liability

196

Franchise

W E A L PROPERTY

[J

210

Land

Condemnation

| | 220 Foreclosure

23 0

Rent L e as e &

Ejectment

D

Case

Number :

24 0

Torts to

Land

245To r t P r od u c t

Liability

29 0

All

Othe r

Real

Property

462 Natural izat ion

Application

46 5

0 t i e r

Immic

r a ti on Ac t ions

'~ ~'A

m

w*

Habeas

Corpus:

I | 463 Alien Detainee

ii 510

Motions

to

Vacate

I

Sentence

530

General

535DeathPenalty

310 Airplane

315 Airplane

Product Liability

320 Assault, Libel &

Slander

330 Fed. Employers'

Liability

34 0 Mar ine

345 Mar ine

Product

Liability

35 0 Motor

Vehicle

355 Motor Vehicle

Product

Liability

36 0

Othe r

Personal

Injury

362 Personal Injury-

Med Malpratice

365 Personal Injury-

Product

Liability

367 Hea lth

Care /

Pharmaceutical

Personal Injury

Product

Liability

368 Asbes to s

Personal

Injury

Produc t Liability

370

371

Tfuth

D380

Oth

er

Fraud

in

Lending

Cthe r Personal

Propejrty Damage

385 Pi

operty

Damage

Product Liability

.BANKRUPTCY

422 Appeal 28

USC 15

58

i t h d rawa l 28

57

r- i 42 3

V\

u USC1

WiMC

CIVIL RIGHtS-j5j|

440

Cjther

Civil

Rights

441V

442

El

44 3

H

jting

ployment

musing/

Acconmoda t ions

445

Afnerica

Disab

Em '

l,'

861

HIA(1395ff)

862

Black Lung (923)

863

DIWC/DIWW

(405

(g))

864

SSID

Title

XVI

865RSI (405 (g

fEDER^LTAXSlJI^

ii

87 0 Taxes

(U.S. Plaintiff or

L-J Defendant)

r- i

871 IRS-ThirdParty 26 USC

L-l 7609

Page 1

of

3


14/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA

CIVIL

COVER 5

HEET

VIII.

VENUE: Your answers tothequestions

below

will determine thedivision oftheCo|urt

to change, inaccordance

with

theCourt's General Orders, upon

review

bytheCourt ofyour

.,

5T^tECASEWAS>JiNDINaJN

to

which

thiscase

will

be

initially

assigned. This

initial

assignment issubject

iomplaint or Notice of Removal.

k .

tp 9^, ffi

,' /^VlT)*llD IV|^kl^iD'lslF; i

~4

QUESTION A:

Was t h is c as e r e m o v e d

from s tate court?

Yes \x\

No

If no, skipto Question B. Ifyes, check the

box to the right

that

applies, enter the

corresponding division inresponse to

Question E,

below,

and cont inue f rom there .

1

Los

Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, orS nLuis Obispo

Western

Orange

Riverside

orSan

Bernardino

g l ^ I I - ^ :r*i-

QUESTION B: Is th e United

States,

or

one

of

its agencies or

employees,

a

PLAINTIFF in

t hi s

action?

Yes [x] No

If no, skipto Question C. If yes, answer

Question B.I,at right.

W MAl iMa r*ii-i4 v m i v

QUESTION C: Is th e United

States,

or

one of its agencies or

employees,

a

DEFENDANT

in this action?

Yes

[x]

No

B.I. Do50%or moreof the defendants who residein

the district reside inOrange Co.?

check oneoftheboxestotheright

t

B.2.

Do

50% o rmo r e o f th e defendan ts who r ;side in

th e

district reside

in Riverside and/or

San

Bern

srdino

Counties? (Consider

thetwo

counties togethejr.)

checkone of theboxes tothe right

C.I. Do50% or more ofthe plaintiffswho reside inthe

district reside in

Orange

Co.?

he k oneofthe oxes to the right ^

C.2. Do 50% or

more

of

th e

plaintiffs who resi

district

reside

in

Riverside and/or

San Bernard i

Counties? (Consider the two counties togeth

Southern

>'' w~

Eastern

YES. Yourcase willinitiallybe assigned to the Southern Division

Enter Southern

inresponseto

Question E, below,

andcontinue

from

there.

NO.

ContinuetoQuestion

B.2.

YES.

Yourcase will initiallybe assigned to the Eastern Division.

Enter

Eastern

inresponsetoQuestion E,

below,

andcontinue

from there.

NO. Yourcase willinitially be assigned to the Western Division.

Enter Western

in responseto

Question E,

below,

andcontinue

f rom there .

YES.

Yourcase will initially be assigned to the Southern Division

Enter

Southern

in responsetoQuestion

E,

below, andcontinue

from there.

NO.

Continueto Question

C.2.

If no, skip to Question D. If yes, answer

C.1,at right.

ie in th e

1 0

.)

YES.

Yourcase willinitiallybe assigned to the Eastern Division.

I I Enter Eastern in response to Question

E,

below,and continue

from

there.

'

.-t

checkone of theboxesto theright

'SX i

; -,- .

Sww

< = .Aft*

er ,

NO. Your case will initially be assigned to the Western Division,

f j

Enter Western

inresponsetoQuestion E, below, andcontinue

from there.

^fe

octroy

otfrainfffs

an* tefwdints1?> ,

i fr

*Vf

IISfc &

Orange

Coulfty

j

$Bbfadimpa w;

dicate the location(s) inwhich 50% or more ofplaintiffs whoresidein this

district

(Check up to two boxes,or leave blank ifnone ofthese choices apply.)

th e

location(s) in

which 50% or more of defendants who reside in this

reside. (Check upto two boxes,or leave blank ifnone ofthese choices

wr tm iw^^ i i m?w* - * r

i i

,

D.1.

Is

t he re

a t least

o n e

answer in Column A?

Yes [X] No

If yes, your case will initiallybe assigned to the

SOUTHERN

DIVISION.

Enter Southern in

response

to

Question

E, below, and

continue

from

there.

If

no,

goto question

D2

to the

right.

^

;jaj

Division?

initial division determined by Question A,B,C,or D above

'iiiu ^ nn

s

^t *,< st'^r> ' $*

ll h

^MMA^kWU^

D.2. Is

t he re

a t

l eas t

o n e a n s w e r in Column B?

Yes [x] No

If yes, your case willinitially be assigned to the

EASTERN DIVISION.

Enter Eastern in

response

to

Question

E, below.

If no, yourcase willbe assigned to the WESTERN DIVISION.

Enter Western in

response

to

Question

E,below.

iNrriAL

DIVISION JNCACD

WESTERN

*

50 ormore ofplaintiffs ordefendants

in this

district

reside in

Ventura, Santa

Barbara,

or

San

Luis Obispo counties? Q

Yes

[x] No

CV-71

(06/14)

CIVIL

COVER SHEET

Page

2

of3


15/15

UNITED STATES

DISTRICT

COURT,

CENTRAL DISTRICT

OF

CALIFORNIA

CIVIL

COVER?

SHEET

IX a). IDENTICAL CASES: Has

this

action

beenpreviously

filed

inthis

court?

Ifyes, listcase number(s):

IX b).

RELATED

CASES:

Is

this

case

related

(as

defined below) to any

cases

previously filed

in

this court?

Ifyes, listcase number(s):

Civil

cases are related when they:

A. Arise from the same

or

closely

related

transactions,

happening,

B

Call

for determination

ofthe same or

substantially related

or

sim

C.

For

otherreasons

would entail

substantial

duplication

of

labor

Check all boxes that apply. That

cases

may involve the same patent,

trademark,

or copyright is not,

in

itself, sufficient to deem cases

related.

X.

SIGNATURE

OF

ATTORNEY

OR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT):

/ftffir-

o r

event ;

ilar questions of law

and

fact; or

ifheard bydifferent judges.

fx] NO

YES

NO

[X]

YES

DATE: October

22 2014

Notice to Counsel/Parties: The

submission

ofthis

Civil Cover

Sheetis

required

b

neither replaces norsupplements the

filing

and service of pleadings orother

more detailed instructions,see separate instruction sheet

(CV-071

A).

i Local Rule 3-1. This Form CV-71 and th e information

contained

herein

papers

as

required

by law,

except as provided

by

local rules ofcourt.

For

Key to Statisticalcodes relatingto SocialSecurity Cases:

Nature of

Suit Code

Abbreviation

Substantive Sta tement of

Caui

e of Action

Allclaims for health insurance benefits(Me ii

include claimsby hospitals,skilled nursing

(42 U.S.C. 1935FF(b))

86 1

86 2

86 3

86 3

86 4

865

(06/14)

HIA

BL

DIWC

DIWW

SSID

RSI

All claims for BlackLung benefits under Ti

923)

Allclaims filed by insured workers for disab

all

claims

filed for

child's

insurance benefits

care)under Title18,PartA, of the SocialSecurityAct,as amended. Also,

1

acilities,

etc., forcertification as providers of services underthe

program.

le4, Part

B,

ofthe FederalCoalMineHealthand SafetyActof 1969.(30

U.S.C.

lity insurance benefitsunderTitle 2ofthe Social SecurityAct, asamended;plus

based on disability. (42U.S.C. 405(g))

All claims filed fo r widows or widowers in

amended.

(42

U.S.C.

405 (g))

nsu

-ance

benefitsbasedon

disability

under

Title

2ofthe Social

Security

Act, as

All claimsfor supplemental security income

amended.

All claimsfor retirement (oldage) and survi\

(42 U.S.C. 405 (g))

paymentsbasedupon

disability filed

underTitle 16ofthe Social Security

Act,

as

ors benefits under Title2 of the SocialSecurityAct,as amended.

CIVIL COVER

SH

EET

Page 3 of 3

orozco v. navarro - viento y sol complaint.pdf

Documents