orp

Sea, Air, and Space Symposium

8 April 2014

PMS397 Program Manager

CAPT William J. Brougham

US DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D

Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014 2

OHIO Replacement Program

System Description

Mission: Strategic deterrence Description: Develop submarine to replace existing OHIO Class SSBNs as they reach the end of their service lives. A portion of effort develops a Common Missile Compartment (CMC) that will be used by both the U.S. and UK for their replacement SSBNs. Employment: Strategic deterrent patrols

Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014

Improved

Availability

Survivability,

Essential Stealth,

and Force Protection

Strategic

Weapons

System (D5-LE)

U.S. – UK

Common

Missile

Compartment

SSBN Design

Modular

Construction

Integrated Tube / Hull Construction

Propulsor

Electric Drive

Coordinated Stern

Updateable

Electronics Systems

Life of Ship Reactor

Core

Extended Service Life

All areas must remain aligned and properly resourced for the program to succeed

OHIO Replacement: The Right Capability at the Right Cost

3


Pulse of the Program

Right Schedule

“The schedule for the Ohio-class replacement, including the design and transition to construction, is very aggressive. There’s a lot of parts that have to move together to make that happen on time.”

ADM John Richardson, Director Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

27 Mar 2014

"The program has to stay on track. We have no slack in this program.“

ADM Jonathan Greenert, Chief of Naval Operations

27 Mar 2014

“We are exactly on track now in terms of the early engineering, the research and development that need to happen...”

The Honorable Ray Mabus, Secretary of the U.S. Navy

27 Mar 2014

“Our national security rests on our ability to deliver this boat on time and within budget.”

U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes, (R-VA) HASC 12 Sep 2013

Right Funding

“My top priority is the SSBN(X) and the strategic nuclear deterrent…I will fund that above all else…”


18 Sep 2013

“…there's a 15-year period where it [the OHIO Replacement] will be the largest part of our shipbuilding program…[this] puts extraordinary pressure on our shipbuilding program.”

The Honorable Sean Stackley, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research,

Development and Acquisition 26 Mar 2014

“The one thing that we can control today is obviously trying to keep the cost down by making sure that the defense -- the design and -- and engineering budget request for Ohio replacement is protected.”

U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, (D-CT) HASC 12 Sep 2013

“Even in a time of declining resources, it's crucial that our nation continue to retain our strategic advantage in undersea warfare.”

U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes, (R-VA) HASC 12 Sep 2013

Continued Affordability Efforts

“The Navy is taking the necessary steps to ensure the OHIO Replacement SSBN is designed, built, delivered, and tested on time with the right capabilities at an affordable cost.”

VADM Terry Benedict, Director, Strategic Systems Programs

5 Mar 2014

“We are able to protect research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) funding to the Ohio Replacement Program-our top priority program-on track.”


12 Sep 2013

“We are leading the charge in affordability. We are at the forefront of implementing Secretary Kendall's [Better Buying Power] efforts.”

RADM David Johnson, Program Executive Officer for Submarines

12 Sep 2013

Right UK Support

“…today we are on schedule in terms of both the OHIO Replacement Program schedule and supporting the [UK’s] SUCCESSOR.”

The Honorable Sean Stackley, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research,

Development and Acquisition 26 Mar 2014

“…the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure that the common missile compartment associated with the OHIO-Class ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on schedule and is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program …in order for the United States to fulfill its longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based strategic deterrence.”

Sense of Congress from the U.S. House of Representatives

14 Jun 2013

“The U.S. and the U.K. have maintained a shared commitment to nuclear deterrence.” “Our programs are tightly coupled both programmatically and technically to ensure we are providing the most cost effective, technically capable nuclear deterrent for both nations.”

VADM Terry Benedict, Director, Strategic Systems Programs

5 Mar 2014

4 Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014

“As long as these [nuclear] weapons exist,

the United States will maintain a safe, secure,

and effective arsenal to deter any adversary,

and guarantee that defense to our allies…”

President Obama

Apr 2010


Lead ship construction must commence in 2021

First Strategic Patrol in 2031

Maintains fleet of 10 operational SSBNs through transition to OHIO Replacement

Procurement timeline meets USSTRATCOM requirements with moderate operational risk during transition period – no additional room for delay

Low margin for unforeseen SSBN maintenance issues or late OHIO Replacement delivery

12 OHIO Replacement SSBNs needed to meet long term requirements during OHIO Replacement mid-life overhaul period

Design efforts in 2014 more than double 2013 and continue growing through 2019 to achieve design maturity at 2021 Construction Start

Sufficient payload: 16 missile tubes (D5)

Meets USSTRATCOM requirements

Flexibility to handle problems across triad or degradation in strategic environment

Sufficient stealth to address the projected threat through the 2080s

12 OHIO Replacement SSBNs to replace 14 OHIOs

Life of ship reactor core

Reduced mid-life maintenance period

Maximize reuse of OHIO and VIRGINIA components to minimize cost

21st Century Capability…

In an Affordable Package…

OHIO Replacement SSBN Attributes

At Responsible Cost.

(Large Aperture Bow Array)

SSBN Force Structure

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

era

tio

n S

SB

Ns

OHIO Replacement SSBN

5

Transition Period

30YR Class Extended to 42YRS

– Cannot extend further


Planned recapitalization extended 20 years

“There is no more margin”

Achieving Key Performance Parameters is the key to success of this optimized force Survivability – Stealth is critical to maintaining an assured response

Material and Operational availability – 12 OHIO Replacements must deliver the same availability as 14 OHIOs

Strategic Weapons System – Must achieve OHIO (D5) demonstrated performance

Other Performance Parameters that drive program efforts Training – Utilize existing facilities and onboard trainers

Net Ready – Supports military operations and effectively exchanges information

Cost – Aggressive push to achieve Milestone A cost goals

Schedule – First hull must be on deployment in 2031 to meet STRATCOM requirements

Space/Weight/Power/Cooling – Must support future tech insertions

Historical SBSD Force Structure

Executing the Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence Mission: “A Lean, Optimized Force”

6

7 Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032

X X X X X X X X X X X

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032

First OHIO

Replacement

Strategic

Deterrent

Patrol

Point Studies

System Descriptions

Component Evaluation

/ Tech. Road Maps

Ship Mfg Assbly Plans

Ship Specifications

Ship Construction Design Disclosure and NC Data CMC MT

ITH Prototypes

Concept Studies Design / Build / Sustain Development Construction

System Definition Documents

OHIO Replacement Lead Ship Construction

System Descriptions and Rev A Diagrams

Ship Specifications

Baseline Integrated Master Schedule

Milestone A Milestone B

SWSA V&V Testing

Ship Detailed Arrangements CMC MT

Lead Ship T&E

PSA

UK CMC and Ship Construction

OR AP / LLTM

Fiscal Year

OR Design Schedule

OR / UK CMC Construction

Prototype Design

CMC

SWSA Testing

OHIO Replacement T&E

Lead Ship Authorization

JROC CDD

Final DASO

Updated 3/11/14

2014 Design Products: More

than Double the 2013 Effort

Non-Shipboard Prototype Design /

Construction

Navy Approved CDD Prototype Construction

First Article MTs First Article Quad Pk

Shipboard Prototypes

OHIO Replacement Program – Design Schedule


Accomplished Set Stern Control Surface Configuration

(X-Stern (Apr 2013))

Joint U.S. / UK CMC Schedule approved (Jun 2013)

Strategic Weapon Systems Ashore (SWS-A) Test

Facility (FL) Construction Start (Jun 2013)

Set Missile Compartment Length (Aug 2013)

Superstructure Hydro Testing (Aug 2013)

Initiated procurement of LLTM for Missile Tube

procurement (Nov 2013)

Set Engine Room Length (Dec 2013)

Set Ship Length (Jan 2014)

Completion of Ship Specifications (Mar 2014)

On-Going & Upcoming Propulsor testing

HM&E component prototyping

Ship Control COOPEX Phase 1

Procurement of Missile Tube Manufacture

Underwater Electromagnetic (UEM) physical

scale model testing

Industrial base investment decisions

Manufacturing Fixtures Surface Launch Test Facility

OHIO Replacement Program Accomplishments

8

Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014 9


Integrated Tube & Hull (ITH) Prototyping Long Lead Time Material (LLTM) and Assembly Procurement

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

CMC Program Milestone #7

1/13

ITH Forging & MT HY80 Plate Contract Award

1st Forging Complete

6/13


Start U.S./UK Missile Tube Build

11/14 1st Missile Tube Complete

11/16

Final Missile Tube

Complete

11/17

MT Fixture Design

& Fab

Access Doors & Associated Liners Contract Award

5/14

Assembly 17 Missile Tubes


Missile Tube Supplier Down Select

11/13

Lon

g L

ea

d T

ime M

ate

ria

l A

sse

mb

ly

Outfitting Fixture Missile Tube Alignment

Fixture (E Fixture)

F Fixture

ITH Weldment Assembly and Hatch

Cylinder, Eject Pipe, Miscellaneous

Attachments Contract Award

11/13

Hatch, Locking Ring, Miscellaneous

Liners, and Monel Liners Contract Award

2/14

First Article Quad Pack

8/16 – 4/18


OHIO Replacement “Quad Pack” Construction Process

State of the Art Construction Processes Minimize Cost and Save Time

84% Outfitted

Missile Tube E-Fixture

F-Fixture

Quad Packs

Prototype

Missile Tube

Reduces Missile Compartment Costs and Construction Time

10


OR SSBN Building the Future -

Today

11


Achieve Affordable Programs Milestone A Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) established affordability targets

Established a Design For Affordability (DFA) management team and plan with shipbuilder

Utilizing incentives to ensure overall program affordability

Planning to take advantage of block buy / multi-year procurement savings

Control Costs Throughout the Product Lifecycle Formal standup of OHIO Replacement Design for Affordability (DFA) program – February 2011

DFA program ensures entire lifecycle costs are planned from acquisition program start

Incentivize Productivity and Innovation in Industry and Government Rewarding shipbuilder for meeting program affordability targets

Utilizing a completion form contract for R&D Design

Investigating fixed price construction contracts for follow ships

Eliminate Unproductive Processes and Bureaucracy Engaging with shipbuilder to identify non-value added processes

Engaging with Navy and OSD to identify documentation requirements for streamlining or deletion

Promote Effective Competition Competitively procuring component development subcontracts

Maximizing Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) / Non Development Items (NDI) in combat systems development / procurement

Improve Tradecraft in Acquisition of Services Service CDD approved early in acquisition process – 2 August 2012 by CNO

Improve the Professionalism of the Total Acquisition Workforce


Alignment with OSD Better Buying Power 2.0

12


Reduced number of missile tubes

Reduced missile tube diameter

Reduced torpedo room capacity

Removed chin array

Reduced sail mast capacity

Reduced force protection features

Reduced OHIO Replacement unique design features

20 to 16 tubes

97 inches to 87 inches

Minimum capacity for defensive load only

Minimum acoustic sensors for defensive detection;

leverage VIRGINIA-Class combat systems

10 to 6 masts

Current OHIO-Class system

Increased use of VIRGINIA-Class components

Delivering the Core Essential Military Capability at the Lowest Possible Cost

Design for

Affordability

(DFA)

Milestone A Service Cost Position Average Follow-on Ship CY10 $ = $5.6B

Report to Congress on Annual Long-Range Plan

for Construction of Naval Vessels for FY2011 Unit Cost CY10 $= $6B to $7B

Milestone A Cost Target Average Follow-on Ship CY10 $= $4.9B

Recent Affordability Initiatives

EOQ and multi-year procurement

Facilities

Design for producability

Requirements and regulations

Integrated Product Development Environment (IPDE)

Manufacturing technologies, service, and support

De

live

ring

the

Co

re E

ssen

tial M

ilitary

Ca

pa

bility

at th

e L

ow

est P

os

sib

le C

os

t

Detailed requirements review produced savings

13

(CY10 $s) Costs developed by NAVSEA05C for OHIO Replacement Service Cost Position; Inflation based on NAVSEA 05C Jan 2010 SCN Shipbuilding Composite Inflation Table

Driving - Down Cost


Funding stability to execute plan of record, design and

technology development progress

Support lead ship construction authorization in 2021

Ready for first strategic patrol in 2031

OHIO Class learning as they retire one ship per year in

2027

12 OHIO Replacement SSBNs replace 14 OHIOs

OHIO Replacement Program Take Aways

14

Focused on a successful Technology Development and Engineering Integration to

support an affordable FY21 lead ship construction for the 12 ship class



Contractors and Government Field Activities Map

ILLINOIS • Scott Forge

MASSACHUSETTS • General Dynamics

Advanced Information

Systems (GDAIS)

• L-3 – Henschel

UNITED KINGDOM • Sheffield

Forgemasters

• BAE Submarine

Solutions

• Babcock

• Rolls Royce

SWITZERLAND • APCO Technologies

PENNSYLVANIA • ARL / Penn State

• Naval Foundry & Propeller Center

• WHEMCO, Inc.

MARYLAND • NAVAIR • NSWC Carderock • JHU / APL

VIRGINIA • SPAWAR Norfolk

• HII-Newport News Shipbuilding

• Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Sensors

• NSWC Dahlgren

• Northrop Grumman–Sperry Marine

SOUTH CAROLINA

• SPAWAR Charleston

WASHINGTON • Kitsap Naval Base

• NUWC Keyport

• Bradken-Atlas

CONNECTICUT /

RHODE ISLAND • NUWC Newport, RI

• Quonset Point, RI

• Electric Boat, CT

FLORIDA • Naval Ordnance

Test Unit

Cape Canaveral

• Goodrich

CALIFORNIA • SPAWAR San Diego

• Northrop Grumman Marine

Systems

• Lockheed Martin Space Systems

• IEC-L3

NEW YORK • Lockheed Martin

Mission Systems

GEORGIA • Kings Bay

Naval Base

MAINE • Bath Iron

Works

MISSISSIPPI • Rolls Royce

• Seemans

Composites

IDAHO • NSWC ARD

Bayview

15

501 Vendors / Suppliers

41 States

3 Countries

Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014 16 Sea, Air, and Space Symposium 8 April 2014