E J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education 24 4, 2010. 11. 909-922 Vol. 24, No. 4, Nov. 2010. 909-922

909

()

, .

, , ,

.

,

.

. 1)

.

,

.

,

.

.

( )

.

,

.

.

. ,

.

* (2010 10 12), ()(2010 10 28), (2010 11 25)

* ZDM : B44

* MSC2000 : 97B40

* : , ,

* 2010

910

.

1999 12 .

,

.

.

. 2010

,

.

.

(, 1993), ( 2, 2000 ),

(, 2001), (, 2002),

(, 2005), ( 1,

2006) .

,

. () ,

(2009) ,

.

,

.

.

. ,

.

( 3, 2004), (

4, 2007) .

.

,

.

911

.

30 ,

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. ,

- .

,

.

, .

. .

,

. 4 ,

, , .

.

.

.

.

.

. ,

. ,

.

912

.

. .

, .

, .

.

.

.

,

.

.

.

, .

, . 1980

.

(), ( ) .

( )

. , , (

), ( ), ( )

.

.

.

.

913

,

..

.

.

.

.

,

.

.

, 12

.

.

1999 2 2009 1

.1)

12 , ( 12

) . 2007

1) 3 1, 3 2, 4 1

.

914

10

.

,

.

,

. 2006

2007 , 2008, 2009 (

) .

2000 .

. .

,

.

.

.

.

( ) .

915

.

,

2008 .

1990 (

) ( ) .2)

( )

3 . ,

.

0.5 1 .

0.3 ,

30% .

100 , 2002 4.31 2007 4.30 15

.

,

.

.

12 .

2) 2005 ( ) , (

) .

916

,

, .

( ) .

.

,

. 2001 2 ( )

3).

100 85

15 F .

1 3

. .

3) 10 1 5 , 1 5

917

( ) (

) 2.5

.

4)

.

.

. 2000

10% .

10% . 10%

4) ( ) 2005

918

.

,

. ( ) ,

( ) ( ) . (

), ( ) ( ) 2005 1 2010

1 .

100 ( )

( ) ( )5)

. ( ) ( )

.

,

.

5) ( ), ( ) 40

919

.

.

.

, 2001 2 .

. 90%

. .

2009 2 ( )

5.0. 2010 1

( ) 3.87 10%

. ,

. ,

.

.

.

, , ,

.

.

12

.

.

2007 .

920

,

.

,

.

.

, .

, .

.

.

.

,

.

,

. ,

.

, .

.

.

,

.

.

.

921

.

.

, .

, ,

.

. ,

.

4 (2007). ,

10(4), 58-77

3 (2004). , 7(1),

64-73

1 (2006). , 12.

(2001). , , 110. 93-101

(2000). , , 92-98.

(1993). , .

(2001). , 4(3). 66-73.

(2009).

, C 12(1), 21-30.

(2002). , 13(1), 155-176.

(2005). , 23(3), 379-403.

922

The Study for Problems of course evaluations in mathematics education 6)

Moon, Kwon BaeDept. of math. education, Sangmyung University, 7 Hongji-dong Seoul Korea

E-mail : kbmoon@smu.ac.kr

This paper deals with disparities in course evaluation between general and major courses of mathematics education. We provide concrete evidences which verify the mismanagement of the evaluation system and can be an impetus to a more rational one. We indicate the direction to which professors of mathematics education should head. Also those statistics obtained from the author's teaching of mathematics education and related subjects for twelve years are provided for the fact-finding of and improving the erroneous evaluation system.

* ZDM Classification : B44

* 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification : 97B40

* Key Words : Problems of course evaluations, Mathematics Subject, Policy of Education