peo/syscom conference brief mr. chuck greco aviation project manager integrated coast guard systems...

PEO/SYSCOM Conference Brief

Mr. Chuck GrecoAviation Project Manager

Integrated Coast Guard Systems

System Requirements and Acquisition

Integration

CDR Carl AlamAviation Project ManagerUnited States Coast Guard

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i pAgenda

• Deepwater History

• Contract Philosophy/Structure/Flexibility

• Integrated Product Team Structure

• Requirement “Flow-Down”

• Process “Flow-Down”

• Systems Engineering

• Questions

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i p

Maritime Mobility

Lightering Zone Enforcement

Foreign Vessel Inspection

Homeland Security

General Defense Operations

Maritime Interception Operations

Military Environmental Defense Operations

Port Operations, Security, & Defense

Peacetime Military Engagement

Coastal Sea Control

Search and Rescue

International Ice Patrol

Drug Interdiction

General Enforcement of Laws and Treaties

Alien Migrant Interdiction

Marine Pollution Enforcement & Response

Living Marine Resource Enforcement

Maritime Safety

Maritime Security

Protection of Natural Resources

National Defense

U.S. Coast Guard Missions


1985-2005

1982-2002

1972-1997

1964-2007

1984-2004

1982-2013

1990-2005

1965-2008

Positive:• Effective multi-mission capability• Record cocaine seizures 3 years

running• Innovative endgame initiatives

Negative:• Missed opportunities – can’t

respond to all available intel• Huge coverage gaps exacerbated

by complex cases• Insufficient C4ISR to mitigate

resource gaps

Year First Commissioned

Expiration of Planned Service Life

17 yrs

30 yrs

18 yrs

37 yrs

12 yrs38 yrs

28 yrs20 yrs

Current Coast Guard Capabilities


• Secures the Homeland by providing improved Maritime Security and Safety

• Enables the Coast Guard to

– Maintain credible presence in key maritime regions to deter potential threats to U.S. sovereignty

– Right way to achieve complex goals through public – private partnership

• Provides Nation best national security, military, law enforcement, and search & rescue capability for taxpayer’s dollar

• Ensures USCG remains best CG in the world – military, multimission, maritime, mobile, agile and flexible

Vision Statement:“Keeping the U.S. Coast Guard the world’s best…properly equipped and

fully prepared to meet every maritime challenge of the 21st Century.”

Why Deepwater?


Performance Based: • Focus on capabilities

not assets

Acquisition Strategy:• Partner with system

integrator

• Acquire integrated system of surface, air, C4ISR, and logistics systems

Overarching Objective:• Maximize Operational Effectiveness while Minimizing Total

Ownership Costs

Mission Statement:• Be the best at what we do. Set a standard of excellence for all

to emulate as we develop, acquire, deploy, and sustain an operationally effective and affordable Integrated Deepwater System.

Solution: Integrated Deepwater System


Operational EffectivenessSurveillance, Detection,

Classification, Identification, Prosecution, (SDCIP)

Efficiency Effectiveness

System Performance Specification, Productivity

System Performance Specification, Productivity

OperationalEffectiveness

Value

Chief Financial Officer Act

Value

SDCIP

Government Performance Results Act

Total Ownership Cost

Performance Based Acquisition


FY01FY01 FY02FY02 FY03FY03 FY04FY04 FY05FY05 FY06FY06 FY07FY07

IDS Concept & Tech Development

IDS System Development & Demonstration IDS Production & Deployment

Sep2001

Jun2001

Ph

ase

2 P

rop

osa

l P

rep

PHASE 1

PHA

SE 2

Prop

osal

Ev

alua

tion

AwardAwardJun 2002

Asset Task Delivery

Order

IDS Engineering, Integration, and Management

SUR

FAC

ELO

GIS

TIC

SC

4ISR

AVI

ATI

ON

Concept & Technology Development

System Development & Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

Disposal

Notional Delivery/Task Order Schedule

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i p Contract Philosophy

“The front-end engineering of institutional arrangements and strategic systems is a far greater determinant of the success or failure of Large Engineering Projects than are the more tangible aspects of project engineering and management….Projects become successful not because they have been optimally selected, but because sponsors and partners commit to sharing risks, shaping choices in turbulent environments, and embracing uncertainties.”

Miller and Lesard, The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks and Governance.

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i p Contract Structure

• A Performance Based Acquisition– Specifications, products and program success judged on system (vice asset)

performance• Operational Effectiveness• Total Ownership Cost

• Partnering with a single Integrated Deepwater System (IDS) contractor - the Systems Integrator - who will:

– Upgrade and/or replace ships, aircraft, logistics systems, and C4ISR through its team of subcontractors

– Integrate the entire system of ships, aircraft, logistics systems, and C4ISR.• Five-year base award with option to award up to five additional five-year award terms.• Delivery Order/Task Order Contract will break annual funding into usable segments in

accordance with A-11.• Contract incorporates many acquisition reforms, innovations and current best practices,

and is constructed to provide flexibility to adapt to: Budget fluctuations Technology refreshment Legislative mandates Mission evolution

11


2002

2003

2004

2024

2023

2022

2005

2021

2020

2019

2006

2018

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2025

2031

2032

FIRM PRICINGBASIC TERM

5 Years

Guaranteed Minimum $ = 1st Year Funding (can end anytime after meeting minimum)

Negotiate any downward adjustment to Award Term #1 - not to exceed prices obtained during FY02 Competition

OFF RAMP

Project Management & Technical Quarterly ReviewsAnnual Performance ReviewsYR3 Award Term Proposal SubmissionYR4 Award Term Evaluation

YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5

TERM

Decision on Award Term #1 (4 years data)• Expected performance in following areas

- Operational Effectiveness (OE)- Total Ownership Cost (TOC)- Competition provided at

Subcontract Level- Project Management

Award Term Contract

12


BASIC TERM

Decision on Award Term 1 (4 years data)

Off Ramp Negotiate Award Term 1

AWARD TERM 1



AWARD TERM 2



AWARD TERM 3



AWARD TERM 4



AWARD TERM 5

Off Ramp

2002

2003

2004

2024

2023

2022

2005

2021

2020

2019

2006

2018

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2025

2031

2032

Project Management & Technical Quarterly ReviewsAnnual Performance ReviewsYR3 Award Term Proposal SubmissionYR4 Award Term Evaluation

YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5

TERM

System Integrator Monitoring


Flexible Design & Procurement Strategy for Changing Requirements

System Integration requirements include:– Modularity and Commonality– Integrated CONOPS & CONLOG– Systems Engineering including

technology refresh– C4ISR Architecture development

at both asset & system level– Developmental testing– IDS Performance/Cost Analysis

Asset C

apability

Force Compositi

on Force Structure

Contract Flexibility


• Public and Private Partnership – Effectiveness

• Support Internal Organization

Collocation at the System Integrated Program Office

(SIPO)

Integrated Product Teams

• Higher plane of trust and coordination – no hidden agendas

• Commitment to higher quality of service – Long term

• Genuine cost-sharing

• Incentives

Innovation: Partnership

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i p USCG/ICGS IPT Structure

Communications

OIPT

IIPT

PMT

ICGS BOD

C/CV/CCS

PEO

DPM

Guidance

Co-Chair

GuidanceAdvice

ICGS PM

Advice

Co-Chair

Organizational Positionor Functional Team

Integrated Productor Process Team

USCG ICGS Joint

LIMS

LEM 2

LEM 1

Shore

…

Comms

Integration

C2

Intel

LegacyUpgrade

MPA

VUAV

MCH

LegacyUpgrade

…

NSC

SRP

123’

…

…

Process F

lowdow

n

Req

uire

men

t Flo

wdo

wn

SystemArchitects

Sys Eng,Process Lead

Surface PM Air PM C4ISR PM ILS PM

DTMDRM

SEIT

GuidanceGuidanceGuidance

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i p Requirements ‘Flow-down”

USCG RQMTS

SPS, MSMP, ORD, BLArch, LAB2000

USCG RQMTS

SPS, MSMP, ORD, BLArch, LAB2000

ILS LSSILS LSS

IDS System Of Systems Engineering

•System Infrastructure

IDS System Of Systems Engineering

•System Infrastructure

TOC/LCCEILS ISPs

CONLOGTOC/LCCEILS ISPs

System Requirement SpecUSCG

Domain Design/Development/Production

System Engineering•C4ISR / ILS•Shore•Surface•Aviation

Domain Design/Development/Production

System Engineering•C4ISR / ILS•Shore•Surface•Aviation

System Requirement SpecAsset Performance Spec•Asset Architecture Guidelines•Interface Design Req. ICGS Asset

Integration & Test•Shore•Surface•Air

ICGS Asset Integration & Test

•Shore•Surface•Air

ICGSAsset

USCGAsset

Design Specs

AssetS/W & Eqpt

System Performance & Requirements Validation


IDS Plans & Processes

• Project Management Plan (PMP)• Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)• Risk Management Plan (RMP)• Requirements Management Plan • Configuration Management (CM) Plan• Data Management (DM) Plan• Test and Evaluation Program Plan (TEPP)• Quality Assurance (QA) Plan• C4ISR Systems Engineering Management Plan

(C4ISR SEMP)• Software Development Plan (SDP)• System Safety Plan (SSP)• Integrated Support Plan (ISP)• ICGS Contractor Work Breakdown Structure

(CWBS)• Integrated Product and Process Development

(IPPD)• Interface Requirements Documents (IRDS)• Concept Of Operations (CONOPS)

Process ‘Flow-down”

• Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)• Measures of Performance (MOP)• Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)• Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs)• Required Operational Capabilities (ROC)• Simulation Test and Evaluation Process (STEP)• Earned Value Management System (EVMS)• Data Management Plan (DMP)• Contractor Deliverable Requirements List

(CDRL)• Technical Performance Measures (TPM)• Design Reference Missions (DRM)• Integrated Management Plan (IMP)• Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability

(RMA) Plan• System Training Plan• System Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) Plan• Support and Test Equipment (S&TE) Plan• Technology Obsolescence Prevention (TOP) Plan

M a n a g i n g C h a n g e t h r o u g h P a r t n e r s h i p System Engineering

IDS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS “ENGINE”

Requirements Definition and Analysis • Analyze Mission/CONOPS • Identify Functional Requirements • Define Performance & Design Constraints • Define Levels of HMI / Automation • Identify Derived Requirements

Functional and Physical Allocation

• Decompose to Lower Level Functions • Allocate Performance • Define Interfaces • Refine and Integrate Functional Architecture

Design Synthesis • Transform Architecture from Functional to Physical • Define Alternative Concepts and Make/Buy

Decisions • Refine Interfaces • Select Solutions for User Feedback

Verification

Process Input

• SPS/SOW • Missions • MOEs • CANDI

Technology Base

• Standards and Doctrine

• Funding

Process Output

• Baselines • Architecture • Foundation

Functional and Physical Config .

• Interfaces • CANDI List • Support and

Sustainment Considerations

Requirements Loop

Design Loop

System Analysis, Validation, and

Control • Proof - of -

Concept Demos • Trade Studies • Effectiveness

Analysis • CAIV • CM, DM • Earned Value • Performance -

Based Progress Measurement

Validation Loop

PDR CDR PRR TRR FAT

• Systems Engineering “Engine” Drives the Spiral that Binds and Integrates Assets, Missions, and People at All Levels of the IDS System Design

• Ensures a System - of - System Perspective • Approach Enforces a Robust and Repeatable

Stepwise Refinement Process that is Inherently Iterative

Assets Assets

Missions Missions

People People

33 - 084

IDS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS “ENGINE”

Requirements Definition and Analysis • Analyze Mission/CONOPS • Identify Functional Requirements • Define Performance & Design Constraints • Define Levels of HMI / Automation • Identify Derived Requirements

Functional and Physical Allocation

• Decompose to Lower Level Functions • Allocate Performance • Define Interfaces • Refine and Integrate Functional Architecture

Design Synthesis • Transform Architecture from Functional to Physical • Define Alternative Concepts and Make/Buy

Decisions • Refine Interfaces • Select Solutions for User Feedback

Verification

Process Input

• SPS/SOW • Missions • MOEs • CANDI

Technology Base

• Standards and Doctrine

• Funding

Process Output

• Baselines • Architecture • Foundation

Functional and Physical Config .

• Interfaces • CANDI List • Support and

Sustainment Considerations

Requirements Loop

Design Loop

System Analysis, Validation, and

Control • Proof - of -

Concept Demos • Trade Studies • Effectiveness

Analysis • CAIV • CM, DM • Earned Value • Performance -

Based Progress Measurement

Validation Loop

PDR CDR PRR TRR FAT

• Systems Engineering “Engine” Drives the Spiral that Binds and Integrates Assets, Missions, and People at All Levels of the IDS System Design

• Ensures a System - of - System Perspective • Approach Enforces a Robust and Repeatable

Stepwise Refinement Process that is Inherently Iterative

Assets Assets

Missions Missions

People People

33 - 084


PEO/SYSCOM Conference Brief

Mr. Chuck GrecoAviation Project Manager

Integrated Coast Guard SystemsWork: (571) 218-3292Cell: (856) 912-4608

[email protected]

Questions?

CDR Carl AlamAviation Project ManagerUnited States Coast Guard

Work: (571) 218-3291Cell: (202) 528-6684

[email protected]