phyto 39

Upload: sandeepajmire

Post on 04-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 PHYTO 39

    1/4

    Giardia and Cryptosporidiumremoval from waste-waterby a duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) covered pond

    J.A. Falabi, C.P. Gerba and M.M. KarpiscakDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, Office of Arid Lands Studies, The University of Arizona,

    Tucson, AZ, USA

    2001/284: received 25 September 2001 and accepted 28 January 2002

    J . A . F A L A B I , C . P . G E R B A A N D M . M . K A R P I S C A K . 2 0 0 2 .

    Aims: To determine the ability of duckweed ponds used to treat domestic waste-water to

    remove Giardia and Cryptosporidium.

    Methods and Results: The influent and effluent of a pond covered with duckweed with

    a 6 day retention time was tested for Giardia cysts, Cryptosporidium oocysts, faecal coliforms

    and coliphage. Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts were reduced by 98 and 89%,

    respectively, total coliforms by 61%, faecal coliforms by 62% and coliphage by 40%. Therewas a significant correlation between the removal of Giardia cysts and Cryptospordium oocysts

    by the pond (P < 0001). Influent turbidity and parasite removal were also significantly

    correlated (Cryptosporidium and turbidity, P 005; Giardia and turbidity, P 001).

    Conclusions: The larger organisms (parasites) probably settled to the bottom of the pond,

    while removal of smaller bacteria and coliphages in the pond was not as effective.

    Significance and Impact of the Study: Duckweed ponds may play an important role in

    wetland systems for reduction of Giardia and Cryptosporidium.

    INTRODUCTION

    The ability of wetland and aquatic systems to improve the

    quality of waste-water is well documented (Gersberg et al.

    1987; Hammer 1989; Kadlec and Knight 1996). Different

    studies have shown that aquatic plants, such as water

    hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes L.), water lettuce (Pistia

    stratiotes L.) and duckweed (Lemna spp.), are capable of

    reducing biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspen-

    ded solids (TSS), and nitrogen and phosphorus concentra-

    tions in waste-water (Dewedar and Bahgat 1995). However,

    little or no information is available on the fate of pathogenic

    protozoan parasites from secondarily-treated sewage (acti-

    vated sludge) applied to constructed wetlands. The removal

    of pathogenic organisms in aquatic or wetland systems couldbe the result of several factors, including natural die-off,

    sedimentation, predation and adsorption (Reed et al. 1995).

    These factors, in turn, are likely influenced by detention

    time and seasonal variability. The objective of this study was

    to evaluate the ability of an aquatic system covered with

    duckweek to remove protozoan parasites (Giardia and

    Cryptosporidium), indicator bacteria and coliphages from

    activated sludge effluent. Physical-chemical data such as

    temperature, turbidity and pH were measured to determine

    whether microbial removal was related to any of these

    parameters.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    The constructed wetland facility

    The constructed ecosystem research facility (CERF) began

    operation in January 1989, and is located adjacent to the

    Roger Road Wastewater Treatment plant operated by Pima

    County in Tucson, Arizona. The facility is operated by The

    University of Arizonas Office of Arid Lands Studies for the

    Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The

    duckweed pond used in this study is 65 m long, 11 9 m wide

    and 26 m deep, with an average influent flow rate of 55

    (range 4759) litres min)1. The operational depth of the

    pond during this study was 09 m. The average detention

    time during the period of this study was estimated at 9 days.

    A free-floating aquatic weed called duckweed (Lemna gibba

    L.) was the primary plant covering the entire surface of

    the pond. The pond receives secondary quality effluent

    Correspondence to: C.P. Gerba, Department of Soil, Water and Environmental

    Science, Office of Arid Lands Studies, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

    85721, USA (e-mail: [email protected]).

    2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology

    Letters in Applied Microbiology 2002, 34, 384387

  • 7/30/2019 PHYTO 39

    2/4

    (activated sludge) from the Pima County Roger Road

    Wastewater Treatment Facility diverted to CERF just prior

    to chlorination.

    Sample collection and processing

    Water samples of influent (waste-water entering the pond)

    and effluent (waste-water exiting the pond) were collected

    from June 1994 through May 1996 from the duckweed-

    covered pond. These samples were analysed for Giardia

    cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts (110 litres), total and

    faecal coliforms (50 ml), and coliphages (50 ml). The

    samples were usually collected once a month in sterile

    plastic bottles and transported on ice to the laboratory for

    analysis. Total coliform and faecal coliform bacteria samples

    were processed within 6 h, coliphage samples within 72 h

    and parasite samples within 48 h.

    Detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium

    Volumes of influent and effluent waste-water of 14 litres

    were collected directly from the pond in sterile plastic

    bottles. Giardia and Cryptosporidium were detected simulta-

    neously in the samples using an indirect immunofluores-

    cence method (APHA 1992a). The immunofluorescent

    method includes three major steps: parasite concentration

    into a pellet, pellet floatation to clarify the samples, and

    antibody staining for the detection of the parasite using a

    microscope with fluorescent light. Giardia cysts and

    Cryptosporidium oocysts were concentrated from the water

    samples by centrifugation at 1050 g for 15 min in a swingingbucket rotor centrifuge (Jouan, Inc., Winchester, VA, USA).

    The pellet provided by initial centrifugation was

    resuspended in floated Sheathers solution (APHA 1992a).

    The pellet obtained, following floatation, was then distri-

    buted on pre-wetted, 25 mm diameter cellulose acetate

    filters with a 02 lm pore size (Costar Corp., Pleasanton,

    CA, USA). The filters were labelled with fluorescent

    antibodies (Hydrofluor Combo Meridian Diagnostics,

    Cincinnati, OH, USA). These antibodies are specific for

    both Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts. During each

    assay, positive and negative controls ensured that assay

    reagents worked properly. The filters were then examinedmicroscopically. Cysts and oocysts were identified according

    to specified criteria: immunofluorescence, size, shape and

    internal morphological characteristics (APHA 1992a). The

    results were reported as the total number of Giardia and

    Cryptosporidium per litre of sample.

    Detection of indicator bacteria

    Total and faecal coliforms were detected by membrane

    filtration on selective media, i.e. mEndo agar (Difco) for

    total coliforms and mFC agar (Difco) for faecal coliforms,

    according to the Standard Methods (APHA 1992b). If

    necessary, samples were diluted using a Tris-buffered saline

    solution which was prepared by mixing 1600 ml distilled

    water and 632 g Trizma Base (Tris hydroxymethyl amino

    methane; Sigma). Various dilutions of the samples werefiltered through 045 lm pore size filters (Gelman Sciences,

    Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The filters were then placed on the

    selective medium and incubated for 24 h at 37C.

    Detection of coliphages

    Coliphages were detected by the double layer agar method

    described by Adams (1959). The host bacteria used for the

    assay was Escherichia coli strain ATTC 15597 (American

    Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD), which detects

    both somatic and male specific coliphages. Waste-water

    samples were filtered through 0

    22 lm pore size filters(Gelman) to remove bacteria that can interfere with the

    visualization of the coliphage plaques. The filters were

    treated with 3 ml 15% beef extract (Becton Dickinson) to

    avoid phage adsorption to the filters. The filtered samples

    (1 ml) to be assayed and 1 ml of the host strain culture were

    added to the previously melted soft top agar (Tryptic Soy

    Broth + 1% agar). All samples were assayed in triplicate.

    Plaque enumeration was determined after 18 h of incubation.

    Determination of physical/chemical parameters

    The influent and effluent water turbidity was determined

    using a turbidimeter 2100P (Hach Company, Loveland, CO,USA). The water pH was determined using both pH

    indicator strips (EM Science, Gibbstown, NJ, USA) and a

    Corning pH meter, model 345 (Corning Inc., Corning, NY,

    USA). The water temperature was determined using a

    thermometer.

    Statistical analysis of the data

    The percentage removal of the studied micro-organisms was

    calculated using the following formula:

    % removal Ninfluent Neffluent 100=Ninfluent

    where Ninfluent number of micro-organisms in the influentwaste-water, Neffluent number of micro-organisms in theeffluent waste-water.

    Cyst, oocyst, faecal coliform, total coliform and coli-

    phage percentage removals were transformed for analysis

    using log10(y + 1), where y number of micro-organisms.Arithmetic averages were calculated and correlation coeffi-

    cients were developed for turbidity, temperature and each of

    the micro-organisms studied using Microsoft Excel Version

    50. The average percentage removal of micro-organisms

    P A R A S I T E R E M O V A L B Y D U C K W E E D 385

    2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 34, 384387

  • 7/30/2019 PHYTO 39

    3/4

    was calculated using the above formula. The values of

    Ninfluent and Neffluent used were the averaged numbers of

    micro-organisms in the influent and effluent.

    R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N

    During the period of this study (JulyMay), 15 sets of

    samples were collected for analysis approximately every 35

    weeks. The average number of Giardia was 156 cysts l)1 in

    the influent and 035 cysts l)1 in the effluent, resulting in an

    average percentage reduction of 98%. On average, Cryptos-

    poridium oocysts decreased by 89%, with an average number

    of 158 oocysts l)1 in the influent and 017 oocyst l)1 in the

    effluent (Table 1). Grimalson et al. (1993) studied the

    occurrence and removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts in

    Kenyan waste stabilization ponds. The oocyst levels they

    detected in raw waste-water samples ranged from 212 to

    6213 cysts l

    )1

    . They also observed that the number ofoocysts in the influent from these ponds ranged between 3

    and 230 cysts l)1. No Cryptosporidium oocysts were noted in

    the final effluent from the 11 ponds studied. The minimum

    detention time for the removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts

    and Giardia cysts by the stabilization ponds was 37 days.

    The average number of total coliforms was 424 106 cfu

    (colony-forming units) 100 ml)1 in the influent and

    165 106 cfu 100 ml)1 in the effluent. The number of

    faecal coliforms averaged 177 106 cfu 100 ml)1 in the

    influent and 597 105 cfu 100 ml)1 in the effluent. Total

    and faecal coliform bacteria were reduced, on average, by 61

    and 62%, respectively, in the duckweed pond. This

    compares with the 9099% removal reported for faecalcoliforms in facultative ponds with detention times of

    47180 days (EPA 1983).

    The average number of coliphages was 1233 pfu (plaque-

    forming units) ml)1 in the influent and 742 pfu ml)1 in

    the effluent. Coliphage reduction averaged about 40%

    (Table 1). Gersberg et al. (1987) found that the total

    number of indigenous F-specific bacteriophage (F-specific

    RNA and F-specific DNA phages) was reduced by about

    99% after passage through a constructed wetland composed

    of bulrush planted in gravel with a detention time of

    55 days. They also found that poliovirus added to the

    wetland was reduced by 999%. During the period of this

    study, the temperature of the influent to the duckweed pond

    ranged from 21 to 2C, and from 11 to 31C in the effluent.

    The turbidity values ranged from 33 to 23

    6 NTU

    (Nephelometric Turbidity Unit) for the influent and from

    104 to 746 for the effluent. The turbidity removal by the

    pond ranged from 0 to 49%. The influent pH ranged from

    66 to 84 and the effluent pH, from 65 to 82.

    Pathogen removal in pond systems is believed to be due to

    a variety of factors, among which are temperature, natural

    die-off, sedimentation and adsorption (Reed et al. 1995).

    Helminths, Ascaris and other parasitic cysts and eggs settle

    to the bottom in the quiescent zone of the pond. Duckweed

    lacks extensive root systems onto which micro-organisms

    can become attached, and they also decrease sunlight below

    the duckweed mat; therefore, the removal of micro-organ-isms in duckweed-covered ponds is likely the result of

    sedimentation. In this study, the larger the organisms, the

    greater the percentage removal (Table 1). The larger

    organisms settle more rapidly to the bottom of the pond,

    while the removal of viruses was not as effective. Studies by

    Reed et al. (1995) on the removal of faecal coliforms and

    enteric viruses in multiple-cell pond systems showed a

    significant reduction after passage through the pond.

    Therewas no correlation between Giardia, Cryptosporidium,

    coliform bacteria and coliphage removal, and the water pH

    and temperature. There was a weak correlation between the

    removal of total coliforms and Cryptosporidium oocysts

    (P 010). However, more data are needed to assess the

    significance of that correlation. Giardia cyst and Cryptospo-

    ridium oocyst removal, and influent turbidity, were signifi-

    cantly correlated (P 001 for Giardia and turbidity;P 005 for Cryptosporidium and turbidity). The removalof Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts was signifi-

    cantly correlated (P < 0001). No correlation existed on

    effluent quality and the parameters studied (data not

    shown). Rose et al. (1991) compared the occurrence of

    Cryptosporidium and Giardia in surface waters and found

    Table 1 Average densities and removal of micro-organisms by the duckweed pond

    Micro-organisms Influent Effluent

    Percentage

    removal (%)

    Size of organisms

    (lm)

    Giardia (l)1) 156 (429)* 035 (006) 98 812

    Cryptosporidium (l)1) 158 (0325) 017 (005) 89 26

    Total coliforms (100 ml)1) 424 106 (822 10

    5875 106) 165 10

    6 (85 10438 10

    6) 61 1115

    Faecal coliforms (100 ml)1) 177 106 (13 10553 106) 597 105 (65 103122 106) 62 1115

    Coliphages (ml)1) 1233 (6531987) 742 (691454) 40 00450065

    *Observed range of values.

    386 J . A . F A L A B I ET AL.

    2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 34, 384387

  • 7/30/2019 PHYTO 39

    4/4

    that the concentrations of these two parasites were signifi-

    cantly correlated in all the waters analysed (P < 001). The

    recovery rate of Giardia and Cryptosporidium may be low

    when the waste-water turbidity is high because visualization

    of the cysts and oocysts is difficult under the microscope.

    There was no correlation between the removal of theparasites and the effluent turbidity.

    The duckweed pond was more effective in reducing the

    number of protozoan parasites (Giardia 98%; Cryptospori-

    dium 89%) than indicator bacteria (total coliform 61%,

    faecal coliform 62%) or coliphages. The removal of micro-

    organisms in the pond appeared to be related to the size of

    the organisms (Table 1).

    This study only assessed the physical removal of the cysts

    and oocysts, and not their viability. Recently, Araki et al.

    (2001) demonstrated that the physicochemical conditions in

    high-rate algal ponds were responsible for a 97% reduction

    in oocyst viability. Thus, the total reduction of infectiouscysts and oocysts is probably greater than what was

    observed.

    Aquatic systems for waste-water treatment appear to be

    promising as tertiary treatment systems for enteric patho-

    gens. Additional detention time could increase the removal

    capability of these systems, increasing the detention time,

    which would slow the flow rate through the pond, allowing

    more time for the micro-organisms to settle before the water

    reaches the outlet of the pond.

    REFERENCES

    Adams, M.H. (1959) Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience Publisher,

    Inc.

    APHA (1992a) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and

    Wastewater 18th edn (Suppl.). Washington, D.C.: American Public

    Health Association.

    APHA (1992b) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and

    Wastewater 18th edn. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health

    Association.

    Araki, S., Martin-Gomez, S., De Becares, E., Louis-Calaburg, E. and

    Rojo-Vazquez, F. (2001) Effect of high rate algal ponds on viability

    of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Applied and Environmental

    Microbiology 67, 33223324.

    Dewedar, A. and Bahgat, M. (1995) Fate of faecal coliform bacteria in a

    wastewater retention reservoir containing Lemna gibba L. Water

    Research 29, 25982600.

    EPA (1983) Design Manual Municipal Wastewater Stabilization Ponds

    EPA 625/1-83-015. Cincinnati, OH: Environmental Protection

    Agency, Center for Environmental Research Information.

    Gersberg, M.R., Lyon, S.R., Brenner, R. and Elkins . B.V. (1987) Fate

    of viruses in artificial wetlands. Applied and Environmental Micro-

    biology 53, 731736.

    Grimalson, A.M., Smith, H.V., Thitai, W.N., Smith, P.G., Jackson,M.H. and Girdwood, R.W.A. (1993) Occurrence and removal of

    Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts and Giardia spp. cysts in Kenyan waste

    stabilization ponds. Water Science and Technology 27, 97104.

    Hammer, D.A. (1989) Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment:

    Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers,

    Inc.

    Kadlec, R.H. and Knight, R.L. (1996) Treatment Wetlands. Boca Raton,

    Florida, USA: CRC Press.

    Reed, S.C., Crites, R.W. and Midlebrooks, E.J. (1995) Natural Systems

    for Waste Management and Treatment 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-

    Hill, Inc.

    Rose, B.J., Gerba, C.P. and Jakubowski, W. (1991) Survey of potable

    water supplies for Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Environmental

    Science and Technology 25, 13931400.

    P A R A S I T E R E M O V A L B Y D U C K W E E D 387

    2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 34, 384387