piles - 1b

Upload: bsitler

Post on 13-Oct-2015

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

NUS Coursenotes

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1Lecture 1 (cont.)

    Soil and rock parameters for

    design

    1.7 Methods to determine soil strength and stiffness

    Soil parameters for pile design Total stress analysis (undrained condition) for

    clay: Apparent cohesion cu Friction angle u (= 0 for saturated clay) Youngs modulus Eu Poissons ratio u (= 0.5 for clay)

    Effective stress analysis (long term) for sandand clay: c (= 0 for normally consolidated clay); ; E and

    Insitu testsCone penetration test (CPT)Standard penetration test (SPT)Vane shear testPressuremeter test (stiff soil only)

    Refer to Section 1.8

    Laboratory tests on undisturbed soil sampleTriaxial compression testConsolidation (oedometer) testRefer to standard geotechnical engineering text 20 ton CPT rig (truck type)

    (a) Cone Penetration Test (CPT)

    Piezocone

    ConePenetrometerpluspiezometer

    Measurements:(i) Static cone resistance(ii) sleeve resistance(iii) pore pressure

    Marine conepenetrationTestingsystem

  • 2Friction angle,

    Fig. 1.1 Correlation between static cone resistance qcand friction angle of sand

    Fig. 1.2

    Chart to aid interpretation of CPT

    (Ratio of sleeve friction over cone resistance)

    Cone resistance

    (b) StandardPenetrationTest (SPT)

    Result: standard penetration resistance (N value) or blow count

    SPTFor clay,Undrained

    apparent cohesion (kPa)

    cu = 5N to 6 N

    Friction angle,

    Fig. 1.3 Relationship between N value and

    (for sand)

    Sand

    Vane shear test setup

    (c) Vane Shear Test

    Fig. 1.4 Commonly used dimensions and formula for vane shear test

    Measurement:Torque M to fail soil

  • 3Fig. 1.5 Variation of against PI

    Correction factor : Cu (corrected) = . Cu (vane shear) 1.8 Rock properties Weathering grade and description Rock Quality Designation RQD Standard penetration test (N value) Unconfined compression test (qu) Point load test Plate load test Pressuremeter test

    (a)

    (b) Rock Quality Designation RQD

    RQD is the percentage of rock recovered as sound length which are 100 mm or more in length.

    Sometimes this is the only rock data available! Fracture state RQD value

    Very poor 0 % to 25%Poor 25% to 50%Fair 50% to 75%Good 75% to 90%Excellent 90% to 100%

    (c) Standard penetration resistance N

    Only suitable for very weak rockExtrapolated N value e.g. 100 blows for a penetration of 100 mm implies that the extrapolated N value is 300

    Unable to perform test in medium hard rock and above due to penetration refusal during test

  • 4(d) Unconfined compression test

    Need core length 2 times core diameterFor a standard NX size core of 53 mm diameter, the required core length is 106 mm

    Not suitable for weak rocks which are often highly fractured and do not have long enough samples

    Diamond saw to flattenends of rock core

    Unconfinedcompressiontest(Unconfinedcompressivestrength qu isalso termedas uniaxialcompressivestrength)

    qu is the failure load divided by X-sectional area

    Same apparatus as testing concrete

    Unconfined compressive strength qu

    Strength of rock qu value (MPa)Very weak < 1.25Weak 1.25 to 5Moderately weak 5 to 12.5Moderately strong 12.5 to 50Strong 50 to 100Very strong 100 to 200Extremely strong > 200

    (e) Point load test Rock core length required is 1 time

    core diameter Can be tested on rock samples of

    different shapes and sizes Test results are correlated to point

    load strength of 50 mm diameter sample termed as Is(50)

  • 5Point load test (test can also be done on site)

    Point loadStrength is the failure load divided by X-sectional area

    Before test

    After test

    Point loadtest

    Sample lengthat least 1 timecore diameter

    Shape otherthancylindricalshape acceptablewithcorrectionfactor

    Point load test can be performed on rock of various shapes & sizes

    (f) Plate load test

    Plateloadtest

    Stiffness(andprobablystrength)of rockat testelevationcan bedetermined

  • 6(g) Pressuremeter test

    A very good test for stiff soil and rock Determination of pressuremeter

    modulus Em and hence Youngs modulus E

    Determination of soil strength cu and rock strength quNote potential errors in determining Em and strength

    Pressuremeterequipment

    Typicalpressuremetertest record

    TypicalData plot of pressureversus radius

  • 7Geology of Singapore

    1.9 GeologyGeology of Singapore

    Bukit Timah granite formation [North and centre of Singapore island] Residual soil of granite overlying fresh granite

    Jurong formation (sedimentary) [West and south] Residual soil of sedimentary origin overlying great

    depth of weak rocks Kallang formation [South and along rivers]

    Soft marine deposit (transported soils) Old alluvium [East]

    Old deposits with layered clay and cemented sands

    GeologyOf WestMalaysia

    Geology of Hong Kong

    GeologyofSoutheasternChina

    1.10 Granite (a) Bukit Timah formation

    Bedrock can be shallow and very difficult to drill throughInsufficient socket length and hence base resistance is relied upon.Standard penetration resistance (N value) can be difficult to obtain.Rock can be much stronger than concrete.

    Change from completely weathered soil to fresh rock can be sudden

    Inclined rock surfaces pose problems

  • 8Granite

    Granite (Hillview area, Singapore)

    200 400 600 800 1000Extrapolated N value

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    Dep

    th b

    elow

    gro

    und

    leve

    l (m

    )

    0 50 100 150qu (MPa)

    Singapore Granite

    Unconfined compressive strength

    Not possible to obtain N value forhard granite

    Granite can be much stronger than concrete

    -3.6 -3.2 -2.8 -2.4 -2.0 -1.6Ln (DV/V)

    0

    40

    80

    120

    Pres

    sure

    (kg/

    cm2 )

    Granite

    Gradient = cu = 62.5 kg/cm2 = 6.25 MPa qu = 2cu = 12.5 MPa

    Pressuremeter test results on Singapore granite

    Not possible to obtain strength of hard granite

    Granite formation (Thomson area, Singapore)Note dense sand layer at soil/rock interface

    (b) soft toe problem

    Thin layer of dense sand at soil/rock interface with high coefficient of permeability causing soil to collapse into borehole (hence soft toe at pile base exists)

    Borehole needs casing or bentonite to stabilise under this situation

    Hong Kong igneous rock

    RQD almost 100% in many places

  • 9(c) Granite formation (Hong Kong)

    Typical subsurface profilePlace Soil Rock weathering

    overburden Grade 3 Grade 2HK Cyber Port 68 m 0 m > 5mTai Lam tunnel 30 m > 3 mWest Rail Central 26 m 1 m > 7mSham Shui Po 29 m > 4 mKwai Hing 7 m > 10 mWanchai 28 m > 5 m

    1.11 Sedimentary rock (a) Singapore

    Highly weathered and fractured in excess of 50 m deep (N values can be obtained & RQD is highly variable)

    Thus unable to found pile base into fresh/hard rock (qu of rock < qu of concrete)

    Rock strength very difficult to determine as rocks are highly fractured

    Highly fractured and very low RQD values

    Kallang formation (soft marine clay) above Jurong formation(sedimentary soils and rocks)

    (Keppel area,Singapore)

    Weathered sedimentary rock outcrop

  • 10

    Sedimentary rock (Alexandra area, Singapore)

    200 400 600 800 1000

    Extrapolated N value

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Dep

    th b

    elow

    gro

    und

    leve

    l (m

    )

    0 20 40 60 80

    RQD (%)0 10 20 30

    qu (MPa)

    (a) (b) (c)

    Singapore Sedimentary rocks

    Rock Quality Designation

    -4.8 -4.4 -4.0 -3.6 -3.2 -2.8Ln (DV/V)

    0

    40

    80

    120

    Pres

    sure

    P(k

    g/cm

    2 )

    Gradient = cu = 44 kg/cm2 = 4.4 MPa

    qu = 2cu = 8.8 MPa

    Sedimentary rock

    Pressuremeter test on Singapore sedimentary rock

    Correlation As it is difficult to obtain properties of

    Singapore sedimentary rocks, correlations of different rock test results are attempted!

    Between qu and RQDNo correlation if rocks at site are not of the

    same type Correlation may be possible if the rock is

    fairly homogeneous(Thus on a case by case basis)

    Correlation not possible for different rock typesSite mainly siltstone and correlation may be possible

  • 11

    Another site with mainly siltstone and correlation also possible

    Correlation between qu & Is(50) Weak Sedimentary rock (Singapore)

    qu = 6 Is(50)

    Weak Granite (Singapore & Malaysia)qu = 10 Is(50)Both are conservative correlation and should be checked for large projects

    Correlation between qu against Is

    Correlation between qu and N

    Weak sedimentary rock (Singapore)

    qu = 10[-3.29 + 1.45 log10(N)]

    for 100 < N < 1200

    Correlation of qu against N value

    Need more data to confirm the promising correlation between qu and Em (pressuremeter modulus)

  • 12

    Rock parameters for design

    Recommended tests Unconfined compression test

    (need long samples) Pressuremeter tests (highly

    recommended) Point load test (preliminary test) RQD (if rock at site is homogeneous) Plate load test (limited to test elevation) N values (generally too crude)

    Residual soils of sedimentary origin

    Soil is stiff when it is dry and soft when it is wet.

    Sedimentary and volcanic rocks (b) Hong Kong

    Repulse Bay Formation (Volcanic rocks)

    Weathering is generally shallow with an average depth of about 10 m

    Depth of weathering may vary considerably over short distances

    Gradual change from weathered to fresh rock in most places

    Deep weathering to depth of 40 m or more along faults and shear zones

    Sedimentary and volcanic rocks (cont.)

    1.12 Old alluvium (Singapore)

    Cemented sand (casing may be necessary)

    Stiff clay

    Typical oldalluviumformationSingapore

    Alternatingdense sandand stiffclay layers

  • 13

    1.13 Soft soilsSoft marine clay (grey)Soft peaty clay (black)

    Kallang formation

    Pile installation problem and negative skin friction