ppt prs econ ch16 9e

Upload: anh-tuan-nguyen

Post on 07-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    1/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 1 of 49

    PowerPoint Lectures for

    Principles of Economics,9e

    By

    Karl E. Case,Ray C. Fair &Sharon M. Oster

    ; ;

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    2/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 2 of 49

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    3/52

    2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster

    16PART III MARKET IMPERFECTIONS AND

    THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT

    Externalities, PublicGoods, and Social Choice

    Fernando & Yvonn Quijano

    Prepared by:

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    4/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 4 of 49

    16

    Externalities and EnvironmentalEconomicsMarginal Social Cost and Marginal-Cost

    PricingPrivate Choices and External EffectsInternalizing Externalities

    Public (Social) GoodsThe Characteristics of Public GoodsIncome Distribution as a Public Good?Public Provision of Public GoodsOptimal Provision of Public Goods

    Local Provision of Public Goods: TieboutHypothesis

    Mixed Goods

    Social ChoiceThe Voting ParadoxGovernment Inefficiency: Theory of Public

    ChoiceRent-Seeking Revisited

    Government and the Market

    CHAPTER OUTLINE

    Externalities, PublicGoods, and Social Choice

    PART III MARKET IMPERFECTIONS AND

    THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    5/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 5 of 49

    Externalities, Public Goods, and Social Choice

    market failure Occurs when resources aremisallocated or allocated inefficiently.

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    externality A cost or benefit imposed or bestowedon an individual or a group that is outside, orexternal to, the transaction.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    6/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 6 of 49

    Find the statement below that is incorrectabout the study ofexternalities?

    a. Externalities are also called spillover, orneighborhood effects.b. The study of externalities is a major concern ofenvironmentaleconomics.

    c. Externalities are limited to free market economies.

    d. When people closer together, externalities become moreimportant.

    e. None of the above. All of the statements above are correct.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    7/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 7 of 49

    Find the statement below that is incorrectabout the study ofexternalities?

    a. Externalities are also called spillover, orneighborhood effects.

    b. The study of externalities is a major concern ofenvironmentaleconomics.

    c.c. Externalities are limited to free market economies.Externalities are limited to free market economies.

    d. When people closer together, externalities become moreimportant.

    e. None of the above. All of the statements above are correct.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    8/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 8 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    marginal social cost (MSC) The total cost tosociety of producing an additional unit of a good orservice. MSCis equal to the sum of the marginalcosts of producing the product and the correctlymeasured damage costs involved in the process of

    production.

    Marginal Social Cost and Marginal-Cost Pricing

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    9/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 9 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Marginal Social Cost and Marginal-Cost Pricing

    FIGURE 16.1 Profit-MaximizingPerfectly Competitive Firms WillProduce Up to the Point That PriceEquals Marginal Cost(P = MC)

    If we assume that the current

    price reflects what consumers arewilling to pay for a product at the

    margin, firms that create external

    costs without weighing them in

    their decisions are likely to

    produce too much.

    At q*, marginal social cost

    exceeds the price paid by

    consumers.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    10/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,

    Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 10 of 49

    For every unit produced beyond the level at which P= MC:

    a. Society uses up resources that have a value (or cost) in excess ofthe benefits that consumers place on that unit.

    b. Society uses up resources that have a value (or cost) that is lessthan the benefits that consumers place on that unit.

    c. Society begins to enjoy the benefits of additional production.

    d. Society stops enjoying the benefits of additional production.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    11/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 11 of 49

    For every unit produced beyond the level at which P= MC:

    a.a. Society uses up resources that have a value (or cost) in excess ofSociety uses up resources that have a value (or cost) in excess of

    the benefits that consumers place on that unit.the benefits that consumers place on that unit.

    b. Society uses up resources that have a value (or cost) that is lessthan the benefits that consumers place on that unit.

    c. Society begins to enjoy the benefits of additional production.

    d. Society stops enjoying the benefits of additional production.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    12/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 12 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Marginal Social Cost and Marginal-Cost Pricing

    Acid Rain and the Clean Air Act

    Acid rain is an excellent example of an externalityand of the issues and conflicts involved in dealingwith externalities.

    The case of acid rain highlights the fact thatefficiency analysis ignores the distribution of gainsand losses. That is, to establish efficiency, weneed only demonstrate that the total value of thegains exceeds the total value of the losses.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    13/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 13 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Marginal Social Cost and Marginal-Cost Pricing

    Other Externalities

    Other examples of external effects are all aroundus. When people drive their cars into the center ofthe city at rush hour, they contribute to thecongestion and impose costs (in the form of losttime and auto emissions) on others.

    Clearly, the most significant and hotly debatedissue of externalities is global warming.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    14/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 14 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Marginal Social Cost and Marginal-Cost Pricing

    Some Examples of Positive Externalities

    Thus far we have described a series of negativeexternalities. But externalities can also be positive.In some cases, when other people or firms engagein an activity, there are side benefits from thatactivity. From an economics perspective, there areproblems with positive externalities as well.

    The problem with positive externalities is that theindividuals in charge have too little incentive to

    engage in the activity.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    15/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 15 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Private Choices and External Effects

    FIGURE 16.2 Externalities in a College DormitoryThe marginal benefits to Harry exceed the marginal costs he must bear to play his stereo system for a period of up to 8hours. When the stereo is playing, a cost is being imposed on Jake.

    When we add the costs borne by Harry to the damage costs imposed on Jake, we get the full cost of the stereo to the two-

    person society made up of Harry and Jake.Playing the stereo more than 5 hours is inefficient because the benefits to Harry are less than the social cost for every

    hour above 5. If Harry considers only his private costs, he will play the stereo for too long a time from societys point of

    view.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    16/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 16 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Private Choices and External Effects

    marginal private cost (MPC) The amount that aconsumer pays to consume an additional unit of aparticular good.

    marginal damage cost (MDC) The additional harmdone by increasing the level of an externality-producing activity by 1 unit. If producing productXpollutes the water in a river, MDC is the additionalcost imposed by the added pollution that resultsfrom increasing output by 1 unit ofXper period.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    17/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 17 of 49

    In the case of a negative externality, the socially efficient level of outputis set where marginal benefit equals:

    a. Marginal social cost.

    b. Marginal private cost.

    c. Marginal damage cost.

    d. Marginal cost.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    18/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 18 of 49

    In the case of a negative externality, the socially efficient level of outputis set where marginal benefit equals:

    a.a. Marginal social cost.Marginal social cost.

    b. Marginal private cost.

    c. Marginal damage cost.

    d. Marginal cost.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    19/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 19 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Five approaches have been taken to solving theproblem of externalities:

    (1) government imposed taxes and subsidies,

    (2) private bargaining and negotiation,

    (3) legal rules and procedures,(4) sale or auctioning of rights to impose

    externalities, and

    (5) direct government regulation.

    While each is best suited for a different set of

    circumstances, all five provide decision makerswith an incentive to weigh the external effects oftheir decisions.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    20/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 20 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Taxes and Subsidies

    FIGURE 16.3 Tax Imposed on a Firm Equal to Marginal Damage Cost

    If a per-unit tax exactly equal to marginal damage costs is imposed on a firm, the firm will weigh the tax, and

    thus the damage costs, in its decisions. At the new equilibrium price, P1, consumers will be paying an amount

    sufficient to cover full resource costs as well as the cost of damage imposed. The efficient level of output for

    the firm is q1.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    21/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 21 of 49

    When a tax is used to internalize an externality, the tax should be setequal to:

    a. Marginal social cost.

    b. Marginal private cost.c. Marginal damage cost.

    d. Marginal cost.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    22/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 22 of 49

    When a tax is used to internalize an externality, the tax should be setequal to:

    a. Marginal social cost.

    b. Marginal private cost.c.c. Marginal damage cost.Marginal damage cost.

    d. Marginal cost.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    23/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 23 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Taxes and SubsidiesMeasuring Damages

    The biggest problem with using taxes andsubsidies is that damages must be estimated in

    financial terms.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    24/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 24 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Taxes and SubsidiesReducing Damages to an Efficient Level

    Taxes also provide firms with an incentive to usethe most efficient technology for dealing with

    damage.

    The Incentive to Take Care and to Avoid Harm

    You should understand that all externalities

    involve at least two parties and that it is not alwaysclear which party is causing the damage.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    25/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,Public 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 25 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Taxes and SubsidiesSubsidizing External Benefits

    Sometimes activities or decisions generateexternal benefits instead of costs.

    Externalities Are All AroundUs

    Abominable Snowmen: TheWar on Lawn Decorations

    Wall Street Journal

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    26/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 26 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Bargaining and Negotiation

    Coase theorem Under certain conditions, whenexternalities are present, private parties can arriveat the efficient solution without governmentinvolvement.

    Legal Rules and Procedures

    injunction A court order forbidding thecontinuation of behavior that leads to damages.

    liability rules Laws that require A to compensate Bfor damages imposed.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    27/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 27 of 49

    According to the Coase theorem, in order to arrive at an efficientsolution to an externality problem associated with a given activity:

    a. No party should be given the right to that activity prior to

    negotiation; otherwise, that party would have no incentive tobargain.

    b. The right to an activity must be decided during the negotiationprocess.

    c. It doesnt matter which party is initially assigned the right to thatactivity.

    d. Both parties must feel that they have equal rights to the activityprior to negotiation.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    28/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 28 of 49

    According to the Coase theorem, in order to arrive at an efficientsolution to an externality problem associated with a given activity:

    a. No party should be given the right to that activity prior to

    negotiation; otherwise, that party would have no incentive tobargain.

    b. The right to an activity must be decided during the negotiationprocess.

    c.c. It doesnt matter which party is initially assigned the right to thatIt doesnt matter which party is initially assigned the right to that

    activity.activity.

    d. Both parties must feel that they have equal rights to the activityprior to negotiation.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    29/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 29 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Selling or Auctioning Pollution Rights

    TABLE 16.1 Permit Trading

    Firm A Firm A Firm A Firm B Firm B Firm B

    Reduction of pollutionby Firm A (in units of

    pollution)

    MC of reducingpollution for Firm

    A

    TC of reducingpollution for Firm

    A

    Reduction of pollutionby Firm B (in units of

    pollution)

    MC of reducingpollution for Firm

    B

    TC of reducing

    pollution for Firm

    B

    1 $ 5 $ 5 1 $ 8 $ 8

    2 7 12 2 14 22

    3 9 21 3 23 45

    4 12 33 4 35 80

    5 17 50 5 50 130

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    30/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 30 of 49

    Externalities and Environmental Economics

    Internalizing Externalities

    Direct Regulation of Externalities

    The Debate Over GlobalWarming

    One of the most hotlydebated issues involvingexternalities is the potentialcost of global warming.

    The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty on global warmingnegotiated by the United Nations in the 1990s. It came intoforce after being ratified by Russia in February 2005. A total of141 countries have ratified the agreement, which commitsthem to reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide and five othergreenhouse gases or to engage in emissions trading. The

    United States has not ratified the treaty.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    31/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 31 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    The Characteristics of Public Goods

    public goods (social or collective goods) Goods

    that are nonrival in consumption and/or theirbenefits are nonexcludable.

    nonrival in consumption A characteristic of publicgoods: One persons enjoyment of the benefits ofa public good does not interfere with anothersconsumption of it.

    nonexcludable A characteristic of most public

    goods: Once a good is produced, no one can beexcluded from enjoying its benefits.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    32/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 32 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    The Characteristics of Public Goods

    free-rider problem A problem intrinsic to publicgoods: Because people can enjoy the benefits ofpublic goods whether or not they pay for them,they are usually unwilling to pay for them.

    drop-in-the-bucket problem A problem intrinsic topublic goods: The good or service is usually socostly that its provision generally does not dependon whether any single person pays.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    33/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 33 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Income Distribution as a Public Good?

    Note that some economists have argued forredistribution of income on grounds that itgenerates public benefits.

    If we accept the idea that redistributing income

    generates a public good, private endeavors mayfail to do what we want them to do, andgovernment involvement may be called for.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    34/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 34 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Public Provision of Public Goods

    All societies, past and present, have had to facethe problem of providing public goods. Whenmembers of society get together to form agovernment, they do so to provide themselves withgoods and services that will not be provided if they

    act separately.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    35/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 35 of 49

    Which of the following is the best example of a mixed good?

    a. A Big Mac.

    b. The Golden Gate bridge.

    c. The Statue of Liberty.

    d. Elementary education.

    e. All of the above are good examples of mixed goods.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    36/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 36 of 49

    Which of the following is the best example of a mixed good?

    a. A Big Mac.

    b. The Golden Gate bridge.

    c. The Statue of Liberty.

    d.d. Elementary education.Elementary education.

    e. All of the above are good examples of mixed goods.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    37/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 37 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Optimal Provision of Public Goods

    Samuelsons Theory

    Economist Paul Samuelson demonstrated thatthere exists an optimal, or a most efficient, level ofoutput for every public good.

    An efficient economy produces what people want.Private producers, whether perfect competitors ormonopolists, are constrained by the marketdemand for their products. If they cannot sell theirproducts for more than it costs to produce them,they will be out of business. Because private

    goods permit exclusion, firms can withhold theirproducts until households pay. Buying a product ata posted price reveals that it is worth at least thatamount to you and to everyone who buys it.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    38/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 38 of 49

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    39/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 39 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Optimal Provision of Public Goods

    Samuelsons Theory

    FIGURE 16.4 With Private Goods, Consumers Decide What Quantity to Buy; Market Demand Isthe Sum of Those Quantities at Each Price

    At a price of $3, A buys 2 units and B buys 9 for a total of 11.

    At a price of $1, A buys 9 units and B buys 13 for a total of 22.

    We all buy the quantity of each private good that we want. Market demand is the horizontal sum of all individual

    demand curves.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    40/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 40 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Optimal Provision of Public Goods

    Samuelsons Theory

    FIGURE 16.5 With PublicGoods, There Is Only OneLevel of Output and ConsumersAre Willing to Pay DifferentAmounts for Each Level

    A is willing to pay $6 per unit for

    X1 units of the public good. B is

    willing to pay only $3 forX1 units.

    Societyin this case A and Bis

    willing to pay a total of $9 forX1

    units of the good.

    Because only one level of output

    can be chosen for a public good,we must add As contribution to

    Bs to determine market demand.

    This means adding demand

    curves vertically.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    41/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 41 of 49

    Which of the following is/are true?

    a. Only one level of output can be chosen for a public good.

    b. The demand for a public good is the horizontal summation of

    individual demand curves for that good.c. Government must decide how much of a public good to produce.

    d. The satisfaction we derive from the quantity consumed of publicgoods is just as great as the satisfaction derived fromconsumption of private goods.

    e. All of the above.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    42/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 42 of 49

    Which of the following is/are true?

    a.a. Only one level of output can be chosen for a public good.Only one level of output can be chosen for a public good.

    b. The demand for a public good is the horizontal summation of

    individual demand curves for that good.c. Government must decide how much of a public good to produce.

    d. The satisfaction we derive from the quantity consumed of publicgoods is just as great as the satisfaction derived fromconsumption of private goods.

    e. All of the above.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    43/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 43 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Optimal Provision of Public Goods

    Samuelsons Theory

    FIGURE 16.6 OptimalProduction of a Public Good

    Optimal production of a public

    good means producing as long as

    societys total willingness to pay

    per unit (DA+B) is greater than themarginal cost of producing the

    good.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    44/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 44 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Optimal Provision of Public Goods

    Samuelsons Theory

    optimal level of provision for public goods Thelevel at which societys total willingness to pay perunit is equal to the marginal cost of producing thegood.

    The Problems of Optimal Provision

    One major problem exists. To produce the optimalamount of each public good, the government must

    know something that it cannot possibly knoweveryones preferences.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    45/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 45 of 49

    Public (Social) Goods

    Local Provision of Public Goods: Tiebout Hypothesis

    Tiebout hypothesis An efficient mix of public goodsis produced when local land/housing prices andtaxes come to reflect consumer preferences just asthey do in the market for private goods.

    Mixed Goods

    mixed goods Goods that are part public goods andpart private goods. Education is a key example.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    46/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 46 of 49

    Social Choice

    The Voting Paradox

    Impossibility theorem A proposition demonstratedby Kenneth Arrow showing that no system ofaggregating individual preferences into socialdecisions will always yield consistent, nonarbitraryresults.

    social choice The problem of deciding what society

    wants. The process of adding up individualpreferences to make a choice for society as awhole.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    47/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 47 of 49

    Social Choice

    The Voting Paradox

    FIGURE 16.7 Preferences of Three Top University Officials

    VP1 prefers A to B and B to C. VP2 prefers B to C and C to A. The dean prefers C to A and A to B.

    TABLE 16.2 Results of Voting on Universitys Plans: The Voting Paradox

    Votes of:Vote VP1 VP2 Dean Resulta

    A versus B A B A A wins: A > B

    B versus C B B C B wins: B > C

    C versus A A C C C wins: C > A

    aA > B is read A is preferred to B.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    48/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 48 of 49

    Social Choice

    The Voting Paradox

    voting paradox A simple demonstration of howmajority-rule voting can lead to seeminglycontradictory and inconsistent results. Acommonly cited illustration of the kind ofinconsistency described in the impossibilitytheorem.

    logrolling Occurs when congressionalrepresentatives trade votes, agreeing to help eachother get certain pieces of legislation passed.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    49/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 49 of 49

    Social Choice

    Government Inefficiency: Theory of Public Choice

    Looking at the public sector from the standpoint ofthe behavior of public officials and the potential forinefficient choices and bureaucratic waste ratherthan in terms of its potential for improving theallocation of resources has become quite popular.This is the viewpoint of what is called thepublicchoice field in economics that builds heavily on thework of Nobel laureate James Buchanan.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    50/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 50 of 49

    Social Choice

    Rent-Seeking Revisited

    A monopolist would be willing to pay to preventcompetition from eroding its economic profits.Manyif not allindustries lobby for favorabletreatment, softer regulation, or antitrust exemption.This, as you recall, is rent-seeking.

    Theory may suggest that unregulated markets failto produce an efficient allocation of resources. Thisshould not lead you to the conclusion thatgovernment involvement necessarily leads toefficiency. There are reasons to believe thatgovernment attempts to produce the right goodsand services in the right quantities efficiently mayfail.

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    51/52

    CHA

    Extern

    alities,P

    ublic 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Economics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 51 of 49

    Government and the Market

    There is no question that government must beinvolved in both the provision of public goods andthe control of externalities.

    The question is not whetherwe need governmentinvolvement. The question is how much and what

    kindof government involvement we should have.

    REVIEW TERMS AND CONCEPTS

  • 8/4/2019 Ppt Prs Econ Ch16 9e

    52/52

    Extern

    alities,P

    Coase theorem

    drop-in-the-bucket problem

    externality

    free-rider problem

    impossibility theorem

    injunction

    liability rules

    logrolling

    marginal damage cost (MDC)marginal private cost (MPC)

    marginal social cost (MSC)

    market failure

    mixed goods

    nonexcludable

    nonrival in consumption

    optimal level of provision forpublic goods

    public goods (social orcollectivegoods)

    social choice

    Tiebout hypothesis

    voting paradox