preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Preferred precipitation of ordered a2 phase at dislocations andboundaries in near-a titanium alloys
Jun Zhang a,b,*, Dong Li b
a Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, PR Chinab Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015, PR China
Received 26 February 2001; received in revised form 4 April 2002
Abstract
The precipitation of a2 ordered phase in different aging conditions after solution treatment in b, high a�/b, or a phase field in Ti�/
Al�/Sn�/Zr�/Mo�/Si�/Nd (1#) and Ti�/Al�/Sn�/Zr�/Mo�/Si�/Nd�/Nb (2#) near-a titanium alloys was investigated. The solution-
treated microstructures consisted of either a single transformed b phase (bt), a duplex mixture of the primary a phase (ap) and
transformed b phase (bt), or a single primary a phase (ap). The precipitation characteristics of a2 phase was determined as a function
of aging temperature. When the aging temperature was high enough, the precipitation of a2 phase occurred predominately at the
boundaries and the dislocations, instead of being uniform throughout the bt matrix. The precipitation of a2 phase in ap, however,
was relatively uniform. No apparent difference in the size of a2 particles was observed. When the aging temperature decreased, the
precipitation of a2 phase became relatively uniform in bt, but the preferred precipitation and growth of a2 phase at boundaries and
dislocations was still obvious. When the temperature was sufficiently low, the precipitation of a2 phase was homogeneous at the
boundaries and dislocations as well as throughout the primary a phase and transformed b phase matrix.
# 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Precipitation; Aging temperature; Titanium alloys
1. Introduction
The ordering transformation of the a2 phase based on
Ti3Al in titanium alloys has been an important problem
attracting extensive attention. Much work was carried
out and much knowledge on the a2 phase in binary Ti�/
Al alloys and near a titanium alloys has been established
[1�/4]. When the aluminum content reaches a certain
value in Ti�/Al binary alloys or a titanium alloys, the a2
phase can precipitate under suitable aging conditions.
The precipitation of a2 phase usually affects the proper-
ties of titanium alloys. As pointed by earlier researchers,
the a2 phase may result in embrittlement of titanium
alloys [5,6]. On the other hand, a2 phase also can
improve the high temperature properties of a phase
titanium alloys [7�/9].With increasing aluminum content in near-a titanium
alloys, the precipitation of a2 phase can be promoted,
and better high temperature strength and creep proper-
ties can be expected. Here, the aging treatment is a
crucial step that is directly related with the precipitation
of the a2 ordered phase. Hence, a knowledge of theprecipitation characteristic of a2 phase in near-a tita-
nium alloys is very important for controlling the
microstructure.
The purpose of the present work is to investigate the
precipitation of a2 phase in two near-a titanium alloys in
different aging conditions and to establish the micro-
structural sites for the preferred precipitation of the a2
phase.
2. Experimental material and procedure
Two near-a titanium alloys Ti�/Al�/Sn�/Zr�/Mo�/Si�/
Nd (1#) with 0.11 wt.% oxygen and Ti�/Al�/Sn�/Zr�/
Mo�/Si�/Nd�/Nb (2#) with 0.12 wt.% oxygen were
employed in this investigation. The b transformation
temperatures for these two alloys were 1035 and* Corresponding author. Fax: �/86-24-88112793
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Zhang).
Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235
www.elsevier.com/locate/msea
0921-5093/02/$ - see front matter # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 5 0 9 3 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 2 4 0 - X
![Page 2: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1047 8C, respectively. The following solution treat-ments and aging treatments, shown in Table 1, were
carried out.
The precipitation of a2 phase was identified by
electron diffraction and dark field microscopy. The
thin foils for electron microscopical analysis (EM-420
transmission electron microscope) were prepared by
twin-jet electro-polishing.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The preferred precipitation of a2 phase along the
boundaries
The samples A1-a and A2-a were solution treated at
high a�/b fields and aged at relatively higher tempera-
tures, respectively. The duplex microstructures were
obtained in both A1-a and A2-a after solution treat-ments. The duplex microstructures consisted of small
volume fraction (�/25%) of equiaxed primary alpha
phase (ap) and the lamellar alpha matrix, or so-called
transformed b (bt) with some rare-earth phase dispersed
in the whole matrix. Oxygen existed in rare-earth phase.
There was almost not oxygen or neodymium in both ap
and bt. Aging treatment did not change the character-
istics of the duplex microstructure.The result of composition analysis showed that the
concentration of aluminum within ap was higher than
that within bt by �/2 at.%. The concentration of
titanium within ap was lower than that within bt by
�/2 at.%. Similar results were achieved in both 1# and
2# alloy, as shown in Table 2.
A typical TEM micrograph of the precipitation of a2
phase along the boundaries of bt in A2-a with ap�/bt
microstructure was shown in Fig. 1(a). The relative high
aging temperature of 800 8C resulted in non-uniform
precipitation of a2 phase in bt. It was very clear that the
preferred precipitation of a2 phase in bt took place along
the grain boundaries. There was rare precipitation of the
a2 phase throughout the matrix phase (bt). On the
contrary, the a2 particles homogeneously precipitated
throughout the ap parent phase, as shown in Fig. 1(b).
For the sample A1-a, the a2 particles in ap were
readily observed after aging at a higher temperature
(780 8C), as shown in Fig. 1(c). It was, however, very
difficult to find a2 particles in bt under this aging
condition, except at some places of the bt boundaries.
The results of secondary aging at lower temperatures,
730 8C for 1# alloy (A1-b) and 750 8C for 2# alloy
(A2-b), respectively, showed that the precipitation of a2
phase became somewhat more uniform throughout the
bt parent phases with decreasing temperature, as shown
in Fig. 2(a) and (b). The a2 particles precipitated in a
dispersed manner throughout the bt under the secondary
aging conditions. It was obvious that the a2 particles
that precipitated along bt boundaries in the first aging
were much larger than those precipitated in bt only
during the secondary aging. Comparing the Fig. 2(b)
with Fig. 1(a), it can be seen that the a2 particles
precipitating along boundaries in the first aging grew
into a larger size during the secondary aging. On the
other hand, the precipitation of a2 phase in ap parent
phases was predominantly characterized by growth into
larger size.
For the specimens solution-treated in the b phase field
and only aging-treated at single temperature, 730 8C for
1# alloy (A1-c) and 750 8C for 2# alloy (A2-c), the
difference in the size of a2 particles precipitated along
the bt boundaries and in the bt matrix was minor, as
shown in Fig. 2(c) and (d). This observation suggests
that the decrease of aging temperature promotes the
tendency of homogeneous precipitation of a2 phase.
This tendency of homogeneous precipitation was more
evident in 2# alloy (A2-c) than in 1# alloy (A1-c) due to
the larger aluminum concentration in 2# alloy. In
Table 1
Solution and aging treatments selected in the present study
Alloy Composition (wt.%) Solution Aging Sample number
Ti Al Sn Zr Mo Si Nd Nb Temperature/time/cooling Temperature/time/cooling
1# Bal 6.3 4.8 2.0 1.0 0.34 0.90 �/ 1025 8C/0.5 h WQ 780 8C/6 h WQ A1-a
780 8C/6 h WQ�730 8C/10 h WQ A1-b
1040 8C/0.5 h WQ 730 8C/10 h WQ A1-c
950 8C/0.5 h WQ 780 8C/6 h WQ A1-d
780 8C/6 h WQ�730 8C/10 h WQ A1-e
1025 8C/0.5 h WQ 650 8C/20 h WQ A1-f
2# Bal 6.8 4.8 2.0 0.5 0.34 0.90 0.70 1035 8C/0.5 h WQ 800 8C/6.5 h WQ A2-a
800 8C/6.5 h WQ�750 8C/10 h WQ A2-b
1050 8C/0.5 h WQ 750 8C/10 h WQ A2-c
1030 8C/0.5 h WQ 650 8C/50 h WQ A2-d
J. Zhang, D. Li / Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235230
![Page 3: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
addition, the a2 particles in bt parent phase in Fig. 2(c)
and (d) showed a more dense distribution and larger size
compared with those precipitating in ordinary sites in
Fig. 2(a) and (b), respectively. This could be attributed
to the preferred precipitation of a2 particles along the
boundaries and dislocations in first aging suppressing
the growth of the a2 particles formed during the
secondary aging in the bt matrix.
Table 2
Compositions of ap, bt and rare-earth phase within 1# and 2# alloys
Alloy Phases Composition (at.%)
Ti Al Sn Zr Mo Si Nd Nb O
1# ap 83.42 12.71 1.70 0.72 0.22 1.23 �/ �/
bt 85.17 10.50 1.99 0.80 0.44 1.01 �/ �/
Rare-earth phase 2.68 0.83 10.77 �/ �/ �/ 12.81 �/ 72.91
2# ap 82.93 13.18 1.93 0.66 0.15 0.83 �/ 0.29 �/
bt 84.09 11.16 1.97 1.26 0.32 0.67 �/ 0.47 �/
Rare-earth phase 2.09 1.64 10.91 �/ �/ 2.46 7.99 �/ 74.91
Fig. 1. The precipitation of a2 phase during aging at higher temperature. (a) bt in A2-a, 1035 8C/0.5 h WQ�/800 8C/6.5 h WQ. (b) ap in A2-a,
1035 8C/0.5 h WQ�/800 8C/6.5 h WQ. (c) ap in A1-a, 1025 8C/0.5 h WQ�/780 8C/6 h WQ. (d) Super lattice diffraction spots from a2 phase
precipitated in ap of A1-a. Indices in rectangle belong to ap, and those with arrow belong to a2 phase.
J. Zhang, D. Li / Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235 231
![Page 4: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Because of the composition deviation of the two
alloys in present investigation from the stoichiometric
atomic ratio of Ti3Al (a2), the local atomic rearrange-
ment or atomic exchange between neighboring sub-
lattice sites would be not sufficient to make the a2
ordered phase precipitate. The precipitation of a2 phase
would proceed a process of nucleation and growth
controlled by Long-range diffusion.
For the ap�/bt duplex microstructure, the precipita-
tion of a2 phase was characterized by homogeneous
nucleation and growth in ap, but it exhibited hetero-
geneous nucleation and growth in bt. Since aluminum is
an a stabilizer, it partitioned preferentially to ap in
duplex microstructure and the aluminum content in ap
was larger than that in bt for each alloy in the present
study. The critical transformation temperature of a2 in
ap was higher than that in bt compared with the binary
Ti�/Al phase diagram. The aging temperatures of 780
and 800 8C for 1# alloy and for 2# alloy, respectively,
were near to the critical transformation temperature of
a2 in bt, but lower than that in ap. Because of much
smaller driving force, the nucleation of a2 in bt was
much more difficult than that in ap. The boundaries
could supply the relatively high driving force and alsoaccelerate the diffusion of aluminum atoms so that the
nucleation and growth of a2 phase at bt boundaries was
preferred to that in bt.
3.2. The preferred precipitation of a2 phase along
dislocations
The precipitation of a2 phase in bt (for the specimens
A1-b and A2-b) showed clearly the characteristic of
preferred precipitation at dislocations, as shown in Fig.
Fig. 2. The precipitation and growth of a2 phase in aging at lower temperature. (a) 1025 8C/0.5 h WQ�/780 8C/6 h WQ�/730 8C/10 h WQ, in bt of
A1-b. (b) 1035 8C/0.5 h WQ�/800 8C/6.5 h WQ�/750 8C/10 h WQ, in bt of A2-b. (c) 1040 8C/0.5 h WQ�/730 8C/10 h WQ, in bt of A1-c. (d)
1050 8C/0.5 h WQ�/750 8C/10 h WQ, in bt of A2-c.
J. Zhang, D. Li / Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235232
![Page 5: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3(a) and (c). As described above, the precipitation of a2
was a process of nucleation and growth controlled by
diffusion. Like the boundaries, the dislocations could
offer preferred sites for nucleation and growth than
other places in bt for the nucleation of a2 precipitates
when aging at higher temperature. Moreover, atom
diffusion could also be accelerated at dislocations.
Therefore, the dislocations provided a preferred site
for the precipitation of the a2 phase.
The precipitation of a2 phase at dislocations in ap in 1#
alloy solution treated in a phase field (for the specimens
A1-d and A1-e) is shown in Fig. 3(e) and (f). Here, no
obvious difference in size of a2 particles could be
observed. The density of a2 particles at dislocations,
however, was higher than that at other places in ap
matrix. The direction of growth of a2 particles seemed to
be normal to the length of the dislocations.It is worth noting that the precipitation of a2 particles
at dislocations appeared to be more pronounced in the
bt (Fig. 3(a) and (c)) than in ap (Fig. 3(e) and (f)). Alloy
composition, particularly the concentration of alumi-
num, and aging temperature appeared to play an
important role. For the same aluminum concentration,
the decrease of aging temperature resulted in a trend
from heterogeneous nucleation to homogeneous nuclea-
tion. For the same aging temperature, the homogeneous
nucleation tendency of a2 phase was strengthened with
increasing aluminum concentration.
Fig. 3. Precedent precipitation of a2 phase at dislocations. (a) Dark field image of a2 in bt of A1-b, 1025 8C/0.5 h WQ�/780 8C/6 h WQ�/730 8C/
10 h WQ. (b) Bright field image of a2 in bt of A1-b. (c) Dark field image of a2 in bt of A2-b, 1035 8C/0.5 h WQ�/800 8C/6.5 h WQ�/780 8C/10 h
WQ. (d) Bright field image of a2 in bt of A2-b. (e) 950 8C/0.5 h WQ�/780 8C/6 h WQ, in ap of A1-d. (f) 950 8C/0.5 h WQ�/780 8C/6 h WQ�/
730 8C/10 h WQ, in ap of A1-e.
J. Zhang, D. Li / Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235 233
![Page 6: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3.3. Uniform precipitation of a2 phase
When the aging temperature was decreased enough,
the uniform precipitation of a2 phase occurred. In the
present investigation, aging at 650 8C, either for 1#
alloy (A1-f) or for 2# alloy (A2-d), resulted in the
homogeneous precipitation of a2 phase in ap or bt
despite the presence of the boundaries or the disloca-
tions, as shown in Fig. 4.Because the aging temperature (650 8C) was suffi-
ciently low, the larger driving force for the nucleation of
a2 phase promoted homogeneous nucleation and pre-
cipitation of a2 phase took place throughout the whole
matrix. The boundaries and dislocations were no longer
strongly preferred sites.
3.4. General discussion
Based on the above results and discussion, it was clear
that the precipitation of a2 ordered phase in near-atitanium alloys occurred in the following three ways.
First, the precipitation of a2 phase only took place at
boundaries and dislocations when the sample was aged
at high temperature, for example, 780 8C for 1# alloy
and 800 8C for 2# alloy. Second, the precipitation and
growth of a2 phase was preferred at boundaries and
dislocations but also took place in the matrix when
aging was carried out at a moderate temperature, for
example, 730 8C for 1# alloy and 750 8C for 2# alloy.
Third, the uniform or homogeneous precipitation and
growth of a2 phase took place throughout the matrix
Fig. 4. Uniform precipitation of a2 phase during aging at relatively low temperature. (a) 1025 8C/0.5 h WQ�/650 8C/20 h WQ, in bt of A1-f. (b)
1025 8C/0.5 h WQ�/650 8C/20 h WQ, in ap of A1-f. (c) 1030 8C/0.5 h WQ�/650 8C/50 h WQ, in bt of A2-d. (d) 1030 8C/0.5 h WQ�/650 8C/50
h WQ, in ap of A2-d.
J. Zhang, D. Li / Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235234
![Page 7: Preferred precipitation of ordered α2 phase at dislocations and boundaries in near-α titanium alloys](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022081804/575022fe1a28ab877ea7a578/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
when aging occurred at a relatively low temperature, for
example, 650 8C for both of the alloys. Moreover, the
transformation temperature of a2 phase rises with
increasing aluminum content in titanium alloys. Foreach state of the precipitation of a2 phase, the aging
temperature could be increased with the increase of
aluminum content.
Because of the relatively low aluminum content in the
present near a titanium alloys (compared with the
stoichiometric composition of Ti3Al), it can be expected
that the precipitation of a2 phase was accompanied by
local composition change in parent phase. It is likelythat Long-range diffusion of atoms is necessary and that
the precipitation of a2 ordered phase is a process of
nucleation and growth controlled by diffusion.
Lutjering and Weissmann investigated the precipita-
tion characteristic of a2 phase in Ti�/Al binary alloys [1].
They reported that the temperature range for the
precipitation of a2 phase could be divided into three
regions in the same way as that presented above, basedon the nucleation feature of a2 phase. In comparison to
their result, the present investigation exhibited similar
features of the precipitation behavior of the a2 phase.
But the corresponding characteristic temperature re-
gions of the three precipitation ways of a2 phase in
present alloys were raised for the same aluminum
concentration (Table 2).
For the ap�/bt duplex microstructure (obtained bysolution treatment at higher a�/b field), the effects of
aging temperatures on the precipitation features of a2
phase in ap and bt were obvious. Aging could be carried
out within a larger temperature range for the uniform
precipitation of a2 phase in ap. Only if the aging
temperature was low enough, could homogeneous pre-
cipitation and growth of a2 phase in both bt and ap
occur. Unlike the results of a2 phase precipitation in Ti�/
6Al�/4Sn�/4Zr�/0.7Nb�/0.5Mo�/0.4Si alloy with duplex
microstructure reported by Cope and Hill [10] or by
Ramachandra, Singh and Sarma [11], the present
investigation demonstrated that the precipitation of a2
phase occurred more easily in ap than in bt at higher
aging temperature.
The precipitation characteristic of a2 phase at bound-
aries and dislocations and the precipitation difference inap and bt suggested that suitable aging temperature,
aging time and one or two-step aging treatment can be
selected easily to control effectively the precipitation of
a2 phase.
4. Conclusion
(1) The precipitation of a2 ordered phase in near-atitanium alloys was a process of nucleation and growth,
controlled by diffusion as well as thermodynamics.
(2) The preferred precipitation of a2 phase at bound-
aries and dislocations occurred at high aging tempera-
tures.
(3) Homogeneous precipitation of a2 phase took place
when aging temperature was relatively low. The fine a2
particles would disperse uniformly throughout the ap�/
bt matrix.
(4) The difference in aluminum concentration in ap
and bt in duplex microstructure influenced precipitation
characteristic of a2 phase in ap and bt.
(5) The preferred precipitation tendency of a2 phase at
boundaries and dislocations was weakened with increas-
ing aluminum concentration and/or with decreasingaging temperature.
References
[1] G. Lutjering, S. Weissmann, Acta Metall. 18 (1970) 785.
[2] M.J. Blackburn, Trans. TMS-AIME 239 (1967) 1200.
[3] A. Madsen, E. Andrieu, H. Ghonem, Mater. Sci. Eng. A171
(1993) 191.
[4] C. Ramachandra, V. Singh, Scripta Metall. 20 (1986) 509.
[5] M.J. Blackburn, J.C. Williams, Trans. Am. Soc. Metals 62 (1969)
398.
[6] D. Banerjee, D. Mukherjee, R.L. Saha, K. Bose, Metall. Trans. A.
14A (1983) 413.
[7] D. Eylon, S. Fujishiro, P.J. Postans, F.H. Froes, J. Metals 36
(1984) 55.
[8] Hidehiro Onodera, Shizuo Nakazawa, Katsumi Ohno, Toshihiro
Yamagata, Michio Yamazaki, ISIJ Int. 31 (1991) 875.
[9] H. Kestler, H. Mughrabi, H. Renner, in: P.A. Blenkinsop, W.J.
Evans, H.M. Flower (Eds.), Titanium’95: Science and Technol-
ogy, The Institute of Materials, London, 1996, p. 1171.
[10] M.T. Cope, M.J. Hill, Sixth World Conference On Titanium,
Proceedings of the Conference Les Editions de Physique, Les Ulis
Cedex, France, (1988) 153.
[11] C. Ramachandra, A.K. Singh, G.M.K. Sarma, Metall. Trans. A
24A (1993) 1273.
J. Zhang, D. Li / Materials Science and Engineering A341 (2003) 229�/235 235