presentación de los editores

Upload: esteban-vedia

Post on 03-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Presentacin de Los Editores

    1/4

  • 8/12/2019 Presentacin de Los Editores

    2/4

    Editors' Introduction:

    Questions

    of

    Evidence

    James

    Chandler,

    Arnold

    I.

    Davidson,

    and

    Harry

    Harootunian

    The

    topic

    of evidence is so central for research and

    scholarship

    that it

    is

    extraordinary how little direct attention it has received. The best-known

    exception

    to

    this rule of

    neglect

    is

    probably

    still

    R. G.

    Collingwood's

    de-

    fense of the humanities

    in

    The

    Idea

    of

    History

    (1946),

    which

    argued

    that

    only

    history,

    in

    Collingwood's expanded

    sense,

    could address

    enlighten-

    ment

    aspirations

    to

    a

    science of human

    nature. What

    distinguished

    history

    from

    science,

    on this

    account,

    was the

    operation

    of an a

    priori

    im-

    agination

    that

    governed

    the

    activity

    of

    historical

    construction;

    what

    distinguished

    historical

    imagination

    from the artistic

    imagination

    was its

    respect

    for

    evidence.

    Collingwood's

    landmark

    discussion of Historical

    Ev-

    idence offered a powerful critique of what he called the scissors-and-

    paste

    model of

    history

    and a

    compelling

    case for the

    notion

    of the

    historian's constitutive

    dialogue

    with the human

    past-a

    notion

    newly

    re-

    cuperated

    in

    the work of

    many

    recent

    theorists.

    Question

    and evidence are

    therefore

    correlative

    in

    the

    strong

    sense

    that facts can

    only

    become evi-

    dence

    in

    response

    to some

    particular question.

    Yet

    despite

    its

    range

    and

    acuity,

    Collingwood's

    discussion of evidence

    suffers from

    two

    related

    shortcomings

    that

    severely qualify

    its

    continuing

    usefulness.

    Its

    science-history

    distinction

    is

    drawn with a

    sharpness

    that

    seems misleading in the light of the last half-century's work in many fields,

    especially

    in

    the

    philosophy

    of

    science. Hence the

    difficulty

    Collingwood's

    defenders

    have had

    in

    maintaining

    his

    sharp

    distinction

    between the

    Critical

    Inquiry

    17

    (Summer 1991)

    S1991

    by

    The

    University

    of

    Chicago.

    0093-1896/91/1704-0004$01.00.

    All

    rights

    reserved.

    738

    This content downloaded from 200.59.229.130 on Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:01:26 PMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/12/2019 Presentacin de Los Editores

    3/4

  • 8/12/2019 Presentacin de Los Editores

    4/4

    740 Editors' Introduction

    themselves

    the

    products

    of historical

    developments,

    and

    themselves

    un-

    dergo

    redifferentiation

    and

    reformulation.

    To address such issues, with

    funding

    from the Centennial Committee

    of

    the

    University

    of

    Chicago,

    we have

    invited

    a dozen

    scholars

    in

    a

    wide va-

    riety

    of fields to contribute

    essays

    to

    Critical

    Inquiry.

    These scholars were

    selected not

    only

    on the basis of their

    extraordinary, specialized

    expertise

    but

    also because their work has led them

    across the

    usual

    boundaries of dis-

    ciplines

    to confront

    unusual

    problems

    in

    evidence. The

    essays

    that follow

    here

    represent

    the

    first installment. The

    authors

    of these

    essays

    have

    also

    been invited to

    a

    public

    conference

    to

    be held at

    the

    University

    of

    Chicago,

    19-22

    May

    1992,

    in

    celebration of the

    University's

    centennial. It is our

    hope

    that

    by encouraging

    experts

    in diverse fields to

    speak

    to one another

    about these

    questions

    of

    evidence

    they

    will

    also make

    their

    positions

    available

    to

    a more

    general

    academic audience.

    Further,

    by

    (as

    it

    were)

    publishing

    the

    proceedings

    in

    advance of

    the

    conference,

    we

    hope

    to

    make

    the

    conference

    itself

    the

    occasion not

    of

    reading

    long

    papers

    but

    of a

    special

    kind of

    discussion,

    one

    in

    which the

    audience,

    as

    disparate

    as the

    readership

    of Critical

    Inquiry

    itself,

    will

    be

    especially prepared

    to

    engage

    the

    matters

    under debate.

    For

    more about the conference

    please

    contact Lorraine Brochu-

    Mudloff,

    administrative

    assistant,

    Chicago

    Humanities

    Institute,

    Joseph

    Regenstein Library,

    1100 E.

    Fifty-ninth

    Street,

    Chicago,

    Illinois,

    60637;

    telephone:

    (312)

    702-8274.

    This content downloaded from 200.59.229.130 on Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:01:26 PMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp