process control department of chemical engineering ntu september 2008

92
Process Control Department of Chemical Engineering NTU September 2008

Upload: avis-bradford

Post on 15-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Process Control

    Department of Chemical EngineeringNTU

    September 2008

  • Class InstructorHsiao-Ping Huang (Room 213)

    Professor Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Taiwan University

    Work with NTU since 1970

  • Teaching Assistant (401)PhD. Candidate

  • Class ContentsLectures: every Monday: 09:10~10:00every Wednesday: 10:20~12:00Examinations: Mid term Exam. Final Exam.Home works: will be assigned after lectures

  • Backgrounds

  • Chart5

    16.9

    15.2

    12.9

    9.2

    7.9

    5.8

    5.3

    4.9

    4.1

    3.7

    14.1

    Industry

    Percent

    Employment of US Chemical Engineers 2005

    Sheet1

    Graphs for Chemeca 2006 Plenary Lecture8/5/06 draft

    Fig. 1

    RegionSales

    Europe38.00%

    Asia Pacific28.00%

    North America25.00%

    Latin America5.00%

    MEAF4.00%

    100.00%

    Figure 2: New large Chem plants

    YearAsia PacificMid EastEuropeUSALatin AmCanadaAfricaTotalChemical Plant Projects

    1995150301056565634242005 vs Avg '00-02

    1996120309048451810361

    1997120309048451810361Middle East148.6%

    1998120309049451810362Asia Pacific71.4%

    1999120309049451810362USA22.7%

    200090357525282515293Latin America-8.0%

    200170805550301818321Africa-8.2%

    2002506011535301616322Europe-14.3%

    20034570922015816266Canada-18.6%

    2004120488550251630374

    20051201457045271615438

    Avg 00-01-0270588237292016312

    Change 05 vs Avg71.4%148.6%-14.3%22.7%-8.0%-18.6%-8.2%40.4%

    Figure 4: Starting Salaries

    $

    MajorAnnual Salary

    Liberal Arts30,800

    Marketing36,300

    Business39,900

    Civil Eng.45,000

    Accounting45,700

    Computer Sci.50,000

    Mechanical Eng.50,700

    Electrial Eng.52,900

    Chemical Eng.55,900

    table 1: Top Employment Industries

    Total respondants=1614IndustryPercent

    IndustryCoreMedicalPetroChemOil ProdNat. GasMetalsPlasticEvironmentalCommodityCatalystsFibers/FilmsSoap,DetergControlsPaint, CoatingsUtilitiesSafety,HealthNuclearSemiconductSoftwareTotal%Chemicals16.9

    Engineering D&C170597924515.2%Engineering Services15.2

    Chemicals162902027216.9%Oil & Gas12.9

    Pharmaceuticals1271277.9%Materials9.2

    Bio & Live Sci.718794.9%Pharmaceuticals7.9

    Petroleum12655131520912.9%Education5.8

    Materials2621748191489.2%Consumer Products5.3

    Education94945.8%Bio, Medical, Life Science4.9

    Government60603.7%Energy Production4.1

    Consumer Products7312855.3%Government3.7

    Energy103026664.1%Others14.1

    Auto & Aero32322.0%Total100

    Industrial Gases30301.9%

    Electronics23914462.9%

    Others7.5%

    100.0%

    Sheet1

    ACC, 2004

    Global Sales of Chemical Products

    Sheet2

    Source [2]

    Mid East

    Asia Pacific

    Europe

    USA

    Asia Pacific

    Mid East

    Europe

    USA

    Latin Am

    Canada

    Africa

    Year

    No. of Projects

    New Chemical Plant Projects

    Sheet3

    Source [5]

    Profession

    Starting Annual Salary ($)

    Salaries by ProfessionUSA 2006 Graduates

    Industry

    Percent

    Employment of US Chemical Engineers 2005

  • Chart2

    30800

    36300

    39900

    45000

    45700

    50000

    50700

    52900

    55900

    Source [5]

    Profession

    Starting Annual Salary ($)

    Salaries by ProfessionUSA 2006 Graduates

    Sheet1

    Graphs for Chemeca 2006 Plenary Lecture8/5/06 draft

    Fig. 1

    RegionSales

    Europe38.00%

    Asia Pacific28.00%

    North America25.00%

    Latin America5.00%

    MEAF4.00%

    100.00%

    Figure 2: New large Chem plants

    YearAsia PacificMid EastEuropeUSALatin AmCanadaAfricaTotalChemical Plant Projects

    1995150301056565634242005 vs Avg '00-02

    1996120309048451810361

    1997120309048451810361Middle East148.6%

    1998120309049451810362Asia Pacific71.4%

    1999120309049451810362USA22.7%

    200090357525282515293Latin America-8.0%

    200170805550301818321Africa-8.2%

    2002506011535301616322Europe-14.3%

    20034570922015816266Canada-18.6%

    2004120488550251630374

    20051201457045271615438

    Avg 00-01-0270588237292016312

    Change 05 vs Avg71.4%148.6%-14.3%22.7%-8.0%-18.6%-8.2%40.4%

    Figure 4: Starting Salaries

    $

    MajorAnnual Salary

    Liberal Arts30,800

    Marketing36,300

    Business39,900

    Civil Eng.45,000

    Accounting45,700

    Computer Sci.50,000

    Mechanical Eng.50,700

    Electrial Eng.52,900

    Chemical Eng.55,900

    table 1: Top Employment Industries

    Total respondants=1614IndustryPercent

    IndustryCoreMedicalPetroChemOil ProdNat. GasMetalsPlasticEvironmentalCommodityCatalystsFibers/FilmsSoap,DetergControlsPaint, CoatingsUtilitiesSafety,HealthNuclearSemiconductSoftwareTotal%Chemicals16.9

    Engineering D&C170597924515.2%Engineering Services15.2

    Chemicals162902027216.9%Oil & Gas12.9

    Pharmaceuticals1271277.9%Materials9.2

    Bio & Live Sci.718794.9%Pharmaceuticals7.9

    Petroleum12655131520912.9%Education5.8

    Materials2621748191489.2%Consumer Products5.3

    Education94945.8%Bio, Medical, Life Science4.9

    Government60603.7%Energy Production4.1

    Consumer Products7312855.3%Government3.7

    Energy103026664.1%Others14.1

    Auto & Aero32322.0%Total100

    Industrial Gases30301.9%

    Electronics23914462.9%

    Others7.5%

    100.0%

    Sheet1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    ACC, 2004

    Global Sales of Chemical Products

    Sheet2

    Source [2]

    Mid East

    Asia Pacific

    Europe

    USA

    Asia Pacific

    Mid East

    Europe

    USA

    Latin Am

    Canada

    Africa

    Year

    No. of Projects

    New Chemical Plant Projects

    Sheet3

    Source [5]

    Profession

    Starting Annual Salary ($)

    Salaries by ProfessionUSA 2006 Graduates

    Industry

    Percent

    Employment of US Chemical Engineers 2005

  • Chart2

    580006100080500

    745007350094000

    835508500097350

    8952092000108000

    100500110000125000

    102500113200113850

    100000115500135000

    110000118050120000

    83000119000142170

    PhD

    MS

    BS

    [Source 4]

    BS

    MS

    PhD

    Years of Work Experience

    Median Salary ($/Yr)

    ChE Salaries by Education LevelsUSA 2005

    Sheet1

    Graphs for Chemeca 2006 Plenary Lecture8/5/06 draft

    Fig. 1[Meyers talk, Beijing, 06]

    RegionSales

    Europe38.00%

    Asia Pacific28.00%

    North America25.00%

    Latin America5.00%

    MEAF4.00%

    100.00%

    Figure 2: New large Chem plants[Hydrocarbon Processing, March '06]

    YearAsia PacificMid EastEuropeUSALatin AmCanadaAfricaTotalChemical Plant Projects

    1995150301056565634242005 vs Avg '00-02

    1996120309048451810361

    1997120309048451810361Middle East148.6%

    1998120309049451810362Asia Pacific71.4%

    1999120309049451810362USA22.7%

    200090357525282515293Latin America-8.0%

    200170805550301818321Africa-8.2%

    2002506011535301616322Europe-14.3%

    20034570922015816266Canada-18.6%

    2004120488550251630374

    20051201457045271615438

    Avg 00-01-0270588237292016312

    Change 05 vs Avg71.4%148.6%-14.3%22.7%-8.0%-18.6%-8.2%40.4%

    Figure 4: Starting Salaries[CEP, Aug '05]

    $

    MajorAnnual Salary

    Liberal Arts30,800

    Marketing36,300

    Business39,900

    Civil Eng.45,000

    Accounting45,700

    Computer Sci.50,000

    Mechanical Eng.50,700

    Electrial Eng.52,900

    Chemical Eng.55,900

    table 1: Top Employment Industries[CEP, Aug '05]

    Total respondants=1614IndustryPercent

    IndustryCoreMedicalPetroChemOil ProdNat. GasMetalsPlasticEvironmentalCommodityCatalystsFibers/FilmsSoap,DetergControlsPaint, CoatingsUtilitiesSafety,HealthNuclearSemiconductSoftwareTotal%Chemicals16.9

    Engineering D&C170597924515.2%Engineering Services15.2

    Chemicals162902027216.9%Oil & Gas12.9

    Pharmaceuticals1271277.9%Materials9.2

    Bio & Live Sci.718794.9%Pharmaceuticals7.9

    Petroleum12655131520912.9%Education5.8

    Materials2621748191489.2%Consumer Products5.3

    Education94945.8%Bio, Medical, Life Science4.9

    Government60603.7%Energy Production4.1

    Consumer Products7312855.3%Government3.7

    Energy103026664.1%Others14.1

    Auto & Aero32322.0%Total100

    Industrial Gases30301.9%

    Electronics23914462.9%

    Others7.5%

    100.0%

    Median ChE Salaries by Ed. Level[CEP, Aug '05]

    Yrs Work ExperienceBSMSPhD

    558,00061,00080,500

    1074,50073,50094,000

    1583,55085,00097,350

    2089,52092,000108,000

    25100,500110,000125,000

    30102,500113,200113,850

    35100,000115,500135,000

    40110,000118,050120,000

    4583,000119,000142,170

    Sheet1

    0.38

    0.28

    0.25

    0.05

    0.04

    ACC, 2004

    Global Sales of Chemical Products

    Sheet2

    15030105656563

    120309048451810

    120309048451810

    120309049451810

    120309049451810

    90357525282515

    70805550301818

    506011535301616

    4570922015816

    120488550251630

    1201457045271615

    Source [2]

    Mid East

    Asia Pacific

    Europe

    USA

    Asia Pacific

    Mid East

    Europe

    USA

    Latin Am

    Canada

    Africa

    Year

    No. of Projects

    New Chemical Plant Projects

    Sheet3

    Source [5]

    Profession

    Starting Annual Salary ($)

    Salaries by ProfessionUSA 2006 Graduates

    Industry

    Percent

    Employment of US Chemical Engineers 2005

    PhD

    MS

    BS

    [Source 4]

    BS

    MS

    PhD

    Years of Work Experience

    Median Salary ($/Yr)

    ChE Salaries by Education LevelsUSA 2005

  • Where the control application is ?

  • Float Level ControlBall cock level control started by EgyptiansWater clocksStill used in many domestic and industrial applications

  • Biological Control SystemsBlood pressure controlAdjust stroke rate of heartdilation of arteries

  • Governor Speed ControlJames Watt invented in 1769Used on both stationary and railway steam enginesJ.C Maxwell analyzed in 1868

  • Washing Machine Fuzzy Logic ControlConcept of Fuzzy Logic introduced by Lofti ZadehFuzzy sets defined by membership functionsConcepts of dirty measured by water turbidity

  • CD ControlPosition control of laser headSpeed control of drive

  • Modern Car Control Adaptive Cruise Control

  • Pick and Place RobotVision feedback systems now common

  • The Sojourner Mars ExplorerLanded Mars, July 4 199711 kg, 2km/hr top speed, 10 m rangeSolar poweredUHF Radio Modem CommsFirst attempt at remote control on another planet

  • Copolymerization ProcessRXHPSLPSLPSProductPurgeFresh Monomer feedChain Transfer AgentCo-Monomer feedInitiator6-30 secs~ 1 min~ 10 minsLong Recycle LoopVery High Pressure; High TemperatureMedium PressureLow PressureMeasurement System

  • Chemical Process Control

  • Chemical Plant

  • Industrial Backgrounds

  • Source of Benefits

  • Industrial EnvironmentCommodity marketsReduce costs by 3% p.a. just to stand stillEnvironmental issuesResponsive to customer demandsQuality product differentiationTiming just in time manufacturingVolume multi-purpose plants

  • Industry TargetsOn-line equipment efficiency > 95%

    Maximum 100%, world class > 85%Operators in regular contact with customersNo alarmsNo health, safety, environmental concerns

  • Incident Reporting SystemAccidentsIncidentsNear MissesErrors & Recoveries

    _964790552.doc

    1

    10

    30

    600

    Critical Incident

    Major Incident

    Serious Incident

    Incident

    Potential Major Incident

    Potential Serious Incident

    _1035701038.doc

    1

    10

    30

    600

    Critical Incident

    Major Incident

    Serious Incident

    Incident

    Potential Major Incident

    Potential Serious Incident

    _963314271.doc

    1

    10

    30

    600

    Critical Incident

    Major Incident

    Serious Incident

    Incident

    Potential Major Incident

    Potential Serious Incident

  • Managing Abnormal Situations - Anatomy of a Disaster From Operations Perspective

  • Various cost elements

    Efficiency

    Operating Target

    Current Limit

    Theoretical Limit

    Plant Performance

    Comfort Margin

    Theoretically possible; currently unsustainable

    Lost opportunity(Cost of comfort)

    Future upgrades (e.g., Advanced Control)

    Lost Profit

    Additional unplanned costs

    Break-even

    Loss

    Fixed Costs(Idle Plant)

    Equipment damage, etc.

    Accident

    Lost Revenue

    Profit

    Shut down

    Incident

  • Lost Opportunity = 3-8% of Capacity!

  • Economics of Better Operation

  • Sumary on the backgroundsThe performance requirements becomes increasingly difficult to satisfy.---Tougher environmental and safty regulations, repid changing economic conditions tighten product qualify specifications.

    Modern plants featured by complexity and highly integrated process become more difficult to operate without process control.

    Increased emphasis placed on safety, efficient plant operation make process control increasingly important than ever.

  • Now, the course of Chemical Process Control

  • What to learn?Exposure to control instrumentation and hardware as practiced in industryUnderstand dynamic behaviors of processesBecome proficient in Analysis of dynamics systems---Use Laplace transformationLearn the effects of feedback system and PID controllersTuning PID controllersAdvanced control strategies

  • Process: The conversion of feed materials to products using chemical and physical operations taking place in some unit or equipment Process dynamics refers to unsteady state process behavior. Transient operation occurs during important situations such as start-up and shut downs, and unusual disturbances or planned transitions from one product to another.Process control refers to maintain a process at the desired operating conditions, safely and efficiently while plant environment or product changes by manipulating some flow of material or energy.Key words:

  • Process Control Symbols for easy communicationFor functional identification For easy communicationFor P&ID diagram

  • Scientific Apparatus Manufacturers Association (SAMA)

  • Example continuous processes

  • Blending Process

  • Control questions: when x1 varies with time , how can we ensure the outlet conc. X remains at or near its desired value, xsp?

  • ProfitableRequired for operations inalmost all manufacturingplantsEconomic considerationsTraditional approach?Model-Based approach?Mathematical programming

  • Classification of variablesControlled variables : The variables that must be maintained, or controlled.Manipulation Variables: the variables used to maintain the controlled variable at constant levels (Set-points)Disturbance variables: Variables that cause the controlled variables to deviate from their set-points.

  • ControlledVariableManipulation variableSteam flow rateDisturbance VariablesSteam pressure

  • Classification of Control StrategiesFeedback control --- Control action occurs only if deviation from set-point is detected.Feedforward control --- Control action occurs at the same time when disturbance enters the processInferential control --- Control actions based on indirect measurement

  • Advantages DisadvantagesSimple Can compensate for any disturbance that enters the processControl action takes place only after error occursThe error correction is essentially a trial-and-error operation

  • Advantages DisadvantagesControl action takes place before error occursPerfect control is theoretically possibleMay result in permanent errorsDisturbance must be measurableUsually encounters Implementation difficulties

  • Feedback & Feedforward Control

    Feedforward control takes care of major and measurable disturbancesFeedback control takes care of all other unmeasurable disturbances and the imperfect compensations left behind from feedforward control

  • Incentives for Process ControlFor safetyTo meet operational ConstraintsTo meet product qualityTo meet environmental regulationsTo save energyTo improve operability

  • Safty valvePressure ControlSafty

  • Product QualityConcentration Control

  • Smooth Operation---Improve operabilityLevel Control

  • Improve operability

  • Improve operability

  • Save energy costMake use of cheap cooling water as much as we can to lower the column pressure so as to save steam consumption

  • Save energy costUse cheap CW as much as we can during the normal operations.Switch to the use of more expensive refrigerant in case of abnormal situations

  • Why is feedback important?To correct errorTo stabilize inherently open-loop unstable processesTo reduce sensitivity of a system to the external inputsTo reduce sensitivity of a system due to modeling error

  • Positive FeedbackMicrophone loud speaker arrangements

  • Basic components of a control systemProcess ---- ObjectSensor/transmitter ---- Measurement and feedback Controller --- Decision makingFinal Control Element --- Action

  • Types of Control --- based on signal feedbackOpen loop-control --- manipulation variables changes according to a pre-determined scenarioClosed-loop control --- manipulation variables changes according to the feedback measurements

  • Control Objectives Servo-control --- To make controlled variable follow changes of set-point

    Regulatory Control --- To correct the deviations caused by the disturbances

  • ProfitableRequired for operations inalmost all manufacturingplantsEconomic considerationsTraditional approach?Model-Based approach?Mathematical programming

  • What Are We Trying to Achieve?

  • Constraints on OperationMinimise quality give-awayMaximise productionConstraint

  • Control Performance

    _1043662381.doc

  • , 2006(3rd ed).

    ***This slide looks at production-- for example, capacity realized--and does not factor in costs required to attain that capacity nor costs of accidents. The typical 125kbbd refinery or average chemical plant has an area under the curve worth on the order of $1 Billion U.S.

    Investments in advanced control are intended to move the distribution of production rates to the right. @sset.MAX plant solutions are designed to slice off the tail on the left. *