qcd meeting july 23, 2004

12
QCD Meeting July 23, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation ? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT observed. Polarization Tom Devlin Rutgers/CDF _

Upload: beverly-baldwin

Post on 04-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

_.  Polarization Tom Devlin Rutgers/CDF. Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT observed. Is it due to the hard collision?. Is it due to fragmentation?. QCD Meeting July 23, 2004. Asymmetry plots in beam-  and beam-K system (ignores jets) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

QCD MeetingJuly 23, 2004

Is it due to the hard collision?

Is it due tofragmentation?

Strong polarization seenin fixed-target experimentswhere jet NOT observed.

PolarizationTom Devlin

Rutgers/CDF

_

Page 2: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Asymmetry plots in beam- and beam-K system (ignores jets)Polarization allowed under parity conservation

is in the y-direction (second from top).

Solid lines: DataDashed lines: 20 hybrid MC-events/real-event scaled by 1/20

Page 3: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Fits Without and With Mass Constraints

Page 4: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

How Do We Get Polarization From This?

These cos() plots contain:1. The Signal: and 2. Ks Background3. Background from random 2-track crossings.

__

Monte Carlo Simulation

and and Ks are straightforward and in place

Now working on random 2-track crossings

__

Page 5: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Work in Progress and Planned: Summer-Fall, 2004

11 Mass-constrained fits: 2-, 2-Ks, 1-ee.11 Sum of weights over solutions = 1.0 per event.3. Mix MC events for events with both K and solutions as in the data, weighted by relative P(2)*P(Decay).4. Further study of sailor-cowboy problem.11 Add fits with mass constraints displaced by 20 MeV.6. Background subtraction.7. Decide whether analysis is viable or not.8. If so, do polarization in the other two coordinate systems.

Additional Tasks

11 Use 2 = 2(MassConstraint) - 2(NoMassConstraint)10. Random 2-track crossings.

Page 6: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

24 : Fit with mass-constraint – 4 deg. freedom

23 : Fit without mass-constraint – 3 deg. freedomIrrelevant Fluctuations in 2 e.g. deviations

from exact 3-D intersection at vertex tend to cancel.Strong deviations from correct mass DO NOT cancel in 2 .

Page 7: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Repeat for Mass Constraint = M 20 MeV(Note that p threshold is only 38 MeV below M)

Page 8: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Subtract sum of two sidebands from Signal+Background(Sideband normalization used here is from previous graphs.)

Page 9: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Problem:The backgrounds from sidebands populate

the cos plots at different values from real backgrounds.

Alternate Approach:Generate hybrid MC backgrounds

For each real event, generate 20 MC events• at same decay vertex as real event• parent mass from background mass distribution• random angles in CM system• apply standard acceptance cuts• apply tight cuts in 2

Page 10: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Fit with no Mass Constraint: Assume Daughters are pSubtract signal, Smooth Remainder (5-bins)

Page 11: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Normalize Probability Distribution P(M) to Unit Area.Numerically Integrate.

Find values of M(p) at intervals of 0.01 in the integraland form a table of its integral.

Choose a random number R(0:1)Table Lookup and Interpolate to get M(p)

Page 12: QCD Meeting July 23, 2004

Status and Plans

Three known contributions to dataset: -- Signal -- Ks Background -- Continuum 2-track background

MC code exists to generate first two.Coding in progress for the third.

Plan: Generate 20 MC of each type for each real event. Mix three MC samples, in appropriate proportions to produce 20 MC events for each real event. Adjust proportions of each and assumed polarization of MC ’s to fit data.