qqr final presentation

27
The Effects of Copy on Product Recall and Purchasing Intent

Upload: yutyembrace

Post on 08-Jul-2015

28 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QQR final presentation

The Effects of Copy on Product Recall and Purchasing Intent

Page 2: QQR final presentation

Intro

Page 3: QQR final presentation

Does the information provided in a print ad’s copy affect the subsequent recall and recognition of a brand?

Study

Purpose

Page 4: QQR final presentation

Literature

Review

Literature

Review

Page 5: QQR final presentation

2 Seconds

Literature

Review

Page 6: QQR final presentation

90% view

image first2% view written

content first

Literature

Review

Page 7: QQR final presentation

Images

Are

Simple to

processEasy to

remember

Express

emotions

effectively

Communicate

quickly

Page 8: QQR final presentation

Ratio of image

to text correlates with attention

Page 9: QQR final presentation

Ratio of image

to text correlates with attention

Page 10: QQR final presentation

Design Complexity

VS.

Feature Complexity

Recall, recognition & appeal

Number of Ad elements

Page 11: QQR final presentation

Effects of Product information

New-product

information

enhances

recognition

and appeal

Negatively

effects

recognition

and appeal

of ad

Page 12: QQR final presentation
Page 13: QQR final presentation

H1: People do not read advertisement copy.

H2: Recall of advertisement will be equivalent between experimental and control groups.

H3: Purchase intention will be equivalent between experimental and control groups.

H4: Advertisement graphics will be first thing participants noticed when exposed to ad.

Hypothesis

Page 14: QQR final presentation

Methodology

+

Cross Sectional Study with

79

Participant

s

Randomly

Exposed

+

Personally

Administered

+

Questionna

ire

Page 15: QQR final presentation

两组对比实验

Me

tho

dolo

gy

Page 16: QQR final presentation

Methodology

Page 17: QQR final presentation

Randomization, us

ed four different

advertisements

and the same

questionnaire

Comparisons

between

control and

experimental

group

Quasi-

experimental

design

+TWO

+one

+three

Methodology

Page 18: QQR final presentation

Literature

Review

Result

Page 19: QQR final presentation

Total

79

+

+

+

+

Percentage

51.9%

See graphic first

52

Percentage

65.8%

Read copy

41

Main

Findings

Page 20: QQR final presentation

Consumer

Recall

Original ad Dummy ad

Number of people 26 33

Percentage ofparticipants

76.5% 73.3%

Main

Findings

Page 21: QQR final presentation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

2.39

1.38

Average purchase Intent (out of 4)

Average …

Main

Findings

Page 22: QQR final presentation

Copy Still

Matters!

Page 23: QQR final presentation

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

71.4%

45.9%

Percentage of people reading copy

Percentage of …

Page 24: QQR final presentation
Page 25: QQR final presentation

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

57.5%

46.2%

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

pe

op

le

rea

din

g c

op

y

Percentage …

• Participant reactivity

• “Popular” Dummy ads

• On-line vs off-line viewing habit

Oth

er

Fin

din

gs

Page 26: QQR final presentation

Managerial Relevance

be careful

Helpful to know when

manager is making a

decision concerning

copyCannot overlook

copy!

Avoid bias and be mindful

Page 27: QQR final presentation

TEAM

Yuting Chen Alex Ferraro Holiday HeMary Adams Bode

THANKS