ref 47 geostat

29
SIAM J. SCI. COMPUT. c 2006 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 776–803 PRECONDITIONING MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS USING COARSE-SCALE MODELS Y. EFENDIEV , T. HOU , AND W. LUO Abstract. We study the preconditioning of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods using coarse-scale models with applications to subsurface characterization. The purpose of preconditioning is to reduce the ne-scale computational cost and increase the acceptance rate in the MCMC sam- pling. This goal is achi eved by generati ng Markov chains based on two-stage computations. In the rst stage, a new proposal is rst tested by the coarse-scale model based on multiscale nite volume methods. The full ne-scale computation will be conducte d only if the proposal passe s the coarse- scale screenin g. F or more ecient simulat ions, an appro ximation of the full ne-s cale computation using precomputed multiscale basis functions can also be used . Compar ing with the regular MCMC method, the preconditioned MCMC method generates a modied Markov chain by incorporating the coarse-scale information of the problem. The conditions under which the modied Markov chain will converge to the correct posterior distribution are stated in the paper. The validity of these assump- tions for our application and the conditions which would guarantee a high acceptance rate are also discussed. We would like to note that coarse-s cale models used in the simulat ions need to b e inex- pensive but not necessarily very accurate, as our analysis and numerical simulations demonstrate. We prese nt numerica l examp les for sampli ng permeab ility elds using two -point geostatis tics. The Karhunen–Lo` eve expansion is used to represent the realizati ons of the permeability eld conditioned to the dynamic data, such as production data, as well as some static data. Our numerical examples show that the acceptance rate can be increased by more than 10 times if MCMC simulations are preconditioned using coarse-scale models. Key words. preconditioning, multiscale, Markov chain Monte Carlo, porous media AMS subject classications. 65N99, 62P30, 62F15, 65C05, 65C40 DOI. 10.1137/050628568 1. Int roduction. Uncertainties on the detailed description of reservoir litho- facies, porosity, and permeability are major contributors to uncertainty in reservoir performance forecasting. Reduc ing this uncertainty can be achi eve d by integra ting additional data in subsur face modeling. With the increa sing interest in accur ate pre- diction of subsurface properties, subsurface characterization based on dynamic data, such as produc tion data, becomes more importa nt. To predict future reservoir performance, the reservoir properties, such as porosity and permeability, need to be conditioned to dynamic data, such as production data. In general it is dicult to calculate this probability distribution, because the process of predictin g ow and trans port in petroleum reservoirs is nonlin ear. Instead, this probability distribution is estimated from the outcomes of ow predictions for a large numbe r of rea liz ati ons of the reser vo ir. It is essentia l tha t the permeabili ty (and porosity) realizations adequately reect the uncertainty in the reservoir properties; i.e., the proba bilit y distributio n is sample d correctly . This problem is cha llengi ng because the permeability eld is a function dened on a large number of grid blocks. Received by the editors April 5, 2005; accepted for publication (in revised form) January 13, 2006; published electronically May 26, 2006. http://www.siam.org/journals/sisc/28-2/62856.html Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3368 (efendiev@ math.ta mu.e du). The researc h of this author was partially supported by DOE grant DE-FG02- 05ER25669. Applied Mathematics, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125 ([email protected], [email protected]. edu). The research of the second author was partiall y supported by NSF ITR gran t ACI-0204932 and NSF FRG grant DMS-0353838 . 776

Upload: rajiv-ag

Post on 08-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 1/29

Page 2: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 2/29

Page 3: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 3/29

Page 4: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 4/29

Page 5: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 5/29

Page 6: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 6/29

Page 7: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 7/29

Page 8: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 8/29

Page 9: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 9/29

Page 10: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 10/29

Page 11: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 11/29

Page 12: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 12/29

Page 13: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 13/29

Page 14: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 14/29

Page 15: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 15/29

Page 16: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 16/29

Page 17: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 17/29

Page 18: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 18/29

Page 19: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 19/29

Page 20: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 20/29

Page 21: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 21/29

Page 22: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 22/29

Page 23: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 23/29

Page 24: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 24/29

Page 25: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 25/29

Page 26: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 26/29

Page 27: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 27/29

Page 28: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 28/29

Page 29: Ref 47 Geostat

8/6/2019 Ref 47 Geostat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ref-47-geostat 29/29