10.1

replicaton avg number of job

118.9

222

319.4

422.1

519.8

621.9

720.2

4/2/2015 10:00:59 PM

0ne-Sample T: C2

Test of = 22.5 vs 22.5

Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean 95% CI T PC2 7 20.614 1.356 0.512 (19.360, 21.868) -3.68 0.010

From the table: T n-1, 0.025 = t 6, 0.025 = 2.45Since 3.68 > 2.45 we have to reject null hypothesis. There is significant difference between simulation and the actual system meanb-Testing mean = null (versus null)Calculating power for mean = null + difference = 0.05 Assumed standard deviation = 1.356

Sample TargetDifference Size Power Actual Power 2 6 0.8 0.820506

Power and Sample Size

1-Sample t Test

Testing mean = null (versus null)Calculating power for mean = null + difference = 0.05 Assumed standard deviation = 1.356

Sample TargetDifference Size Power Actual Power 2 7 0.89 0.898536

10.2

4/2/2015 10:00:59 PM One-Sample T: C2

replicaton

13.70

24.21

34.35

44.13

53.83

64.32

74.05

Test of = 4 vs 4

Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean 95% CI T PC2 7 4.0843 0.2441 0.0923 (3.8585, 4.3101) 0.91 0.396

From the table: T n-1, 0.01 = t 6, 0.005 = 3.707Since 0.91< 3.707we have to accept null hypothesis. There is no significant difference between simulation and the actual system meanb-1-Sample t Test

Testing mean = null (versus null)Calculating power for mean = null + difference = 0.01 Assumed standard deviation = 0.2441

Sample TargetDifference Size Power Actual Power 0.5 8 0.9 0.959931

10.3 Paired T-Test and CI: simulation out put, actual system

Paired T for simulation out put - actual system

N Mean StDev SE Meansimulation out put 4 22.58 2.58 1.29actual system 4 20.77 1.76 0.88Difference 4 1.80 3.60 1.80

95% CI for mean difference: (-3.93, 7.53)T-Test of mean difference = 0 (vs 0): T-Value = 1.00 P-Value = 0.391

From the table: T n-1, 0.025 = t 3, 0.025 = 3.183Since t = 1