res perverta

8/9/2019 RES PERVERTA

1/5

PUBLIC NOTICE OF RES PERVERTA

DEFENDANT CROOKED U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS G. WILSON

ATTN:MAGISTRATE JUDGE REAPPOINTMENT COMMENTS

401 W. Central Blvd., Suite 2100Orlando, FL 32801-0210

OBJECTIONS TO FACIALLY FRAUDULENT report and recommendation, DOC. # 67

1. The Plaintiff Government corruption & crime victims object to Defendant Crooked

Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilsons premeditated

a. Cover-up of Government Officials crimes and corruption on the public record;b. Fraudulent concealment of, e.g., Def. Officials extortion, fraud, obstruction of justice;

c. Extension of Government corruption, fraud, retaliation, and deliberate deprivations;

d. Extortion of Plaintiffs Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, and money underfraudulent pretenses.See Doc. # 67, mailed on 08/19/2010; Case 2:2010-cv-00089.

PLAINTIFFS CONTEST MAGISTRATE WILSONS CORRUPTION, DOC. # 67

2. The Plaintiff unimpeachable record owners of and title holders to Lot 15A contestDefendant Magistrate Thomas G. Wilsons publicly recorded and proven:

a. Corruption;

b. Fraud, deception, and trickery;c. Fraud on the Court;

d. Dishonesty;

e. Objective partiality;f. Incompetence;

g. Perversion of the law and public record evidence.

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSONS FABLE & FABRICATION OF res judicata

3. It is a hackneyed truism that res judicata does not preclude a litigant from making a directattackupon the judgment before the court which renders it. 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice,

0.407, at 282 (2d ed. 1991). In other words, a party may introduce evidence, normally

extrinsic in nature, "with the direct and primary objective of modifying, setting aside,

canceling or vacating, or enjoining the enforcement of the judgment. C. Wright & A.Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure at 4406 (citing Intermill v. Nash, 94 Utah 271, 75

P.2d 157 (1938)).

DIRECT ATTACK OF BRAZEN FRAUD ON THE COURTS SINCE 2006

4. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record title holders to riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A

directly attackedpublicly recorded organized judicial crime and corruption in FloridaCourts.

a. Here, the original Federal Case, 2:2007-cv-00228, is under appeal and attackfor, e.g.,

publicly recorded Government racketeering, retaliation, extortion, fraud, fraud on

the Courts, and deliberate deprivations, 18 U.S.C. 241, 242;


2/5


3/5

3

d. NOTfindany Lee County title to forged land parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;

DEF. CROOKED JUDGE WILSON PERVERTED THE 1912 PLAT, PB 3, PG 25

10. Plain and short, the attached 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat of Survey

a. Was devoid offalsified land parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;

b. Wasdevoid offalsified land parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;c. Was devoid of the falsified Lee County park.Here, Def. Wilson knew that as a matter of law the fraudulently pretendedconveyance ofsaid fake land parcels in reference to said 1912 Plat had been legally and factuallyimpossible.

WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL ORGANIZED JUDICIAL CRIME, DOC. # 67

11. Florida law prohibitsfraudulent fabrication of a fakeinterestin fictitious land parcels.Here, Plaintiff(s) had demandedjudicial notice of, e.g.:

a. Ch. 95, Florida Statutes,ADVERSE POSSESSION; b. Ch.73, 74, Florida Statutes,EMINENT DOMAIN;

c. Ch. 712, F.S., self-enforcingFLORIDAMARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT;d. Article I, s. 10, Florida Constitution;e. Article I, s. 2, Florida Constitution;f. Article I, s. 9, Florida Constitution;

g. The recorded fraudulent violations of Florida Statutes and Constitution;

h. Def. K. M. Wilkinsons publicly recorded fabrications and fraud on the Court.

DEF. CROOK WILSON CONCEALED DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS,

FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, 1st, 14

th, 7

th, 4

th, 5

thU.S. CONST. AMEND.

12. Article I, s. 9, Fla. Const., states that

"[n]o person shall be deprived of . . . property without due process of law . . . ."

Art. I, s. 2, Fla. Const. states that

"[a]ll natural persons are equal before the law . . . ."

Art. I, s. 10, Fla. Const., states that"No . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed ."

Here, the Plaintiffs had the fundamental equal rights to own their Lot 15A, Cayo Costa,

and exclude Defendant Governments from their riparian Gulf-front street and uplands, PB 3

PG 25, U.S. Constitutional Amendments. The Plaintiff record real property tax payers, Lot15A, and title holders were entitled to defend theirperfected unencumbered marketable

record title against Defendant Officials racketeering, extortion, retaliation, deliberate

deprivations, and obstruction of justice underfraudulent pretenses and color of office.

EXTENSION OF RECORD EXTORTION, FRAUD, DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS

13. Defendants facially frivolous allegations of said sham land parcels werea. Legally incomprehensible;

b. NOT any valid defense orgenuineclaim;c. Forcriminalpurposes of, e.g., racketeering, retaliation, extortion, and fraud;

d. Controverted by the Lee County Real Property Grantor/Grantee Index.e. Prohibited under


4/5

4

DEF. WILSONS IDIOTIC, ARBITRARY, AND CAPRICIOUS report, DOC. # 67

14. Like a bungling Government idiot, Def. Wilson rambled incomprehensibly:The property may have been taken over by Lee County in some way. Id., p.

Florida law does not recognize take over by Government.15. Any involuntary alienation of property in Florida is strictly and necessarily a judicial

function and must follow due judicial process, Chapters 73, 74, 95, Fla. Stat. Here, nojudgehad everorderedany title transfer, Lot 15A, against the Plaintiffs will. Here, no eminentdomain oradverse possession judgmentordocumenthad everexisted.

AMBIGUOUS AND VAGUE JUDICIAL TRASH, DOC. # 67, P. 2:

GUESSING GOVERNMENT CROOK THOMAS G. WILSON

16. On the public record, Doc. # 67, Defendant Wilson asserted his guessing game and judicialcharade:

I guess something was appealed Id., p. 2.

PLAYING DUMB & DUMBER: DEFENDANT IDIOT THOMAS G. WILSON

Upon reading of the complaint, I have no concrete idea what happened. Id., p. 3.

Other defendants had something to do with the record of title to the property. Id., p. 2.

Here is all that I could get out of it. Id.

Here, Government idiot Wilson played so dumb that he confused, e.g.:a. Causes of action;

b. Claims for relief;c. Parties;

d. Actions.

17. Here, the Plaintiffrecord owners and holders ofindisputable Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, can

only live in furtherfear ofinjury from, e.g., said publicly recorded judicial

a. Corruption;

b. Idiocy;c. Ignorance;

d. Irrationality;

e. Recklessness.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al.

18. In their independent action for relief from, e.g., extrinsic fraud, fraud on the Court,racketeering, retaliation, extortion, obstruction of justice, the Plaintiff record owners of Lot

15A attacked the prima facie nullity, illegality, and criminality of judicial determinations

regarding the record ownership of private land fraudulently claimed as public land underfacially false and deceptive pretenses of fake law and/or resolution, scam O.R.569/875. See U.S.A. Ex Rel. et al. v. U.S.A. et al., 1:10-cv-321-JL, U.S. District Court,District of New Hampshire.


5/5

5

19. Here, Def. Wilson concealed the most elementary legal principle that any involuntaryalienation could not havepossibly been a legislative function, and that the fraudulent land-transfer-by-resolution-scam was a hoax and extortion scheme

DEF. WILSON CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL FAKED frivolous appeal motion:

WILSON KNEW THAT WILKINSON ADMITTEDLY DID NOTfile Rule 38 motion20. Here admittedly, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Crooked Lee County Property

Appraiser, had filed a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule 27-4.

Here, Defendant Crooked Magistrate Wilson knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspiredwith other Government Agents to conceal that Def. Wilkinson did notfile a Rule 38 orfrivolous appeal motion:

DEFENDANT WILKINSON FILED RULE 27-4motion [frivolous motion], DOC. # 386

See Doc. # 386, 11/30/2009, p. 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.

DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO grant FAKE rule 38 motion

21. In the record absence of a rule 38 motion, the Defendant U.S. Appellate Court Judges,11

thCircuit, conspired with other Defendant Officials to fake and grant a non-existent

rule 38 motion, which they knew Defendant Wilkinson had admittedlynotfiled.

See Doc. # 386-4, 11/30/2009, p. 1 of 2, Case 2:2007-cv-00228.

res perverta

Documents