robo-ethics rafael capurro ラファエル・カプーロ international center for information...
TRANSCRIPT
Robo-Ethics
Rafael Capurro ラファエル・カプーロ International Center for Information Ethics
国際情報倫理学研究センターhttp://www.capurro.de/home-jp.html
Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation - University of Tsukuba Joint Symposium
Robo-Ethics and „Mind-Body-Schema“ of Human and Robot Challenges for a Better Quality of Life
University of Tsukuba, JapanJanuary 23, 2015
2
A Robot Age
Will robots be widespread in the 21st century similarly to cars in the last century?
How quickly?
3
A Robot Age
Will robots be widespread in the 21st century similarly to cars in the last century?
Who will use them?
4
A Robot Age
Will robots be widespread in the 21st century similarly to cars in the last century?
For what purposes?
5
A Robot Age
Will robots be widespread in the 21st century similarly to cars in the last century?
With what kind of inbuilt rules of behaviour?
6
A Robot Age
Will robots be widespread in the 21st century similarly to cars in the last century?
What are the social risks and opportunities?
7
A Robot Age
With what consequences for:
• Self-awareness• Everyday life• Working environment• Ecology• Privacy / Publicness• Safety / Security• Surveillance
10
Robots and Humans
The more computable a being is, the more and the better it is.
Freedom: the capacity to opt for diverse forms of being-in-the-world.
11
Robots and Humans
The more computable a being is, the more and the better it is
Feelings open dimensions of being-in-the-world
12
Robots and Humans
Being a robot is more and better than being a human
Sharing bodily the world with others
13
Robots and Humans
Linear robot time Three-dimensional human (spatial-)temporality
Situation - Ba 場
15
Ethics of Care
Care tends to take the place of the other,
Care opens up a path for the other to care for him or herself.
a “care for the other” (“Fürsorge”) from one pole in which such “care” tends to take the place of the other, to the other pole that opens up a path for the other to care for him or herself. (
24
Conclusion
Adapting social ‚immune systems‘ (Sloterdijk) to robots
Adapting robots to social ‚immune systems‘
免疫系(めんえきけい )
(me nekikei)
28
Conclusion
Cosima Wagner writes in her book „Robotopia Nipponica. Research on the Acceptance of Robots in Japan“ (2013):
"[...] "social robots" illustrate the "negotiation character of the creation and use of technological artefacts" (Hörning), which for example includes the rejection of military applications of robot technology in Japan.
29
Conclusion
On the other hand, as a cultural topos, they mirror dreams, desires and needs of human beings at a certain time and therefore have to be interpreted as political objects as well.
30
Conclusion
As a source for a Japanese history of objects "social" robots exemplify the cultural meaning of robots, the expectations of the Japanese state and economy, the mentality of Japanese engineers and scientists
31
Conclusion
and last but not least the socio-cultural change, which the ageing Japanese society is about to face.„ (Cosima Wagner, 2013)
33
References
Capurro, Rafael: Medicine 2.0. Reflections on a pathology of the information society. In: Innovation, journal of appropriate librarianship and information work in Southern Africa, Nr 46, June 2013 (Special Issue: Information Ethics, ed. Stephen Mutula) pp. 75-96.
http://www.capurro.de/Medicine2_0.html
Capurro, Rafael: Ethical Aspects of Biometrics. Contribution to Tabula Rasa (FP 7 2011: Trusted Biometrics under Spoofing Attacks, Deliverable D 7.2) (Questions by Andrew P. Rebera)
http://www.capurro.de/biometrics.html
http://www.tabularasa-euproject.org/
Capurro, Rafael: Ethical Aspects of Value Ageing. (Questions by Barry Guihen)(FP 7, 2013)
http://www.capurro.de/value_ageing.html
http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/60667_en.html
34
References
Capurro, Rafael: Toward a Comparative Theory of Agents. In: AI & Society, Vol. 27, 4 (2012), 479-488.
http://www.capurro.de/agents.html
Capurro, Rafael: The Quest for Roboethics. Contribution to the Workshop organized by Cybernics, University of Tsukuba (Japan), September 30, 2009. In: Cybernics Technical Reports. Special Issue on Roboethics. University of Tsukuba 2011, 39-59 (CYB-2011-001 -CYB-2011-008 March 2011).
http://www.capurro.de/roboethics_survey.html
Capurro, Rafael: The Quest for Roboethics. In: IEEE ISTAS – International Symposium Technology and Society, Australia 2010. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvB6cYzDkcg Proceedings:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?reload=true&punumber=5507518
35
ReferencesCapurro, Rafael: Toward a comparative theory of agents. In AI & Society, 27, 4 (2012), 479-488.
http://www.capurro.de/agents.html
Capurro, Rafael: Ethics and Robotics. In: Rafael Capurro and Michael Nagenborg: Ethics and Robotics. Heidelberg 2009, 117-123. http://www.capurro.de/ethicsandrobotics.html
http://www.capurro.de/ethicsandrobotics.html
Capurro, Rafael and Nakada, Makoto: An Intercultural Dialogue on Roboethics. In: ibid. (Eds.): The Quest for Information Ethics and Roboethics in East and West. Research Report on trends in information ethics and roboethics in Japan and the West. ReGIS and ICIE, March 31, 2013, pp. 13-22 (ISSN 2187-6061).
http://www.capurro.de/intercultural_roboethics.html
Capurro, Rafael, Eldred, Michael and Nagel, Daniel: Digital Whoness: Identity, Privacy and Freedom in the Cyberworld. Frankfurt 2013.
Capurro, Rafael and Marsiske, Hans-Arthur: Der Moment des Triumphs. E-Mail-Dialog über ein Bild. In: Hans-Arthur Marsiske (Ed.): Kriegsmaschinen - Roboter im Militäreinsatz. Hannover 2012, 11-30.
http://www.capurro.de/kriegsmaschinen.pdf
36
References
Capurro, Rafael: Wer ist der Mensch? Überlegungen zu einer vergleichenden Theorie der Agenten. In: Hans-Arthur Marsiske (Ed.): Kriegsmaschinen - Roboter im Militäreinsatz. Hannover 2012, 231-238.
http://www.capurro.de/kriegsmaschinen.pdf
Capurro, Rafael and Nagenborg, Michael (Eds.): Ethics and Robotics. Heidelberg 2009.
ETICA: Ethical Issues of Emerging ICT Applications (FP 7, 2009-2011):Deliverable 3.2 Evaluation Report (M. Rader, ed.)Deliverable 3.2.2 Ethical Evaluation (M. Nageborg, R. Capurro)
http://www.capurro.de/etica_deliv3.2.2.pdf Deliverable 2.2 Normative Issues Report (R. Heersmink, J. van den Hoven, J.
Timmermans)http://www.etica-project.eu/deliverable-files
37
References
ETHICBOTS: Emerging Technoethics of Human Interaction with Communication, Bionics and Robotic Systems (FP 6, 2005-2007):
Deliverable 4 : Analysis of national and international EU regulations and Ethical Councils Opinions related with technologies for the integration of human and artificial entities (R. Capurro, M. Nagenborg, J. Weber, Chr. Pingel)
See also: R. Capurro, M. Nagenborg, J. Weber, Chr. Pingel: Ethical Regulations on Robotics in Europe. In: AI & Society, 22 (2008), 349-366.
Deliverable 5 Technoethical Case Studies in Robotics, Bionics, and Related AI Agent Technologies(R. Capurro, G. Tamburrini, J. Weber, eds.)
http://ethicbots.na.infn.it/documents.php
38
References
Kimura, T, Nakada, M., Suzuki, K., Sankai, Y. (Eds.): Cybernics Technical Reports. Special Issue on Roboethics. University of Tsukuba, March 2011. CYB-2011-011 – CYB-2011-008.
Nishigaki, Toru: Is a Society of Cohabitation with Robots Possible? In: Toru Nishigaki and Tadashi Takenouchi (Eds.): Information Ethics. The Future of Humanities. Nagoya City 2012, 1-25.
Wagner, Cosima: Robotopia Nipponica – Recherchen zur Akzeptanz von Robotern in Japan. Marburg 2013. http://www.japanologie.uni-frankfurt.de/japlehre/English_abstract_Robotopia_Nipponica_CW.pdf