semantic infrastructure for taxonomy 2.0 a new approach to folksonomies and other knowledge...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
Semantic Infrastructure for Taxonomy 2.0 A new approach to folksonomies and other knowledge
representations
Tom ReamyChief Knowledge Architect
KAPS Group
Knowledge Architecture Professional Services
http://www.kapsgroup.com
2
Agenda Introduction - Themes Essentials of Folksonomies
– Advantages, Disadvantages, and Dangers of Folksonomies Improving the Quality of Folksonomies
– Facets and Flickr– Del.icio.is – Topics, Popularity and Findability– LibraryThing – facets, topics, and weirdness
Semantic Infrastructure Solution– Elements of Semantic Infrastructure / Taxonomy 2.0– Evolving Folksonomies– Ontologies and Natural categories
Conclusion
3
KAPS Group: General
Knowledge Architecture Professional Services Virtual Company: Network of consultants – 12-15 Partners – Convera, Inxight, Siderean, FAST, etc. Consulting, Strategy, Knowledge architecture audit Taxonomies: Enterprise, Marketing, Insurance, etc. Services:
– Taxonomy development, consulting, customization– Technology Consulting – Search, CMS, Portals, etc.– Metadata standards and implementation– Knowledge Management: Collaboration, Expertise, e-learning– Applied Theory – Faceted taxonomies, complexity theory, natural
categories
4
2.0 Themes
“Tags are great because you throw caution to the wind, forget about whittling down everything into a distinct set of categories and instead let folks loose categorizing their own stuff on their own terms." - Matt Haughey - MetaFilter
“It’s MySpace meets YouTube meets Wikipedia meets Google – on steroids.”
“It’s ignorance meets egotism meets bad taste meets mob rule – on steroids.” – The Cult of the Amateur – Andrew Keen
“Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,…The best lack all conviction, while the worstAre full of passionate intensity.” - The Second Coming – W.B. Yeats
5
2.0 Themes
Web 2.0 is Dead! Long Live Web 2.0! Hype 2.0 is Dead! Until Hype 4.0
– True Belief meets reality once again. Revolution and Evolution
– Doesn’t anyone do evolution (Web 1.2 anyone?) Wikipedia – users can do it all - NOT
– With the help of 2,000 trusted editors and software, combating the passionate conviction and impact of money
Wisdom of Crowds– Good for guessing jelly beans, not useful tags
Library 2.0 – if it is more Library than 2.0– Social networking best for social networking, not finding
6
Essentials of Folksonomies?
Wikipedia: A folksonomy is an Internet-based information retrieval methodology consisting of collaboratively generated, open-ended labels that categorize content such as Web pages, online photographs, and Web links.
A folksonomy is most notably contrasted from a taxonomy – done by users, not professionals,
Example sites – Del.icio.us and Flickr (not really – no feedback)
It is just metadata that users add Key – social mechanism for seeing other tags
7
Advantages of Folksonomies
Simple (no complex structure to learn)– No need to learn difficult formal classification system
Lower cost of categorization– Distributes cost of tagging over large population
Open ended – can respond quickly to changes Relevance – User’s own terms Support serendipitous form of browsing Easy to tag any object – photo, document, bookmark Better than no tags at all Getting people excited about metadata!
8
Disadvantages of Folksonomies - Quality
They don’t work very well for finding No structure, no conceptual relationships
– Flats lists do not a onomy make
Issues of scale – popular tags already showing a million hits Limited applicability – only useful for non-technical or non-
specialist domains Either personal tags (other’s can’t find) or popularity tags – lose
interesting terms (Power law distribution)– Most people can’t tag very well – learned skill
Errors – misspellings, single words or bad compounds, single use or idiosyncratic use
9
Dangers of Folksonomies
Unwisdom of Crowds– “We find that whole communities suddenly fix their minds
upon one object, and go mad in its pursuit; that millions of people become simultaneously impressed with one delusion, and run after it, till their attention is caught by some new folly more captivating than the first.”
– From witch hunts to tulipomania to stock market crash • Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds
Tyranny of the majority– Popularity drowns quality– Narrowing of choices, lost content
10
Better Folksonomies:
Will social networking make tags better? Not so far – example of Del.icio.us – same tags Quality and Popularity are very different things Most people don’t tag, don’t re-tag Study – folksonomies follow NISO guidelines – nouns, etc –
but do they actually work – see analysis Most tags deal with computers and are created by people
that love to do this stuff – not regular users and infrequent users – Beware true believers!
12
Flickr Facets
Basic Facets – over 90% of content– Place – Amsterdam to Beach – 40%– Events, Date, People, Things / Animals, Color
Subject Matter – less than 1% Works on lower level scales:
– Artparade, tourofbritain, stgilesfair, hideoutblockparty (last weeks)
Faceted navigation – extremely powerful, easy to use to find How to develop automatic facets?
– Design facet system – one time cost, some monitoring– Entity Extraction, suggested placement
13
Del.icio.us Tags
Design blog software music tools reference art video programming webdesign web2.0 mac howto linux tutorial web free news photography shopping blogs css imported education travel javascript food games
Development inspiration politics flash apple tips java google osx business windows iphone science productivity books toread helath funny internet wordpress ajax ruby research humor fun technology search opensource
Photoshop media recipes cool work article marketing security mobile jobs rails lifehacks tutorials resources php social download diy ubuntu freeware portfolio photo movies writing graphics youtube audio online
14
Del.icio.us - Topics, not Facets
High level topics - photography, news, education Get related terms by popularity, not conceptual
– Photography• Synonyms - photo, photos• Related – art, design, images, camera• Related Facet – howto, tutorial, photoshop
Popularity is not quality– Dominance of computer terms– Tyranny of the majority – design (1 MIL), interior design – 3,909
Top 25 – same set, slight order shift – social inertia– New terms - important – iphone, ipod, .net, ebooks,facebook– Dropped terms – adult, babes, britney, naked, sex, sexy
15
Del.icio.us - Folksonomy Findability
Too many hits (where have we heard that before?)– Design – 1 Mil, software – 931,259, sex – 129,468
No plurals, stemming (singular preferred)– Folksonomy – 14,073, folksonomies – 3,843, both – 1,891– Blog-1.7M, blogs – 516,340, Weblog- 155,917, weblogs – 36,434,
blogging – 157,922, bloging – 697– Taxonomy – 9.683, taxonomies – 1,574
Personal tags – cool, fun, funny, etc– Good for social research, not finding documents or sites– How good for personal use? Funny is time dependent
16
Del.icio.us - Improving the Quality
Bundle tags – if used? – Types of relationships – ubuntu – tutorial, howto, reference, tips,
install Ontology Clusters – grow with people and software Taxonomy Clusters – software – Linux – ubuntu Add broad general taxonomy of most popular tags
– Tags as natural categories – build up and down– Start – evolve a simple 2 level taxonomy– People assign tags to a category, build numbers
Evolve quality of tags and emerging structure of tags– Preferred term = popular (Blog/blogs – Books/book)– Add mechanisms – rank tags, taggers, categories
17
Library Thing
Book people aren’t much better at tagging High level concepts – psychology (55,000), religion
(120,000), science (101,000) Issue – variety of terms – cognitive science – need at least
40 other tags to cover the actual field of cognitive science Strange tags – book (19,000) – it’s a book site? Combination of facets and topics
– Facets – Date (16th century, 1950’s, 2007) // Function (owned, not read) // Type (graphic novel, novel) // Genre (horror, mystery)
– Topics – majority like Del.icio.us
18
Enterprise Environment – Taxonomy 2.0
From internet to intranet – we’ve done this before– Remember early Intranets built on Internet model?
Smaller content repositories, more coherent More precise targets – specific documents (the official
version) not web sites More formal – from documents to publishing procedures More control of publishing – corporate policy More options for tagging – part of CM system, policy,
dedicated editor team, reward system
19
Semantic Infrastructure Solution
What won’t work:– Recommendations about count-non-count nouns or singular – plural– Link to online dictionary or Wikipedia – extra work, whole focus is on
ease of tagging – any help has to be immediate and integrated - or done by a central group
New Relationship of Center and Crowd– Not top down or bottom up– Interpenetration of opposites
Integrated Evolving Solution: Content Structures, People, Technology, Policies and Procedures // with Feedback with consequences
20
Semantic Infrastructure: People
Library 2.0 – New librarians – social and intellectual context
New relationship of center and users – more sophisticated support, more freedom, more suggestions, more user input
– - New roles – for users (taggers, part of variety of communities – both distributed and central)
– New roles for central – create feedback system, tweak the evolution of the system, Develop initial candidates
Communities of Practice – apply to tagging, ranking– Community Maps – formal and informal – Map tags to communities – more useful suggestions– Use tags to uncover communities (see tech SNA)
21
Semantic Infrastructure - Technology
Enterprise Content Management– Place to add metadata – of all kinds, not just keywords– Policy support – important, part of job performance– Add tag clouds to input page– More sophisticated displays
• Tag clouds mapped to community map• Tag clusters, taxonomy location
Semantic Software – Inxight, SchemaLogic etc.– Suggest terms based on text, on tag clouds
Social Networking – add semantics– SNA – apply to people and tags
KM – platforms, COP’s – social tags
22
Semantic Infrastructure: Putting it all togetherComplexity Theory and Folksonomies: Feedback
Ranking Methods– Explicit – people rank directly
• Categories, tags, taggers
• Good tags, best bets for terms or categories?
– Implicit – software evaluation, reverse relevance
Ranking Roles– Taggers – everyone (rewards, make it easy and fun)– Meta-taggers – everyone (but levels of meta-taggers)– Editors – tagging system, integration with taxonomy, resolve
disputes, Wikipedia model
23
Content Structures – Best of Both Worlds
Start and end with a formal taxonomy / Ontology– Findability vastly superior– Communication with others – share tags– Take advantage of conceptual relationships
Tagging experience – folksonomies plus – Users can type any word – system looks it up – plurals, synonyms,
preferred terms, spelling variations– Software suggestions – based on content of bookmark, document
and on popular user tags – natural level not top down– New terms flagged and routed to central team
Facets – for both things and documents (faceted taxonomy)– Software suggests facet values, user override – Cognitively simpler task than own value, complex hierarchy
24
Conclusions: Semantic Infrastructure for Taxonomy 2.0
Folksonomies can help – but they need help to evolve better quality
– Fundamental contradiction of ease of tagging and findability will limit usefulness of Internet folksonomies
90% of what you hear about 2.0 is hype – again– 2.0 is a great source for first drafts and social research
Enterprise (Intranets, KM) is where the benefits will happen Semantic Infrastructure solution (people, policy, technology,
semantics) and feedback is best approach Evolve folksonomies, taxonomies, ontologies – not just a central,
top-down design Go Forth and Become Taxonomy Gods!
Questions?
KAPS Group
Knowledge Architecture Professional Services
http://www.kapsgroup.com