sensitive measurements using cold atoms · 2017. 4. 25. · bec optical trap potential e 2 2 1 u...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Sensitive measurements using cold atoms冷却原子を用いた精密計測
Quantum Information Processing Summer School 2010Hotel Sunrise Chinen, Okinawa, Japan August 21, 2010
Takuya Hirano平野 琢也
Department of physics, Gakushuin Univerisity学習院大学理学部物理学科
-
Research on gaseuos BEC
1995 The first creation of gaseous BEC: Rb, Na, Li
two areas
“quantum electronics” “condensed matter physics”
“atomic condensate as a coherent gas”or “Atom lasers”
“BEC as a new quantum fluid”or “BEC as a many-body system”
Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2001By WOLFGANG KETTERLE
applications
cold molecules“ultra-cold chemistry”
atom lithography
precision measurementsgravity, angular velocity,time, magnetic field, …
nonequilibrium physics
unforeseen applications
optical latticequantum simulation
-
Outline
1. Introduction
2. A brief review of atomic BEC
3. Atomic magnetometer
4. Magnetometer using BEC
5. Quantum magnetometer
-
Making of atomic BECMagneto-Optical Trap(MOT)
I
I
Blaser
N~109
Magnetic trap
rz
Bias coil Gradient coil(radial)
Curvature coil(axial) current
atoms
Evaporative cooling
RF
10mm
1.2mm
5mm
50MHz
5MHz
2MHz
1.2MHz NBEC~106
-
1.2mm
1.2m
m
thermal bimodal pure
Time Of Flight measurement of atomic BEC
Critical temperature:~500nK
-
Atoms in a magnetic trap
87Rb
F=2
F=1
mF2
1
0
-1
-2
Magnetic sublevels
5S1/2
1
0
-1
Hyperfine states
Magnetic potential for F = 2
E 〉= 2mF
〉= 1m F
〉= 0m F
〉−= 1m F
〉−= 2m F
position
No spin degrees of freedom in a Magnetic trap
-
Atoms in an optical trap
Optical trap
Far-off detuned laser
BEC
Optical trap potential
2E21U ⋅−= α
∆−∝
P
α : polarizability, E :electric fieldP : laser power∆ : detuning (flaser-fresonace)
5S1/2
5P1/2
5P3/2
D1D2
D1 : 795 nmD2 : 780 nm
lens
spin degrees of freedom are liberated in an optical trap
87Rb
850 nm
-
Lifetime of BEC in Optical Trap - Stretched State (F=2, mF=-2) -
104
105
106
Num
ber
of
conde
nced
atom
s
Trap time (s)
magnetic trapwith rf shield
optical trap
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
s4~
s7~
trap optical
trap magnetic
τ
τ
loss rate
photon scattering rate
2×10-3 /s
(in the region of N < 1×105)
-
A short summary of atomic BEC
• Condensation not only in the momentum space but also in the coordinate space
• Typical number of atoms 105-107, dimension 10-100 µm, life time < several sec.
• Internal degrees of freedom are librated in an optical trap: spinor BEC
F =0 (S =0, I =0)4He*, 40Ca,174Yb, 176Yb
87Rb, 23Na, 7Li, 41K
F =1, 2
85Rb F =2, 3133Cs F =3, 452Cr F =3 (S =3, I =0)
unstable
-
Rb BEC with internal degrees of freedom
・Magnetic sublevels can be coherently coupled, and their populations can be controlled.
・Scattering lengths can be controlled via Feshbach Reaonance.・Rich variety of physics
Spin-exchange collision, Ground-state phase,Phase separation, Spin-squeezing, Quantized vortex, etc…
87Rb
F=1
F=2 -2 -1 0 +1 +2
+1 0 -1
mF low-field seekerhigh-field seeker
-
Crossed Far-Off Resonant Trap (FORT)
Trap depth: ~ 1.0 µK
r (radial)
z (axial)
g
FORT Beam (radial)
coil for magnetic trap
λ : 850 nm
beam waist radiusradial : 90 µm (21Hz)axial : 32 µm (140Hz)
5 deg.
FORT Beam(axial)
Energy level diagram of 87Rb(ground hyperfine states)
Δ=58 kHz
Initial state
mF =+2+1
0
-1
-2
B = 20 G
14.078 MHz
14.020 MHz
F = 1
6.8 GHz
Zeeman splitting at
B=20GF = 2
mF =+1
0
-1
4x105atoms
Experimental setup and spin-state manipulation
-
Energy level diagram of 87Rb at 20 G
Time evolution and imaging
TOF15ms for F =2
Transmission0 1
F = 1 and 2
Stern-Gerlachmethod (SG)
18ms for F =1
+2 +1 0 -1 -2-1 0 +1
Spin-state manipulation
F = 2
mF
mF
initial state
+2 +1 0 -1 -2
rf
+1 0 -1
Microwave 6.8GHz+ rf 2.0 MHz
2-photon transition(magnetic dipole transition)
F = 1
|2,-1>
|1,+1>g
z
-
Optical Magnetometer
review article: D. Budker and M. Romalis, Nature Phys. 3, 227 (2007).
pump light
B
probe light
-
"A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer," I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred & M. V. Romalis, Nature, Vol. 422, pp. 596-599 (2003).
VtnTB
2
1γ
δ = )12(/ += Ig B hµγ
-
"A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer," I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred & M. V. Romalis, Nature, Vol. 422, pp. 596-599 (2003).
1チャンネルの雑音(磁気シールドの熱雑音)
隣接チャンネルの差からもとめた固有雑音
-
Why magnetometer is important: Numerous and diverse applications
• detection of magnetic field from brain and heartnon-invasive studies of individual cortical modules in the brain
• detection of signals of NMR and MRI• detection of microparticles• detection of magnetic anomalies
SQUID脳磁計(横河電機: MEGvision)
Magnetic fields recorded from a brain in response to an auditory stimulation by a series of short clicks (averaged over about 600 presentations). The prominent feature at 100 ms after the stimulus is the evoked response in the auditory cortex, most clearly seen as a difference in the magnetic fields recorded by different channels. In contrast, ambient field drifts, such as those seen before the stimulus, generate similar signals in all channels. (Xia, H., Baranga, A. B., Hoff man, D. & Romalis, M. V. Magnetoencephalography with an atomic magnetometer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 211104 (2006).)
-
Outline
1. Introduction
2. A brief review of atomic BEC
3. Atomic magnetometer
4. Magnetometer using BEC
5. Quantum magnetometer
-
"High-Resolution Magnetometry with a Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate," M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 98, 200801 (2007).
Direct Nondestructive Imaging of Magnetization in a Spin-1 Bose-Einstein Gas,J. M. Higbie, L. E. Sadler, S. Inouye, A. P. Chikkatur, S.R. Leslie, K. L. Moore, V. Savalli, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn,PRL 95, 050401 (2005).
-
"High-Resolution Magnetometry with a Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate," M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 98, 200801 (2007).
-
Quantum magnetometer
“Squeezed spin states,” Masahiro Kitagawa and Masahito Ueda, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138–5143 (1993)
Angular momentum system
),,( zyx SSSS =r
Cyclic commutation relation
kijkji SiSS ε=],[222
41))(( kji SSS ≥∆∆
For N atoms in mF=F along the quantization axis z,FNSz =
A magnetic field along y axis causes a rotation of S in x-z plane. Polarization of light propagating along x will be rotated propotional to Sx. This measumentis limited by the projection noise of the atom,
2/2
)( 2 FNSS zx ==∆and light shot noise of polarization measurement.
-
"Sub-Projection-Noise Sensitivity in Broadband Atomic Magnetometry," M. Koschorreck, M. Napolitano, B. Dubost, and M. W. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 104, 093602 (2010).
Laser cooled Rb atoms, 106, 25µK, dipole trap20 times QND measurement w/o dipole trap
“Spin Squeezing of a Cold Atomic Ensemble with the Nuclear Spin of One-Half”,T. Takano, M. Fuyama, R. Namiki, and Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033601 (2009).
-
"Squeezed-Light Optical Magnetometry," Florian Wolfgramm, Alessandro Cerè, Federica A. Beduini, Ana Predojević, Marco Koschorreck, and Morgan W. Mitchell , Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 105, 053601 (2010).
Hot Rb atoms, 794.7 nm, D1 line
-3.2 dB, 3.2 x 10-8 T/√Hz
-
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
1
2
3
4
Num
ber
of at
om
s (×
10
5 )
Trap time (ms)
8
Decay of F=2, mF=0 BEC in OT at B = 1.5G
Time evolutionmF = -1 0 +1
mF=±1 components appeared during decay process.Atoms in BEC initially polarized in F=2, mF=0 state.
Total-spin-conserved spin-relaxation processTrap time
(ms)
0
10
20
30
80
mF=0mF=±1mF=±2total
Kuwamoto et al. Phys. Rev. A 69, 063604 (2004).
-
Rb BEC with internal degrees of freedom
C1
C2
Cyclic
Antiferro-magnetic
Ferro-magnetic
Ciobanu, Yip, & Ho, PRA 61, 033607 (2000).Koashi & Ueda, PRL84, 1066 (2000).
731074
74
4202
2
242
1
aaam
c
aam
c
+−=
−=
h
h
π
π
87Rb
F=1
F=2 -2 -1 0 +1 +2
+1 0 -1
mF low-field seekerhigh-field seeker
・ Ground-state phase of 87Rb BEC
Measured coefficients
( )21 4c mπh( )22 4c mπh
( )0.99 0.06 Ba+ ±( )0.53 0.58 Ba− ±
Widera et al., New Journal of Physics 8, 152 (2006)
87Rb
New quantum phase!!
-
Hiroki Sato & Masahito UedaPhys.Rev.A 72, 053628 (2005)
Above configuration appears at 100mG.
Evolution of mF = -2 & mF = +2 BEC mixture
mF = -2 & +2initial configuration
If F = 2 87Rb spinorBEC is “cyclic”,
mF = -2 & 0 & +250~300 ms evolution
external magnetic field : 45mGTrap time
(ms)
50
200
mF=-2 mF=+2
300
0
100
Total remained atoms
Relative population
No other components grew ...
-
Miscibility of BECs
Mixture of binary BECs miscible immiscible?
BECs or BECsBECs
22112
12 aaa > 22112
12 aaa >Phase-separation conditionPhase-separation condition
time-evolution
Difference of scattering length gives rise to phase-separation.
[2] D.S. Hall et al., PRL 81, 1539 (1998).[3] K.M. Mertes et al., PRL 99, 190402 (2007).
(87Rb |F=2, mF= +1> and |1, -1>)
Scattering length in (2,-1) + (1,+1) states
[1] A. Widera et al., New J. Phys. 8, 152 (2006).95.00 Ba( *[2])22 95.68 Ba a= 11 100.40 Ba a= 21 97.66 Ba a=[1] [1] *[2]
-
Feshbach Resonance in mixed spin states
change in magnetic field strength
R
resonance between atomic and molecular states
T. Voltz et al., PRA 68, 012702(R) (2003).
A. Merte et al., PRL 89, 283202 (2002).
two-body loss rates scattering length
@ 1007 G(1,+1)+(1,+1)
M. Erhard et al., PRL 69, 032705 (2004).
@ 9.09 G
E.G. van Kempen et al., PRL 88, 093201 (2002).
@ 9.1 G
@ 1.9 G
• Prediction • Experiment Magnetic field dependence of two-body loss rates(2,+1)+(1,-1)
(2,-1)+(1,+1)
(2,-1)+(1,+1)
-
Phase-separation near Feshbach resonance
(2,-1)
(2,-1)
(1,+1)
(1,+1)
-
現状:磁気シールドルームでBEC装置の再構築中
-0.01
-0.008
-0.006
-0.004
-0.002
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
23:2
9'1
9
01:0
9'1
9
02:4
9'1
9
04:2
9'1
9
06:0
9'1
9
07:4
9'1
9
09:2
9'1
9
時間
磁場
(G
)
外
内
山手線運休時間
今後の研究計画・F=2 Rb BECによる磁力計(バークレイはF=1)・F=1とF=2のスイッチング・フェッシュバッハ共鳴の磁力計への応用:磁場に敏感な現象・標準量子限界を超える感度:スピンスクイージング,光のスクイージング