simulation study of reno-50

21
Simulation study of RENO-50 Jungsic Park Seoul National University RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea

Upload: norris

Post on 24-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Simulation study of RENO-50. Jungsic Park Seoul National University. RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea. Preliminary RENO-50 Detector Concept. Concentric cylindrical detector. Initial concept is same as RENO. No gamma-catcher region and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulation study of RENO-50

Simulation study of RENO-50

Jungsic ParkSeoul National University

RENO-50 International WorkshopJune 13-14, 2013

Hoam Faculty House, Korea

Page 2: Simulation study of RENO-50

Preliminary RENO-50 Detector Concept

25 m27 m

RENO-50

25 m27 m

LS (10 kton)15000 10”

PMTs

Mineral Oil

32 m

32 m

Water

KamLAND x 10

1000 10” OD PMTs Concentric cylindrical detector.

- Initial concept is same as RENO.- No gamma-catcher region and filled with Liquid Scintillator Only.

- Install 15000, 10 inch inner PMTs and 1000, 10 inch outer PMTs.

Page 3: Simulation study of RENO-50

RENO-50 Detector with Monte-Carlo

Target : Acrylic, 25m*25mBuffer : Stainless-Steel, 27m*27mVeto : Concrete, 32m*32m

PMT attachment scheme.

Barrel : 50 raw * 200 column (9*26 for RENO)Interval of each PMT center is 50cm.

Top & Bottom

2501 PMTs for each region. (60 for RENO)45cm

45cm

2700cm

2700cm

Page 4: Simulation study of RENO-50

Energy resolutionAssume that optical properties and thickness of detector materials are same as RENO detector.

For the energy resolution, we generate single gamma of various energy (1~10MeV)at the detector center.

Using the initial concept, we get~7% resolution @ 1MeV and calculated PMT coverage is 24%. PMT coverage : 23.95%

Page 5: Simulation study of RENO-50

sensitivity test by Monte-Carlo.

Using the Pseudo-experiment , check the sensitivity of θ12 and Δm221 measurement.

True value : varied varied

002320

0000760

1002

855602

231

221

132

122

.

.

.sin

.sin

m

m

fixed

Measurement of θ12 and Δm221

Assume 10kton * 20GW * 5years exposure

002320

1002

855602

0000760

231

132

122

221

.

.sin

.sin

.

m

m

fixed

Page 6: Simulation study of RENO-50

222

2

26

112

2

11

)()()(

)*(

))(*)(**)(*exp*(

reb

bbkgbkgsignal

roscirbkgsignal

feb

NNN

funcefNbNN

Nsignal = 30000 (oscillation , 10kton, 20GW, 5years, 100% efficiency & Livetime )Nbkg = 300 (~1% level)

ε = 1.0 (detection efficiency)b,e, f : pull parameter (e : efficiency, f : reactor)σeff = 0.015 (1.5%)σr = 0.03 (current limit : ~3% goal is below 1%)σb = 0.05 (5%)

Nexpr : Expected event number without oscillationFuncosci(θ12) : oscillation / No oscillation (fraction)

Χ2 fitting with pulls for θ12

Page 7: Simulation study of RENO-50

True value : 0.8556Fitting value : 0.8552 +- 0.0162 (1σ) ~1.89%

Χ2 fitting result

σeff = 0.015 (1.5%)σr = 0.03 (3%)σb = 0.05 (5%)

Page 8: Simulation study of RENO-50

Statistics part decrease very rapidly.The main portion is systematic part.

Statistical part only for θ12

Page 9: Simulation study of RENO-50

Uncertainty of detection efficiency and reactor uncertainty are both important.

Systematical part for θ12

We assumed σb is zero.

Page 10: Simulation study of RENO-50

222

2

26

1

22111

1

2

)()()(

)*(

))(*)(**)(*exp*(

r

f

e

e

b

b

bibkgNi

bkgNisignalN

rmoscifuncefr

iNbibkgNi

signalNNbin

i

For the Δm221 , we should use the spectrum shape.

N_signal, N_expr N_bkg should be considered bin by bin.Assumed that background is flat. (same number for each bin content)

50bin/MeV 1.8 ~ 8 MeV range cut

Χ2 fitting with pulls for Δm221

ε = 1.0 (detection efficiency)b,e, f : pull parameter (b: background, e : efficiency, f : reactor)σeff = 0.015 (1.5%)σr = 0.03 (current limit : ~3% goal is below 1%)σb = 0.05 (5%)

Page 11: Simulation study of RENO-50

Systematical part for Δm221

True value : 7.6e-5

Fitting value : (7.598 +- 0.048)e-5 (1σ) ~0.64%σeff = 0.015 (1.5%)σr = 0.03 (3%)σb = 0.05 (5%)

Page 12: Simulation study of RENO-50

Expected neutrino visible energy spectrum of RENO-50

002320

0000760

1002

855602

231

221

132

122

.

.

.)(sin

.)(sin

m

m

Page 13: Simulation study of RENO-50

Energy resolution plays a crucial role to RENO-50Solid line : Normal HierarchyDashed line : Inverted Hierarchy

So, How can we increase the energy resolution ?

@1MeV

Page 14: Simulation study of RENO-50

1. Increase the attenuation length of Liquid Scintillator. - 1.5 times current value : 18.7m @ 430 nm - 2.0 times current value : 24.9m @ 430 nm

2. Increase the PMT Quantum Efficiencies. - 1.25 times current value : 30.0% @ 427 nm - 1.5 times current value : 36.0% @ 427 nm

3. Increase the PMT coverage. - 25000 PMTs : 40.86 % coverage

Cf) Default value 24% PMT coverage Att.length of LS is 12.4m @ 430 nm PMT QE is 24% @ 427 nm

Improve the optical properties

Page 15: Simulation study of RENO-50

24% @ 430 nmMaximum 25% @ 390nm

PMT Quantum Efficiency of R7081 Hamamatsu 10 inch PMT

Page 16: Simulation study of RENO-50

Mineral OilLiquid Scintillator

Liquid Scintillator : 12.4m @ 430 nmMineral Oil : 17.0m @ 430 nm

Attenuation Length of Current Materials.

Page 17: Simulation study of RENO-50

Increase the Attenuation Length

Attenuation length should be comparable of detector size.

Page 18: Simulation study of RENO-50

Increase the PMT Quantum Efficiency

Page 19: Simulation study of RENO-50

Increase the PMT Coverage

Page 20: Simulation study of RENO-50

Applying all the Improvement Effect

It’s very challenging task to acquire ~3% energy resolution.

Page 21: Simulation study of RENO-50

Summary

RENO-50 Monte-Carlo preliminary version was made.

Statistical uncertainty decrease rapidly within few years.

Detection efficiency and reactor uncertainty contributes to systematic a lot.

Including other uncertainty parameters is still keep going.

3% energy resolution is very challenging task. We should improve all the Optical properties about twice. It’s time to think about the improvement method all together.