VERSITET

ANJA BECHMANN DIGITAL FOOTPRINTS RESEARCH GROUP

AARHUS UNIVERSITET 17. SEPTEMBER 2014

UNI

Sociale medier og socialisering

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

PROGRAM › 12.15 Gruppeøvelser › 13.10 Pause › 13.30-14.15 ”Virksomhedsbesøg” › 14.15-15.00 Gruppeøvelse fortsat og opsamling

2

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

TEKSTER ›  Van Dijck, J. (2013): The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media, Oxford

University Press, chapter 2: ›    ›  boyd, d.m., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and

scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. ›    ›  Marwick, A. & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context

collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. ›    ›  Kaplan, A. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities

of Social Media. Business Horizons (2010) 53, 59—68. ›    ›  Caers, R., Couck, M, Stough, T., Vigna, C. & Bois, C.U (2013). Facebook: A literature

review, New Media & Society, 15 (9): 982-10002: ›   

3

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

GRUPPEØVELSE 1 › 3 personer 15 min. – 15 min opsamling

› Van Dijck: › 1. Hvilke perspektiver ligger Van Dijck på sociale medier? (microsystems

› 2. Hvad mangler I hendes teoretiske rammeværk og I de seks perspektiver – er der forhold der ikke lader sig beskrive/indfange/analysere?

4

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

› Can we describe this more empirically than van Dijk did in her book – describing microelements on a microlevel through qualitative methods?

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

QUESTIONS/CRITIQUE AB ›  Difficult to separate different microsystems ›  Would latour work in this way? ›  How does latour /ANT correspond with policital economy approach – what would I

label van Dijck’s approach as…? ›  Do I like her macro level approach – can microsystems be investigated on this level

without empirical data/studies? ›  What does she bring to the table that we did not already know? Focus on

interoperability – but she treats them separately in order to get to the interoperable points which stay on a somewhat superficial level (conclusions) – shared: algorithmic logic, interoperability of data, need for legal/regulatory improvement

›  Result: Does the user become victim/Are they victims of capitalism/internet platforms/companies/organizations?

›  MEN stærk analytisk framework til at kortlægge udnyttelse af brugeres netværkskommunikation via forskellige socio-økonomisk og tekno-kulturelle aspekter af fænomenet (seks elementer). Også god til definition af forsk sider af SoMe (sociale medier).

›    7

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

GRUPPEØVELSE 2 ›  2 personer på tværs – 15 min. – 10 min opsamling

›  boyd, d.m., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.

›    ›  Kaplan, A. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and

opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons (2010) 53, 59—68. ›    1. Hvordan definerer de to tekster sociale medier? 2. hvordan adskiller de sig I deres fokusområder 3. kritik? (hvad tager de ikke højde for?) 4. lav jeres egen definition med reference til teksterne.

8

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES › Are applications that enable users to connect by creating personal information profiles, inviting friends and colleagues to have access to those profiles, and sending emails and instant messages between each other (kaplan & haenlein)

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES › Allow individuals to 1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, 2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and 3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. (boyd & ellison)

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

PERSPECTIVES › Impression management and friendship performance

› Networks and network structure › Bridging online and offline social networks › Privacy › Other (ethnicity, gender etc.)

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014 13

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

GRUPPEØVELSE 3 ›  3 personer på tværs af tekster 15 min 15 min opsamling ›    ›  Marwick, A. & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users,

context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133.

›    ›  Caers, R., Couck, M, Stough, T., Vigna, C. & Bois, C.U (2013). Facebook: A literature

review, New Media & Society, 15 (9): 982-10002: ›   

›  1. Hvordan beskriver teksterne socialisering på henholdsvis Twitter og Facebook? 2. Hvilke perspektiver tages der ikke højde for – kan I liste andre socialiseringsformer, der kunne være interessante at analysere?

14

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

Sociale medier og socialisering ANJA BECHMANN

17. SEPTEMBER 2014

OPSAMLING › Hvordan kan SoMe analyseres › Hvordan defineres SoMe › Hvad kendetegner twitter socialisering › Hvad kendetegner facebook socialisering

15