soil classification - chihping lin...
TRANSCRIPT
Soil Classification
ChihChih--Ping LinPing LinNational National ChiaoChiao TungTung [email protected]@mail.nctu.edu.tw
Soil Mechanics −
Outline
1.1. PurposePurpose
2.2. Classification SystemsClassification Systems
3.3. The Unified Soil Classification System The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)(USCS)
4.4. American Association of State Highway and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials System (AASHTO)Transportation Officials System (AASHTO)
PurposeClassifying soils into groups with similar behavior, Classifying soils into groups with similar behavior,
in terms of in terms of simplesimple indices, can provide geotechnical indices, can provide geotechnical engineers a general guidance about engineering engineers a general guidance about engineering properties of the soils through the properties of the soils through the accumulated accumulated experienceexperience..
Simple indices
GSD, LL, PI
Classification system
(Language)
Estimate engineering properties
Achieve engineering
purposesUse the
accumulated experience
Communicate between
engineers
Classification Systems
Two commonly used systems:Two commonly used systems:
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).
American Association of State Highway and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) SystemTransportation Officials (AASHTO) System
Unified Soil Classification SystemOrigin of USCS:
This system was first developed by Professor A. Casagrande(1948) for the purpose of airfield construction during World WarII. Afterwards, it was modified by Professor Casagrande, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to enable the system to be applicable to dams, foundations, and other construction (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981). ASTM D2487
Four major divisions:(1) Coarse-grained(2) Fine-grained(3) Organic soils(4) Peat
Group Symbol Group Symbol –– Group NameGroup Namee.g. SM e.g. SM –– Silty sand with gravelSilty sand with gravel
Definition of Grain Size
Boulders CobblesGravel Sand Silt and
ClayCoarse Fine Coarse FineMedium
300 mm 75 mm
19 mm
No.4
4.75 mmNo.10
2.0 mm
No.40
0.425 mm
No.200
0.075 mm
No specific grain size-use Atterberg limits
Group SymbolsSoil symbols:Soil symbols:
G: GravelG: Gravel
S: SandS: Sand
M: SiltM: Silt
C: ClayC: Clay
O: OrganicO: Organic
Pt: PeatPt: Peat
Gradation symbols:Gradation symbols:
W: WellW: Well--gradedgraded
P: PoorlyP: Poorly--gradedgraded
Fine ComponentFine Component
C: ClayeyC: Clayey
M: SiltyM: Silty
Liquid limit symbols:Liquid limit symbols:
H: High LL (LL>50)H: High LL (LL>50)
L: Low LL (LL<50)L: Low LL (LL<50)
Example:
SW, Well-graded sand
SC, Clayey sand
SM, Silty sand,
MH, Elastic silt
)sandsfor(
6Cand3C1
)gravelsfor(
4Cand3C1
soilgradedWell
uc
uc
≥<<
≥<<−
Group Names
The group symbol was enhanced by addition The group symbol was enhanced by addition of several group names for each group symbol.of several group names for each group symbol.e.g. SM e.g. SM –– Silty sand with gravelSilty sand with gravel
Noun = Primary componentNoun = Primary component
Adjective = Secondary component or further explanation of Adjective = Secondary component or further explanation of first componentfirst component
““with with …”…” =Tertiary component=Tertiary component
Adjective Noun “with .”
General Guidance
Coarse-grained soils:
Gravel Sand
Fine-grained soils:
Silt ClayNO.200
0.075 mm
2. Gradation orFine component
Grain size distribution(Cu and Cc)
2. CompressibilityPL, LL(Plasticity chart)
50 %
NO. 4
4.75 mm
50%1. MajorComponent
Required tests: Sieve analysis and Atterberg limits (P#40)
Initial Classification
FineFine--grained soilgrained soilP#200 > 50%P#200 > 50%
CoarseCoarse--grained soilgrained soilP#200 < 50%P#200 < 50%
Highly Organic SoilHighly Organic SoilPrimarily organic materialPrimarily organic materialDark brown, dark gray, or black colorDark brown, dark gray, or black colorOrganic odorOrganic odorSoft consistencySoft consistency
If P#200 > 5%, conduct Atterberg limits tests on the soil passing #40
Conduct sieve analysis test
Classification of fine-grained soils
(Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)
LL
PI
HL
• The A-line generally separates the more claylike materials from silty materials, and the organics from the inorganics.
• The U-line indicates the upper bound for general soils.
Note: If the measured limits of soils are on the left of U-line, they should be rechecked.
Plasticity Chart
Classification of coarse-grained soils
P#200<50%
G(P#4<50%)
P#200
<5% 5-12% >12%
GSD(W,P)
PlasticityChart(M,C)
Both
S(P#4<50%)
P#200
<5% 5-12% >12%
GSD(W,P)
PlasticityChart(M,C)
Both
)sandsfor(
6Cand3C1
)gravelsfor(
4Cand3C1
soilgradedWell
uc
uc
≥<<
≥<<−
Organic Soils
Highly organic soilsHighly organic soils-- Peat (Group symbol PT)Peat (Group symbol PT)−− A sample composed primarily of vegetable tissue in various stageA sample composed primarily of vegetable tissue in various stages of s of
decomposition and has a fibrous to amorphous texture, a darkdecomposition and has a fibrous to amorphous texture, a dark--brown brown to black color, and an organic odor should be designated as a hito black color, and an organic odor should be designated as a highly ghly organic soil and shall be classified as peat, PT.organic soil and shall be classified as peat, PT.
OOrganic clay or silt( group symbol OL or OH):rganic clay or silt( group symbol OL or OH):−− ““The soilThe soil’’s liquid limit (LL) after oven drying is less than 75 % of its s liquid limit (LL) after oven drying is less than 75 % of its
liquid limit before oven drying.liquid limit before oven drying.”” If the above statement is true, then If the above statement is true, then the first symbol is O.the first symbol is O.
−− The second symbol is obtained by locating the values of PI and LThe second symbol is obtained by locating the values of PI and LL L (not oven dried) in the plasticity chart. (not oven dried) in the plasticity chart.
Summary of Soil Classification
Coarse-grained material
Grain size distribution
Fine-grained material
LL, PI
(Santamarina et al., 2001)
Highly
(Santamarina et al., 2001)
Highly
Example
Passing No.200 sieve 30 %
Passing No.4 sieve 70 %
LL= 33
PI= 12
PI= 0.73(LL-20), A-line
PI=0.73(33-20)=9.49
SC (≥15% gravel)
Clayey sand with gravel
Borderline Cases (Dual Symbols)For the following three conditions, a dual symbol should be For the following three conditions, a dual symbol should be
used.used.
CoarseCoarse--grained soils with 5% grained soils with 5% -- 12% fines.12% fines.−− About 7 % fines can change the hydraulic conductivity of the About 7 % fines can change the hydraulic conductivity of the
coarsecoarse--grained media by orders of magnitudegrained media by orders of magnitude..
−− The first symbol indicates whether the coarse fraction is well oThe first symbol indicates whether the coarse fraction is well or r poorly graded. The second symbol describe the contained fines. Fpoorly graded. The second symbol describe the contained fines. For or example: SPexample: SP--SM, poorly graded sand with silt.SM, poorly graded sand with silt.
FineFine--grained soils with limits within the shaded zone. (PI grained soils with limits within the shaded zone. (PI between 4 and 7 and LL between about 12 and 25).between 4 and 7 and LL between about 12 and 25).−− It is hard to distinguish between the silty and more claylike maIt is hard to distinguish between the silty and more claylike materials.terials.
−− CLCL--ML: Silty clay, SCML: Silty clay, SC--SM: Silty, clayed sand.SM: Silty, clayed sand.
Soil contain similar fines and coarseSoil contain similar fines and coarse--grained fractions.grained fractions.−− possible dual symbols GMpossible dual symbols GM--MLML
Borderline Cases (Summary)
(Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials system
Origin of AASHTO: (For road construction)
•This system was originally developed by Hogentogler and Terzaghi in 1929 as the Public Roads Classification System. Afterwards, there are several revisions. The present AASHTO (1978) system is primarily based on the version in 1945. (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)
•Rated soils according to their suitability for support roadway pavement
•Assign a group classification and a group index to the soilA-1 ………A-8 0 ………20
best soil … worst soil good soil … poor soil
Definition of Grain Size
Boulders Gravel Sand Silt-Clay
Coarse Fine
75 mm No.4
4.75 mmNo.40
0.425 mm
No.200
0.075 mm
No specific grain size-use Atterberglimits
General GuidanceThe required tests are sieve analysis and The required tests are sieve analysis and AtterbergAtterberg limits.limits.8 major groups: A1~ A7 (with several subgroups) and 8 major groups: A1~ A7 (with several subgroups) and organic soils A8organic soils A8
The group index, an empirical formula, is used to further The group index, an empirical formula, is used to further evaluate soils within a group (subgroups).evaluate soils within a group (subgroups).The original purpose of this classification system is used for The original purpose of this classification system is used for road construction (road construction (subgradesubgrade rating).rating).
A4 ~ A7A1 ~ A3
Granular Materials
≤ 35% pass No. 200 sieve
Silt-clay Materials
≥ 36% pass No. 200 sieve
Using LL and PI separates silty materials from clayey materials
Using LL and PI separates silty materials from clayey materials (only for A2 group)
Classification
Das, 1998
Classification (Cont.)
Das, 1998
Note:
The first group from the left to fit the test data is the correct AASHTO classification.
Group Index
[ ])10PI)(15F(01.0
)40LL(005.02.0)35F(GI
200
200
−−+−+−=
)10PI)(15F(01.0GI 200 −−=For Group A-2-6 and A-2-7
The first term is determined by the LL
The second term is determined by the PI
In general, the rating for a pavement subgrade is inversely proportional to the group index, GI.
use the second term only
F200: percentage passing through the No.200 sieve
ExamplePassing No.200 86%
LL=70, PI=32
LL-30=40 > PI=32
[ ]
3347.33
)10PI)(15F(01.0
)40LL(005.02.0)35F(GI
200
200
≅=−−+
−+−=
Round off A-7-5(33)