species diversity

87
Species Diversity

Upload: baka

Post on 19-Feb-2016

73 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Species Diversity. What do we mean by diversity? Species Richness Count Species/area Species/number 2. Heterogeneity = Richness + evenness 3. Scales of diversity Alpha Beta Gamma. Measures of diversity sensitive to both richness and evenness Simpson’s Index - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Species Diversity

Species Diversity

Page 2: Species Diversity

What do we mean by diversity?

1. Species RichnessCountSpecies/areaSpecies/number

2. Heterogeneity = Richness + evenness3. Scales of diversity

AlphaBetaGamma

Page 3: Species Diversity
Page 4: Species Diversity
Page 5: Species Diversity

Measures of diversity sensitive to both richness and

evenness

Simpson’s Index D = 1/Σ pi

2

Shannon IndexH’ = - Σ( pi log pi) or exp(H’)

Page 6: Species Diversity

What do we mean by diversity?

1. Species RichnessCountSpecies/areaSpecies/number

2. Heterogeneity = Richness + evenness3. Scales of diversity

AlphaBetaGamma

Page 7: Species Diversity
Page 8: Species Diversity

β=γ/αγ = α + β

Additive Partitioning of Diversity:

(Wagner et al. 2003)

α1

α2

α3

α4

β 3

β 2

β 1

γ

Page 9: Species Diversity

Global Patterns of diversity

1. Islands2. Climate 3. Latitude

Dependence of these patterns on grain size?

Page 10: Species Diversity
Page 11: Species Diversity

Number of species of reptiles on Caribbean islands

Page 12: Species Diversity

Species – Area RelationshipS = c A z z ~ 0.3

•Galapagos – Land Plants.325•West Indies – Reptiles. & Amph..301•Bahamas – Orchids .31•West Indies – Carabids .34•East Indies – Ants .30•East Indies – Birds .28

Page 13: Species Diversity

MacArthur and Wilson 1967

Assumptions:

1. The immigration rate decreases as the number of species on the island increases. This is expected because competition increases and the number of available niches decreases.

2. The extinction rate increases with increasing species number. This is expected because more species implies greater competition.

Equilibrium theory

Page 14: Species Diversity
Page 15: Species Diversity

Assumptions:

1. The immigration rate decreases as the number of species on the island increases. This is expected because competition increases and the number of available niches decreases.

2. The extinction rate increases with increasing species number. This is expected because more species implies greater competition.

3. For a given number of species, immigration decreases with increasing distance from the mainland. That is, the farther the island is from the mainland, the less frequent Long-distance dispersal events will be.

Page 16: Species Diversity
Page 17: Species Diversity

Assumptions:

1. The immigration rate decreases as the number of species on the island increases. This is expected because competition increases and the number of available niches decreases.

2. The extinction rate increases with increasing species number. This is expected because more species implies greater competition.

3. For a given number of species, immigration decreases with increasing distance from the mainland. That is, the farther the island is from the mainland, the less frequent Long-distance dispersal events will be.

4. For a given number of species, the extinction rate increases with decreasing island size. That is, populations on smaller islands have a greater risk of extinction because their population sizes are lower.

Page 18: Species Diversity

Equilibrium theory has led to a large body of theory and observation to which we will return in the next lecture .

Page 19: Species Diversity

Climate as a determinant of diversity

Page 20: Species Diversity
Page 21: Species Diversity

Latitudinal gradient

Breeding bird diversityGreenland 56 (840,000 mi2)New York 105N Am. North of Mexico 650Guatemala 469 (42,000 mi2)Columbia 1395+ (440,000 =1/16 N. Am area)

Page 22: Species Diversity

Ant species Arctic Alaska 3 (66-72) Alaska 7 (55-72) Iowa 73 (41-43) Cuba 101 (20-

23 N) Trinidad >134 San Paulo, Brazil >222 (20-25 S) Tucuman, Argentina 139 (26-

28) Buenos Aires, Argentina 103 (33-39) Humid western Patagonia 19 (40-52) Tierra del Fuego 2 (43-55)

Page 23: Species Diversity

Latitude and grain size

Snakes per political unit (large grain)Canada 22US 126Mexico 293

Trees per 1000 m2 (small grain)Canadian boreal forest ~2N. US Deciduous forest ~8North Carolina Piedmont ~15

(to 30)Panama & Columbia ~100 Pluvial Columbia >260

Page 24: Species Diversity

Willig et al. 2003. Annual Reviews E&S

Page 25: Species Diversity
Page 26: Species Diversity
Page 27: Species Diversity
Page 28: Species Diversity
Page 29: Species Diversity
Page 30: Species Diversity

Willig et al. 2003. Annual Reviews E&S

Page 31: Species Diversity

Exceptions?• Often narrow specialist taxonomic groups

– Ichneumonid wasps– Saxifrages

• Buffered environments– endo and ecotoparasites of vertebrates– aquatic plants– secondary marine vertebrates

Willig et al. 2003. Annual Reviews E&S

Page 32: Species Diversity

Willig et al. 2003. Annual Reviews E&S

Page 33: Species Diversity

Global Mechanisms1. Area, Heterogeneity & Geometry2. Time (Age, Time , History, Stability?)3. Climate/Environment

- Favorableness of climate or environment- Constancy, stability or predictability of

climate or environment - Energy-diversity or Species-energy Theory - Productivity

4. Biotic interactions or Coevolution- Competition - Predation

Page 34: Species Diversity

Area & Heterogeneity • More connected (contiguous) area permits

greater population size, lower extinction.• Premise: More contiguous area of uniform

environment in tropics then in temperate to arctic latitudes; tropical area in one block

• Question: Corrected for area, does diversity reach similar levels across latitudes?

Page 35: Species Diversity

Mid-domain effect• Random placement of species ranges within

a bounded domain• Null models all produce latitudinal gradients,

but with different specific attributes.– Unconstrained– Constrained by range midpoints– Constrained by the distribution of range

sizes• Species wholly contained in any geographic

domain should exhibit a mid-domain peak.

Colwell & Hurtt 1994

Page 36: Species Diversity

Time (Age, Time , History,

stability?)• Evolutionary time:

– More time for evolution to produce species;

– fewer extinctions in stable environments.• Ecological time:

– More time for species to colonize appropriate habitat.

• Premise: the tropics have sustained less drastic change in environmental conditions over time

• Question: Does species richness increase without limit?

Page 37: Species Diversity

Favorableness of climate or environment

• Fewer species can tolerate climatic extremes.

• Premise: ideal conditions for life are found in the tropics

• Questions: What is the limit to evolutionary rate as a function of latitude?

Page 38: Species Diversity
Page 39: Species Diversity
Page 40: Species Diversity

Constancy, stability or predictability of climate or

environment • Fewer species can tolerate varying

environments; those that do tolerate great ranges of environment have broad niches

• Premise: seasons less pronounced in tropical latitudes

• Problem: some species-rich environments do occur in seasonal environments; some stable environments are poor in species.

• Questions: Do fluctuating environments select for broad tolerance, broad niches, and low specialization?

Page 41: Species Diversity

Variant – speed of speciation

Page 42: Species Diversity

Rapoport-Rescue Hypothesis

• Range size varies inversely with latitude• Because seasonality increases with

latitude, species with broad tolerance are found at higher latitudes

• Northern hemisphere fits better than soutehrn hemisphere

Page 43: Species Diversity

Energy & Productivity• Without production, no diversity• More primary production allows more

energy and thus more species• The Paradox of Enrichment (diversity

increases and then decreases with productivity)

• Problem: many species poor habitats are highly productive, and some unproductive habitats are highly diverse

• Question: Why do competitive dominants evolve in some ecosystems

Page 44: Species Diversity
Page 45: Species Diversity

Biotic interactions or Coevolution

• Species diversity begets possible interactions, leading to more species

• Premise: tropics, being more diverse, have more specialized coevolutionary relationships

• Questions: – Does this argument require that there already be

a diversity gradient for this effect to be more pronounced in the tropics?

– Does the latitudinal gradient reflect a gradient from selection by biotic interaction to selection by physical factors

Page 46: Species Diversity

Competition • Competitive exclusion limits richness.• Competition promotes specialization,

divergence, and niche partitioning.• Premise: tropics have higher competition,

more niche divergence.• Question: competitive pressure to

specialize would not occur without diversity—which came first?

Page 47: Species Diversity

Predation • Predation prevents competitive exclusion.• Janzen-Connell hypothesis on tree

regeneration vs. density• Premise: tropics, being more diverse, have

more predators, pests, and diseases, so competitive exclusion less likely.

• Question: Does a latitudinal gradient in predators, pests, and diseases exist and how did this come about?

Page 48: Species Diversity
Page 49: Species Diversity

Global Mechanisms1. Area, Heterogeneity & Geometry2. Time (Age, Time , History, Stability?)3. Climate/Environment

- Favorableness of climate or environment- Constancy, stability or predictability of

climate or environment - Energy-diversity or Species-energy Theory - Productivity

4. Biotic interactions or Coevolution- Competition - Predation

Page 50: Species Diversity
Page 51: Species Diversity
Page 52: Species Diversity

Species pools

Page 53: Species Diversity

Zobel 1997

Page 54: Species Diversity
Page 55: Species Diversity
Page 56: Species Diversity
Page 57: Species Diversity

Regional patterns & mechanisms

- Moisture & Elevation- Substrate- Production- Succession

Page 58: Species Diversity
Page 59: Species Diversity
Page 60: Species Diversity

Succession in a neotropical rain forest (0.5ha)

• Years 3-5 30-50 100-150 >300

• Birds 21 49 127 236• Primates 0 2-6 6-8 8-12• Trees 20 33 64 112

Page 61: Species Diversity
Page 62: Species Diversity
Page 63: Species Diversity
Page 64: Species Diversity
Page 65: Species Diversity
Page 66: Species Diversity
Page 67: Species Diversity
Page 68: Species Diversity
Page 69: Species Diversity
Page 70: Species Diversity
Page 71: Species Diversity
Page 72: Species Diversity

River FloodplainRiver Floodplain

River Bedrock Scour BarRiver Bedrock Scour Bar

Scoured IslandScoured Island

Page 73: Species Diversity

Native

Exotic

Upland(1090 plots)

Riparian (121 plots)

31.12

0.20 268 plots with exotics

55.66

7.98 110 plots with exotics

Mean Species Richness

Page 74: Species Diversity

After Brown & Peet 2003

Page 75: Species Diversity

Not discussed in lecture

Page 76: Species Diversity
Page 77: Species Diversity
Page 78: Species Diversity

Community patterns and mechanisms

- Environmental tolerance- Competition – the paradox of

enrichment- Slow dynamics- Suppression of dominance- Immediate disturbance hypothesis- Spatial mass effects – Propagule pressure- Temporal mass effects- Asymmetry of competition- Ecological equivalency

Page 79: Species Diversity
Page 80: Species Diversity

Willig et al. 2003. Annual Reviews E&S

Page 81: Species Diversity

Does diversity matter?- Stability ?- Productivity ?- Invasibility ?

Page 82: Species Diversity
Page 83: Species Diversity
Page 84: Species Diversity
Page 85: Species Diversity
Page 86: Species Diversity
Page 87: Species Diversity