spinoza and his social contract theory - chiba u...spinoza and his social contract theory hoshikawa,...

1
千葉大学 公共研究 第 14 巻第1号(2018 年3月) 431 Summary of an Article in English Spinoza and his Social Contract Theory Hoshikawa, Ryunosuke PhD. Student, Chiba University In this paper, I discussed Spinozaʼs political thought, especially focusing on his social contract theory. Is Spinoza a social contract theorist? In conclusion, the answer is no. In order to describe this, I critically examined the discussion of Takashi Kato, who considers Spinoza a social contract theorist. While relying on Kanichi Fukudaʼs paradigm, Kato presented Spinozaʼs political thought as individualistic theory. By the scheme of nature and artifice (sakui)Spinozaʼs political theory is understood as artificial and his natureis regarded as secondary. However, such an interpretation of Spinozaʼs political thought is problematic. There are two reasons for this: First, Spinozaʼs philosophy is consistently one of nature based on the formula God or Nature. Second, at the center of Spinozaʼs political thought is always a multitude, not an individual. This is understood from the fact that social contract is lost between Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (TTP) and Tractatus Politicus (TP). Certainly in TTP, Spinoza was discussing social contract theory, but in TP he abandoned it. In TP, Spinoza began to emphasis on natural relationships and cooperativeness. And there was no longer a need to use social contract theory to describe his thought. It is impossible to interpret Spinozaʼs political thought in the artificial way.

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spinoza and his Social Contract Theory - Chiba U...Spinoza and his Social Contract Theory Hoshikawa, Ryunosuke PhD. Student, Chiba University In this paper, I discussed Spinozaʼs

千葉大学 公共研究 第 14 巻第1号(2018 年3月)

431

Summary of an Article in English

Spinoza and his Social Contract Theory

Hoshikawa, Ryunosuke

PhD. Student, Chiba University

In this paper, I discussed Spinozaʼs political thought, especially focusing on his

social contract theory. Is Spinoza a social contract theorist? In conclusion, the

answer is “no”. In order to describe this, I critically examined the discussion of

Takashi Kato, who considers Spinoza a social contract theorist. While relying

on Kanichi Fukudaʼs paradigm, Kato presented Spinozaʼs political thought as

individualistic theory. By the scheme of “nature and artifice (sakui)” Spinozaʼs

political theory is understood as artificial and his “nature” is regarded as

secondary. However, such an interpretation of Spinozaʼs political thought is

problematic. There are two reasons for this: First, Spinozaʼs philosophy is

consistently one of nature based on the formula “God or Nature”. Second,

at the center of Spinozaʼs political thought is always a multitude, not

an individual. This is understood from the fact that social contract is lost

between Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (TTP) and Tractatus Politicus (TP).

Certainly in TTP, Spinoza was discussing social contract theory, but in TP

he abandoned it. In TP, Spinoza began to emphasis on natural relationships

and cooperativeness. And there was no longer a need to use social contract

theory to describe his thought. It is impossible to interpret Spinozaʼs political

thought in the artificial way.

公共研究第14巻_校了.indb 431 2018/03/27 10:16:12