spiritual outcomes - chiang mai university€¦ · nursing intervention & process patient, ......

46
SPIRITUAL OUTCOMES Assistant Professor Dr. Yupin Tanatwanit Adult Nursing, Burapha University, Chonburi

Upload: trancong

Post on 29-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

SPIRITUAL OUTCOMES

Assistant Professor Dr. Yupin Tanatwanit

Adult Nursing, Burapha University,

Chonburi

Spirituality/ spiritual care

• ค.ศ. 1980s (พ.ศ. 2523)—started to explore

spiritual dimension

• ค.ศ. 1982 (พ.ศ. 2525)—regarded as the important

aspect of the care

• ค.ศ. 1999 (พ.ศ. 2542)—wrote the spiritual policy

in palliative care

• ค.ศ. 2004 (พ.ศ. 2547)—should be provided by the

multi-disciplainary team

Topic--Spirituality/outcomes

Spirituality—spiritual care

one part of holistic care

Outcomes

Results of care (Quality of care)

Patient’s spirituality

?

Outcomes

: the end results of care

foundation of nursing professional accountability

tremendous potential to be translated into powerful health care decision

outcome data helping to improve clinical practice or patient care

Outcomes/nursing outcomes Quality of nursing care

Outcome—clinical value compass

Quality of care

Functional

Clinical

Satisfaction

Cost

Outcomes--Development

Donabedian’s Classic Framework Structure, Process, & Outcomes (1966)

Structure Process Outcomes

Organizational structures

Nursing intervention & Process

Patient, Nurse, & Organizational outcomes

Structure—resources in the health care setting physical facilities

staff mix

Qualification of staff etc.

Process—how care is delivered—the means to the ends

Outcome—the results or consequences of care

(Donabedian, 1966)

In the past, outcomes focused on negative measurement—5Ds: death, disease, disability, discomfort, & dissatisfaction—adverse outcomes

Structural characteristics Client characteristics

Processes

Outcomes

Linear model implied by the traditional Structure-process-outcome (Mithchell, et al, 1998).

Cost, LOS, Patient mortality, Patient satisfaction, adverse events---Outcomes

Outcomes

Cost, LOS, Patient mortality, Patient satisfaction

Factors (: functional, social, psychological, physical- physiologycal factors)

Achievement of appropriate self care, Demonstration of health promoting behaviors, Health-related quality of life, Patient perception of being well

System Individual/organization group

Interventions Outcomes

Client Individual, family, or community

Quality Health Outcome Model (1994-1995-1998)

2 directions

Jennings, Staggers, & Brosch (1999) Patient-focused outcomes—diagnosis, holistical outcome

Provider-focused outcomes—complication rate

Organization-focused outcomes—adverse events:

falls, deaths, or unplanned readmission

Nurse staff mix outcomes Nursing job satisfaction, Job stress, or Role tension Patient diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) Complications etc.

: the end results of care--changes

Foundation of nursing professional accountability—VALUE of nurses/ nursing care

tremendous potential to be translated into powerful health care decision

Outcome data helping to improve clinical practice or patient care

Outcomes

Results from Performance—Outcomes (or interchangeable)

Jennings & Staggers (1998)

Outcome research/Outcome management

• Efficacy

• Effectiveness

• efficiency

Outcome research Outcome management

by Outcome research—a mean to systemically evaluate the effectiveness of interventions relative to their cost and outcomes

Outcome management—be driven by pragmatic force within the health care deliver environment as a means of examining the results of care--research

Outcome data Measured

Nursing-sensitive patient outcome --sufficient sensitivity to measure outcomes

Indicators

Qualifying (levels)

Consisting 6 components: 1. Prevention of complications (such as injuries) 2. Clinical outcomes (such as symptom control) 3. Knowledge of dz, its treatment, & management of

side effects 4. Functional health outcomes (holistic outcomes) 5. Satisfaction of care 6. cost

Spiritual outcomes

Each is of better care, not quality of care.

Spiritual (Outcomes) Definitions of spirituality:

1. : as an individual’s philosophy, value, and understanding of the meaning of life (Chan, 2009)

2. : an innate component of an individual’s basic structure, facilitating optimal wellness, health, and stability (Villagomeza as cited in Chan, 2009)

3. : as a possession of human beings, enabling self-awareness, heighten consciousness and providing the strength to transcend the usual self (Watson as cited in Chan, 2009)

4. : a quality that goes beyond religious affiliation and strives for inspiration, reverence, awe, meaning and purpose, even for those who do not believe in any God (Fawcett & Noble as cited in Chan, 2009)

5. : as seeking harmony with the universe and striving for answers about the infinite, during facing emotional stress, physical illness or death (Nagai-Jacobsen, & Burkhardt as cited in Chan, 2009)

6. : an individual’s search for meaning of life, wholeness, peace, individuality, and harmony (Bown & Williams; Burkhardt as cited in Chan, 2009)

7. : defined by 5Rs (Chan, 2009): 1., 2. Reason & Reflect—the search for meaning in the life experiences 3. Religion—a vehicle for expressing spirituality through a framework of values, beliefs, and ritual practices, providing answer for life & death 4. Relationship—relationship with ourselves, others, & God 5. Restoration—the ability of spirituality to have a positive influence on the physical aspect of a person

8. FIRM (Walter & Fisher, 2012)

F—Faith, I—Identity, R—Relationship, & M--Meaning

ภาพท่ี 2.2 การประยกุต์การดแูลประคบัประคองภาวะสขุภาพกบัการดแูลอื่นๆ ในช่วงระยะเวลาการเจ็บป่วย From “How to establish a palliative care program: Application to patient at risk” by

V. Gunten, F.S. Ferris, R.K. Portenoy, & M. Gla; Chen 2001, Center to Advance Palliative Care p.1. Copyright 2001 by the Center to Advance Palliative Care.

Religion & spirituality

I. : Spirituality is broader than religion

II. : as a way to obtain the spirituality

Persons with no religion still have spiritual need.

Religion & spirituality

Religion • Focusing on rites & practice,

using worship

• Support mechanism to suffering chronic disease with optimism & a fighting spirit in the face of life challenging changes

spirituality

• Personal relationship with God/supernatural things

• Producing successful outcomes during dying, death, & bereavement

• Provided by palliative care, mostly

Spiritual need and care

Spiritual need: an experiencing disharmony of mind, body, spirit such as facing physical illness, emotional stress, or death to enhance their personal spiritual coping strategies. (Tyler & Raynor, 2006)

Spiritual care: as the activities and ways of being that bring spiritual quality of life, well-being, and function—all of which are dimensions of health—to clients (McEwan, 2005)

Spiritual needs (McSherry & Jamieson, 2011)

Expressed by the need for: 1. Meaning or purpose

2. Love & harmony relationship

3. Forgiveness

4. Trust

5. Personal beliefs/values

6. Spiritual practices or concept of God/supernaturalism

7. creativity

Advantages of Spiritual Care Active religious/spiritual beliefs help patients and family

increase ability to cope with their illness, symptoms, and dying (Hunt, Cobb, Keeley, & Ahmedzai, 2003)

Spirituality has a positive influence on health & well-being. (Tyler & Raynor, 2006)

Spiritual care provides prevention of disease, enhances recovery following illness, & fosters composure for the ill. (Culliford as cited in Tyler & Raynor, 2006)

Spiritual care promotes spiritual health & an individual ‘s sense of well-being and wholeness. (Tyler & Raynor, 2006)

Roles of Nurses for spiritual care As both a science & an art, anointing (การทาน า้มนั) has been

integrated into nursing, serving as basic practice to care for others : “providing for physical needs as well as for emotion and spiritual needs” (Carson as cited in Tyler & Raynor, 2006, p. 64.)

Taking actions: listening, being present, prayer, use of religious objects, talking, conveying a benevolent/merit attitudes, validation of clients’ feelings & thoughts, facilitation, & instilling hope—assessment & care

Taking holistic assessment to identify spiritual needs of individual patients and spiritual care

Having the accountability to provide spiritual care—fundamental nursing care

Who do take the role for spiritual care?

Non-clinical group

Clinical group**

Chaplains/

religious persons

(McSherry & Jamieson, 2011)

Evidences 50% of nurses rarely or never provide spiritual care

Nurses (3,880) encountered spiritual needs of their patients (McSherry & Jamieson, 2011)

daily 1,639 (41.4%)

weekly 953 (24.2%)

monthly 816 (20.7%)

yearly 410 (10.4%)

Need education, training [workshop] 1658 (41.3%) agreed & 1523 938.0%) strongly agreed – did

not receive sufficient education and training in spirituality (McSherry & Jamieson, 2011)

Comfort as Experienced by Thai Older Patients

with Advanced Cancer

By

Tanatwanit, Yupin

2011

The Catholic University of America

Barriers to provide spiritual care 1. Giving less importance to beliefs & faith in healing

(WHO, 1998)

2. Lack of academic training--uncertainty

3. Inadequate of time & staffing

4. Belief that spiritual care is a religious service; should be provided by religious persons

5. Demographic of nurses: religious beliefs, marital status, working department, & past hospitalization experiences (Chan, 2009)

6. Feeling discomfort to assess or discuss about spiritual needs & care

16 nurses in a 25-bed acute medical ward in a rural hospital (Smyth & Allen, 2011), found important issues: 1. Understanding spirituality—not clear

2. Assessment of spirituality—profound spiritual needs & no standardized assessment tool

3. Difficulties in meeting spiritual need—

3.1 lack of privacy or appropriate space for discussing

3.2 workload or time constraints

4. Education—insufficient skills & knowledge

Barriers to provide spiritual care

Approaches to address spiritual care

1. Education & training (knowledge & skills)

2. Preparing nurses for spiritual care

3. Policy supporting spiritual care

4. Creating guideline for spiritual assessment & care

(Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization, 2005)

Assessment Question about support system, prayer, spiritual goals,

religious/spiritual resources, & beliefs about life & illness

Question about Hope

Observe certain indicators: crying, anger, depression, God- talk, resentment etc.

Characteristics of patients

5. Promoting nurses’ competency: a) willingness, b) understanding, c) ability to assess, without forcing, & d) appropriate responses (promoting meditation, prayer, area for

religious activities etc.) Another one (Leeuwen, Tiesinga, Middle, Post, & Jochemsen, 2009):

1) Assessment 2) Professionalization 3) Personal support 4) Referral 5) Communication 6) Attitude

6. Attitude & Awareness

Approaches to address spiritual care (contn)

5 strategies to heighten awareness of nurses for spiritual care

: are the learning activities to self-explore in order to challenge nurses, promote critical and reflective thinking .

5 strategies:

1. Exploring one’s spirituality

2. End-of-life issues

3. Grief and loss

4. Living with chronic illness

5. Spiritual assessment of the client—spiritual dimension of the client—comfortable or difficult & its levels

(Backman, Boxley-Harges, Bruick-Sorge, & Salmon, 2007)

Explore the self, then discussing

Knowledge & Skills for spiritual care • Education—better understanding knowledge & concepts (Pranee Lundberg & Petcharat Kerdonfag, 2010)--educated

• Training or education training or workshop on holistic care, encompassing the spiritual dimension (Chan, 2009)

• Preparation nurses for spiritual/palliative care • Awareness to provide spiritual care (high level) • Communication/counseling

– Sensitivity to spiritual needs

• Referral (Walters & Fisher, 2010)

– Counselors 36% – Complementary therapists + social worker 7% – Doctor 4% – Nurse colleagues + multiple team 17%

Spirituality care Outcomes

Spiritual outcomes

Tools

measure

Outcome measures: Clinical practice guideline Clinical pathway Algorithm (stepwise assessment & intervention)

Protocol Professional organization

1. The Spirituality Scale: development and psychometric testing of a holistic instrument to assess the human spiritual dimension.

Delaney C. (2005, June) Journal of Holistic Nursing; 23(2): 145-167)

2. Spirituality and Spiritual care Rating Scale (SSCRS) (McSherry, 2011)

3. Spiritual Care Competency Scale = 6 parts (Leeuwan, Tiesinga, Middel, Post, & Jochemsen, 2009) at back

4. Spiritual and Religious Care Competency for Specialist Palliative Care (Marie Curie Cancer Care, 2003)

1, 2, 3, 4, levels; Question about Knowledge, skills, & actions

Existing Assessment Instruments/Tools

Existing Assessment Instruments

1. “Spiritual Well-Being Scale, SWBS” Ellison.(9) The scale is focusing on religious well-being, reflecting on one’s perception and feeling of God, at the same Dhar, et al.: Spiritual health scale 2011

277 Indian Journal of Community Medicine/Vol 36/Issue 4/October 2011 time claiming to be an instrument to measure the spiritual well-being (of an atheist). It reflects the inbuilt contradiction in the scale.

2. “Spirituality Assessment Scale”, SAS Beazley.(10) This

scale is limited to the organizational situations and dealing with impact of the individual’s spirituality on the growth of the organization and not on the growth of the individual.

3. “Spiritual Assessment Inventory, SAI” Edward.(5) It measures spiritual maturity and quality of life but the approach is limited in terms of Judeo-Christian emphasis.

4. “Index of Core Spiritual Experiences, INSPIRIT” Kass.(11) This scale has limited value having no application

for an atheist. It is relevant only for the believers.

5. “Independent Spirituality Assessment Scale” Rojas.(12) The tool, however, is limited to serve the

empirical research needs of the management and other disciplines.

6. “Myers-Briggs Type Indicator MBTI”, Richardson.(13) MBTI basically focuses on the already actualized and transcendent individuals, but its validity for the common worldly person, who is in the process of evolving spiritually, is questionable.

7. Spiritual Health Scale (SHS 2011):

cognitive (thinking level), affective (feeling level) and behavioral (action level). (Dhar, Chaturvedi, & Nandan , 2011)

8. The popular Spiritual Well-Being Scale The SWBS is a 20-item scale developed by Ellison (1983) to measure overall

perceived spiritual quality of life. The SWBS is a general indicator of wellbeing which may be used for the

assessment of both individual and congregational spiritual well-being.

9. The Community Spirituality Scale, (Faith, Love, Relationship)

The Community Spirituality Scale (CSS) was comprised of seven items developed by Rover & Kocum (2010) to capture the third domain of spirituality (relationship) suggested

in the literature, namely the relationship with partner, family, significant others, and community

10. Student Survey of Spiritual Care (SSSC) (Mayer, 2003)

9 items, 1-6 rating scale (knowledge, care, well being, ability to identify spiritual needs/distress)

etc.

3 Domains, 6 Constructs and 27 Determinants of spiritual health were identified through a scientific process with testing reliability & validity

Spirituality care Outcomes

(Spiritual outcomes)

Tools

measure

Quality of care

EBP

Evidence-Based Practice

Evidence-based practice (EBP)—the conscientious use best evidence in decision making for improving the quality of care. In the past, nurses mostly applied research into practice via

research utilization, which is based on a single study, while EBP greater relates to a deeper knowledge and a larger skill set, including: Best evidence from a thorough search and critical appraisal of all relevant studies, context, healthcare resources, practitioner or nurse skills, patient status and circumstances, and patient preferences and values.

(Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005)

5 critical steps of EBP

1. Asking the burning clinical question.

2. Collect the most relevant & best evidence

3. Critical appraise the evidence

4. Integrate all evidence with one’s clinical expertise, patient preference, & values in making a practice decision or change

5. Evaluate the practice decision & change

Note. From “The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care” by M. G. Titler; V. J. Streelman; G. Budreau; K. C. Buckwalter & C. J. Goode, 2001, Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 13(4), pp. 497-509.

Good speech for distinction

“ Vicars [who] deal with spiritual things…doctor prescribed the drugs I take and the nurses, keep me comfortable, help me to have a wash or take me to the toilet”

(Walters & Fisher, 2010, p. 331)

Hope, importantly, Suandok hospital will be able to demonstrate the

excellence of spiritual care soon.

End

References Backman, S., Boxley-Harges, S., Bruick-Sorge, C., & Salmon, B. (2007). Five

strategies that heightn nurses’ awareness of spirituality to impact client care. Holistic nursing Practice, 21(3), 135-139.

Chan, M. F. (2009). Factors affecting nursing staff in practising spiritual care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2128-2136.

Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Quarterly, 44(Suppl) 166-206.

Jennings, B. M., & Staggers, N. (1998). The Language of outcomes: Quality and accountability in practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(4), 72-80.

Jennings, B. M., Staggers, N., & Brosch, L. R. (1999). A classification for outcome indicators. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholar, 31, 381-388.

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization. (2005). Evaluating your spiritual assessment process. Joint Commission, 3(2), 1-2.

Katerndahl, D. A. (2008). Impact of spiritual symptoms and their interactions on health services and life satisfaction. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(5), 412-420.

Leeuwan, R. V., Tiesinga, L. J., Middel, B., Post, D., & Jochemsen, H. (2009). The validity and reliability of an instrument to assess nursing competencies in spiritual care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 2857-2869.

References (contn)

Lundberg, P. & Kerdonfag, P. (2010). Spiritual care provided by Thai Nurses in (5) intensive care units. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 1121-1128.

McEwan, M. (2005). Spiritual nursing care: State of the art. Holistic Nursing Practice, 19(4), 161-168.

McSherry, W., & Jamieson, S. (2011). An online survey of nurses perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care. Journal of Nursing Scholar, 20, 1757-1767.

Mitchell, P. H., Fe Ketich, S., & Jennings, B. M. (1998). Quality Health Outcome Model. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholar, 30(1), 43-46.

Narayanasamy, A. (1996). Clinical. Spiritual care of chronically ill patients. British Journal of Nursing, 5(7), 411-416.

Pringle, D., & Doran, D. (2003). Patient outcomes as an accountability. In D. M. Doran. (ed.). Nursing-sensitive outcomes: State of the science (pp. 1-26). Unites State of America: Jones and Bartlett.

Smyth, T. , & Allen, S. (2011). Nurses’ experiences assessing the spirituality of terminally ill patients in acute clinical practice. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 17(7), 337-342.

Tanatwanit, Y. (2011). Comfort as experienced by Thai older patients with advanced cancer. (Doctoral Dissertation, The Catholic University of America, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts

International (17), (UMI No. 3439981)

Tyler, I. D., & Raynor, J. E. (2006). Spirituality in the Natural sciences and nursing: An interdisciplinary perspective. Association Black Nursing Faculty,

Walters, G., & Fisher, S. (2010). The development and audit of a spiritual care policy used across three hospices in England. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 16(7), 327-332.

References (contn)